
A former firefighter in the Legislature has ideas. Will Democrats listen?
It's safe to say there's no legislator more familiar with battling fires against the Santa Ana winds than Sen. Kelly Seyarto.
He's one of just a few former firefighters in the Legislature's history, and the only former career firefighter currently in office, according to the California State Library (Current Assemblymember Heath Flora, a Republican from Ripon, worked three summers as a firefighter and volunteered for another 15).
The Republican from Murrieta spent 35 years in the field — starting as a firefighter and paramedic for the Inglewood Fire Department and retiring as a battalion chief for the Los Angeles County Fire Department.
During that time, he was assigned to various fires throughout Southern California, and led a 20-person strike team in the 2007 Canyon Fire that burned one of the areas affected by the recent Palisades fire.
Still, when it came to special session bills in the Senate related to the recent fires, Seyarto said he was pretty much left out of the planning. Meetings to discuss the Legislature's initial response were limited to Democrats.
'For Pete's sake, folks, I've been in the fire service for 35 years,' Seyarto said recently on the Senate floor, where he voted in favor of two bills to fund the fire recovery. 'I implore you, no more caucus meetings to come up with a Senate Democrat plan, or Assembly Democrat plan. … We need a plan from all of us to make sure this doesn't happen again.'
Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire, a Democrat from Santa Rosa, did not respond to a request for comment.
Chris Micheli, a longtime lobbyist, said Democratic leaders in the Senate typically pick a handful of legislators to work on large issues like wildfires. 'Those working groups don't include Republicans. But of course, Republicans can introduce bills of their own, and can obviously provide input on legislation.'
Tim Edwards, president of the union representing state firefighters, said — no matter which party — it helps to have someone in the Legislature who has worked in the trade, so they can communicate issues to other lawmakers, such as Seyarto's support on a recent proposal to transition seasonal firefighters into year-round employees.
'Public safety is a unique thing, so in order to have someone that's actually worked the job to walk you through and explain things is really great to have on the legislation,' he said.
Public service: from fires to government
Seyarto, 65, was born and raised in the San Gabriel Valley and wanted to be a doctor growing up. But he didn't have the best grades, so a firefighter neighbor encouraged him to try out the paramedic path instead.
During his decades as a firefighter, there were plenty of memorable moments. He doesn't like to talk about the bad ones: 'There are too many of those. It's usually when people are dying, and you can't do anything about it.'
He prefers to think about the ones where he was able to save lives. One was an apartment building fire in the late 1980s or early 1990s, he said, where 40 people had jumped from the second story to escape flames.
'I wound up having to figure out how to manage 40 patients that … had broken legs and hips and cracked heads,' he said. 'We didn't really have a system yet, and so I kind of figured out a streamlined system on how to get them all through.'
That inspired conversations within L.A. County's fire department to create a formalized system, now known as the Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment, or START, system.
'That's where my mind kind of goes, is how to organize something quickly and then make it go through a quick process and get it done,' he said. 'That's why it's so frustrating being in the Legislature, because you see a problem and you think, 'Okay, well, let's see, we can do this, this and this, and then let's get it going. And it doesn't go like that.'
Seyarto stepped into elected office when he ran for Murrieta City Council in 1997 while still working for the fire department. He served on the city council until 2006, then stepped away to spend more time with his wife and three daughters. He retired from firefighting in 2015 and returned to the council in 2016, serving a total of four stints as mayor.
In 2020, he won a seat in the state Assembly, where he served two years before switching to the Senate. He now serves on seven committees and is vice chair of four of them: appropriations, natural resources, public safety and housing.
Seyarto doesn't focus on wildfire legislation as a state senator — he says he prefers to apply what he learned in the fire service to various policy areas. He has only introduced a few bills related to wildfires since 2021, none of which has passed.
The Legislature's role
So how does Seyarto think the Legislature should approach wildfires?
