&w=3840&q=100)
Ahead of Trump-Putin call, European leaders call for Russia to agree to 30-day ceasefire
Ahead of a call between US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, European leaders have called for Russia to accept the US-endorsed proposal for a 30-day ceasefire. read more
Ahead of a scheduled call between US and Russian leaders, European leaders on Sunday held talks with President Donald Trump and called for Russia to accept a US-endorsed 30-day ceasefire proposal.
The European leaders who held talks with Trump included French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.
Macron said in a post on X that Putin 'must show he wants peace by accepting the 30-day unconditional ceasefire proposed by President Trump and backed by Ukraine and Europe'. Starmer said that they 'discussed the need for an unconditional ceasefire and for President Putin to take peace talks seriously'. He further said that they discussed the use of sanctions if Russia 'failed to engage seriously in a ceasefire and peace talks'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump on Saturday said that he will hold talks with Putin over phone at 10 am ET (7:30 pm India time) on Monday and then call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) countries — France, UK, Germany, and Italy are Nato members.
Zelenskyy and European leaders have stressed that Putin must accept a US-endorsed 30-day ceasefire proposal as part of peace efforts. So far, Putin has rejected all three ceasefire proposals floated by Trump — including the 30-day ceasefire proposal. Zelenskyy has accepted all three proposals.
Zelenskyy meets Vance ahead of Trump's call
Zelenskyy met US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of Pope Leo's inauguration on Sunday. This was their first meeting since Vance shouted at Zelenskyy and berated him at the White House in February.
The meeting was aimed at preparing for a call between Trump and Zelenskyy on Monday, according to Guardian.
Zelenskyy described the meeting as 'good' and said, 'I reaffirmed that Ukraine is ready to be engaged in real diplomacy and underscored the importance of a full and unconditional ceasefire as soon as possible.'
A senior Ukrainian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Guardian that Zelenskyy and Vance discussed 'the situation on the front, preparations for [Trump's phone conversations on Monday], the possibility of sanctions against Russia if there are no results, a ceasefire'.
Trump's call with Putin comes after direct talks between Ukraine and Russia, the first since 2022, failed to produce a breakthrough in Turkey last week. After Putin refused to join talks and sent a low-level delegation, there were no expectations of a breakthrough.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Putin defies peace efforts with massive drone barrage
In defiance of Trump's peace initiative, Putin launched the largest drone attacks on Ukraine on Sunday.
Russia launched a total of 273 drones on the intervening night of Saturday and Sunday at Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Donetsk regions, according to Ukraine's air force.
Separately, the Ukrainian military intelligence agency HUR has said that Russia is preparing to test-launch an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in yet another show of defiance amid peace efforts. It said that Russia is preparing to test-launch RS-24 Yars missile on Monday evening.
The nuclear missile will carry a non-nuclear training warhead for the purpose of the test-launch, according to the HUR.
The HUR has said that the purpose of the test-launch is to build pressure on Ukraine and its European partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How did things get from bad to worse between Donald Trump and Elon Musk? A step-by-step guide
A no-holds-barred and very public blow-up between the world's richest man and the president of the United States has had social media agog in recent days, with each making serious accusations against the other. And while tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to have cooled the spat somewhat – deleting some of his more incendiary social media posts about Donald Trump – the president still appears to be in no mood to make up, warning Musk of 'very serious consequences' if he backs Democrats at the mid-term elections in 2026. Tensions erupted over Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB). The OBBB proposes extensive tax cuts which could add roughly USD 3 trillion (AUD 4.62 trillion) to the US national debt. After stepping down from his role as advisor to Trump, Musk criticised the OBBB as 'disgusting abomination' that would 'burden America [sic] citizens with crushing unsustainable debt'. Trump returned fire, suggesting 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave […] and he just went CRAZY!'