Abolishing culture, media and sport department would be ‘madness'
Culture minister Sir Chris Bryant has sought to 'bury' rumours that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) will be abolished, saying it would be 'absolute madness'.
When pressed on recent reports that DCMS is in the firing line, Sir Chris branded these 'daft rumours', adding: 'Honestly, the department is not going to be abolished.'
Lisa Nandy's absence at DCMS questions on Thursday was also pointed out by the chairwoman of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Dame Caroline Dinenage.
Speaking in the Commons, the Conservative MP for Gosport, said: 'While the Secretary of State is awol today, rumours abound that the whole DCMS is for the chop. He must see that this sends out a terrible message to those sectors about how their Government values the power of those industries.
'So, I wondered if he'd take the opportunity today to, first of all, put that rumour to bed and, if he can't, perhaps he'd like to take the chance to put on record that this would be a horrible idea.'
Sir Chris said the Culture Secretary is 'doing a very important job of building our relationship with Japan', as she attends the World Expo Conference in Osaka.
He added: 'One of the worst things if we were to get rid of the department is that we'd have to get rid of the select committee as well, and for that matter the whole of the front bench – oh hang on, maybe it's a good idea.'
'I'm not going to put this rumour to bed – I'm going to bury it, because in the words of Stephen Sondheim, I'm absolutely certain that in a year's time we will be able to sing as in the musical Follies, I'm Still Here,' Sir Chris said.
Liberal Democrat culture spokesperson Max Wilkinson said: 'He says he's burying the rumour about the abolition of DCMS, so why does he think that so many people here think it's going to happen, and why is it being briefed out to the press so often?'
Sir Chris replied: 'Why on Earth is he perpetuating daft rumours? That's the question I want to ask myself. Honestly, the department is not going to be abolished. It would be absolutely madness.
'This department touches the lives of nearly everybody in the country every single day of the week, whether it's through sport, football, rugby, cricket, tennis, or it's through broadcasting or it's through our wonderful creative industries – so many different aspects of what we do touch everybody.
'I cannot see any way in which this department is going to be abolished.'
Shadow culture minister Stuart Andrew said: 'I know that (Sir Chris) has been on a long audition for the role of Secretary of State for the department, so his comments about the rumours about the abolishing of DCMS are reassuring.
'But can I gently point out that most of these briefings seem to be coming from number 10? So will the minister speak to people in number 10 to give reassurance to all of those sectors that this department will remain for the years ahead?'
Culture minister Stephanie Peacock replied: 'I think my colleague has very much dismissed those rumours. Let's not believe everything we read in the papers.'
Mr Andrew also raised concerns about the appointment of David Kogan as chair of English football's new independent regulator.
He said: 'The nominee for the chair of the football regulator continues to raise serious questions, during the hearing of the select committee, it was revealed the candidate had also donated to both the Secretary of State and the Prime Minister's leadership campaigns, something I don't recall being declared during second reading.
'The Secretary of State has now, rightly, been forced to recuse herself from the process. Given the appointment will likely have a prime ministerial interest, will the Prime Minister be doing the same?'
Ms Peacock replied: 'There is no suggestion of wrongdoing and, indeed, David Kogan was approached under his government for the role. We have got full confidence, he was endorsed by the cross-party select committee.'
Mr Andrew said Mr Kogan was approached by the Permanent Secretary, not by 'political ministers'.
