logo
Army To Retire All Of Its Turboprop Surveillance Planes By The End Of The Year

Army To Retire All Of Its Turboprop Surveillance Planes By The End Of The Year

Yahoo7 days ago

The U.S. Army says it is on schedule to retire the last of its turboprop-powered intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft by the end of this year. Prior to the start of these divestments in 2022, the service had dozens of crewed turboprop ISR planes spread across units in the United States and forward deployed overseas. There continue to be questions about forthcoming capability and capacity gaps, with business jet-based replacement aircraft still years away from entering service and recent reports that the Army could ultimately buy just six of them.
'The divesture of the AISR [aerial ISR] legacy fleet is ongoing and will continue throughout 2025,' a spokesperson for the Army's Program Executive Office for Aviation (PEO-A) confirmed to TWZ. 'The RC-12X, MC-12, and EO-5 fleets will be divested by the end of 2025. The divestment of the legacy AISR fleet has been ongoing since 2022.'
The RC-12X, also known as the Guardrail Common Sensor (GRCS), is a twin-engine Beechcraft King Air-based ISR aircraft equipped with a signals intelligence (SIGINT) package and a ventral sensor turret with electro-optical and infrared full-motion video cameras. The RC-12X is the latest in a line of Guardrail variants with steadily improving capabilities, the first of which entered service in the 1970s and were staples during the Cold War. Prior to 2022, the Army had 14 GRCS aircraft, plus five RC-12X(T) pilot trainers with no sensors fitted.
Also known as the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System (EMARSS), the Army's MC-12S planes first began entering service in the 2010s. The fleet is an amalgam of additional Beechcraft King Air types with a variety of sensor configurations, including still and full-motion video cameras, radar and laser imaging systems, and SIGINT suites, as you can read more about here. The bulk of the 24 EMARSS aircraft had previously supported U.S. military operations on a contractor-owned and operated basis.
It is unclear how many EO-5C Airborne Reconnaissance Low-Multifunction (ARL-M) aircraft, also known by the program name Crazy Hawk, were still in service by 2022 when the aerial ISR divestment process started. The Army had eight of the aircraft, which are based on the four-engine de Havilland Canada DHC-7, or Dash-7, in inventory at least as of 2015. Originally designated as RC-7Bs, the ARL-Ms first began entering service in the late 1990s.
The Army had previously planned to replace the EO-5Cs with RO-6A Airborne Reconnaissance Low-Enhanced (ARL-E) aircraft based on the more modern twin-engine de Havilland Canada DHC-8, or Dash-8. Just like the EMRASS fleet, a number of the ARL-Es had already been providing ISR support through private contractors before the Army acquired them. The service retired the RO-6As back in 2022.
'The AISR mission continues to use legacy aircraft until fully divested with Contractor Owned, Contractor Operated (COCO) aircraft bridging the gap until [the] High Accuracy Detection and Exploitation System (HADES) is operational,' the PEO-A spokesperson also told us. ' The COCO aircraft are Airborne Reconnaissance and Targeting Exploitation Multi-Mission Intelligence System (ARTEMIS), Airborne Reconnaissance and Electronic Warfare System (ARES), and Army Theater Level High-Altitude Expeditionary Next-Generation ISR aircraft (ATHENA).'
The forthcoming HADES aircraft, now designated the ME-11B, as well as the ARES and ATHENA contractor-operated types, are all based on Bombardier Global 6000/6500 business jets. The ARTEMIS planes are based on Bombardier's Challenger 600 series.
The transition to business jet-based ISR platforms has been the Army's stated plan for years now. In general, compared to turboprop types, jet ISR aircraft offer increased range and speed, allowing them to reach operating areas further away, do so faster, and stay on stay on station longer. Those capabilities allow them to be more readily transferred from one area to another, as well. The added performance could be particularly valuable for future operations across the broad expanses of the Indo-Pacific region. In addition, thanks to higher operating ceilings, they can provide a better perch for sensors to 'see' from. The Army has also presented all of this as helping to reduce vulnerability to increasingly more capable threat air defenses.
The exact mix of sensors found on the ARTEMIS, ARES, and ATHENA aircraft is unclear, as is the planned configuration for the ME-11B. The HADES package will at least include Raytheon's active electronically scanned array (AESA) Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System-2B (ASARS-2B). ASARS-2B, work on which first began as an upgrade for the U-2 Dragon Lady spy plane, can produce synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, which are highly detailed ground maps, and has ground moving target indicator (GMTI) functionality to spot and track vehicles on the ground. GMTI data can be used for various intelligence purposes, including establishing patterns of life or targeting, as well as be overlaid on top of SAR and other imagery to help refine collection areas.
The ME-11B is also shaping up to be much more than just a traditional ISR aircraft, with its capabilities also set to include the ability to launch drones, potentially with ranges up to 1,000 miles. HADES might be able to launch electronic and cyber warfare attacks, as well.
'While HADES is expected to rapidly deploy and provide deep-sensing capabilities, the task force is learning the aircraft could provide even more capability than it initially imagined, including the ability to disable enemy space-based capabilities,' Defense News reported earlier this month, but did not elaborate.
