Myanmar earthquake: Junta fires at Chinese Red Cross convoy
Myanmar's military opened fire at a Chinese Red Cross convoy carrying earthquake relief supplies on Tuesday night. The Ta'ang National Liberation Army, an armed rebel group, said that military troops shot at the convoy of nine vehicles with machine guns in eastern Shan State. The convoy was en route to Mandalay, the hard-hit city near the epicentre of the magnitude-7.7 earthquake that struck last Friday. No injuries have been reported.Myanmar's junta, which said it was investigating the incident, denied shooting directly at the vehicles. It said troops fired shots into the air after the convoy did not stop, despite it being signalled to do so.
China's foreign ministry said on Wednesday that its rescue team and supplies were safe, adding that it hoped "all factions and parties in Myanmar will prioritize earthquake relief efforts".Myanmar has been gripped by violence amid a civil war between the junta - which seized power in a 2021 coup - and ethnic militias and resistance forces across the country.The country's humanitarian crisis has worsened significantly after last week's massive earthquake, which has killed more than 2,700 people, by the government's estimate. The actual death toll is believed to be much higher.Multiple international aid agencies and foreign governments have dispatched personnel and supplies to quake-hit regions.A military spokesperson on Wednesday said troops saw the aid convoy coming from Naungcho township on Tuesday night, with vehicles sporting Chinese stickers and Myanmar number plates, but had not been given prior notice of the vehicles' movement."When we saw the convoy, we stopped it. But they continued. We opened fire from about 200m away, but they didn't stop," he said. "At about 100m away, we fired three shots in the air, after which the vehicles turned back towards Naungcho."China's Blue Sky Rescue Team, which has been providing rescue support in Mandalay, had been given a security cover when they travelled through this route, the spokesperson said.He added that when international agencies want to give aid, they need to inform the Myanmar government.The TNLA, which was escorting the Red Cross convoy, said they had informed the military council about going to Mandalay.After retreating to Naungcho, they would be continuing their journey, the group said in a statement.Rebel groups have unilaterally announced a ceasefire to support earthquake relief efforts. But the military has refused to do the same. Hours after the quake struck on Friday, the junta launched an air strike in Naungcho township that killed seven people.Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing has said that since ethnic armed groups were still "training in preparation for attacks", the military would continue its "necessary defence operations".The UN described the airstrikes as "completely outrageous and unacceptable".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
Israel launches devastating airstrike on Iran's nuclear sites killing top military leaders
The operation raised the potential for all-out war between the countries. Israel launched a brutal attack on the heart of Iran's nucreal and military structure on Friday, June 13, deploying warplanes and drones smuggled into the country to target key facilities and kill top generals and scientists. Officials said the barrage was necessary and was aimed to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions. The operation raised the potential for all-our war between the countries and launched the region, already on edge, into even greater upheaval. Within hours, Iran hit back, sending a swarm of drones towards Israeli territory as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned of 'severe punishment'. The strike came just a day after the UN's atomic watchdog condemned Iran for failing to meet international nuclear obligations. Israel had long threatened to take action, with previous US administrations trying to hold them back, fearing it could spark a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear programme. However, a confluence of developments following Hamas ' October 7, 2023, attack and the election in the US of President Donald Trump created the conditions that allowed Israel to finally follow through on its threats. Also on Friday, Israel claimed it had struck an Iranian nuclear site in Isfahan. Iran did not immediately acknowledge the attack. The facility in Isfahan, some 350 kilometres (215 miles) south-east of Tehran, employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It is also home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic programme. Israel had told the Trump administration that the large-scale attacks were coming, officials in the US and Israel said. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. On Wednesday the US pulled some American diplomats from Iraq's capital and offered voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East. The United States is shifting military resources, including ships, in the Middle East in response to Israel's strikes on Iran and a possible retaliatory attack by Tehran, two US officials said. Countries in the region condemned Israel's attack, while leaders around the globe called for immediate de-escalation from both sides. Iran asked for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. Israel's military said about 200 aircraft were involved in the initial attack on about 100 targets. Its Mossad spy agency positioned explosive drones and precision weapons inside Iran ahead of time, and used them to target Iranian air defences and missile launchers near Tehran, according to two security officials. Among the key sites Israel attacked was Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. It also appeared to strike a second, smaller nuclear enrichment facility in Fordo, about 60 miles from Tehran, according to an Iranian news outlet close to the government that reported hearing explosions nearby. Israel also said it destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. Israel military spokesman Effie Defrin said the Natanz facility was 'significantly damaged' and that the operation was 'still in the beginning'. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders: one who oversaw the entire armed forces, General Mohammad Bagheri; one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, General Hossein Salami; and the head of the Guard's ballistic missile programme, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Iran confirmed all three deaths, significant blows to its governing theocracy that will complicate efforts to retaliate. Khamenei said other top military officials and scientists were also killed. In its first response, Iran fired more than 100 drones at Israel. Israel said the drones were being intercepted outside its airspace, and it was not immediately clear whether any got through. Mr Trump urged Iran to reach a deal with Washington on its nuclear programme, warning on his Truth Social platform that Israel's attacks 'will only get worse'. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' he wrote. 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' Israeli leaders cast the attack as necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike. Iran maintains its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but has never acknowledged having such weapons. On Friday, Israelis rushed to supermarkets in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and elsewhere to buy bottled water and other supplies. But, otherwise, streets and parks were mostly deserted. For Mr Netanyahu, the operation distracts attention from Israel's ongoing and increasingly devastating war in Gaza, which is now more than 20 months old. Khamenei said in a statement that Israel 'opened its wicked and blood-stained hand to a crime in our beloved country, revealing its malicious nature more than ever by striking residential centres'. Mr Netanyahu expressed hope the attacks would trigger the downfall of Iran's theocracy, saying his message to the Iranian people was that the fight was not with them, but with the 'brutal dictatorship that has oppressed you for 46 years'. 'I believe that the day of your liberation is near,' he said. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence.