Ms Peacock replied: 'David Kogan was appointed to the board of Channel 4 under the previous Conservative government. He has been welcomed across this House and across the media and footballing world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Fears for Britain's elderly over digital landline switchover...as minster admits he can never get hold of his father on the phone
A government minister has warned he cannot guarantee that all elderly and vulnerable people will be safely switched over to digital landlines - as he revealed he can never get hold of his own father on the phone. Minister for the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology Sir Chris Bryant exclusively told MailOnline he'd be 'fibbing' if he promised every household will be transferred to internet-based landlines safely, with telecare devices still working. His comments coincide with a new government campaign aimed at raising awareness about the switchover, to encourage vulnerable and elderly people to get in touch with their landline provider for assistance. Telecoms firms including BT, Sky and Virgin are currently switching every household in Britain to new internet-based landlines, as ageing copper wires are increasingly unreliable and at risk of failure. The transition is expected to be completed by early 2027. The tech giants are moving to the final phase of turning off the UK's old copper wire system, and forced migrations to a new digital service have resumed. After previously telling MailOnline the fear of people being left with telecare devices - alarms that call for help in the case of an emergency - kept him up at night, Sir Chris says he is now more confident the correct support systems are in place to transition people safely. Asked if he could guarantee everyone would always be able to call emergency services after being switched over to the new phone line, he said: 'I can't guess what terrible set of circumstances there might be in one particular street. 'Sometimes if you're in an area where mobile connectivity is very poor, and obviously some older people won't have a mobile phone. I can never persuade my father to have a mobile phone which is really irritating, it makes him very difficult to get hold of. 'I can't say 100 percent, I'd be fibbing, but what we've tried to do is put in as many different measures to make sure that as many different people in as many sets of circumstances are protected. 'It might be that the cable's down, or all sorts of different things that might arise, and you want to mitigate against all of those, but it's impossible to get to 100 percent.' He added that his department had written to every local authority to request details of vulnerable people in their area to be passed onto telecoms firms - and that 95 percent have provided this information. This leaves five percent of councils which have not. In 2023, telecoms firms were forced to halt non-voluntary upgrades following several incidents of personal alarms failing in emergencies. Some 1.8 million people in the UK rely on life-saving telecare devices to sound the alarm in the case of a medical emergency or fall. The devices function by being linked to a wearer's landline or mobile phone. There have been concerns for years over the transition to digital as, while traditional landline phones continue working in the case of a blackout or internet outage, internet-based phonelines do not. Ofcom, the industry regulator, ruled that telecoms firms must provide a back-up to the landline lasting at least one hour to all vulnerable people in case they need assistance during an outage. But Sir Chris said this is not enough, and the majority of firms have agreed to provide between four and seven hours. But amid data published last year that revealed millions of people still have no idea about the ongoing transition, he added that he doesn't think elderly people 'actually need to understand' what is being done to their landline, as long as it happens. The minister said: 'Two thirds of people have already been done. And probably they don't even know that that's what's happened. 'I don't care about that, what I care about is whether the telecare device around somebody's auntie's neck still works when they go from one system to another. 'That's what I care about and that's what we're making sure happens. And it may be that some elderly people don't actually need to understand what's happening to the cable outside their home as long as the system works.' He told MailOnline the firms 'needed help' with the transition: 'On almost day one of me arriving in post I said [the switchover] is one of the things I want to focus on, and within weeks we had a meeting of all the operators and they were really responsive. 'I think they all wanted to move together, they wanted a sense of where government wanted them to go, they needed some help actually. 'They wouldn't know who the vulnerable people are with telecare devices, the only people who know that are the social care departments of local authorities. 'I could help get that information so we could work together and I think it felt like a very productive round table that we had.' But the minister also warned that severe weather events and local disasters could still pose a major risk to vulnerable people who rely on landlines. 'A few years ago in one of the big storms, we had big flooding in one of my areas in the Rhondda. 'Now in that situation you're not going to have any kind of electricity, nothing's going to work, it's probably going to be out for several days and there's nothing you can do about that.' He told how, before the last election, a lorry drove straight into a telephone cabinet in his constituency, knocking out services for a week. 'I was very angry just as a constituency MP, this was before the last election, I didn't feel that the operators were actually sorting that out, responding quickly enough. But that was a massive accident, the lorry had gone straight into the cabinet, and the entire village was out. 