The 'task force' referred to here is the Army's Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Task Force. Andrew Evans, the ISR Task Force's director, had spoken to Defense News and other reporters about plans for HADES and other developments at the Army Aviation Association of America's (AAAA) Mission Solutions Summit on May 15.
'We are committed to building HADES in a way that unlocks maximum value for Army and Joint forces operating anywhere on the globe, including USINDOPACOM [U.S. Indo-Pacific Command] as the priority theater,' Evans subsequently told TWZ in a statement. 'The manner in which we will interact with and affect adversarial capabilities operating in the land, sea, space, and cyber domains remains classified.'
Overall, the Army is certainly presenting HADES as a major upgrade over its existing crewed turboprop ISR aircraft, but the first of the jets are not currently expected to enter service until 2027 at the earliest. In addition, serious questions remain about what the future ME-11B fleet will ultimately offer, not least of which due to its planned size. The service has said in the past that it could buy at least 12 of the jets, and potentially as many as 14 to 16. However, reports earlier this month, citing an internal Army memo, say that number could be slashed to just six as part of a larger force structure shakeup.
Just how survivable the non-stealthy ME-11Bs would really be during a future high-end fight, such as one in the Pacific against China, remains an open question, as well. The jets still have to be able to get close enough to designated target areas to bring their sensors to bear, and available line of sight could be a further limiting factor. The aircraft also have to remain on station for at least some amount of time to gather useful data, making them a prime target. The air defense threat ecosystem continues to evolve and expand, and the U.S. Air Force has said that it could include anti-air missiles with ranges of up to 1,000 miles by 2050.
In the meantime, there continues to be significant demand across the U.S. military for aerial ISR support in hotspots where the airspace is largely permissive, especially in Africa and Latin America. There are also a variety of peacetime surveillance requirements, including on the Korean Peninsula and in Europe. Army turboprop surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft have historically played a major role in meeting these kinds of demands.
Aerial ISR has been a major component of stepped-up U.S. military support along the southern border with Mexico since President Donald Trump took office in January. U.S. Air Force RC-135V/W Rivet Joints and U-2 Dragon Ladies, and U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidons – all far higher-end platforms than the Army's turboprop ISR fleets – along with MQ-9 Reaper and RQ-4 Global Hawk drones, have been employed on border surveillance missions in recent months.
The Army's aerial ISR divestments also come at a time when U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) is moving to cut its own fleets of U-28A Draco and MC-12-type turboprop ISR aircraft. SOCOM does plan to leverage the resources freed up by retiring the U-28As and the MC-12s to help field its new OA-1K Skyraider IIs, but has stressed it does not see the new light attack aircraft as direct replacements for the ISR types. This has raised separate questions about ISR capability and capacity gaps, which the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a Congressional watchdog, is now notably scrutinizing.
It is worth noting that the Army's future aerial ISR vision includes a mix of other capabilities beyond crewed fixed-wing aircraft, including high-altitude balloons and very high-flying drones with extreme endurance. The service has also been investing in new types of smaller and shorter-ranged drones for more localized surveillance and reconnaissance tasks. There is also a broader move across the U.S. military to push a variety of surveillance and reconnaissance functions that have traditionally been performed by aircraft into space, with a number of at least prototype systems already in orbit.
As has been done for years, the Army could use contractors to fill any new capacity gaps. Private companies that provide aerial ISR services might seek to acquire the aircraft the Army is now divesting. The planes could also go to other U.S. government agencies, such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which operate similar types.
'The Army will scale capability solutions to match the threats and demands voiced by Army and Joint Force commanders around the world. Today we are demonstrating the ability to generate transformational sensing capability at a volume and velocity that holds our adversaries at-risk anywhere in the world, in any weather, any time,' Army ISR Task Force Director Evans also told TWZ in response to a question about concerns about future ISR capacity gaps. 'The way we deliver on that commitment in the coming years may evolve, but our approach will always remain THREAT informed and SOLDIER-focused. We will ruthlessly prioritize investments to ensure that our Soldiers have this level of support when they need it most. Lethality starts with Intelligence, and the future of our nation depends on it.'
If nothing else, the Army is now on track to see an end to an era by the close of this year with the complete retirement of its remaining RC-12X, MC-12S, and EO-5C aircraft.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Military parades are as American as apple strudel
Military parades are as American as apple strudel