. In a dramatic escalation, Musk responded by calling for Trump's impeachment. Musk also tweeted allegations that Trump was implicated in the Epstein files related to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He has since deleted those tweets. Why has the much-hyped 'bromance' between Musk and Trump suddenly ended? And what was the basis of their alliance in the first place? Like many billionaires, Musk had previously been hesitant to get involved in frontline politics. He says he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020, but claimed in 2021 'I would prefer to stay out of politics'. In early 2024, Musk was still claiming to be politically non-aligned, suggesting he would not donate to either presidential campaign. This apparent neutrality ended following the attempted assassination of Trump at a July 2024 campaign rally, with Musk immediately endorsing Trump. In reality, Musk's conversion to the MAGA movement long predated the assassination attempt. Musk's hyperactive Twitter/X account shows a steady radicalisation. Across 2020-2024, Musk engaged with accounts sharing MAGA and far-right conspiracy theories. These include the antisemitic Great Replacement Theory, and the related South African white genocide conspiracy. Musk's posts also show the obsession with opposing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies characteristic of the MAGA movement. After endorsing Trump, Musk spent USD 288 million (AUD 444 million) supporting Trump's election and appeared at campaign events around the country. Musk's support for Trump was both ideological and pragmatic. From tax cuts to immigration restrictions to opposing DEI, there were clearly many ideological commonalities between Musk and Trump. There were also clear practical benefits for both men. Trump gained the financial backing of the world's wealthiest man. Musk gained not only unparalleled access to the US president, but also a role leading the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Early reporting on the second Trump presidency noted the omnipresence of Musk, who at one point moved into Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to be close to the president. However, observers were sceptical about the potential effectiveness of DOGE, and Musk's claim it would save the government USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion). In the early months of the Trump administration, Musk cut government programmes and employees at a remarkable rate. The USAID programme was particularly hard hit, as were the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As the spending cuts picked up pace, Musk began to attract more controversy. Critics questioned the apparent power wielded by the unelected billionaire. Musk's ties to the far right were also in the spotlight after he appeared to perform two 'Roman salutes', which many observers believed to be a Nazi salute. Musk's apparent rampage through government did not last long. As Trump's executive appointees assumed control of their departments, Musk and DOGE experienced increasing resistance. After a series of fractious cabinet meetings, Trump reportedly reduced the power of DOGE in March. Political attention was also clearly affecting Musk's businesses. The negative publicity has significantly damaged the Tesla brand, leading to declining sales around the world and repeated falls in Telsa's share price. On May 1, Musk announced he would be leaving DOGE, claiming the department had saved the government USD 180 billion (AUD 277 billion) in spending. This number is likely an exaggeration, but still falls well short of his original target. Musk has learned a harsh lesson in politics – that the complexities of government resist simple reform and cannot be easily rolled back in the way a CEO might slim down a company. For Trump, his manoeuvring of Musk appears to be another smart political move. As the public face of DOGE, Musk bore the negative rap for early government cuts and chaos. Having used his money and reputation, Trump dispensed with Musk as he has with so many advisers and appointees before. Musk departed his role in a muted White House ceremony, where Trump thanked him for his service and presented him with a ceremonial 'golden key' to the White House. However, behind the public show of civility, tension was brewing over Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill. Trump and Musk had originally claimed the USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion) in DOGE savings could be used to fund a substantial tax cut. With the efficiency savings not eventuating, Musk worried the OBBB would significantly increase US public debt. Unable to convince Trump or other Republican legislators, Musk took to X, launching a 'Kill the Bill' campaign that ultimately led to his incendiary showdown with Trump. For his part, Trump has belittled Musk, suggesting Musk only opposed the OBBB because it cut subsidies for electric vehicles. Though the subsidy cuts will affect Tesla, Musk has previously supported eliminating subsidies. Musk's anger at the OBBB is more likely driven by the realisation he has been played by Trump. Trump has used and discarded many other powerful figures in his chaotic political career. Musk has more power than most, and might be able to strike back at Trump. Yet, with his public reputation and brands already tarnished, Musk would be ill-advised to pick further fights with Trump and his adoring MAGA movement. Accordingly, Musk has indicated over the weekend he is open to a détente. Tesla investors will no doubt be relieved if Musk makes good on his pledge to step back from politics and return to his businesses. More concerning are the prospects for democracy. With wealth and power continuing to concentrate in a handful of billionaires, voters appear reduced to the role of viewers forced to watch the reality TV drama unfold. Though Trump appears to have won this round of billionaire battle royale, whatever happens next, democracy is the real loser.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
