logo
New bill to end employers' ‘boycott' of pay deals tabled by Labour Party

New bill to end employers' ‘boycott' of pay deals tabled by Labour Party

The Labour Party said its new bill would strengthen Joint Labour Committees.
These committees, which include employer and union representatives, set legally binding employment conditions and rates of pay for workers in different sectors including childcare, contract cleaning and security.
Labour politicians said they wanted to address an 'ongoing employer boycott' in some industries. They claim this was leaving 'good employers' at a disadvantage and causing a 'race to the bottom'.
The party said the bill provided a mechanism to get around an employer 'boycott' and would ensure fair wages were paid in sectors, including home care, retail and hospitality.
TD George Lawlor, the party's enterprise, tourism and employment spokesperson, said the process for setting up a Joint Labour Committee required the co-operation of all parties, so the employer side could exercise a veto.
He said the Labour bill aimed to clear this 'impasse'. It would allow the Labour Court to appoint members to a committee if any party refused to participate, and draw up proposals.
Mr Lawlor said a collective bargaining approach was best.
'It is a much better process because you're not dealing with individual difficulties,' he said. 'It's much easier to be dealing with a union than individual 'asks' from various different people.
'If your staff are comfortable where they are, it stops them leaving. Staff retention is a big thing and cuts out the cost of training and recruitment. A lot of that is down to the fact that negotiations have taken place as opposed to people having ill will and gripes that flare up sporadically.'
He said if employers could not afford higher pay, it was very much in their interest to attend talks and put their 'cards on the table'.
Introducing the Industrial Relations (Boycott of Joint Labour Committees) bill yesterday, he said the Irish Hotels Federation had taken judicial review proceedings over moves to reconstitute a Joint Labour Committee.
Mr Lawlor said the fact that there was non-co-operation by an employer representative body in the committee system meant the case was struck out, so there was essentially an employers' veto.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community
TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community

Trinity College Dublin 's decision to boycott Israeli institutions and universities will 'detrimentally impact' the college's global standing, particularly in the US, the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland has warned. In an open letter to the chair of TCD's board Paul Farrell, Maurice Cohen, a senior figure in Ireland's Jewish community, accused the university of a 'blatant violation' of the Equal Status Acts. In the letter, which was co-written with former minister for justice Alan Shatter , Mr Cohen also accused Trinity of violations of the Universities Act and relevant EU regulations, including those governing the Erasmus student exchange programme Trinity's board voted on Wednesday to cut all ties with Israeli universities and companies based in Israel over the conflict in Gaza in what is the first move by an Irish university to agree on the full divestment of interests in Israeli companies. READ MORE The boycott includes ending all academic and research collaborations and Erasmus student exchange programmes with Israeli universities. Trinity has two Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities - one with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends next month, and the other with Bar Ilan University, which ends in July 2026. Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter said in their letter that boycotting Israeli academics, a majority of whom are Jewish and who include prominent critics of the Israeli government, amounts to 'anti-Semitism', according to the definition laid out by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. 'It also constitutes discrimination against non-Jewish Israeli academics, of whom there are many in Israel's universities and research bodies,' they wrote. They argued that by boycotting Israeli academics and Israeli research institutions, Trinity is 'holding them collectively responsible for actions of the Israeli state'. The letter also criticised Trinity's board for failing to address 'Iran's sponsorship of the Houthis attacking international shipping and daily targeting Israel with ballistic missiles, its sponsorship of Hamas, Hizbullah and other terrorists groups'. The boycott vote followed a series of meetings of a taskforce set up between staff and student representatives at the university. The meetings were arranged as part of an agreement to end a five-day encampment that was set up on campus in May of last year in protest over the university's ties to Israel. The letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter requests that the board immediately publish the report of the task force and 'cancel its premature decisions'. It also requests that before any further decisions, 'representatives of Ireland's Jewish community should be given the opportunity to consider and respond to the report' alongside Government and relevant departments. The Irish Times contacted Mr Farrell seeking his comment on the letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter. Jenny Maguire, outgoing president of TCD' students' union, called the decision a 'historic win' that 'must be a catalyst for action across this island'.

