New building rules could still require ‘bat tunnels and fish discos'
New building rules might still require developers to set up 'bat tunnels and fish discos', the Conservative shadow housing secretary has warned.
Kevin Hollinrake suggested that nature restoration proposals in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill risked delaying builders working on new homes and infrastructure.
The Buckinghamshire 'bat tunnel' at Sheephouse Wood, a 900 metre-long structure designed to stop bats from colliding with high-speed trains on the HS2 railway between London and Birmingham, has cost more than £100 million.
An 'acoustic fish deterrent' in the Bristol Channel, to keep fish away from a nuclear reactor cooling system at the Hinkley Point C power station in Somerset, has previously been dubbed a 'fish disco'.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner described the Buckinghamshire structure as 'an outrage' on Monday as she introduced the Bill, and Labour MP Chris Curtis told the Commons that the existing planning system was 'indefensible'.
The Bill, if agreed to, would give Natural England the power to set up environmental delivery plans (EDPs) to look at natural features which could be negatively affected by building, and set out conservation measures.
They would also set out how much developers must pay as part of a 'nature restoration levy' to cover these measures.
At the despatch box, Mr Hollinrake asked: 'Are Natural England sufficiently resourced to carry out their work? How long will it be before these plans are in place?
'Have the Government taken into account the inevitable delays due to judicial reviews of the EDPs?'
Ministers can only adopt EDPs if they pass an 'overall improvement test', if the conservation measures outweigh the 'negative effect' of building.
The Conservative former minister suggested that if an EDP fails this test, 'then the system won't apply and the developer will still need to build those bat tunnels and fish discos'.
Ms Rayner, who is the Housing Secretary, had earlier said: 'I'm sure it's a shared goal by all members across this house, that we want to improve outcomes for nature.
'But I'm also confident that no one here thinks the system is working well. Any set of rules that results in a £100 million bat tunnel is an outrage.
'I know those on the benches opposite agree, but they were determined to take a clumsy approach to fix nutrient neutrality that risked ripping up environmental protections and would not have worked.'
Mr Curtis, the MP for Milton Keynes North in Buckinghamshire, described plans for a nature recovery fund as a 'policy masterstroke'.
He told the Commons: 'What is most shameful about our current setup of nature legislation including the habitats regulation is not just that it stops us from building the homes and infrastructure our country needs and damages our economy in the meantime.
'It's that it doesn't even work on its own terms. Britain is still … one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world.'
Mr Curtis said 'the money we force builders to pay for nature projects isn't being spent in the most efficient way'.
Turning to the 'infamous bat tunnel', the MP said: 'It cost us more than £120 million to protect a tiny proportion of bats, all while critical infrastructure projects were delayed or cancelled.
'Imagine what we could have done for nature not just with that money but with the extra money that would have been provided to our economy by not stalling that project for so long.
'However, while the nature recovery fund is a welcome step forward, we must ensure it works. It is heavily reliant on Natural England bringing forward workable delivery plans in a timely fashion.'
Conservative former environment secretary Steve Barclay later said Mr Curtis had created a 'strange paradox to criticise' the 'bat tunnel', while 'also then supporting giving Natural England more powers to make similar decisions moving forward'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
12 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
South Wales Argus
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
South Wales Guardian
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
