
Buying a home — with a little help from friends
Advertisement
It's tough to buy a home with someone who's unrelated to you — a practice known as copurchasing. Most banks are reluctant to broker mortgages to unmarried people looking to buy together, and it's still a relatively rare occurrence. But a new City of Boston program aims to change that.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In her recent State Of The City address, Mayor Michelle Wu unveiled
Copurchasing isn't completely novel. In the 1920s, working-class Jewish New Yorkers joined forces to
Advertisement
But owning a home with friends isn't necessarily the same thing as living in a co-op. Some co-ops encourage shared social events like dinners and meetings, while others have a more intentional theme — such as the
Either way, you're sharing not just the home-buying costs but the oft-overlooked hassles of owning a home. If the furnace breaks or if a tree falls on your roof, you all are responsible. But that also means you don't have to fix it alone.
Evan Seitz co-owns a large house in Roslindale with five friends. The idea of buying together arose when Seitz and some of his future co-owners were housemates at the Unitarian Universalist Lucy Stone Cooperative in Roxbury, where residents cook, clean, and shop together, sometimes several times a week. They were feeling burned out by the obligations of that co-op living style. 'We sort of discovered that we were all planning on leaving,' Seitz says. . Co-ownership of a house, split equally, struck them as an ideal balance between affording Boston housing prices, transitioning to a more laid-back living situation, and holding on to some of the community benefits they enjoyed at the Lucy Stone Cooperative.
But like most people trying to co-own a house, they had trouble getting a mortgage from a bank. 'We got lucky and were able to secure a private mortgage through my housemate's mom, who had this lump sum of money from her late partner's life insurance and was happy to loan it to us,' Seitz says.
Advertisement
Margaret Rosewitz, a book production coordinator, ran into a similar hurdle while trying to buy a multiunit property with her sister and a close friend in Dorchester. 'The concept of a mortgage with three people seemed to be confusing for our broker,' Rosewitz says. 'But on the other hand, our real estate agent was really excited about the idea because it felt novel at the time. He had never done anything like this before.'
After closing on a triple-decker in Codman Square, the three were introduced to Ingram-Bee, the Jamaica Plain real estate agent who has channeled her interest in co-ownership into offering free informational seminars for aspiring homebuyers. She uses success stories like Rosewitz's in her sessions as tangible examples of what unrelated buyers should anticipate as they house-hunt.
'I break it down into three categories,' Ingram-Bee says. 'There are the managerial questions such as, do you mostly want your own spaces or will there be more communal spaces? The financial side is often the most important; you need to have candid, in-depth conversations about your incomes, debts, credit scores, and money habits.' And just as crucial, according to Ingram-Bee, is the legal structure of co-ownership agreements. This includes provisions for scenarios like one co-owner deciding to move and sell their share of the property.
One of the people living with Seitz decided to move on three years after they bought the house together. 'We had collectively planned for something like this by setting aside money that would allow the rest of us to buy the other person's share,' Seitz says.
Advertisement
As an aspiring copurchaser myself, I am currently renting with a few friends and testing our compatibility. I can attest that until lately, learning the basics of cobuying a home in Boston was a matter of asking around. I was introduced to Seitz and Ingram-Bee through friends, and Ingram-Bee connected me to Rosewitz.
The City of Boston's new program aims to make things more official. The program includes interest-deferred loans to help copurchasers cover down payments and closing costs. Households earning up to 100 percent of the area's median income can secure up to $50,000 in interest-deferred loans (payable upon sale, transfer, or refinancing of one's property share), while those making up to 135 percent can receive up to $35,000.
Paige Roosa, the director of the mayor's Housing Innovation Lab and the architect of the CoPurchasing Housing Pilot program, says that copurchasing with individuals whose incomes exceed the income limits would not prevent an eligible applicant from receiving the financial assistance themselves.
The main problem that this program may help to solve for many aspiring home owners is the astronomical cost of Boston's real estate. 'We had been trying to figure out how to address the lack of supply of homes on the private market that are affordable to the kind of folks that can use our funding,' Roosa says. Supporting aspiring co-owners, as Roosa puts it, is a creative way for Boston to unlock more of the city's market-rate housing for more people.
