Brazil's Supreme Court clears way to hold social media companies liable for user content
Brazil's Supreme Court agreed on Thursday on details of a decision to hold social media companies liable for what their users post, clearing the way for it go into effect within weeks.
The 8-3 vote in Brazil's top court orders tech giants like Google, Meta and TikTok to actively monitor content that involves hate speech, racism and incitation to violence and act to remove it.
The case has unsettled the relationship between the South American nation and the US government. Critics have expressed concern that the move could threaten free speech if platforms preemptively remove content that could be problematic.
After Thursday's ruling is published by the court, people will be able to sue social media companies for hosting illegal content if they refuse to remove it after a victim brings it to their attention. The court didn't set out firm rules on what content is illegal, leaving it to be decided on a case-by-case basis.
The ruling strengthens a law that requires companies to remove content only after court orders, which were often ignored.
It's the product of two cases accepted by the court last year in which social media companies were accused of failed to act against users promoting fraud, child pornography and violence.
A majority of the 11 justices voted to approve the change two weeks ago, but it took until today to reach consensus on how to implement it.
The justices also agreed that social media companies will not be liable if they can show they took steps to remove illegal content in a timely fashion.
Google said in a statement that is analyzing the court's decision. 'We remain open for dialogue,' the company said.
Brazil's top court came to the decision after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials involved in censoring American citizens.
Thursday's ruling brings Brazil's approach to big tech closer to the European Union's approach, which has sought to rein in the power of social media companies and other digital platforms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Samsung Galaxy M36 5G Launch Today in India
The Samsung Galaxy M36 5G will launch in India today as the new model after the Galaxy M35 5G. The phone comes with a large 6.7-inch full-HD+ Super AMOLED screen and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. It has a strong 50-megapixel main camera with image stabilization and a 12-megapixel front camera. Both cameras can record 4K videos. The phone runs on an Exynos 1380 processor with at least 6GB RAM and uses Android 15 with Samsung's One UI 7. It also includes smart AI features and Google's Circle-to-Search. The Galaxy M36 5G has a big 5,000mAh battery and supports fast 45W wired charging. It will be available in three colors: Orange Haze, Serene Green, and Velvet Black. Samsung has priced the phone under Rs. 20,000. It will be sold online on Amazon, Samsung's website, and in stores.
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Google Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 at risk: Here's why
Google has had a major setback in Japan, where a court has banned the sale of its Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones due to patent infringement. This ruling could soon affect the upcoming Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models, which threaten Google's growing presence in the Japanese smartphone market. Google Pixel 7 and Pro smartphone sales have been banned in Japan due to patent infringement.(HT) The dispute centres on a technical part of 4G network communication involving the transmission of an 'acknowledgement signal' or ACK between devices and base stations. This technique is protected by Japanese patent law. Although Pantech, the patent holder, no longer makes smartphones, its remaining patents continue to hold legal weight. The Tokyo District Court ruled that Google's use of this technology violated those patents. Also read: Gemini's dramatic apologies: Why Google's chatbot sometimes says it should 'switch itself off' after failing tasks Furthermore, the judge criticised Google for what was described as an "insincere attitude" during the case. This criticism contributed to the court's decision to impose a full sales ban instead of a lesser penalty or settlement. Pixel Ban's Impact on Market Presence This ruling challenges Google's growing presence in Japan, where the Pixel brand recently became the second most popular smartphone line after Apple's iPhone. The success of the Google Pixel 7 series and the Pixel 7a helped boost the brand's market share. Also read: Could non-Nintendo chargers shorten your Switch 2's life? Here's what a user's experiment found The situation may escalate as the companies behind the patent, IdeaHub and Pantech, are pushing to extend the ban to the upcoming Google Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models. No official ruling has been made on these devices yet, but the potential for a wider ban adds pressure on Google to resolve the legal issues quickly. Japan stands out as a strong market for Google Pixel phones outside the United States. A broader sales ban could disrupt Google's growth in the region and might also affect customer trust. Also read: Big tech's tariff troubles: Why US trade policy has Silicon Valley on edge Moreover, Google has not yet provided a detailed response to the court's decision. The company now faces choices including appealing the ruling, negotiating licensing rights, or redesigning future phones to avoid patent conflicts. Each option carries risks, especially with the Google Pixel 9 launch expected later this year. Currently, only the Google Pixel 7 and 7 Pro are banned. However, the case signals a growing trend in the tech industry, where older patents are increasingly enforced by entities that do not produce consumer products, which are creating new legal challenges for tech giants. Mobile finder: Google Pixel 8 Pro LATEST price, specs and all details
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ex-OpenAI researcher confirms move to Meta, denies $100 million payout
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The AI talent war continues to heat up. Lucas Beyer, one of the three senior researchers who recently left OpenAI for Meta , has confirmed his new role at the social media giant but dismissed claims that the trio was offered a $100 million sign-on bonus.'Hey all, couple quick notes: 1) yes, we will be joining Meta. 2) no, we did not get 100M sign-on, that's fake news,' Beyer wrote on social media platform X. He added, 'Excited about what's ahead though, will share more in due time!'Beyer was part of OpenAI's Zurich office along with researchers Alexander Kolesnikov and Xiaohua Zhai. The Wall Street Journal had earlier reported that all three had been poached by Meta to join its CEO Mark Zuckerberg's newly created 'superintelligence' team is tasked with developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), AI systems that can perform tasks better than this week, OpenAI chief Sam Altman criticised Meta's approach to hiring , suggesting that the company was offering massive packages to lure away top talent because it lacked in innovation.'They started making giant offers to a lot of people on our team,' Altman said in a podcast hosted by his brother. 'You know, like $100 million signing bonuses, more than that in compensation per year.'Meta has denied those claims. According to The Verge, during an internal meeting on Friday, the company's CTO told employees that Altman's remarks were inaccurate.'Sam is known to exaggerate, and in this case, I know exactly why he's doing it, which is because we are succeeding at getting talent from OpenAI,' he said. 'He's not very happy about that.'Meta's AI push has intensified in recent months. The company is investing heavily to stay ahead in the race, including a $14.3 billion deal for a 49% stake in Scale AI . It has also onboarded Scale AI's 28-year-old founder Alexandr Wang to bolster its efforts.
