From Balikatan to Taiwan: Why Firepower Beats Perfection
Commentary
Balikatan 2025—the largest Indo-Pacific exercise in years—sent a clear message: the United States is preparing for a major regional fight. With anti-ship missile strikes, island defense scenarios, and Japanese ground forces participating, it was the most complex iteration yet.
But exercises don't win wars. Firepower does.
The Pentagon must face a hard truth: victory in the next conflict won't come from flawless, gold-plated systems. It will come from what we can deploy quickly, at scale, and under fire.
Ukraine's Lesson: Volume and Speed Win
Ukraine is showing the world how high-intensity warfare works in the 21st century. Their battlefield success hasn't come from perfect weapons. It's come from fielding what's ready—drones, loitering munitions, commercial communications tools, and artillery.
Not because they're the best. Because they're available.
Quantity wins. Mass drone strikes and heavy artillery have been more decisive than boutique precision systems.
Speed wins more. The systems that arrived early—regardless of sophistication—changed the fight.
Iteration matters. Ukraine's ability to adapt and repurpose tech in real time has saved lives and shifted momentum.
While Western procurement measures in years, Ukraine adapts in weeks. That's the pace of modern war.
INDOPACOM's Edge Will Come Early—or Not at All
The Indo-Pacific is not Ukraine. Distances are longer. Logistics are harder. But the principle holds: the side that delivers effective firepower first will dominate the fight.
A Taiwan Strait war wouldn't be measured in months. It would be decided in days. The U.S. won't have time to surge exquisite assets across the Pacific—or build new ones mid-conflict.
Related Stories
5/8/2025
3/22/2025
If we're still waiting for 'perfect' systems to arrive, we'll lose the initiative. And possibly the war.
Balikatan 2025 rehearsed island defense, long-range fires, and distributed C2. But behind the scenarios is a sobering question: do we have enough munitions, drones, and comms gear to fight for real?
Buy What We Can Use Now
Defense acquisition must evolve—fast. It's not just about improving the process. It's about buying the right things, at the right speed, and in the right quantity.
Ukraine has repurposed commercial drones and Starlink terminals into ISR, targeting, and command tools. They didn't wait for five-year procurement cycles. They found what worked—and fielded it immediately.
INDOPACOM should do the same. Especially when the opening days of conflict may define the next decade of global stability.
Fix Procurement Before It's Too Late
To prepare for a potential fight in the Indo-Pacific, we need to prioritize three things in acquisition: speed, scalability, and survivability. Here's what that looks like:
1. Fund what's fieldable now. Buy off-the-shelf drones, comms, loitering munitions, and ISR tools that can deploy immediately.
2. Build surge capacity before a crisis. Ukraine ran out of munitions fast. We can't. Stockpile and pre-position across the Pacific now.
3. Cut procurement timelines in half. If it takes five years to field, it won't help in Taiwan. Fast-track authorities must become the norm.
4. Empower those at the front. In Ukraine, warfighters influenced what got procured. We should embed their feedback into acquisition decisions.
This isn't about throwing out the system—it's about adjusting it to meet the timeline of modern conflict.
Balikatan's Warning Shot
Exercises like Balikatan matter. They expose where we're falling short. And if we can't deliver munitions, drones, or comms gear quickly in peacetime, how will we do it under fire?
Ukraine is already showing the answer: get adaptable systems to the field, in volume, now.
The U.S. cannot afford to learn that lesson the hard way in INDOPACOM.
Perfection Is a Peacetime Luxury
The next war won't be won by the most beautiful system. It'll be won by the one that arrives first, hits hard, and keeps working.
We must shift from a procurement mindset built for long-term savings to one optimized for near-term victory.
As Balikatan winds down and strategic focus stays fixed on China, we should ask: are we building to win a contract—or to win a war?
In the Indo-Pacific, we may only get one chance to get it right.