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Military parades are as American as apple strudel

When President Donald Trump announced there would be a major military parade in Washington, D.C. on June 14, my first reaction was: What? On Flag Day? He explained it was to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. That made more sense, especially when it was further pointed out that it coincided with his own 79th birthday. Trump had long admired the pomp and spectacle of large military parades like France's Bastille Day rollout. In his first term he proposed such a full-scale military parade for July 4, 2018. That proposal was abandoned when the D.C. government and the Army pushed back over the estimated high cost and potential damage tanks would do to the streets. This time, those objections were overcome when the Army promised to lay heavy metal plates on the streets and pay for any damage incurred. Still, the Defense Department estimates the parade could cost up to $45 million. Some 6,700 troops are being flown in from around the country to participate in the parade. The procession of over 150 vehicles will include 28 Abrams tanks weighing 140,000 pounds each. Fifty aircraft will be flying overhead along with a parachute jump by the Army's Golden Knights team. Wars and military parades are as old as civilization itself, and America is no different in wanting to celebrate and show off its military might. I call such parades, 'as American as apple strudel,' because our first army was trained in musket drills at Valley Forge by a Prussian military officer, Baron von Steuben. He trained 100 of the elite officers, who in turn trained another 100, until our entire army was trained. Precision military drills are the basis of military parades. They instill in troops the important values of discipline, cooperation and precision that forge unit cohesion on the battlefield. There is a certain ambivalence in America about flaunting our military might through ostentatious displays of our power in parades. That is not to say we have been reluctant to celebrate our military victories in parades honoring and thanking our troops for their successes and sacrifices. In the early days of the republic, it was quite common for the president to review the troops in parades every Fourth of July. That practice ended with President James Polk in 1845. However, in 1865 perhaps the most impressive military parade in U.S. history was held. Called the Grand Review of the Armies, it was held on May 23 and 24 after President Andrew Johnson declared an end to the Civil War on May 10. The returning Union soldiers marched 12 abreast, stretching back seven miles. In 1942 and 1946 there were two huge military parades in New York City marking U.S. entry and victory in World War II. Beginning with President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first and second inaugurals in 1953 and 1957, impressive military parades were staged, at least implicitly honoring 'Ike's' heroic military leadership in World War II. In 1963, President John F. Kennedy's inauguration was matched by another military parade that again implicitly recognized his heroic deeds in World War II, but also served as a muscle-flexing display at the peak of the Cold War. The 1991 military parade marking victory in the Persian Gulf War was the last of its kind. There had been nothing comparable after the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The Army's 250th celebration will be coupled with next year's 250th commemoration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4. Lest there be any concern about the Navy and Marines' 250th birthday commemorations this fall, elaborate arrangements are being made for each in Philadelphia. I was raised in small towns in the Midwest, where there were no military parades — only annual celebrations on Labor Day of the towns themselves. In one town it was called 'Homecoming Day,' in another, 'Old Settlers' Day,' but the parades were the same, led by a military color guard followed by dozens of gaily decorated floats and interspersed with high school bands from the area. A street carnival and evening stage performances rounded-out the holiday. I can identify most with what Erma Bombeck is supposed to have said about July 4 celebrations: 'You have to love a nation that celebrates its independence every July 4, not with a parade of guns, tanks, and soldiers who file by the White House in a show of strength and muscle, but with family picnics where kids throw Frisbees, the potato salad gets iffy, and the flies die from happiness. You may think you have overeaten, but it is patriotism.' Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year staff veteran of Congress, culminating as chief-of-staff of the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).

