Brazil's top court votes to hold social media platforms accountable for user posts
By Ricardo Brito
BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazil's Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that social media companies must be held accountable for some types of content published by users on their platforms in the country, but details on the decision have yet to be resolved.
Six of the 11 Supreme Court judges voted to hold platforms responsible for third-party content seen as illegal, in a decision that could result in fines against social media companies for not removing some users' posts in the country.
The decision could impact the business of platforms including Meta's Facebook and Instagram, as well as TikTok, Elon Musk's X and other internet giants, such as Alphabet's Google, in a market of more than 200 million people.
Only one justice so far voted to not change the current law on the matter, which says that the companies can only be found responsible for third-party content on their platforms if the firms do not comply with a legal decision ordering the content removal.
Writing for the majority, Justice Gilmar Mendes said current Brazilian law represents "a veil of irresponsibility for digital platforms."
"Even if they are informed of the occurrence of crimes on their platforms, they (currently) cannot be held responsible for damages caused by keeping this content online, except in the case of a court order," he said.
Asked to comment, Meta sent a 2024 statement where it had said that a decision holding platforms responsible could make them "liable for virtually all types of content even without having been notified."
In a statement sent before the vote which gave the court a majority, Google said the current Brazilian law regarding social media can and should be improved, "as long as procedure guarantees and criteria are set to prevent legal uncertainty and the indiscriminate content removal."
TikTok and a representative of X in Brazil did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The court did not agree on the scope of the decision, such as what types of content would be considered illegal. The court's head, Luis Roberto Barroso, said he will work with the court members to find a consensus.
Four judges still need to vote in the trial, which has been rolling over for months. Votes previously cast can still be changed, although that is not common. The trial is set to resume on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
Meta Invests Nearly $15 Billion in Scale AI to Kick-Start Superintelligence Lab
Meta said on Thursday that it planned to invest nearly $15 billion in Scale AI, a start-up that works with data to train artificial intelligence systems, in a deal that Meta hopes will add needed muscle to its disappointing A.I. division. As a condition of the deal, Alexandr Wang, Scale AI's 28-year-old chief executive, plans to join Meta in a top leadership role in the new division, which Meta is calling its Superintelligence lab. Mr. Wang, whom people inside Meta have taken to calling a visionary leader, will also bring a team of employees from Scale AI to work at Meta. The move to invest billions in Scale AI, an amount equal to about 10 percent of Meta's revenue in 2024, would be Meta's first major minority investment in an outside company. It is Meta's second-largest deal, after the $19 billion acquisition of the messaging app WhatsApp about 11 years ago. Meta is scrambling to catch up with A.I. competitors such as Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic, as industry executives jockey for an edge in what they believe will be the most transformative technology in a generation. 'Meta has finalized our strategic partnership and investment in Scale AI,' a spokesperson for Meta said in a statement. 'As part of this, we will deepen the work we do together producing data for A.I. models, and Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on our superintelligence efforts.' Meta's investment with Scale AI is unusually structured. Meta will take a minority stake in the start-up and receive little control over its direction. The structure was intentional. Executives at Meta and Scale AI were worried about drawing the attention of regulators. Meta is waiting on a federal judge's decision in an antitrust case scrutinizing its earlier acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. The Federal Trade Commission under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was skeptical of big technology acquisitions, and Lina Khan, who led the agency at the time, scrutinized multibillion-dollar investments in A.I. companies. The structure of those deals — which included Amazon's investments in Anthropic and Microsoft's backing of OpenAI — allowed the big companies to form close ties with smaller rivals while dodging regulatory issues. It is unclear if the F.T.C. under its new chairman, Andrew Ferguson, will continue down that path. But Mr. Ferguson has shown few signs of changing course. OpenAI kicked off the A.I. movement in late 2022 with the release of its chatbot ChatGPT, compelling companies like Google and Meta to build similar technologies. Meta found an important niche when it chose to open source its systems, freely sharing the underlying tech with developers and businesses. But its latest system, called LLAMA4, has not matched the technologies produced by its biggest rivals. Among technologists, superintelligence is a futuristic goal of A.I. development. OpenAI, Google and others have said their immediate aim is to build artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., a machine that can do anything the human brain can do. Superintelligence, if it can be developed, would go beyond A.G.I.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New grads are struggling to find jobs and they're being locked out of the labor market because of 3 key factors
