Watch: Idris Elba backs blunt kitchen knives to stop knife crime
Credit: X/@BBCr4today
Idris Elba has called for kitchen knives to have their ends rounded off to protect victims of the UK's violent gang crisis.
Speaking ahead of the release of his documentary on knife crime that will air on Wednesday evening, the 52-year-old actor said there needed to be 'innovative' solutions amid a surge in knife crime that has pushed it back to near-record levels.
The Luther star said that while the Government's ban on the sale of zombie knives was a positive step in tackling the issue, he also believed ninja swords should be outlawed and suggested kitchen blades have their sharp point removed.
'I do think there are areas of innovation that we can do. Not all kitchen knives need to have a point on them, that sounds like a crazy thing to say. But you can still cut your food without the point on your knife, which is an innovative way to look at it,' he said. 'In a country in crisis, yes, let's look at that.'
Britain's knife crime crisis has seen a total of 507 children treated in English hospitals for knife injuries in the 12 months to April 2024, according to the latest figures analysed by the Youth Endowment Fund.
The number of knife crimes reported by police forces across England and Wales passed 50,000 in the year to June 2024, for only the second time since records began. In London, they hit a record high of 15,859, up 16 per cent on 2023, according to the Office for National Statistics.
A ban on the sale of pointed kitchen knives has been backed by the Church of England, judges, top trauma doctors and psychiatrists, the police and victims as they argue that it would make life-threatening injuries far less likely.
It follows a five-year study in Edinburgh which found that 94 per cent of the sharp instruments used in homicides were kitchen knives.
Axel Rudakubana, the Southport triple killer, used a kitchen knife he bought via Amazon for his murderous attack last July.
Campaigners say sharp knife points were only used historically to pick up food because forks had not been invented and it was a time when they could be carried openly.
Sharp points remain only as an anachronistic hangover from 18th century Britain during which forks became commonplace.
Elba's new documentary sees the British actor spend 12 months exploring the reality of the UK's knife crime crisis.
During the programme, he met with victims' families, police officers and teenage offenders for a deep dive into the problem.
In an effort to tackle the issue, a ban on zombie knives and machetes came into place in England and Wales in September, making it an imprisonable offence to possess, sell, manufacture or transport them.
Elba said it was 'massive step in the right direction', but believed schools could intervene in young people's lives earlier to stop them 'going towards a dark place'.
The actor highlighted disciplinary action like school exclusions as an opportunity for teachers to pay more attention to children in their pre and early teens.
Elba said: 'The big thing that I learned in the room [when he visited Feltham Young Offender Institution for the show] is that they're not big and scary in the way that it's portrayed; gangs, balaclavas, black jackets.
'These were people, young people, still grasping on to their development, it was sad. It just felt like they were just banged up behind there, and no-one cares.
'Of course, they're being looked after there, but it did feel like, 'oh, wow, we just turned our back on them', because we're expecting them to come out of there loved and ready to get back into society. It was really educational for me, and sad.'
Elba backed moves by the Government to crackdown on knife sales. Last weekend ministers announced new measures including a ban on doorstep sales and two-step age verification for online purchases – to prevent under 18s buying knives online.
The actor said tech companies and social media needed to take more responsibility over the issue: 'When it comes to big tech, there needs to be accountability within their own policies, and their policies need to be educated and driven by what society deems is right or wrong.
'It's great that you're a big company, you make a lot of money, got lots of social media followers, that's fantastic. But by the way, we don't like knives, we're not going to tolerate you advertising knives to young people, please.
'We don't like porn, we don't like this, we don't like bully dogs, it can be done in a society, and in my opinion, where democracy leads, it takes a village.'
Ministers are planning new laws to fine tech executives up to £10,000 if they fail to remove content promoting, advertising or allowing the sale of banned knives.
Elba said there were 'indicators of hope' already in the fight against knife crime and praised the under-the-radar intervention schemes that were 'really working'.
The BBC film, Idris Elba: Our Knife Crime Crisis, sees Elba meet Sir Keir Starmer, before becoming prime minister, who said that his party would commit to halving knife crime if elected.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia say Trump administration's actions left ‘stain' on Constitution
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia are accusing President Donald Trump's administration of pretending for weeks to be powerless to bring him back to the United States from El Salvador, despite orders from a federal judge and the Supreme Court to facilitate his return. Abrego Garcia's attorneys made the allegation in a court filing shortly after the Maryland construction worker was flown to Tennessee on Friday to face federal human smuggling charges . '(T)he Government has always had the ability to return Abrego Garcia, but it has simply refused to do so,' the attorneys wrote, arguing that the administration has 'engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage Abrego Garcia.' The attorneys said the lawsuit over his mistaken deportation has not concluded in a Maryland federal court. 'The executive branch's wanton disregard for the judicial branch has left a stain on the Constitution,' the attorneys wrote. 'If there is to be any hope of removing that stain, it must start by shining a light on the improper actions of the Government in this tragic affair and imposing meaningful remedies.' Abrego Garcia's attorneys made that argument in response to a filing by the Trump administration to halt the lawsuit's proceedings because he's back in the U.S. U.S. attorneys asked for an immediate stay after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the charges in Tennessee . The attorneys wrote that the government complied with the Maryland federal court's order to return Abrego Garcia. The U.S. intends to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In a court filing on Tuesday, the Trump administration pushed back against the accusations of Abrego Garcia's lawyers, describing them as baseless, desperate and disappointing. 'But the proof is in the pudding — Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do,' the U.S. attorneys wrote. 