From
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
23 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
The Leverage Against China That the US Hasn't Used Yet
News Analysis The United States and China are locked in a war, experts are saying. It's not a war of bullets, but rather an 'unrestricted war' in almost every other strategic domain, including the economy, cyberspace, culture, and information. In many ways, the information war is key. It determines what people know, which then sets what they think. That, in turn, determines their actions in all other areas of the conflict. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wages its information war on many levels, from seeding grand overarching narratives to tarring individual critics. In some areas, however, the regime lacks a counterargument. Some of its actions are so gruesome, the only option is to suppress the information, experts say. It's exactly these areas where the United States could mount severe, potentially fatal pressure on the regime—if willing to pursue them, several China experts told The Epoch Times. 'The darkest crime they're doing right now is organ harvesting,' said Sean Lin, former U.S. Army microbiologist and Epoch Times contributor. He is also a member of the independent group, Committee on the Present Danger: China. 'Maybe there are even darker crimes, more vicious, darker than organ harvesting. We don't know. And so the CCP is very afraid of this being further exposed, further recognized by the international community,' he added. The fact that the CCP was killing prisoners of conscience for their organs was first reported in 2006 by The Epoch Times based on whistleblower testimony. Since then, evidence of the crime has snowballed, resulting in an independent tribunal in the United Kingdom Related Stories 5/22/2025 5/14/2025 Still, to this day, no government has published the results of a formal investigation into the issue. 'Western governments did not take all this information seriously. They were still wishfully thinking that if we bring economic freedom to China, then eventually China will change its political system,' said Nan Su, a China commentator and senior editor with the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times. Three factors have changed that situation, he said. The COVID-19 pandemic showed China as irresponsible and malicious, blocking critical information that would have aided other countries in facing the disease. The undercutting of Hong Kong's independence in 2022 showed that China wouldn't honor its promise to preserve the island's separate political and legal system for 50 years. And finally, the CCP's support for Russia in the Ukraine war shows China siding with adversaries of the United States and Europe. In recent years, Congress passed several resolutions condemning forced organ harvesting in China, but 'none of them really had teeth,' Nan said. 'If the U.S. government was to really take this issue seriously, invest time and money into the investigation, that's something Beijing's leaders have always been afraid of happening.' The issue is, in fact, a 'key point' in the international confrontation with China as it allows the West to hold the CCP's feet to the fire, said Heng He, an expert on Chinese politics and Epoch Times contributor. (L-R) Robert Destro, former assistant secretary of state for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Cheng Peiming, a Falun Gong practitioner who had his organs forcibly removed in China, and Dr. Charles Lee, forced organ investigator, speak during a press conference in Washington on Aug. 9, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times For issues such as unfair trade practices and military expansion, the CCP can just ignore the criticism. Even if the CCP invaded Taiwan or started a war with the Philippines, 'somebody can still defend China, find excuses for China,' he said. 'But for organ harvesting, nobody can,' he added. Rarely is there a matter so clear-cut as to allow one side to assume the unequivocal moral high ground, the experts suggested. 'The issue is whether the U.S. government has a strong will to do it, to expose it, to take action,' Lin said. 'The CCP now realizes that they are at a critical junction … because the current Trump administration has one of the strongest teams, you can say the most hawkish team against the CCP,' he added. The wheels are already in motion; last month the House The CCP is well aware of the historical precedent of the Holocaust, Lin noted. 'The CCP is really worried that their persecution of Falun Gong will become something like that,' he said. Shoot the Messenger Unable to explain the organ harvesting issue away, the CCP is trying to suppress the information by discrediting its victims, the experts said. As The Epoch Times previously 'They want to take down Falun Gong's reputation in the United States so the U.S. government would hesitate to collaborate with the Falun Gong group to expose CCP crimes,' Lin said. The CCP sees this issue as particularly urgent because it strikes at its constant source of insecurity—a lack of legitimacy, Heng He said. Dr. Sean Lin, former lab director of the viral disease branch at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. (Courtesy of The Epoch Times In the past, Chinese dynasties drew legitimacy from a divine mandate. In modern times, legitimacy usually stems from elections, said Heng. However, the CCP rejects both. With its revolutionary promises depleted after Mao Zedong's catastrophic Cultural Revolution in the '60s and '70s, the Party now uses economic growth as a source of pseudo-legitimacy. With the Chinese economy teetering from a massive real estate crash, insolvency in its off-the-books local government financing vehicles, a lack of foreign investment, and the trade war with the United States, the CCP is already facing significant challenges. Thorough exposure of its crimes could very well push the regime over the edge, Lin suggested. 'Even though the Chinese economy has a hard landing and crashes, as long as the CCP leadership is there, they may try to survive this harsh time. And the critical issue is that they still need to be somewhat legitimate to the world, to the Chinese people,' Lin said. 'If their crime against innocent Falun Gong practitioners inside China is fully exposed, nobody can accept such a government, and the CCP may even be disintegrated from inside.'