A new class of young graduates is getting ready to enter the workforce this summer, but they're likely to face a chilly reception. In one social media post after another, entry-level workers are bemoaning the state of the labor market and how hard it is to find a job. 'It feels more likely to win the lottery right now than get a job,' said one young TikTok poster. 'This is not what I expected,' said another young woman on Instagram as she held a stack of resumes and wiped tears from her eyes. 'But I can't be delusional anymore, I literally need to make money.' The current labor market appears strong on the surface—unemployment is still low at 4.2%, wage growth is steady, and the U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May. But those numbers don't tell the whole story. A deeper look beneath the surface reveals a much different jobs market for entry-level workers. The unemployment rate for recent college graduates aged 22-27 was 5.8% as of March, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. And a May report from Oxford Economics found that 85% of unemployment since the middle of 2023 could be attributed to people just entering the workforce. 'Top-line job openings and unemployment statistics aren't, in practice, reflecting the experience of new grads entering the workforce,' Mischa Fisher, an economist at Udemy, a provider of online training courses, tells Fortune. 'Because entry-level roles are in short supply.' It's no surprise, then, that employee confidence amongst entry-level workers just hit an all-time low, according to a recent report from Glassdoor. And more than half (56%) of this year's college graduates feel pessimistic about starting their careers in the current economy, according to another survey from jobs platform Handshake. A few different factors are likely contributing to such a tough job market for young people right now. Experts tell Fortune that a combination of factors including a cooling labor market, a hiring pullback prompted by shifting tariff policies, and the long-promised of integration of AI into the workforce, are all creating massive problems for a new generation of job seekers. 'There are now clear trends in the data,' not just vague whisperings, that more and more people are getting left behind, says Cory Stahle, an economist at hiring platform Indeed's Hiring Lab. The COVID pandemic kicked off a major workforce reshuffling, unofficially dubbed the 'Great Resignation,' during which workers were successfully able to switch jobs for higher wages. But that era is long gone. The labor market has become more stagnant, and quit rates fell from 3% in March of 2022, the highest in over two decades, to around 2% as of April 2025, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Workers who switch roles are also less likely to make more money if they do so. People who stay in their jobs are seeing an average of 4.4% wage growth, while those who leave are getting just 4.3% more, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That lack of turnover means that there are fewer opportunities for entry level workers to nab a role. 'We're seeing the labor market's version of the housing market's 'lock-in' effect, where employees are too nervous to make moves,' says Fisher. 'This freeze is blocking normal opportunity flow, so early career workers can't break in, experienced workers can't move up, and burned-out employees are staying put.' Trump's tariff policy changes, and their subsequent impact on the economy, is also creating problems for entry-level workers in the labor market. With an uncertain economic outlook thanks to on-again-off-again levies for major U.S. trading partners, many companies have pulled back on hiring until they get further clarity on what kind of economy will take shape in 2025. Around 30% of small and mid-size business owners say tariffs are directly impacting their organizations in a negative way, and 42% say they plan to pull back on hiring as a result, according to a May survey from coaching and advisory firm Vistage, in partnership with the Wall Street Journal. 'Business leaders are uncertain and when that happens they don't do as much hiring because they don't know what the next week is going to look like, let alone the next month,' says Allison Shrivastava, a labor economist also at Indeed's Hiring Lab. 