Calls for media regulator to take a ‘hard line' with Facebook on bogus accounts – ‘They could destroy someone's reputation'
Calls for media regulator to take a ‘hard line' with Facebook on bogus accounts – ‘They could destroy someone's reputation'

Irish Independent

time2 days ago

  • Irish Independent

Calls for media regulator to take a ‘hard line' with Facebook on bogus accounts – ‘They could destroy someone's reputation'

Labour TD George Lawlor is the latest in a whole host of public representatives or public figures to have been targeted with a fake 'cloned' account, bearing his name and photos. The fake account has not made a post publicly yet and, due to Deputy Lawlor making it clear via his own pages that the account was bogus, has only amassed a small number of 'friends' on Facebook. "While the account may not have posted publicly, I have no way of knowing what kind of private messages its sending to people purporting to be me,' the Wexford TD said. "It's just one example of this type of thing. I and several of my friends and colleagues have reported this fake account to Facebook and they refused to take action stating that it wasn't in breach of their standards. It's bizarre.' In a correspondence from the social media giant, Deputy Lawlor was told: 'We didn't remove the profile. To keep our review process as fair as possible, we use the same set of Community Standards to review all reports. "We've taken a look and found that the profile doesn't go against our Community Standards. We understand that this may be upsetting, so we recommend exploring the options available to control what you see.' The TD was then told he could request a review within 180 days if unhappy with the decision not to remove the page. "The notion that pages that are clearly fake are not being actioned by Facebook is indicative of the type of organisation that Facebook has become,' Deputy Lawlor blasted. "God knows what damage a page like this could do to someone's reputation if people were to assume it was the person in the profile picture. "It's high time that Coimisiún na Meán took a hard line on this. People's reputations can be irreparably tarnished as a result of fake profiles set up by people with nothing better to do.'

‘Scunnered' Scottish voters go to the polls in crucial byelection
‘Scunnered' Scottish voters go to the polls in crucial byelection

Irish Times

time2 days ago

  • Irish Times

‘Scunnered' Scottish voters go to the polls in crucial byelection

When Scottish broadcaster STV recently hit the streets of Hamilton to gauge the mood of voters in advance of Thursday's crucial byelection, its political editor Colin Mackay returned with a pithy one-word verdict. Locals, he said, were 'scunnered' with politics. This general mood of disdain towards the establishment parties has opened the door to a once-unthinkable proposition: Reform UK , Nigel Farage 's upstart English nationalist outfit, is now a serious contender in a constituency vote in Scotland. Reform is still thought unlikely to win this week's byelection for the Holyrood devolved parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse; the Scottish National Party (SNP) is the favourite. But the mere fact that Reform is even capable of mounting a serious challenge illustrates the degree to which the sands are shifting in UK politics. Polling guru John Curtice, a professor at Strathclyde University, believes the SNP should prevail in the byelection, but with potentially only a third of the vote. Meanwhile, Labour 's worst nightmare would be if Reform were to push it into third place. READ MORE That would cement a narrative taking hold in British politics that says Reform, having conquered the Tories , is now coming for Labour's votes. It could also be a harbinger that the SNP, which looked dead and buried a year ago after the Westminster election, could yet cling to power in Holyrood after next year's devolved parliament elections. With a dearth of constituency polling, Labour sources still hope the party could pull off a surprise win in this week's Hamilton byelection. But for a Labour win to be seen as an outside prospect so soon after its supposed Scottish comeback last year shows just how its fortunes have dipped since winning power in Westminster. This week's byelection is in an area of Lanarkshire to the southeast of Glasgow. It was called following the death in March of the SNP's Christina McKelvie, who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. A large part of the devolved parliament constituency overlaps with the Westminster constituency of Labour MP Imogen Walker. She is married to Irish man Morgan McSweeney, UK prime minister Keir Starmer 's top adviser. That would make it even more embarrassing for the party were Reform to push it into third spot. The area includes most of the large town of Hamilton, with its relatively depressed centre, as well as the town of Larkhall, a bastion of Glasgow Rangers support that was once tagged the 'most sectarian town in Scotland'. Past articles have focused on the vandalism of anything in the town that was the colour green, synonymous with Irishness; the shopfront of the local Subway was repainted black by the company. Reform has canvassed heavily in Larkhall. [ SNP stages unlikely revival as Scottish Labour support collapses Opens in new window ] The campaign has been nasty at times. Reform, whose candidate is former Tory Ross Lambie, ran an online ad targeting the leader of Scottish Labour, Anas Sarwar. It suggested he would 'prioritise the Pakistani community'. Given Sarwar's ethnic heritage, the jibe was criticised as 'racist' by the other parties. The SNP's candidate is Katy Loudon, who unsuccessfully ran for the party in a Westminster byelection in 2023 and at last July's national poll. Considering Reform is pulling most of its support from Labour and the Tories, it could be third time lucky for Loudon this week as Farage's party further splits the pro-Union vote. Labour surged to more than 35 per cent of the Scottish vote in the Westminster vote last year, but most recent opinion polls for Holyrood show it has given up that ground already. It is now neck-and-neck with Reform at just below 20 per cent, but can blame much of its Scottish woes on the unpopularity of Starmer's UK government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store