Belfast Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Demonstrators set to gather for multiple protests in London on Saturday
A protest against proposals for a new Chinese embassy will take place from 2pm at Royal Mint Court, near the capital's financial district, while pro-Palestinian demonstrators are expected to gather in Parliament Square at the same time. Police have set out conditions for the first protest under the Public Order Act which demands that any person taking part in the procession must not deviate from a specified route and that participants in the static portion of the protest must remain in a specified area. The assembly must conclude by 5pm, the Met added. The Hong Kong Democracy Council, which describes itself as a non-partisan, non-profit organisation for Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement and Hong Kongers, posted about Saturday's protest on its social media. The group shared an image of a poster for the event, which read: 'Say 'no' to China mega embassy'. It also said: 'No more CCTVs from China. No more surveillance from China.' The protest comes days after former leader of the Conservative Party, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, said plans for the embassy have become a 'walk of shame' for the Government. On Monday, he said a response by the Government to the proposed embassy had become 'Project Kowtow', as he criticised the Government for 'one denial after another (and) one betrayal after another'. Sir Iain referred to the warnings reportedly issued by the White House and Dutch government to Downing Street over the plans, which are set to be scrutinised by ministers. The worries stem from the close proximity of the proposed embassy's Royal Mint Court site to data centres and communication cables. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. The Sunday Times said the US was 'deeply concerned' about the plans, quoting a senior US official. In response, planning minister Matthew Pennycook said he could not give a full response as the matter was still to come before the department for a decision, and any verdict could be challenged by the courts. Sir Iain said: 'Beijing has a recent history of cutting cables and confirmed infrastructure hacks, including embedding malware capable of disabling all that infrastructure.' There are 'currently' no conditions in place for the protest organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), Stop the War and other groups but 'there will be a police presence', the Met said. Organisers labelled the demonstration an 'emergency protest' which will issue calls to stop bombing Iran and stop arming Israel. 'As it commits genocide against the Palestinians Israel is now bombing Iran,' PSC posted on social media. 'Join us to demand our government stop arming genocidal Israel.' Police said they have not been informed of any planned counter protests.
Economist
8 hours ago
- Economist
Can you pass the toughest tests in the world?
Civil-service exams in China and India are notoriously difficult. But they shape their countries' societies Max Weber, sensible German intellectual that he was, considered bureaucracy the best way to organise large societies. And societies don't come any larger than China and India, where the decisions of bureaucrats shape the lives of more than a quarter of the world's people. Even as the countries' private sectors have grown in recent decades, jobs in their civil services remain deeply coveted. Government jobs in India, especially in the federal services that run the country, remain a ticket to prosperity, prestige and better marriage prospects. In China, where the economy has slowed, securing a top-tier state job (known locally as 'landing ashore') is back in fashion—quite literally. Young people sometimes don 'cadre-style' attire—windbreakers in muted colours and high-waisted suit trousers—in order to emulate officials. But perhaps the biggest similarity between the two bureaucracies is the brutality of their selection processes, which hinge on a gruelling set of examinations. To give you a taste of the difficulty, The Economist has chosen some questions from the first part of recent exams. Have a go: Such questions are only a small part of a much larger process. In India those who pass the first exam in May or June must sit a second later in the year. This features nine papers taken over 27 hours. In China the written test takes place on one day in late November or early December. Candidates do a multiple-choice exam and then write a series of essays testing their understanding of policy, as well as their writing skills. Both countries hold in-person interviews as a final filter. Only a fraction survive the ordeal. Last year 1.1m people applied to join the top tier of India's civil service, but around 1,000 (0.2% of those who actually sat the first exam) were offered a spot. In China a record 3.41m people registered and passed the initial screening for the national civil-service exam last year—well over twice the number who did so in 2014. Just over 39,700 (1.5% of those who sat the exam) secured a job. In both countries the exams are considered the fairest way to filter candidates. Indeed, in India they were introduced by British colonial masters after Indians complained about the previous patronage-based system. In China, the guokao, as the exam is called, is modelled on the keju, which was instituted in 587 and was lauded for being relatively corruption-free and meritocratic. Candidates' ability to leapfrog social classes was so cherished that, say some academics, the riots that followed the exam's abolition in 1905 contributed to the toppling of the Qing dynasty, China's last imperial rulers, a few years later. The civil-service exam in China has shaped the country's