'And I know there was an incidence there where somebody was not able to make a phone call to get an ambulance.' A checklist - which telecoms giants are understood to have signed up to during Sir Chris' first meeting with firms last summer - means all 'vulnerable' customers will be able to have an engineer visit their household to support them through the transition. The engineer will then test any telecare devices before leaving to ensure they are still working. If any issue occurs, there is the option to return the household to their old landline until this can be fixed, if no alternative is available. And vulnerable households will be given back-up devices to protect them in the case of a power cut or internet outage - with firms pledging to ensure this exceeds Ofcom's minimum recommendation that such devices provide one hour of battery power. Firms have been instructed to ensure that no telecare user will be migrated to digital landline services without the communication provider, the customer, or the telecare service provider confirming that the user has a compatible and functioning telecare solution in place.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight
The fierce battle over artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright - which pits the government against some of the biggest names in the creative industry - returns to the House of Lords on Monday with little sign of a solution in sight.A huge row has kicked off between ministers and peers who back the artists, and shows no sign of abating. It might be about AI but at its heart are very human issues: jobs and highly unusual that neither side has backed down by now or shown any sign of compromise; in fact if anything support for those opposing the government is growing rather than tailing off. This is "unchartered territory", one source in the peers' camp told me. The argument is over how best to balance the demands of two huge industries: the tech and creative sectors. More specifically, it's about the fairest way to allow AI developers access to creative content in order to make better AI tools - without undermining the livelihoods of the people who make that content in the first sparked it is the uninspiringly-titled Data (Use and Access) proposed legislation was broadly expected to finish its long journey through parliament this week and sail off into the law books. Instead, it is currently stuck in limbo, ping-ponging between the House of Lords and the House of bill states that AI developers should have access to all content unless its individual owners choose to opt out. Nearly 300 members of the House of Lords disagree. They think AI firms should be forced to disclose which copyrighted material they use to train their tools, with a view to licensing Nick Clegg, former president of global affairs at Meta, is among those broadly supportive of the bill, arguing that asking permission from all copyright holders would "kill the AI industry in this country". Those against include Baroness Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer and former film director, best known for making films such as Bridget Jones: The Edge of says ministers would be "knowingly throwing UK designers, artists, authors, musicians, media and nascent AI companies under the bus" if they don't move to protect their output from what she describes as "state sanctioned theft" from a UK industry worth £ asking for an amendment to the bill which includes Technology Secretary Peter Kyle giving a report to the House of Commons about the impact of the new law on the creative industries, three months after it comes into force, if it doesn't change. Mr Kyle also appears to have changed his views about UK copyright once said copyright law was "very certain", now he says it is "not fit for purpose".Perhaps to an extent both those things are Department for Science, Innovation and Technology say that they're carrying out a wider consultation on these issues and will not consider changes to the Bill unless they're completely satisfied that they work for creators. If the "ping pong" between the two Houses continues, there's a small chance the entire bill could be shelved; I'm told it's unlikely but not it does, some other important elements would go along with it, simply because they are part of the same bill. It also includes proposed rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they die, changes to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easily, and even a 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks (I told you it was a big bill).There is no easy answer. How did we get here? Here's how it all started. Initially, before AI exploded into our lives, AI developers scraped enormous quantities of content from the internet, arguing that it was in the public domain already and therefore freely available. We are talking about big, mainly US, tech firms here doing the scraping, and not paying for anything they hoovered they used that data to train the same AI tools now used by millions to write copy, create pictures and videos in seconds. These tools can also mimic popular musicians, writers, artists. For example, a recent viral trend saw people merrily sharing AI images generated in the style of the Japanese animation firm Studio founder of that studio meanwhile, had once described the use of AI in animation as "an insult to life itself". Needless to say, he was not a has been a massive backlash from many content creators and owners including household names like Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa. They have argued that taking their work in this way, without consent, credit or payment, amounted to theft. And that artists are now losing work because AI tools can churn out similar content freely and quickly Elton John didn't hold back in a recent interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. He argued that the government was on course to "rob young people of their legacy and their income", and described the current administration as "absolute losers".Others though point out that material made by the likes of Sir Elton is available worldwide. And if you make it too hard for AI companies to access it in the UK they'll simply do it elsewhere instead, taking much needed investment and job opportunities with opposing positions, no obvious compromise. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Leprosy never went away – here's proof