Army meets recruiting goal 4 months early under Trump admin
Army meets recruiting goal 4 months early under Trump admin

American Military News

time2 hours ago

  • American Military News

Army meets recruiting goal 4 months early under Trump admin

The U.S. Army announced on Tuesday that it has reached its Fiscal Year 2025 recruiting goals for active-duty soldiers by recruiting over 61,000 new soldiers four months early under President Donald Trump's administration. In a Tuesday press release, the U.S. Army Public Affairs said the military service had successfully met its recruiting goals for this year by signing contracts with 'more than 61,000 future Soldiers' four months before the end of Fiscal Year 2025. Officials explained that meeting the Army's recruitment goals early demonstrates a 'significant turning point for the Army' and points toward a 'renewed sense of patriotism and purpose among America's youth.' 'I'm incredibly proud of our U.S. Army recruiters and drill sergeants,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said. 'Their colossal efforts and dedication to duty helped the U.S. Army accomplish our FY25 annual recruiting goal a full four months ahead of schedule.' The U.S. Army explained that its recruitment goal for Fiscal Year 2025 was 10% higher than Fiscal Year 2024's goal of 55,000 new Army recruits. Officials noted in Tuesday's press release that the Army's ability to meet a higher recruitment goal this year signifies a 'surge in interest and enthusiasm for Army service.' The Army added that the average number of contracts signed per day this year has surpassed last year's numbers by 'as much as 56%' in the same period. READ MORE: Over $6 billion spent on US military recruitment, retention in 3 years: Report 'I want to thank the commander in chief, President Trump, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth for their decisive leadership and support in equipping, training and supporting these future Soldiers as they face a world of global uncertainty and complex threats,' Driscoll stated. 'Putting Soldiers first is having a tangible impact and shows that young people across our country want to be part of the most lethal land fighting force the world has ever seen.' According to Army Times, the Army exceeded its recruitment goal by roughly 11,000 recruits last year after failing to reach its recruitment goals for two years. The outlet noted that the Army only succeeded in securing 44,901 recruits in 2022 with a goal of 60,000 recruits and only 54,000 recruits in 2023 with a goal of 65,000 recruits. Highlighting the future service of the 61,000 new recruits for Fiscal Year 2025, the Army said, 'These 61,000 men and women, who are choosing to serve their nation, represent the best of America. As the Army approaches its 250th birthday on June 14, 2025, these future Soldiers will carry forward a legacy of honor, courage and service spanning two and a half centuries.'

Opinion - Ukraine takes the war to Russia — have the nukes launched yet?
Opinion - Ukraine takes the war to Russia — have the nukes launched yet?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Ukraine takes the war to Russia — have the nukes launched yet?