'They're going to wait, especially for those jobs in what we think of as, traditionally, white collar sectors, which are often difficult and costly to hire for.' The promise of AI has been a looming threat to human workers for years, but there are now signs that companies are using the new tech to take over work previously done by entry-level employees. Many of the tasks that used to serve as a training ground for junior employees, like data entry, research, and handling basic customer or employee requests, are already being delegated to AI. Technical fields like computer science and finance are getting hit especially hard. While employment for people older than 27 in computer science and mathematical occupations has grown a modest 0.8% since 2022, employment for those aged 22-27, or recent graduates, has declined by 8%, according to a May report from labor market research firm Oxford Economics. That's compared to college graduates in all other occupations, who saw 2% employment gains. 'We concluded that a high adoption rate by information companies along with the sheer employment declines in these roles since 2022 suggested some displacement effect from AI,' the report reads. LinkedIn's chief economic opportunity officer Aneesh Raman, echoed that thought in a recent New York Times op-ed. 'In tech, advanced coding tools are creeping into the tasks of writing simple code and debugging—the ways junior developers gain experience,' he wrote. Companies are under pressure from investors to show that they can do more with less because of AI, says Sam Kuhn, an economist at Appcast, a job advertising company. Cutting jobs, or freezing hiring, are ways to do that. 'We are starting to see the ripple effects of companies that have invested a lot of money into artificial intelligence, wanting to show that they're actually getting something out of it,' he says. Meta reportedly plans to use AI to review the platform's privacy and societal risks instead of human staffers. At Microsoft, CEO Satya Nadella said in April that around 30% of code is now written by AI, a reality that likely factored into recent layoffs. And the CEO of payments platform Klarna has openly admitted last month that AI helped the company cut its workforce by around 40%. AI company founders are also getting more candid; Dario Amondei, the CEO of leading AI company Anthropic, has said outright that the technology could wipe out roughly 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs. 'It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it,' he said. 'We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming.' New job seekers can comfort themselves with the knowledge that it's not just their imagination—the hiring landscape really is tougher for them than it was a few years ago. That means they need to be more resourceful than their predecessors when it comes to outsmarting the labor market. That might include things like pivoting their job search to consider other industries or roles outside of what they studied in school. They also need to work harder to show employers that the skills they learned in college are a perfect fit for a given role. 'In the current labor market, new graduates need to find additional signals of skill beyond just a degree,' says Fisher. 'From certificates to demonstrated soft skills like communication, the candidates who stand out show they're already bridging the gap between school and skills acquisition.' Because the hiring process skews towards Zoom interviews and AI-driven recruiting, young people also need to take the initiative and reach out to hiring managers on their own, whether that's on LinkedIn, at a local job fair, or tapping into an alumni network. 'There are fewer opportunities now to engage on a human level with employers up front,' says Steve Rakas, executive director of the Masters Career Center at Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business. There remains, however, a reason for young people to hold out hope. Labor market trends are cyclical, and there are still opportunities out there for young people who want them, notes Rakas—even if they're not ideal. 'We're coaching them to think about not just plan A, but also plan B, C and D,' he says.'To be pragmatic, and also to pivot.' This story was originally featured on
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
Sources: Meta finalizes $15 billion deal for Scale AI stake
Meta has finalized a deal to pay around $15 billion for a 49% stake in Scale AI, a company best known for providing the human labor needed to label data used in the creation of AI models, sources told Axios. Why it matters: The deal, if regulators don't stop it, is set to put Scale CEO Alexandr Wang inside Meta, but raises big questions for the future of a data-labeling company widely used by all the major AI players, including Google and OpenAI. Yes, but: Even though Meta isn't buying all of Scale, regulators may still raise objections. The big picture: It's the latest in a series of deals in which giant tech companies have bought less than an entire company to get the people or intellectual property they want. Last year, Microsoft struck a deal with chatbot creator Inflection AI in which Microsoft got the services of Inflection CEO (and DeepMind co-founder) Mustafa Suleyman as well as other colleagues and technology. Inflection's investors got an immediate return while also leaving in place a slimmed-down operation focused on sales to businesses. Google made a similar arrangement with acquiring key talent and a technology license, handing over millions to investors without buying the entire company.