NATO chief urges 400% increase in alliance's air defence
AP image Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday was due to urge a "400 percent increase" in the transatlantic alliance's air and missile defence capacities in response to the threat from Russia. "We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies," Rutte was due to say in a speech to the Chatham House think-tank in London, according to comments quoted in a statement. To maintain credible deterrence and defence, he was to say that Nato needs "a 400 percent increase in air and missile defence". His comments come ahead of a Nato summit in the Netherlands this month where US President Donald Trump is pressuring alliance members to announce a major boost in their military budgets. Trump is pushing Nato members to increase their defence spending to five percent of their gross domestic product (GDP), up from the current target of two percent. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said last week in Brussels that the allies were close to an agreement on the five-percent target, which could be formalised at the summit in The Hague. Nato members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its war against Ukraine in February 2022. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hand Chopper| Free Delivery | COD Available Undo Hand Juicer | Manual Jucier | Free Delivery | COD Available Undo PavBhaji Masher | Free Delivery | COD Available Undo Strech Lids | Free Delivery | COD Available Undo "Danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends," Rutte was to say. "We need a quantum leap in our collective defence... We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full." "Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells." Rutte will visit London next week, where he is expected to welcome Britain's new defence strategy. Britain announced plans last week to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Modern tech and old-school spycraft are redefining war
Deception, infiltration and spycraft have played a major role in warfare at least since the ancient Greeks gifted a wooden horse to the citizens of Troy. In more recent times, such operations rarely had a strategic effect, but the spectacular operations of Israeli intelligence against Hezbollah in Lebanon last fall and of Ukraine against Russia's strategic bomber fleet last weekend have brought them back to the forefront of conflict in the 21st century. Both showed how technological advances—such as drones, communications networks and smaller but more powerful batteries and explosives—can potentially alter the course of a war when they are coupled with superior tradecraft. 'Technology today allows you many new possibilities: There is a larger surface where you can actually detect places where your enemy is vulnerable due to the fact that you can bypass a lot of physical barriers that in the past you couldn't bypass," said Eyal Tsir Cohen, a former senior division director of Israel's Mossad intelligence service. Yet, he added, many of the same technologies can also empower one's opponents. 'It always works both ways—it depends on which side is more sophisticated in exploiting the vulnerabilities of the other side," Cohen said. 'You need good people to work with technology—technology rides on the shoulders of the human factor and not vice versa." Ultimately, success in this rapidly changing world depends on the ability to anticipate the new opportunities—something that big powers such as Russia and perhaps the U.S., can be slow to understand as the very nature of warfare evolves. 'The failure of thinking through the insecurities of the supply chain on the part of Hezbollah and the astounding failure by Russia—those were failures of imagination," said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. The new way of war redresses the balance of power in favor of weaker actors, he added: 'If you can punch above your weight while also having limited costs and blowback to yourself, it can level the playing field." Israel's multistage operation to intercept and booby-trap pagers used by Hezbollah, then the militia commanders' walkie-talkies, followed up by targeted strikes that killed leader Hassan Nasrallah last September and wiped out most of the organization's leadership, reshaped—at least temporarily—the balance of power in the entire Middle East. In that campaign, the result of a yearslong effort to infiltrate Hezbollah and its Iranian sponsors, Israel didn't just dramatically weaken the U.S.-designated terrorist group, its most formidable immediate foe that has lost its stranglehold over Lebanon's government. Israel also helped create conditions for the downfall of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria two months later and the overall shrinking of Iran's regional power. The Ukrainian operation on June 1 to target five Russian airfields that house Moscow's strategic bomber fleet was also the result of a lengthy intelligence operation deep behind enemy lines. The simultaneous attack, launched by drones hidden in prefabricated homes moving on trucks, showed that even the farthest parts of Russia are within Ukraine's reach—and that Ukrainian intelligence is able to operate throughout Russia's surveillance-intensive police state. Four of the five airfields—including one just north of Mongolia—were hit. The fifth drone launcher malfunctioned. Ukraine struck more