'None of Plaintiffs' hyperbolic arguments change that or justify further proceedings in this matter.' U.S. officials said Abrego Garcia was deported because of a 2019 accusation from local police in Maryland that he was an MS-13 gang member. Abrego Garcia has denied the allegation and was never charged with a crime, his attorneys said. Abrego Garcia's deportation violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shielded him from expulsion to his native country. The immigration judge had determined that Abrego Garcia faced likely persecution by a local Salvadoran gang that had terrorized his family. Abrego Garcia's American wife sued over his deportation. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered his return on April 4 . The Supreme Court ruled on April 10 that the administration must work to bring him back. Arguments ensued over the next several weeks about whether the Trump administration was following those orders or not. Meanwhile, Trump said publicly that he could return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. with a call to El Salvador's president. The federal judge in Maryland ordered U.S. attorneys to submit documents and testimony to show what the government had done to follow her orders. The Trump administration claimed that much of that information is protected under the state secrets privilege . The judge has not ruled on that matter. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five common mistakes that let criminals hack your online accounts
Attacks on British retailers like Marks & Spencer have highlighted how mistakes can let cybercriminals into online accounts with devastating consequences. M&S announced on Tuesday it had finally reopened its website weeks after a cyberattack in April that the company blamed on 'human error' and it said it would cost around £300m. The government's cybersecurity breaches survey, published earlier this year, found 43% of businesses had suffered a security breach in the last 12 months. But even for ordinary people, it's still very possible to make mistakes that can lead to criminals gaining access to your account - and then using your details for identity theft or stealing money. Research by the Global Anti-Scam Alliance found that 10% of Brits had lost money to scams or identity theft in 2023. Yahoo News spoke to security expert Truman Kain, a security researcher at cybersecurity firm Huntress, about the common mistakes people make - including one which almost all of us have never even thought about. In security questions on online accounts such as banking, people often put their real mother's maiden name or the name of a first pet. But this is a mistake, Kain explains - and instead you should make up a fake name, because hackers can potentially use a security question to reset accounts and gain access, and such information is often easy to find out. Kain said: 'Security questions are a relic. When used as originally intended, they aren't security, they're trivia that hackers already know. "Think of it this way: if you had to, could you answer your friend's security questions? Yes? Well, so could a hacker. Attackers can typically guess or find your answers to common security questions on your social media or elsewhere online. 'This is how accounts can get taken over even if you do have a strong password. So, treat security questions like passwords… lie! Generate and save fake answers to security questions with a password manager. Never assume that your real answers to security questions are private.' Browsers such as Chrome commonly offer the option to save passwords, which can be highly convenient for users - but using this is a mistake. So are other common ways of storing passwords like notes apps, Word documents or spreadsheets, says Kain. 'Lots of people store passwords in places they shouldn't: these are a problem, because they can all be quickly scraped by malware or someone with access to your device," Kain says. For example, if your PC gets a virus, it can be easy for criminals to find passwords stored in this way. Instead, Kain advises, you should use a separate password manager app on your PC or smartphone, and generate strong passwords using the app. Kain said: 'If you care about your accounts, use a dedicated password manager. It's the simplest way to keep your accounts secure. Storing passwords anywhere else is like locking your front door and then leaving the key under the doormat. Reusing passwords offers an easy way to log in, for example, when forced to create a password to order on a pub's menu. But if you use one password across a lot of accounts, it's only a matter of time before it leaks online, says Kain, due to the frequency of data breaches. Kain said: 'By reusing passwords, you're basically playing Russian roulette. A breach at some random site, at any point in the future, can hand attackers the keys to your most important accounts. 'They'll turn right around and plug those credentials into every major service they can think of… and if you reused, they're in.' Kain said: 'Today's phishing attacks aren't poorly worded emails. They're polished, look just like the real thing and sometimes even come from real providers like DocuSign or Canva.' To deal with such attacks, it's best to be ultra-cautious around links in emails, particularly when they relate to banking or anything similar. Instead of following the email, use your banking app or navigate to your bank's website - or if you're really worried, call. Kain said: "Today, fake login pages are pixel-perfect and often use legitimate-looking domains. All it takes is one moment of distraction or misplaced trust, and your credentials or sensitive information are compromised. 'Attackers love evoking senses of fear or urgency because those emotions often cause you to act without thinking. So, always take a minute to stop and think: is this legit? Just because a site looks real doesn't mean it is. Check the URL before entering credentials and navigate to sites directly instead of clicking links in emails or text messages.' Multi-factor authentication (MFA) bolsters passwords by insisting on a second check (often via text or through a dedicated app) to prove people are who they say they are. This means that if a criminal finds your password in an online data breach, they still cannot access your account. Kain said: 'MFA is one of the most effective defences you have against account takeovers. However, it's often ignored because 'it's annoying', or put off with 'I'll do it later'. 'The reality is that passwords get breached. Phishing works. MFA adds a backstop that makes it much harder for attackers to get in when they inevitably get a hold of your credentials. App-based MFA is ideal, but any form of MFA is better than none.'


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Chinese AI firms block features amid high-stakes university entrance exams
As more than 13 million students filed into rooms across China to sit for the notoriously grueling, high-stakes, gaokao college entrance exam, they already faced strict anti-cheating and real-time surveillance measures, including facial recognition technology, metal detectors, drones and cellphone-signal blockers. Vehicles transporting the test papers — classified as state secrets — are equipped with video surveillance. Copies of the test are stored in steel-reinforced rooms that can only be opened by three people, each wielding their own key. China made cheating on exams a criminal act in 2015 — punishable in some cases by prison sentences.