S.C. attorney general tells state's capital city to drop its conversion therapy ban
South Carolina's attorney general, Alan Wilson, sent a letter to the city of Columbia requesting that it overturn its municipal ban on conversion therapy. Wilson said the ban violates a state religious freedom law and is unconstitutional because it violates the religious rights of faith-based counselors.
'This letter just says, 'Hey, look, the ban is unconstitutional and it's also unlawful under current state law.' Just comport with it. Comply with it. We're good,' Wilson told WIS TV.
Columbia Mayor Daniel Rickenmann questioned the need for the letter.
'I have a whole lot of other priorities.' Rickenmann told reporters on Wednesday, The State reports.
Rickenmann also questioned the letter's timing, asking, 'Why now?' and suggesting a political connection. Wilson is rumored to be considering a run for governor in the state.
Related: SCOTUS agrees to hear conversion therapy ban case
The state's Senate also applied pressure, threatening to withhold $15 million in state funding if the city did not overturn the ordinance.
Conversion therapy is the so-called reparative ex-queer therapy based on the belief that a person can be 'cured' of their same-sex sexual attraction and that conversion from homosexuality to heterosexuality is possible. Various means of implementing this therapy can include prayer groups, electroshock therapy, and training in gender behavior. Health experts agree that the practice is harmful.
Columbia narrowly approved the ban on conversion therapy within its city limits in 2021. The following year, the state passed the Medical Ethics and Diversity Act, which sought to protect the rights of medical practitioners.
In the letter, Wilson derides what he calls a mischaracterization of conversion therapy that 'conjures images of draconian and harmful treatments, like electroshock therapy or other physical cruelties, aimed at changing the sexuality of individuals who were unsure about their sexual orientation.'
Related: Gay man SC Rep. Nancy Mace told to 'f**k' himself speaks out
He goes on to say that faith-based counselors are forced to 'come into compliance with 'gender affirming care,' which he incorrectly says is fake science.
'This ordinance crosses the line, violates the law, and must be repealed,' Wilson said in a statement.
All major medical associations in the U.S. support gender-affirming care.
Wilson said he sent the letter now because he recently signed a brief supporting a similar overturning of conversion therapy bans in Michigan.
Dylan Gunnels, the president of South Carolina Pride and the founder of The Agape Table, a local LGBTQ+ advocacy and support group, is a survivor of conversion therapy. He described Wilson's claimed motivation for sending the letter as 'hogwash' and instead said he was falling in line with the Trump administration's assault on LGBTQ+ rights and DEI.
Related: Trump admin tells states to stop Medicaid for trans minors
'What has changed is that they're emboldened by an administration that's obsessed with DEI and erasing the existence of LGBTQ people,' Gunnels told WIS TV. "And again, having no clue or understanding what conversion therapy actually is, and clearly not even the tenants of what that ordinance was. So you're using your power and control in a moment when you're vying for the governor's seat to attack LGBTQ people yet again.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
43 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Senate Republicans want to trim some of Trump's populist tax cuts
WASHINGTON -- Even before the House passed the sweeping bill carrying President Donald Trump's domestic policy agenda, Senate Republicans made it clear that they hoped to make major changes to the legislation before the GOP was done muscling it through Congress. Several have wanted to pare back the cuts to Medicaid, the health care program for the poor, that House Republicans envisioned in the version of the legislation that they approved late last month. A handful have sought to salvage tax credits incentivizing clean energy projects that the House measure would repeal. Many have pushed to grant companies prized tax breaks for the long run, not just for a few years, as their colleagues across the Capitol opted to do. The problem senators face is that each of these changes would be expensive. At $2.4 trillion, the cost of the legislation that barely passed the House is already huge. So Senate Republicans are now hunting for ways to save money, a hazardous task that could involve shaving the ambitions of their colleagues in the House or the White House. On the chopping block are some of Trump's favorite parts of the bill, like not taxing overtime. Republican lawmakers have long been skeptical of some of the president's tax ideas, with the view that the populist policies will not spur the economy like traditional supply-side conservatism can. 'I think it all comes down to what we've got to pay for,' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said. 'At the end of the day, we've got to pay for pro-growth policies.' The debate is in some ways a classic one on Capitol Hill, where throughout history and without regard to political party, senators have been reluctant to defer to their colleagues in the House, and vice versa. 'It's the Senate, so the Senate is going to do what it damn well wants to do, and that's a good process,' Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said at a Punchbowl News event Wednesday, where he warned that his chamber would pass a bill 'markedly different' from the House measure, pushing enactment of the package well past his party's July 4 deadline. To top Senate Republicans, the most economically powerful tax cuts incentivize companies to make new investments and conduct research. Accelerated depreciation schedules, though, do not grab political attention the way Trump's promises for 'no tax on tips' did, so the House version of the bill only included the business tax breaks through 2029. Senate Republicans want to make the business write-offs a permanent feature of the tax code, a change that they and some economists believe would help encourage more companies to expand. As one way to cover that cost, Senate Republicans are looking at ways to further curb eligibility for a tax cut for overtime pay, including by setting a lower income ceiling for the break and by more strictly defining what counts as overtime, lawmakers said. 