High court challenge against France's 'dysfunctional' residency permit website
Sooner or later most non-EU citizens living in France will have to interact with the Anef website - the online portal to which France is gradually moving the administration to get or renew a
carte de séjour
residency card.
But since its inception in 2020, the site has been dogged with technical problems. Last year the rights body
Défenseur des droits
revealed that it was dealing with
a 400 percent increase in complaints
relating to residency permits since the website was launched.
Now a group of 10 charities, organisations and human rights groups
have launched a joint complaint
with the Conseil d'Etat.
Advertisement
Announcing their legal action, the group say that repeated problems with the Anef site "hinder foreigners' access to the job market, exacerbate their precarious situation and heavily penalise the associations and companies that support or employ them."
READ ALSO
9 tips for dealing with the Anef website
They added that the result was "life paths shattered, people prevented from working, companies deprived of employees, associations exhausted by dysfunctional procedures and préfectoral services struggling to unblock situations".
They also note that while there have long been problems in securing a
carte de séjour
, in recent years there has been a sharp rise in problems with renewing the card.
France's Conseil d'Etat has a dual role - scrutinising new laws and acting as an arbitrator in disputes between the government and the people. Individuals can bring their own private cases, but it's more common for groups or representatives to bring a case about an issue that affects a large number of people.
Explained: How France's Conseil d'Etat works
In this case the groups bringing the case say they are acting after repeated appeals directly to the Interior Ministry - responsible for immigration processes - have been ignored.
In December 2024
Défenseur des droits
- issued a
40-page report
, detailing the many problems that foreigners in France face when using the ANEF website.
Some of the most common problems included information not being passed on to the préfecture dealing with the application, applications not being 'closed' properly, preventing people from being able to renew their card and not being given the correct type of
récépissé
while they were waiting for their application to be dealt with.
In a separate issue, many foreigners in France have reported problems with getting an appointment at their local préfecture to collect the card once the application has been dealt with.
The legal case before the Conseil d'Etat accuses the state of "fault through failure to act" on the complaints received.
Have you had problems using the Anef wbsite? Share your experiences in the comments section below
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: The Macron-Trump bromance is heading for a bust-up
On Sunday President Emmanuel Macron will become the first French leader ever to make an official visit to Greenland. He will be the first EU leader to set foot in the vast Danish autonomous territory since Donald Trump began to make bullying comments about the manifest right of the United States to grab all the real estate on its northern borders. Trolls were originally part of Danish, Swedish and Norwegian folklore. Macron is 'trolling' Trump – on his way to a G7 summit in Canada where he will meet the US President that he calls a 'friend'. Something has changed in Macron's obsequious public approach to Trump in the last few weeks. Other members of the French government – the Prime Minister François Bayrou and the foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot – have overtly criticised the US President. In March Bayrou said that Donald Trump planned to 'destroy the international order' and 'make the world even more dangerous'. In public, Macron has been careful not to attack Trump by name. He claims a 'friendship' with the US president from their first terms of office. He said in March that he speaks to Trump at least once every two days. Advertisement In private, Macron, I am told, has no illusions about the US leader. He returned from his visit to the White House in February disturbed by what he heard off-camera. He told senior political and military figures in France that his conversations with Trump and senior US administration figures had been 'bizarre, brutal and sometimes racist'. Macron believes nonetheless – or once believed - that nothing can be gained by frontal attacks on Trump. Something useful might still be achieved, he once hoped, for Ukraine and for transatlantic trade, by a mixture of flattery, cajolery and a patient separation of facts from Trumpian obsessions and inventions. Four months later, something is shifting. Macron has still not attacked Trump directly. But the French president is moving towards the kind of open challenge to the Trumpian worldview that is likely to strain their strange bromance. On his visit to south-east Asia last month, Macron called on Asian countries to ally with Europe to resist bullying attempts by 'big powers' to build 'spheres of coercion'. Officially, he was talking about China and Russia. In the context, he was also clearly referring to the United States. Speaking at a conference on the future of the oceans in Nice on Tuesday, Macron said that 'ocean depths are not for sale, any more than Greenland is for sale'. Referring to his visit to the Danish territory this weekend, he said that his intention was to make it clear that 'predation' and 'threats' were not acceptable. Where all this is heading is unclear. Trump may not yet have noticed the change in Macron's tone. It may suit both men to continue the fable of their unlikely friendship. But I expect that we are heading for a bust-up. The French President has almost two years left in power but no majority in parliament and little real influence on domestic policy. The second coming of Trump offered him vindication at home and pivotal, diplomatic influence abroad. His appeals in the last eight years for Europe to build its own 'strategic autonomy', independent of the US, have proved to be visionary. Macron remains an important figure in Europe and internationally. It was the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland prime minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen who invited him to 'troll Trump' by joining them in talks on the territory's future this weekend. But Trump's return to office has also confronted the French President with his own contradictions. After appealing for years for the EU to move towards military and diplomatic autonomy, Macron finds that France's own future defence investment is compromised by the state budget deficits that have piled up during his eight years in office. At the Nato summit in The Hague later this month, Trump will push for European countries to increase defence spending to 5 percent of GDP (while doing everything he can to undermine their economies). Macron has spoken vaguely of increasing the French defence budget to 3.5 percent of GDP but there is no obvious way that can happen without cutting social spending or missing France's deficit-cutting targets. Advertisement In alliance with Sir Keir Starmer, Macron hoped that he could persuade Trump that Vladimir Putin had no plans to end the war in Ukraine. It was time to intensify international sanctions on Russia, not weaken them. Trump seems to have accepted that his disjointed and floundering peace initiative is going nowhere. But there is no sign that he is willing to join the EU in new sanctions or that he is prepared to continue military aid to Ukraine. On transatlantic trade, Trump continues to speak nonsense about the size of the US-EU trade deficit and refer to the EU as a 70-year-old conspiracy to damage the United States. The Trump State Department published an unhinged new doctrine on Europe last month in which France, Britain and Germany are America's enemies and Marine Le Pen and 'Christian Hungary' are America's friends. Advertisement In sum, the chances of a big quarrel between the US and Europe in the next month are high. Trump has given way on China; he will be looking for a diversionary squabble elsewhere. The French president, marginalised in domestic politics, is understandably tempted to prove that he still exists by playing a pivotal role in European and international affairs. But at some point soon he will have to make a clear choice. Will he continue to humour and flatter Trump or will he stand up to him?
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
President Trump says he'll set unilateral tariff rates within weeks
US President Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he would send letters to trading partners in the next week or two, outlining unilateral tariff rates. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' Trump said at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington. 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it,' he added. This would put Trump ahead of his tariff deadline, as the president previously paused so-called 'reciprocal' duties for 90 days until 8 July. The higher rates are set to kick in on the 9th. Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center that a delay to the deadline is unlikely, although US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent previously suggested there may be some flexibility. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." The US has thus far only managed to secure a trade framework with the UK, as well as clinching a tariff deal with China. Trump was nonetheless upbeat about negotiations on Wednesday. "We're rocking in terms of deals," he said. "We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us." Following talks in London, Trump said on Wednesday that magnets and rare earths would be supplied up front by China and that the US would allow Chinese students into its colleges and universities. The president added that a 55% tariff would be applied to Chinese imports. A White House official, who was not authorised to discuss the terms publicly, said the 55% was not an increase on the previous 30% tariff on China because Trump was including other pre-existing import taxes. Specifically, the president was tallying up his 10% baseline tariff, the 20% fentanyl trafficking levy and a 25% pre-existing tariff on China. In May, the US agreed upon a trade framework with the UK, which allows US goods to be fast-tracked through customs and reduces trade barriers on a number of products. The framework lowers US duties on British steel, aluminum and cars, although there are some knots to work out, meaning the specifics of the deal could arrive later than the 9 July deadline. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Wednesday that a deal with the European Union will likely be among the final trade agreements concluded by the United States. 'I'm optimistic that we can get there with Europe. But Europe will be probably [at] the very, very end,' Lutnick told CNBC. In May, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on EU goods coming to the US, although he later said he would hold off on this threat until 9 July. The president originally placed a 20% so-called 'reciprocal' levy on EU goods, but this duty was lifted during the 90-day pause window. Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday. This is the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorized copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from 'Despicable Me'. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users on Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. 'I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time,' Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around.' In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He presented the process as a form of creative inspiration, rather than plagiarism. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number of other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers generate new videos, synthesise voices and edit footage. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement on Wednesday that 'strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry' and it supports a 'balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centred innovation'. The Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against firms that make AI-generated music, endorsed the lawsuit as a 'critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation'. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
EU targets US 'Big Beautiful Bill' over tax provision in tariff talks
The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states.