Leprosy, as Oliver Basciano notes in his fascinating and humane book Outcast, is more than an illness. It's a byword, a 'cultural artefact' that functions as 'a receptacle for nightmares and prejudice'; a kind of 'Ur-stigma' that has run through our collective nightmares for two millennia. Those who suffer from leprosy aren't just sick, but unclean. They were infectious and contagious long before infection or contagion were understood, and they still are, long after the latter were understood well enough to be tamed. Even though the reach of the disease itself has shrunk – from five million cases worldwide in the 1980s to a little under 200,000 today – the charge around it has not. Basciano's mission is to uncover the ways in which leprosy has been seen. He wants to provide something that's less a 'medical biography' of the disease than a cultural archaeology of the fears that become attached to it, and the ways they attach to other modes of isolating and casting out the 'undesirables' among us. While the medical facts are present, the resulting book – part history, part travelogue – is above all an analysis of the realities of prejudice and ways in which shared fears exert such outsized grips on communities. And, as Basciano tracks the disease from his native St Albans to Japan, via outposts across the world, it also becomes a meditation on the flipside of such fears: a hymn to the resilience of the cast-out and the lives they have managed to make. One medical fact shines out with painful irony: this symbol of contagion is not, in fact, all that contagious. 'Ninety-five per cent of the world's population', Basciano explains, 'is naturally immune', and most people with 'a good diet and the privilege of hygiene could spend a lifetime living with someone who is actively affected with the disease and not contract it'. For those who do contract it, Mycobacterium leprae, first isolated in 1873 by the Norwegian doctor Gerhard Armauer Hansen, is 'incredibly slow to replicate'. Its victims can remain asymptomatic for anything between five and 25 years, with the bacterium hiding out in the extremities of their body, in the far reaches of the nervous system, before the effects become manifest as a slowly increasing numbness. After that, the results can be devastating. Rashes or lesions appear – the 'scales' that give the disease its name, from the Greek leprós (scaly) – then 'damage to the skin, the upper respiratory tract, toes and fingers, the eyes and the inside lining of the nose'. As the bacterium proliferates, much of the physical harm to a sufferer's body is accidental: numbness allows knocks and cuts to go unnoticed, leading to secondary infection and scarring. Despite being treatable through a multidrug therapy that has been available since 1981, its capacity to lie dormant combines all too well with the vicissitudes of public health in countries such as India, Brazil and Indonesia. Slow diagnosis and poor treatment networks allow it to stubbornly persist. In Britain, where Basciano begins, leprosy has decayed into legend: a bogeyman of a half-real, half-imaginary medieval era. Searching out the meagre traces of a leper hospital, or leprosarium, built at the gate of medieval St Albans to house 13 devout sufferers in 1194, he outlines the gaps between the reality and the legend. Behind the 'cliché of the 'medieval leper'' with his rags and bell lay a more complex reality of leprosaria – some 19,000 across Western Europe, according to the 13th-century chronicler Matthew Paris – formed as religious communities, upheld by wealthy patrons, and run in ways that often accorded large degrees of agency and democracy to suffers. Leprosy could be seen – as in Chaucer 's 1380s poem Troilus and Criseyde – as a form of divine punishment; it could also be seen as a holy affliction, bringing the sufferer closer to God. Lepers might be subject to the same kind of persecution as Jews, yet they might be accorded surprising degrees of respect and autonomy, even to the point of being considered divine in their own right. Richard of Wallingford, elected as abbot of St Albans in 1327, remained in post despite falling prey to the disease, devoting his attention to designing and building a clock for the abbey while a coadjutor carried out the 'more strenuous duties'. The historical portion of Basciano's narrative continues with thoughtful chapters on Hansen and his promulgation of the doctrine of strict medical isolation for sufferers; on 19th-century contemporaries 'Father Damien' and Kate Marsden, who became celebrities for their dedication to the disease's victims; and on the leprosarium on South Africa's Robben Island, the isolatory regime that anticipated the apartheid government's incarceration of ANC activists there. Where the book really takes off, though, is when Basciano steps into the living legacies of leprosaria in the present, with trips to Romania, Mozambique, Brazil and Japan. Face to face with sufferers, Basciano's writing blossoms. In Mozambique, he confronts the realities of illness in a time of civil war, when aid programmes cease to function, diagnoses cease and patients disappear. In Japan, where forced sterilisations and abortions of patients continued long after the theory of hereditary transmission had been refuted, 720 patients live on in scattered sanatoria, winners of a long legal battle for recognition, simultaneously victims and members of a community on the verge of extinction. Leprosaria were refuges too, Basciano writes: places where 'utopian seeds' could take root on the stoniest ground, shielding their inmates from secret police, overriding nationalism, and even war. While the historical sections of Outcast are absorbing, Basciano's encounters turn this book into something altogether more moving and important. This is a cautionary tale: leprosy might be fading into history, but there is always another human 'contagion' to fear, if we let our fears control us. Deftly balancing learned and elegant reflection on illness and prejudice with the very human faces of the disease's sufferers, Basciano has crafted a quite brilliant book. It's a fitting tribute to outcasts who should never have been cast out.