than 20 aircraft and destroyed at least 12, according to drone footage released by Ukrainian intelligence from the four bases and independent satellite photos. The attack has seriously eroded Russia's ability to launch cruise missiles across Ukraine—one of Moscow's most important advantages in this war. Russia owned some 112 Tu-22 and Tu-95 strategic bombers before Sunday's attack. It is no longer able to manufacture the bombers and as little as half of the fleet was operational. Unlike the Israeli pager operation, which caused a number of civilian casualties in Lebanon, Ukraine didn't strike any Russian civilians in the airfield attack, dubbed Operation Spiderweb. Before the wide-scale killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's overtures to Russia soured many Ukrainians' opinion of Israel, Ukrainian officials openly spoke of their admiration for the daring and the inventiveness of the Israeli intelligence. During a 2022 interview with The Wall Street Journal, Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov made sure to display a book about the Mossad atop his desk. 'Back in the 1970s, when Israel faced an existential threat and was surrounded by much more powerful enemies that plotted its elimination, it survived through asymmetric warfare. Ukraine, too, has to think asymmetrically—it's our only chance to survive," said Ukraine's former defense minister, Andriy Zagorodnyuk, who currently advises the Ukrainian government. Using innovative naval drone tactics, Ukraine had already severely curtailed the ability of the Russian Black Sea Fleet to operate, turning expensive warships into a liability rather than asset for Moscow, he said. If Ukraine similarly disables Russia's strategic aviation, it would be 'an enormous achievement," he added. Despite Sunday's losses, Russia retains the capacity to lob cruise missiles at Ukraine from its strategic bombers and it fired a salvo on Friday morning, hitting Kyiv and several other cities. In another drone attack Friday, Ukraine also blew up the fuel facility at the Engels airfield, one of the main bases of the Russian strategic bomber fleet, and hit the Bryansk airfield. Israel's pager operation against Hezbollah caused a strategic pivot only because it was followed up by additional successes in the following days and weeks, said Nadav Pollak, an Israeli intelligence veteran and a lecturer at Reichman University. 'If there wasn't a cumulative aspect and effect, we wouldn't think of it as strategically successful. One thing needs to happen after another—and if Ukraine continues to hit strategic assets, eventually they will have a cumulative effect as well," he said. No matter how daring, operations behind enemy lines don't necessarily lead to a war-altering outcome. Italian divers, after all, sank or damaged four British ships by riding torpedoes and attaching explosives to the vessels in Alexandria harbor in 1941—but still failed to prevent an Allied victory in North Africa. Creating paranoia and chaos within enemy ranks is often as useful as the actual physical damage. The Israeli strikes against Hezbollah and the assassination of the leader of Hamas in a government guesthouse in Iran made its enemies spend considerable resources on revising plans and procedures and on hunting for possible moles while trying to figure out to what extent they have been compromised, intelligence officials say. The same goes for President Vladimir Putin's Russia, where Ukrainian intelligence was able to mount a complicated operation likely involving a considerable number of agents—who operated under the nose of the FSB security service. In the past, Putin has spoken proudly that his own father was assigned to a 'demolition battalion" of the NKVD, the predecessor to the KGB, at one point dropping into a forest behind enemy lines to blow up a Nazi munition depot. Before joining the KGB, Putin grew up on the spy thrillers produced by the Soviet spy service that dramatized Moscow's sabotage operations against the Third Reich. 'What amazed me most of all is how one man's effort could achieve what whole armies could not," Putin later said in his autobiography. Now, the tables have turned. 'Ukraine is behind enemy lines, using asymmetric warfare to strike back at a nuclear-armed enemy," said Dan Hoffman, a former CIA station chief in Moscow. 'The symbolism is potent because Putin is an intel officer himself and yet he's suffering numerous intel failures." Operation Spiderweb is already reverberating through NATO allies who are studying the innovations Ukraine deployed—including the use of artificial intelligence to help guide the drones to their targets. The operation has shown how Ukraine, with less manpower to draw from, can use a technological edge to increase the potency of its intelligence operations. It turned a Russian advantage—its vastness—into a weakness, by simultaneously striking targets thousands of miles apart. 'In the past, you would have special forces in a small submarine maybe, getting close to a bridge, and planting some explosives," said Tomáš Kopečný, a Czech governmental envoy for Ukraine. 'Now you have drones doing all that. It's the technologization of these operations." 'Every military is learning from this," he said, referring to Operation Spiderweb. 'If you had asked me point-blank, I would have not come up with this." Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at Drew Hinshaw at and Joe Parkinson at