evolution. The keju was the 'anchor of Chinese autocracy', according to Yasheng Huang, who has written a book about it. Mind-bogglingly difficult, it required total intellectual commitment, sometimes from the age of five, leaving the most talented and ambitious members of society no time to foment new ideas. Gui Youguang, a 16th-century writer, passed the exam's final stage aged 59, after decades of failed attempts, and died shortly after. The guokao, which can only be taken by those aged 35 or under, remains an important tool for the state. After China embarked on market reforms in the 1970s, the bureaucracy took on a more important role in a complex, open society. As a result, the guokao was tweaked to examine candidates' knowledge of laws and regulations. Over time the questions became more practical, testing common sense and numeracy. But in recent years the exam has also become a test of party loyalty, with ever more questions dedicated to Xi Jinping Thought. Chinese essay questions 'Dedicate yourself to your field, constantly 'refine' and 'repair', and silently contribute to a warm and steadfast order of life for the people, while progressing steadily.' Based on your understanding of this sentence, draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. Write a report on the achievements, shortcomings and suggestions for improvement regarding the implementation of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Law. Conduct an in-depth analysis of the three dimensions of administrative law enforcement—'power' (力), 'reason' (理) and 'interest' (利). Draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. India's civil service, in contrast, has remained relatively apolitical. After independence in 1947, leaders chose to retain the 'steel frame' of the Imperial Civil Service, but changed the role of the bureaucrats it hired from upholding colonial rule to ensuring development. By 1979 competition to enter the service was so fierce that a second set of exams was introduced to test candidates' breadth of knowledge. In 2012 a paper on ethics was added. India's civil service is associated with prestige—but also corruption. In a recent high-profile example, a young civil servant in the eastern state of Odisha was accused of accepting a bribe of 1m rupees ($11,683) from a businessman. Indian essay questions Is conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision-making? Discuss. Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children. Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team. Discuss. Success in both exams requires immense toil. Many examinees do not work in the year, even years, leading up to the test; those holding down jobs end up studying early in the morning or late at night. Thousands seek the help of coaching centres; the best ones offer full-time training and board. Shikha Singh, for example, moved from a small town in central India to Delhi just to prepare for the exam surrounded by fellow aspirants. She has failed the test three times, but ramped up her efforts with each attempt. Ahead of her recent fourth try, Ms Singh put in ten-hour days, but worries that still might not be enough to cover the wide variety of subjects. In south-eastern China, Ms Zhong, a prospective civil servant from Jiangxi province, has put in similar shifts since quitting her job in 2023 and moving back in with her parents. Her concern is that preparation alone may not be enough in an exam that tests 'innate ability'. Even if they succeed, will their effort be worth it? Those who pass the exams reap instant and long-term benefits, such as housing and a pension (and often a job) for life. Once in their roles they are treated like royalty, with an army of staff to do their bidding and a special chair marked with a white towel. Research from India suggests some correlation between exam performance and effectiveness as a civil servant. But in both countries critics believe the exams filter candidates according to the wrong criteria. By screening for rote-learning and test-taking, they neglect to assess actual public-policy skills such as management, teamwork and communication. This contributes to the poor performance of the bureaucracy. On a measure of government effectiveness calculated by the World Bank, China and India rank in the 74th and 68th percentiles globally. In both countries efforts are under way to recruit people in other ways. China is experimenting with hiring some candidates for fixed terms according to their experience, rather than their exam performance. Similarly India has introduced a 'lateral-entry' scheme to allow private-sector specialists to join the public workforce. But these remain nascent initiatives. Exams will remain the backbone of public-sector recruitment. If the merits of this selection process are debatable, the costs—both human and economic—are more easily quantified. Aspirants who fail to meet the mark tend to try again. A cycle of application and rejection has an effect on morale: exam failure often pushes candidates to suicide in both countries. Ms Singh, the Indian candidate, feels she has lost social status because of her failed attempts. Her Chinese counterpart, Ms Zhong, is also weighed down by anxiety. 'Only a few people pass the exam,' she says. 'I wonder what those who fail do.' It is an important question. Years of youth spent in study, instead of work, are an economic loss. The exams force college graduates to delay employment, reducing their long-term consumption. And the subjects so feverishly swotted up late at night are not necessarily of use once the exams are over. Knowing big cats' biological intricacies or the details of Xi Jinping Thought might help candidates earn a civil servant's towel-covered chair—but perhaps not a place in the private sector.