If you believe Russia's apologists, then Ukraine, hot off bold strikes on military airfields spanning Russia and the Kerch Strait Bridge in Crimea, is recklessly risking giving Russian President Vladimir Putin a reason to go nuclear. The notion is utter nonsense. Ukraine, by taking the war to Russia, is just embracing a U.S. Army saying: 'Keep on keeping on.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not provoking World War III but defending his country by striking legitimate Russian targets and weapons systems. In doing so, Zelensky is reminding the West that Ukraine remains resilient. They are not losing; they are very much still in the game. As Clifford D. May, founder and president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies described the situation, 'Those who have been saying Putin is winning are wrong. The Ukrainians are holding their own, even though the support they've been receiving from the United States and other free nations has been woefully insufficient.' Ukraine keeps on keeping on. Adversity brings that out of you. This was evident early in the war when Zelensky refused to be evacuated from Kyiv by the U.S., instead stating, 'The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.' Despite Vice President J.D. Vance and President Trump's public chiding of Zelensky in February, telling him 'you don't have the cards,' he did have them. He had been holding them close to the vest for nearly a year. On Sunday, Zelensky's special operators delivered two stunning blows to the Kremlin. Ukrainian attack drones, concealed in Russian cargo trucks, destroyed 34 percent of the Russian strategic bomber fleet stationed at four airbases: Belaya, Olenya, Dyagilevo, and Ivanovo. All of these were launch sites for cruise missile attacks against Ukrainian cities. Then on Tuesday, the Security Service of Ukraine announced it had struck the Russian Kerch Strait Bridge, which connects Crimea to Russia's Krasnodar Krai region. 'The underwater supports of the piers were severely damaged at the bottom level — 1,100 kg of explosives in TNT equivalent contributed to this,' the service announced. 'In fact, the bridge is in a state of emergency.' The bridge has since reopened, but the message was delivered and received. Zelensky has no intention of capitulating to the Kremlin. Nor is Ukraine going to allow Russia's nuclear bluffing to deter it. Team Trump needs to be sending the same message and not leaving Europe to go it alone. On Tuesday, the Pentagon abruptly announced that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth would neither attend nor remotely participate in the 57-member Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting in Brussels. The group has collectively provided Ukraine with over $126 billion in weapons and military assistance, including $66.5 billion from the U.S. Then later on Tuesday, retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. and Special Envoy Keith Kellogg fell back on familiar language and concerns of nuclear escalation stating, 'I'm telling you the risk levels are going way up. When you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their nuclear triad, that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side's going to do.' But Ukraine did not strike Russia's nuclear triad or threaten their national survival. They struck a cruise missile delivery system that was deliberately targeting Ukrainian civilians from airfields deep within the Russian interior where Putin thought they were secure. Why is it that when Russia attacks Ukraine's 'national survival system' that Kyiv cannot strike back? Ukraine entrusted its 'national survival system' to the signatories of the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 when they gave up their nuclear weapons. Russia attacked their vulnerability, Ukraine responded in kind. Russia found out 'what the other side was going to do' and now the Kremlin is crying foul. Hopefully, Trump pushed back against Moscow's nuclear bluffing during his Wednesday telephone call with Putin. Russia continues to attack while Ukraine continues to defend their country. Innovation, ingenuity, and the guts to try are leveling the playing field much to Putin's displeasure. This war cannot be contained to just within the Ukrainian borders. The Biden administration already tried that with HIMARS munitions. Sanctuary only affords opportunity for the Kremlin despite Ukraine always finding a way to overcome adversity. As the White House militarily distances itself from Ukraine and the European theater in favor of the Indo-Pacific theater, Europe is rallying to the Ukrainian cause under the leadership of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. London and Brussels understand Ukraine is only the tip of the iceberg and that more robust investment in their defense is critical to their security. As Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates cautioned, 'My own view, having dealt with him and having spent most of my life working on Russia and the Soviet Union, is Putin feels that he has a destiny to recreate the Russian Empire… As my old mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski once said, without Ukraine, there can be no Russian Empire.' Last week, retired U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus warned that Putin will invade a NATO country if he is successful in Ukraine. He went on to say that Russia could launch an incursion into a Baltic state — Lithuania being most at risk — to test Western resolve or as a precursor to a wider Russian offensive. Last month, Russian forces began to reoccupy and fortify military bases along the border with NATO member Finland. The Zapad-2025 joint military exercise with Belarus and Russia is a potential rehearsal for an invasion scenario in the Suwałki Gap — a 40 mile wide stretch of border between Poland and Lithuania that separates Russian-controlled Kaliningrad from Belarus. If Russia were to occupy the gap, it would divide and isolate the Baltic States from NATO. Germany recognized the threat, and deployed a tank brigade to Lithuania in May. Russia is not interested in a peaceful outcome in Ukraine. On Tuesday, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev wrote on Telegram that the point of holding peace talks with Ukraine was to ensure a swift and complete Russian victory. 'Our Army is pushing forward and will continue to advance,' he wrote. 'Everything that needs to be blown up will be blown up, and those who must be eliminated will be.' Zelensky and his army are in the way of Putin's desired destiny. Europe is finally coming around to recognizing that fact. No amount of Russian whining and bluffing about Ukraine provoking a nuclear war should stop London and Brussels from ensuring Zelensky soundly defeats Putin in Ukraine. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer. Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store