Seyarto said the Legislature's most impactful role would be to pursue a comprehensive statewide strategy focused on prevention, response and recovery instead of the piecemeal approach the state often takes with legislation targeted toward a specific community impacted by a fire.
He said a comprehensive approach would require a bipartisan effort that brings together experts in the various issues involved: housing, insurance and local governments.
'We have to figure those things out, and we can't figure them out if we're having Democrat caucus discussions only, or Republican caucus discussions only,' he said. 'This is a whole legislature (joined by) experts in the field type of issue.'
In general, Seyarto said stopping a fire once it has started is challenging. That's why risk management is key, he says: identifying fire hazard zones and hiring enough staff to clear brush or manage controlled burns that can prevent fires from starting or spreading.
He also introduced a bill last month that would allow evacuation routes in fire hazard zones to be eligible for funds under Proposition 4, which voters approved last year to fund climate-related projects.
'It's all about saving those people first, and so having evacuation routes … and not allowing a bureaucratic structure to obstruct the process,' he said. 'It's that kind of bureaucratic process, especially when it relates to public safety that we really need to kind of eliminate … so we don't keep repeating the same catastrophes, one after another, after another.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
Washington — The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are urging lawmakers to quickly get behind the centerpiece of President Trump's legislative agenda, saying the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles adds urgency to the push to secure additional resources for border security. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on X on Monday that the legislation, which addresses Mr. Trump's tax, energy and immigration priorities, "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation[']s borders." Republicans call the legislation the "one big, beautiful bill." "The lawlessness happening in LA is ANOTHER reason why we need to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill IMMEDIATELY," Johnson said, pledging that Congress will support Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who he said are "fighting to keep Americans safe against illegal aliens AND the radical left." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a similar message earlier Monday, saying the scenes unfolding in some areas of Los Angeles "prove that we desperately need more immigration enforcement personnel and resources." "America must reverse the invasion unleashed by Joe Biden of millions of unvetted illegal aliens into our country," Leavitt said in a post on X. "That's why President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill funds at least one million annual removals and hires 10,000 new ICE personnel, 5,000 new customs officers, and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson holds a press conference after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025, in Washington, legislation is now in the hands of the Senate after the House narrowly approved it last month following weeks of intraparty disagreement over its components. Though the bulk of the funding allocated in the legislation goes toward tax cuts, it also includes resources aimed at bolstering border security and defense. It provides $46.5 billion for the border wall, $4.1 billion to hire Border Patrol agents and other personnel and more than $2 billion for signing and retention bonuses for agents. It also imposes an additional $1,000 fee for people who are filing for asylum in the U.S. The disagreement among Republicans over the bill has largely centered on cuts meant to offset the bill's spending, including restrictions to Medicaid. In the House's razor-thin GOP majority, the disagreements threatened to tank the bill's progress at every stage. And as the bill moved to the Senate for consideration last week, Johnson warned the upper chamber against making significant changes that would throw off the delicate balance. Senate Republicans initially voiced support for separating the complicated tax components and border security provisions into two separate bills to deliver Mr. Trump a victory on immigration early on in his tenure. But House Republicans opposed the approach, expressing doubts that the president's agenda could pass through the narrow GOP majority in the lower chamber in separate parts. Senate Republicans are now seeking to amend the House-passed bill, sending it back to the House for approval with a goal of getting the legislation to the president's desk by the July 4 holiday. And with a 53-seat majority, the upper chamber can afford to lose just three Republicans. Last week, opposition from Elon Musk threatened to throw a wrench into the legislation's progress, after he stoked concerns by fiscal hawks about the bill's impact on the deficit. The episode, which began with Musk calling the bill "a disgusting abomination," erupted into a dramatic and public feud between Musk and the president last week. But the dispute did not appear to spark significant new opposition the the bill in Congress. The urgency expressed Monday surrounding securing additional border resources comes as Mr. Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the L.A. area amid protests over activity by ICE, prompting a clash with California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom warned that the move would inflame the situation, while urging that there is no shortage of law enforcement. The governor indicated late Sunday that his office plans to sue the Trump administration over Mr. Trump's move. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the president's move on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday, claiming Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the president chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline