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon diverting key anti-drone technology from Ukraine to US forces in the Middle East
The Pentagon notified Congress last week that it will be diverting critical anti-drone technology that had been allocated for Ukraine to US Air Force units in the Middle East, according to correspondence obtained by CNN and people familiar with the matter. The move reflects the US' shifting defense priorities under President Donald Trump – toward the Middle East and the Pacific – and the fact that US stockpiles of some defense components are becoming increasingly stretched. The technology, proximity fuzes for the rockets Ukraine uses to shoot down Russian drones, was redirected from the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) to Air Force Central Command on orders from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, according to the correspondence dated May 29 and sent to the Senate and House Armed Services committees. USAI is a Defense Department funding program that was established in 2014, when Russia first invaded eastern Ukraine and annexed Crimea. It authorizes the US government to buy arms and equipment for Ukraine directly from US weapons manufacturers. The proximity fuzes were originally purchased for Ukraine but were redirected to the Air Force as a 'Secretary of Defense Identified Urgent Issue,' the correspondence says. The notification was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. The Pentagon has in recent months redirected a large amount of equipment and resources to the Middle East, including air defense systems out of the Indo-Pacific Command, amid threats from Iran and the Houthi rebels in Yemen. It is not yet clear what the impact will be of diverting the fuzes away from Ukraine. But the technology has made their rockets more effective against Russian drones, since the fuze sets off an added explosion as the rocket nears the drone. US forces in the Middle East have had to contend with drones, too, however, particularly from Iran-backed groups in Syria and Iraq.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pattern of defiance: Israel expands settlements in face of Western pressure
Israel's international allies are growing louder in their condemnation of its war on Gaza and its continued construction of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. United Nations experts, human rights groups and legal scholars have all previously told Al Jazeera that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza and committing abuses that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity in the West Bank. And yet less than two weeks after receiving a stern warning from its Western allies, Israel approved 22 illegal settlements in the West Bank, amounting to what has been described as the largest land grab since Israeli and Palestinian leaders inked the Oslo Peace Accords in 1993. 'Israel is all about showing [the world] who calls the shots. They are saying … you can condemn us all you want, but in the end, you will bow down to us and not the other way around,' said Diana Buttu, a legal scholar and political analyst focused on Israel and Palestine. The Oslo Accords were ostensibly aimed at creating a Palestinian state, including the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with occupied East Jerusalem as its capital. However, in practice, Israel has continued to expand illegal settlements and render the two-state solution impossible, analysts told Al has often announced the building of new illegal settlements in response to signals of support for Palestinian statehood from the UN or its allies. In 2012, Israel went so far as to approve 3,000 new settler homes in the occupied West Bank after the Palestinian Authority (PA) – the entity created out of the Oslo Accords to govern swaths of the West Bank – was granted non-member observer status in the UN General Assembly. Last year, Israel's far-right Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, warned that a new illegal settlement would be built for every country that recognises a Palestinian state. The announcement came after Spain, Norway, and Ireland took the symbolic step in May 2024. 'I certainly think there is a pattern where Israel responds to pressure regarding its occupation – or anything else – by announcing settler expansion,' said Omar Rahman, an expert focused on Israel and Palestine for the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. 'We see that pattern repeated over and over again,' he told Al Jazeera. As global pressure mounts against Israel's war on Gaza, Israel has continued to test the patience of its allies. On May 21, Israeli troops fired warning shots at a group of European, Asian and Arab diplomats who were on an official mission to assess the humanitarian crisis in Jenin refugee camp, which has been subjected to a months-long attack and siege by the Israeli army since the start of the year. 'I don't know where the red line is. It is clear that there is no red line,' said Zionist militias ethnically cleansed some 750,000 Palestinians to make way for the state of Israel in 1948 – an event referred to as the 'Nakba' or catastrophe – Israel has increasingly annexed and occupied the little that remains of Palestinian land. Annexation of the occupied West Bank has accelerated in recent years thanks to far-right settlers who occupy positions in the Israeli government, said Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. He believes Israel was always planning to approve the 22 illegal settlements irrespective of the joint statement issued by France, the UK and Canada, as it fit in with the state's ultimate goal of expanding Jewish settlement of the occupied West Bank. 'Nobody can really think that if those countries didn't issue an announcement that [further] annexation wasn't going to happen. Of course, it was going to happen,' he told Al Jazeera. Rahman, from the Middle East Council, believes Israel's tactic of announcing pre-planned settlement expansion in the face of Western pressure simply aims to dissuade its allies from taking concrete action. He suspects Canada, the UK and France will likely not slap on targeted sanctions against Israeli officials, as they have threatened to do, instead using the argument that any moves against Israel will lead to a backlash against Palestinians.'[Canada, UK and France] may say they are acting for the preservation of the two-state solution by not doing anything to save the two-state solution,' Rahman told Al Jazeera. Analysts believe that sanctions on Israel would be the only way to rescue the two-state solution and end Israel's war on Gaza, but accept that comprehensive sanctions against the Israeli state would still be unlikely at this stage. Instead, Western countries like Canada, France and the UK may target sanctions at the far-right ministers most associated with pro-settler policies, Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. 'These men … are trying to jam in everything they can do now because they know there is no guarantee they will maintain their positions of power indefinitely,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. Buttu fears that European countries will merely resort to more symbolic measures such as 'recognising Palestine', which will have little impact on the ground. 'By the time everyone gets around to recognising Palestine, there won't be any land [for Palestinians] left,' she told Al Jazeera.