Not that long ago, many of us temporarily experienced living in the same house with extended family and friends. The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was a remarkable moment when millions chose to live together, for social support, safety, and financial reasons. During that winter, I
Advertisement
In late 2020, those unanswered questions were major roadblocks. Now, Boston's new program is bringing the prospect of home ownership within reach for many more people.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
How Zohran Mamdani's promises would destroy working-class New York
Zohran Mamdani, the Queens assemblyman and mayoral candidate, has a plan for winning this month's Democratic primary: He's promising to give away lots of stuff. Unfortunately for New Yorkers, his success would be extremely costly. Officially, Mamdani claims he's running 'to lower the cost of living for working-class New Yorkers' — but his platform does nothing to make goods and services in the city less expensive. Advertisement Instead, he wants government to collect more taxes and pay for things itself, and to limit what others can charge for them. Among many other pledges, Mamdani aims to 'permanently eliminate the fare' on city buses and to make CUNY 'tuition-free.' These are the cheaper of his giveaways, each with sticker prices just shy of $1 billion. Advertisement Of course, nuking fares or tuition doesn't mean decent service: Many cities that made buses free soon found that they became mobile homeless shelters — and more riders would push up the cost of services, too. A Mayor Mamdani would have to spend more money than planned, provide less service than promised, or both. 3 Michael Mulgrew and Vanecia Wilson speak with NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani at the UFT Annual Meeting in NYC Hilton. Robert Miller This is basic economics — and Mamdani correctly recognizes that winning elections today hinges more than ever on convincing the electorate to ignore such constraints. Advertisement The cost of that ignorance will be massive, and not just because Mamdani's proposed $9 billion tax hike — a steep jump that would inevitably fuel outmigration — isn't nearly enough to cover his spending plans. Worse yet is the extent to which Mamdani risks harming working-class New Yorkers as he attempts to reconfigure the city economy. His bigger-ticket items — a freeze on rents and 'free childcare for every New Yorker' up to age 5, provided at wages 'at parity with public school teachers' — are so enormously extravagant that his campaign hasn't even ballparked their totals or economic impacts. Advertisement Both would be guaranteed to cause major market distortions, with working New Yorkers as collateral damage. 3 Zohran Mamdani speaking at a Tenants' Rights Rally at Riverside Church in New York City on May 15, 2025. Kevin C Downs forThe New York Post Freezing rents on the city's regulated units would do nothing to address the city's fundamental housing problem: its supply shortage. In fact, by discouraging existing tenants from leaving their sweetheart deals, it would make it harder for others to find a place to live. Thousands of rent-stabilized units are currently sitting vacant because the law doesn't let their owners raise rents enough to recoup the costs of improvements. Freeze rents, and even more will follow — idled apartments that aren't available to anyone, at any price. And Mamdani's freeze would bring poorer living conditions for rent-stabilized tenants. Advertisement Owners are already struggling to cover operating costs that rise far faster than allowable rents, so a freeze would immediately limit what they can spend on maintenance or improvements. More buildings would fall into disrepair sooner. New York has seen this play out before. But by Mamdani's analysis, the inevitable apartment bankruptcies and foreclosures aren't a problem but a silver lining. His platform calls for city government, already NYC's biggest landlord, to take an even more active role in the housing market, spending $70 billion of taxpayer money on public housing over the next 10 years. 3 Zohran Mamdani, New York State Assemblyman and mayoral candidate for New York City, speaks at an emergency rally held by the Working Families Party to criticize the Trump administration, after ICE agents arrested Ras Baraka, mayor of Newark and New Jersey Democratic candidate for governor, at Foley Square in New York, New York, May 10, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement That's a terrible idea — even leftist Public Advocate Jumaane Williams admits City Hall is 'the worst overall landlord for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers.' Yet Mamdani's rhetoric regarding child care deserves the most scrutiny. Not only would it put the biggest dent on the city's operating budget of all his proposals, it would cause tremendous distortion in other parts of the economy — even if his program fails. Advertisement Making child care 'free,' and bumping up provider pay to the starting rate of a New York City schoolteacher (about $1,500 per week), would pit employers big and small against their city government. Workers across the economy would expect unrealistic pay parity, with hospitals and other health-care firms taking the worst of it. Regardless of how many families actually get free care — and it won't be all of them — Mamdani's plan is guaranteed to cause disruptions in the private child-care market along the way. Then again, as in housing, reducing the role of private providers might be his socialist point. Advertisement His separate push for a $30-per-hour minimum wage wouldn't help New Yorkers, either: Besides encouraging the underground economy, it would pressure employers to automate and outsource. Those who want to put their foot on the economic ladder would find themselves out of luck — and on the public-assistance rolls. Mamdani is brushing aside centuries of economic truth, asking voters to ignore mismatches between the city's abilities and means and the havoc he would cause along the way. His strategy — for the next four weeks, if not the next four years — was summarized neatly by New York's own George Costanza. 'Jerry, just remember,' George assures Jerry Seinfeld in a memorable 1995 episode: 'It's not a lie if you believe it.' Ken Girardin is a fellow of the Manhattan Institute.


Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Iran has amassed even more near weapons-grade uranium, UN watchdog says
VIENNA — Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels, a confidential report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog said Saturday. In a separate report, the agency called on Tehran to urgently change course and comply with its years-long probe. The report comes at a sensitive time, as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to reach a deal with Tehran to limit its nuclear program. The two sides have held several rounds of talks, so far without agreement. The report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency — which was seen by The Associated Press — says that as of May 17, Iran has amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. That's an increase of 133.8 kilograms (294.9 pounds) — or almost 50% — since the IAEA's last report in February. The 60% enriched material is a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. A report in February put this stockpile level at 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds). There was no immediate comment from Tehran on the new IAEA report. The IAEA report raised a stern warning, saying that Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material' — something the agency said was of 'serious concern.' Approximately 42 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic bomb, if enriched further to 90%, according to the watchdog. The IAEA report, a quarterly, also estimated that as of May 17, Iran's overall stockpile of enriched uranium — which includes uranium enriched to lower levels — stood at 9,247.6 kilograms (20,387.4 pounds). That's an increase of 953.2 kilograms (2,101.4 pounds) since February's report. Iran has maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but the IAEA chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make 'several' nuclear bombs if it chose to do so. Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. U.S. intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program, but has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so.' Israel said Saturday's report was a clear warning sign that 'Iran is totally determined to complete its nuclear weapons program,' according to a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. It said IAEA's report 'strongly reinforces what Israel has been saying for years — the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is not peaceful.' It also added that Iran's level of enrichment 'has no civilian justification whatsoever' and appealed on the international community to 'act now to stop Iran.' It is rare for Netanyahu to make statements on Saturday, the Jewish day of rest, underlying the urgency with which he sees the matter. Grossi said Saturday that he 'reiterates his urgent call upon Iran to cooperate fully and effectively' with the IAEA's years long investigation into uranium traces discovered at several sites in Iran. The IAEA also circulated to member states on Saturday a second, 22-page confidential report, also seen by the AP, that Grossi was asked to produce following a resolution passed by the 35-member IAEA Board of Governors last November. In this so-called 'comprehensive report,' the IAEA said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has 'been less than satisfactory' when it comes to uranium traces discovered by IAEA inspectors at several locations in Iran that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces discovered by the IAEA could provide evidence that Iran had a secret military nuclear program until 2003. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018 after Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this but in 2019 IAEA inspectors detected the presence of manmade uranium particles there. After initially blocking IAEA access, inspectors were able to collect samples in 2020 from two other locations where they also detected the presence of manmade uranium particles. The three locations became known as Turquzabad, Varamin, and Marivan. A fourth undeclared location named as Lavisan-Shian is also part of the IAEA probe but IAEA inspectors never visited the site because it was razed and demolished by Iran after 2003. In Saturday's comprehensive report, the IAEA says that the 'lack of answers and clarifications provided by Iran' to questions the watchdog had regarding Lavisan-Shian, Varamin and Marivan 'has led the agency to conclude that these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear program carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material.' Saturday's comprehensive report could be a basis for possible further steps by European nations, leading to a potential escalation in tensions between Iran and the West. European countries could move to trigger snap-back sanctions against Iran that were lifted under the original 2015 nuclear deal ahead of October, when the deal formally expires. On Thursday, senior Iranian officials dismissed speculation about an imminent nuclear deal with the United States, emphasizing that any agreement must fully lift sanctions and allow the country's nuclear program to continue. The comments came a day after Trump said he has told Netanyahu to hold off on striking Iran to give the U.S. administration more time to push for a new deal with Tehran. Trump said on Friday that he still thinks a deal could be completed in the 'not too distant future.' 'They don't want to be blown up. They would rather make a deal,' Trump said of Iran. He added, 'That would be a great thing that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East.'


Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Iran has amassed even more near weapons-grade uranium, UN watchdog says
Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels, a confidential report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog said Saturday. In a separate report, the agency called on Tehran to urgently change course and comply with its years-long probe. The report comes at a sensitive time, as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to reach a deal with Tehran to limit its nuclear program. The two sides have held several rounds of talks, so far without agreement. The report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency — which was seen by The Associated Press — says that as of May 17, Iran has amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. That's an increase of 133.8 kilograms (294.9 pounds) — or almost 50% — since the IAEA's last report in February. The 60% enriched material is a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. A report in February put this stockpile level at 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds). There was no immediate comment from Tehran on the new IAEA report. The IAEA report raised a stern warning, saying that Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material' — something the agency said was of 'serious concern.' Approximately 42 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic bomb, if enriched further to 90%, according to the watchdog. The IAEA report, a quarterly, also estimated that as of May 17, Iran's overall stockpile of enriched uranium — which includes uranium enriched to lower levels — stood at 9,247.6 kilograms (20,387.4 pounds). That's an increase of 953.2 kilograms (2,101.4 pounds) since February's report. Iran has maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but the IAEA chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make 'several' nuclear bombs if it chose to do so. Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. U.S. intelligence agencies assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program, but has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so.' Israel said Saturday's report was a clear warning sign that 'Iran is totally determined to complete its nuclear weapons program,' according to a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. It said IAEA's report 'strongly reinforces what Israel has been saying for years — the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is not peaceful.' It also added that Iran's level of enrichment 'has no civilian justification whatsoever' and appealed on the international community to 'act now to stop Iran.' It is rare for Netanyahu to make statements on Saturday, the Jewish day of rest, underlying the urgency with which he sees the matter. Grossi said Saturday that he 'reiterates his urgent call upon Iran to cooperate fully and effectively' with the IAEA's years long investigation into uranium traces discovered at several sites in Iran. The IAEA also circulated to member states on Saturday a second, 22-page confidential report, also seen by the AP, that Grossi was asked to produce following a resolution passed by the 35-member IAEA Board of Governors last November. In this so-called 'comprehensive report,' the IAEA said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has 'been less than satisfactory' when it comes to uranium traces discovered by IAEA inspectors at several locations in Iran that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces discovered by the IAEA could provide evidence that Iran had a secret military nuclear program until 2003. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018 after Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning denied this but in 2019 IAEA inspectors detected the presence of manmade uranium particles there. After initially blocking IAEA access, inspectors were able to collect samples in 2020 from two other locations where they also detected the presence of manmade uranium particles. The three locations became known as Turquzabad, Varamin, and Marivan. A fourth undeclared location named as Lavisan-Shian is also part of the IAEA probe but IAEA inspectors never visited the site because it was razed and demolished by Iran after 2003. In Saturday's comprehensive report, the IAEA says that the 'lack of answers and clarifications provided by Iran' to questions the watchdog had regarding Lavisan-Shian, Varamin and Marivan 'has led the agency to conclude that these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear program carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material.' Saturday's comprehensive report could be a basis for possible further steps by European nations, leading to a potential escalation in tensions between Iran and the West. European countries could move to trigger snap-back sanctions against Iran that were lifted under the original 2015 nuclear deal ahead of October, when the deal formally expires. On Thursday, senior Iranian officials dismissed speculation about an imminent nuclear deal with the United States, emphasizing that any agreement must fully lift sanctions and allow the country's nuclear program to continue. The comments came a day after Trump said he has told Netanyahu to hold off on striking Iran to give the U.S. administration more time to push for a new deal with Tehran. Trump said on Friday that he still thinks a deal could be completed in the 'not too distant future.' 'They don't want to be blown up. They would rather make a deal,' Trump said of Iran. He added, 'That would be a great thing that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East.'