Carney says Canadians 'weren't impressed' by U.K.'s offer of second state visit to Trump
Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canadians "weren't impressed" when the U.K. decided to offer U.S. President Donald Trump an unprecedented second state visit while he was threatening Canada's sovereignty.
"To be frank, they weren't impressed by that gesture, quite simply, given the circumstance," Carney told British news channel Sky News in an interview posted online Wednesday.
"It was at a time when we were being quite clear, some of us were being quite clear, about the issues around sovereignty."
Carney said that when he was campaigning for the party leadership he was "being clear" that Canada is not for sale, and the invitation that U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer presented to Trump while in the Oval Office "cut across some of those messages."
Asked if Carney thought it was appropriate to invite Trump for a second state visit, Carney said that was a choice for the United Kingdom and Buckingham Palace to make.
"I leave the diplomacy to the U.K. government," he said.
Sky News pressed Carney for an answer, saying he must have an opinion on the decision, to which Carney replied, "I have an opinion on many things, some of which I keep to myself."
At his first news conference after the April 28 election, Carney announced that King Charles will travel to Canada later this month to deliver the speech from the throne on May 27.
"This historic honour matches the weight of our times," Carney said then, adding that Queen Camilla would join the visit.
Gov. Gen. Mary Simon issued a statement confirming the royal visit on May 26 and 27.
Every new session of Parliament is opened by a throne speech, a document that lays out the government's expected direction and goals, and how it plans to achieve them.
King's visit not 'a coincidence' Carney says
Much attention has focused in recent weeks on Charles's role as head of state of Canada, particularly in the face of repeated taunts from Trump about it becoming the 51st state.
Carney explained that he asked the King if he would visit Canada when he met with him after being sworn in as prime minister in March and that it is not accidental that the King is visiting at a time when Canada's sovereignty as a country is being challenged by the U.S.
"All issues around Canadian sovereignty [that] have been accentuated by the president, what he said, they exist in normal times as well," he told Sky News. "So no, not it is not coincidental but it is also a reaffirming moment, will be a reaffirming."
Starmer handed Trump the invitation for a second state visit during a visit to Washington in February, saying the president's last state visit in 2019 had been a "tremendous success."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Carney agrees to ‘regularize' communication between Canada and China
Prime Minister Mark Carney arrives to a caucus meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick In a notable move amid recent diplomatic and trade tensions, Prime Minister Mark Carney has agreed to 'regularize channels of communication between Canada and China' after having a conversation with a top Chinese official on Thursday. According to a readout from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) released late Thursday, Carney and Chinese Premier Li Qiang also agreed to work together to address the fentanyl crisis and discussed trade between the two countries. 'Prime Minister Carney took the opportunity to raise trade irritants affecting agriculture and agri-food products, including canola and seafood, as well as other issues, with Premier Li,' the readout says. 'They welcomed their trade ministers' meeting this week, during which Canada and China agreed to convene the Joint Economic and Trade Commission (JETC) at an early date to address outstanding trade issues,' the statement goes on to say. The PMO has confirmed to CTV News this was Carney's first conversation with Chinese leadership since becoming prime minister. Carney's outreach to China comes as he seeks to strengthen economic ties with other large economies like China and India in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war. Asked directly while speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill on Friday on whether he trusts China, Carney did not give an explicit answer. 'This is the start of a process of recalibrating the relationship with China. It's very important that we reopen dialog with Chinese authorities for several reasons,' Carney said, while highlighting China as Canada's 'second largest trading partner.' Previously, during the federal election earlier this year, Carney called China one of the largest threats when it comes to foreign interference in Canada and emerging threats in the Arctic. 'China willing to work with Canada:' Li In an interview with CTV Question Period back in May, China's Ambassador to Canada Wang Di expressed China's desire to meet with the Carney government 'as soon as possible' to discuss the latest trade issues between the two countries. Premier Li released a statement on Friday, saying he spoke with Carney at the prime minister's request. 'China is willing to work with Canada, in the spirit of looking to the future, to promote the steady improvement of bilateral relations, bring them onto a track of sound and steady development, and strive for win-win cooperation,' Li said. Last October – under the government of former prime minister Justin Trudeau – Canada followed the U.S. lead and imposed a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), accusing Beijing of 'distorting global trade' by exporting EVs at 'unfairly low prices.' Canada also hit China with a 25 per cent tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum. Following its own so-called anti-discrimination investigation, China retaliated by imposing a 100 per cent tariff on Canadian canola oil and canola meal, along with several other tariffs on Canadian agricultural products. In 2024, Canada's total canola exports to China were valued at almost $5 billion. China is also Canada's second-largest seafood market. Premiers have been putting pressure on Carney to improve trade relations with China and get those tariffs lifted. At the First Ministers' Meeting in Saskatoon on Monday, Carney said the federal government planned to work urgently to remove Chinese tariffs on impacted Canadian agriculture and seafood products. 'The Canadian government is engaging with its Chinese counterparts at the ministerial level and we'll continue those discussions,' Carney told reporters on Monday. The relationship between Canada and China still has not recovered since 2018 after Canada arrested Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on behalf of the United States over bank fraud charges. Days later, China separately detained Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor over allegations of espionage – accusations they denied. Both men were eventually released after spending more than 1,000 days in a Chinese prison, not long after Meng herself was released from house arrest. China's ambassador to Canada – who assumed his role in June 2024 – acknowledged those past tensions when speaking to CTV Question Period last month but insisted China is 'ready to move on and look ahead.' 'We are ready to work together with Canada to bring our relationship back onto the right track,' Wang said.