A privately owned company is proposing a pipeline across five states. While some of the state governments appear to be on board, the project is facing backlash from a large and formidable population: property owners. The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota. Construction of the $9 billion pipeline is expected to begin this year, with operations kicking off in 2026. In June 2024, the project received regulatory approval from the Iowa Utilities Commission, despite landowner protests. Julie Glade and her husband, Paul, are Iowans who oppose the project because of its use of eminent domain. Their property aligns with the proposed route, and in 2022 the couple was visited by a land agent. "The guy who came to our door wanted us to sit down and sign it without reading it," Glade tells Reason. "They swooped in and tried to contact as many people as possible right away before the people knew what the consequences were. It's very unethical." Several other landowners in the state share the Glades' worries. During a hearing conducted by the Iowa Utility Commission, landowner Joan Gaul testified against the pipeline, which she said would cross a large portion of her farmland. Gaul said Summit Carbon Solutions mailed two easements, which would give the pipeline a legal right to her land, to her without notice. "This letter came telling us about taking our land using eminent domain. It was a difficult pill to swallow," she said. Gaul said she didn't accept the easements and has indicated that she will continue to fight the project. The Glades visit the Iowa Capitol nearly every week to voice their opposition to the pipeline. They are joined by what the couple calls a diverse coalition united by their concern for the basic constitutional right to land ownership. "We have MAGA Republicans and we have lefties. We put our differences aside and we work together," she says. The Glades' efforts could soon pay off. In May the state Senate passed House File 639, which would prevent CO2 pipelines from using eminent domain unless the company proves the pipeline meets the definition of public use. The bill would also prevent CO2 pipelines from operating longer than 25 years. The bill is awaiting the signature of Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is reportedly weighing opinions from pipeline supporters and detractors. If passed, the bill would represent a significant win for the rights of Iowa property owners. It would also be the latest setback for the Summit Carbon Solutions project. After the company launched a blitz of eminent domain lawsuits in South Dakota, Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed a bill into law in March preventing carbon dioxide pipelines from receiving eminent domain permission in the state. The post Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline appeared first on
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kash Patel Sends Ominous Threat in Response to L.A. Protests
The FBI says it will act on its own to squash the Los Angeles anti-ICE protests. FBI Director Kash Patel issued an ominous threat to the city and its residents late Sunday night, claiming that his agency would intervene in the multiday anti-Trump display without explicit direction. 'Just so we are clear, this FBI needs no one's permission to enforce the constitution,' Patel posted on X. 'My responsibility is to the American people, not political punch lines. LA is under siege by marauding criminals, and we will restore law and order. I'm not asking you, I'm telling you.' In a move that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem should agree with, California announced it would sue the federal government Monday, arguing that the Trump administration's order to send hundreds of National Guard troops toward Los Angeles, without coordination with the state's governor, was an unconstitutional breach of power. Hours earlier, FBI Public Affairs Assistant Director Ben Williamson shared that Patel had gotten off a call with 'senior leadership' addressing what they referred to as 'riots' in L.A., specifying that Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino had 'offered all necessary resources from FBI HQ' to address the situation. Williamson said the pair 'reiterated the position that any perpetrator who attacks or interferes with law enforcement will be aggressively pursued and brought to justice.' Bongino made it plain that one of the agency's primary targets would be individuals suspected of assaulting officers, writing on X that he and Patel had notified all FBI teams to pursue suspected individuals 'long after order is firmly established.' 'We will not forget. Even after you try to,' Bongino posted. But Republicans have so far not been very successful at pinpointing wrongdoing in Los Angeles. Instead, some viral videos circulating in conservative circles of protest-related violence in the city are actually not from the weekend at all, but were instead taken in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter protests.