'Obviously, there's a lot of dials, whether you're talking about no tax on tips, overtime, any of those,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. 'How many years did they go? At what level do they stop?' Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, a former car dealer, wants to tighten the House plan for allowing Americans to deduct up to $10,000 in interest on car loans, which would apply to vehicles made in the United States, including used and new cars, as well as all-terrain vehicles and recreational vehicles. Moreno is proposing to limit the tax break, one of Trump's campaign promises, just to loans for new cars. 'We save a lot of money. An RV? Motorcycles? ATVs?' he said. 'That's not the idea; the idea is to help working Americans be able to afford a car.' Senate Republicans are searching for cuts because of growing concern among some conservatives, as well as on Wall Street, about the bill's impact on the country's fiscal situation. While paring back some of Trump's campaign promises could help keep the cost of the legislation near what it was in the House, some lawmakers are calling for much deeper spending cuts. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has been loudly calling for the legislation, which already includes roughly $1.8 trillion in spending reductions, to slash trillions more. His complaints won him a meeting with top White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, at the Capitol this week. Johnson's pitch is to remove all of Trump's new tax priorities from the bill and instead focus the legislation exclusively on extending expiring tax cuts from 2017, cutting spending and raising the debt ceiling. Republicans could then tackle White House priorities, and further spending cuts, in a second piece of legislation, Johnson argues. 'You can't do it in one fell swoop. I don't want to criticize what has been done; I want to support what's been done,' he said. 'But I absolutely -- I can't accept that this is the new norm. We need another bite of the apple in this Congress.' Of course, jettisoning much of the president's agenda from the legislation is a tall order, and White House officials have been making the case for the House measures to cut taxes on tips and overtime and for older Americans. 'No Tax on Overtime and No Tax on Tips are presidential priorities that 80 million Americans voted for in November,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. 'They will remain in this historic piece of legislation in order to deliver the largest tax cut in history.' There are other sources of money tempting Senate Republicans. Some are considering cuts to Medicare, though changes to the health care program for older Americans comes with substantial political risks. Then there is the state and local tax deduction, often called SALT. In the House, a small group of Republicans from New York, New Jersey and California demanded that the legislation include an increase to the $10,000 cap on the deduction. They ultimately won an agreement to set the new limit at $40,000, an expensive change that would largely benefit homeowners in areas with high taxes. While the change was necessary to win the support of blue-state Republicans in the House, senators are less committed to the policy. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, recently remarked at the White House that 'there really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue.' At the same time, House Republicans committed to more SALT relief have warned that changing the House agreement could scuttle the entire package. But some Republican senators cannot help but think that money earmarked for a higher SALT cap could have a better use. 'There's a lot of things we could do with that,' said Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Watch Political News On-Demand & Real-Time Election Coverage
In the ever-evolving world of politics, staying informed is essential—not just for voters, but for students, analysts, and every concerned citizen. That's where comes in: a next-generation political reporting platform offering video-on-demand political content, real-time updates, and sharp insights into domestic and global events. Tired of biased headlines and clickbait journalism? delivers reliable breaking political news with an emphasis on factual reporting and balanced perspectives. Whether you're tracking a presidential campaign, legislative reform, or international diplomacy, this platform provides the clarity and depth you need. Get real-time updates and watch political news videos anytime, from any device—thanks to a streamlined and responsive video-on-demand (VOD) system. One of the platform's standout features is its political video content, available on-demand. With over a million followers on social platforms, the channel publishes exclusive interviews, daily briefings, and documentary-style clips—perfect for those who prefer watching over reading. High CPC Keywords Featured: Watch political commentary online Election campaign video coverage Dan Bongino FBI reform news Lily Tang Williams interview US political video updates Whether you lean conservative, libertarian, or independent, delivers curated news for audiences seeking alternatives to mainstream outlets. With consistent updates on major events like election cycles, policy shifts, SCOTUS rulings, and congressional debates, you'll always have context behind the headlines. It's a smart destination for: Students researching political science Small business owners tracking economic policies Voters preparing for local and federal elections 👉 Read their latest political commentary blog posts. covers high-interest, high-CPC topics including: US elections 2024 news Government policy changes FBI and CIA reform Second Amendment updates Free speech and censorship in media Global political conflicts These topics not only generate heavy traffic but are also critical to shaping public opinion. is more than just a website—it's a growing digital media brand with active communities on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Subscribe or follow for real-time alerts and trending video content. Start watching exclusive political videos now → Watch on If you're serious about staying informed in today's chaotic political landscape, is your go-to source for truth-driven, timely, and thought-provoking reporting. Don't just skim headlines—dive into political analysis, understand the issues, and form your own opinions based on facts, not noise. 🔗 Visit now and elevate the way you consume political news. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.