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Halifax mayor defends motion to temporarily pause new bike lane infrastructure
Halifax Mayor Andy Fillmore is defending a motion he intends to put forward next week at regional council to temporarily pause awarding new design and construction contracts for bike lanes. In his memo to colleagues, which was posted to Reddit on Friday, Fillmore said the move is in response to frustration among residents and business owners over "worsening traffic congestion" and the escalating project costs for the AAA (all ages and abilities) bicycle network. Fillmore stated the municipality is also failing to deliver a "balanced and efficient mobility system" as per its integrated mobility plan. Fillmore told CBC Radio's Mainstreet Halifax on Friday that his goal is to build cycling infrastructure and active transportation infrastructure "in the right way, in a way that doesn't create the very unfortunate backlash that is very real in our city right now." The mayor said he'd like to create cycling infrastructure in Halifax that doesn't sacrifice the needs of others who use the roads, like bus drivers, people who ride the bus, delivery and commercial vehicle drivers, people who have to drive in a car because they're not on a bus route, and those who aren't able to ride bikes. "We have to have a very balanced approach and I just push back on any commentary that we're facing some sort of a binary choice," Fillmore told Mainstreet. "This is very much a pause so that we can all move forward together in a mindful way that reflects the changing reality we have in our growing and busy city." Only applies to tenders not yet awarded Fillmore said the municipal bicycle network was only meant to cost $25 million. He said $16 million has already been spent, but that the budget for the project now is $93 million. "That leaves $77 million yet to be spent. Only $8 million will come from provincial and federal sources, and that leaves an unexpected $69 million to be funded through the municipal tax rate," Fillmore said. Fillmore said construction being done right now will be finished. Tenders identified in the capital budget for the next four years — but not yet awarded — would be put on hold. "This gives us an opportunity to have staff come back to us with a list of all those projects that are in that capital budget with a red light or a green light," he said, adding projects that threaten to "worsen congestion" will be paused. "All that red light means is, OK, we're just going to take a redesign here," Fillmore continued. "I expect a great percentage of the project on that list will get a green light and may only have a holdup of a month or two." 'Misguided proposal' David Trueman, the chair of the Halifax Cycling Coalition, called Fillmore's recommendation a "misguided proposal." He's calling on people to write to their regional councillor and urge them to vote against it. "We just got the cycling infrastructure projects back on track with the report to council from staff where they took the plan that was supposed to be delivered by the end of 2024 and they presented a detailed plan to get to it by 2028," Trueman said. "If we have a temporary pause, this is going to be delayed by years. We have a lot of staff and consultants tied up in designing these infrastructure protects, which take years through the pipeline. If you stop the pipeline, the flow is cut off and there can be untold delays and escalating costs." Trueman said the roads are already built and cycling is catching up. He said the upkeep cost on cycling infrastructure is a tiny fraction of what it would be for road costs. Divisive issue "These projects include all the costs of revamping a given street, and often there are other aspects of the road improvement ... [that] reduce the impact on car traffic," he said, citing a flyover bicycle bridge planned for the Macdonald Bridge site. "If we weren't worried about cars, we could do a much less expensive solution there. It's our propensity to avoid any impact to cars that raises the cost of cycling." Trueman said he thinks Fillmore's proposal is politically motivated. "Halifax has the second highest rate of active transportation of any city in Canada. Surely we don't want to throw that away," he said. "But what Andy Fillmore is keying in on is that cycling is a divisive issue. There's maybe 30 per cent of the population that has their doubts or their objections to it and he wants to create a wedge issue."
Globe and Mail
34 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
AFN calls emergency meeting to discuss Bill C-5
The Assembly of First Nations will hold an emergency meeting later this month to discuss federal legislation designed to speed up project approvals, amid concerns that the changes could infringe on Indigenous rights. The online meeting will take place on June 16 and all 634 chiefs are invited to participate, AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said in an interview. She said she spoke to Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday, adding that Parliament needs to ensure they have enough time to review it before it is passed. 'As I said to the prime minister, First Nations support efforts to protect Canada from economic uncertainty and advance resource-revenue sharing agreements,' she said. 'However, First Nations are very concerned that this proposal may violate many collective rights.' The AFN is now reviewing Bill C-5, which was tabled Friday, and will have a full response to it in the coming days, said Ms. Woodhouse Nepinak. Along with the emergency meeting, she said that the AFN national executive will also be meeting to discuss strategy, potential legal implications and next steps ahead of the organization's July general assembly. Bill C-5 would create a federal 'major projects office' that would identify projects 'of national interest' and put them on a list for priority treatment. It looks to speed up decision timelines while still ensuring environmental protections and commitments to Indigenous rights, according to the federal government. Nation-building projects are considered ones that, among other criteria, make a significant contribution to Canada's prosperity and advance the interests of Indigenous peoples, the government said in a statement. Projects would only get the designation following full consultation with affected Indigenous peoples, it added. New federal legislation would cut internal trade barriers, advance 'nation-building' projects The proposed office would include an Indigenous advisory council with First Nation, Inuit and Métis representatives, said the statement, and the government will allocate funding to strengthen Indigenous participation. Officials said the government sent letters to 66 Indigenous groups ahead of the bill's introduction to have a first discussion about its framework. 'Canada will uphold its constitutional obligations to consult Indigenous groups to ensure projects proceed in ways that respect and protect Indigenous rights,' the statement said. 'We are committed to working in a way that respects our commitments to the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act and the principles of reconciliation, including economic reconciliation.' Earlier this week Justice Minister Sean Fraser said that First Nations do not get a 'veto' over infrastructure projects, but then apologized the next day, saying his comments eroded trust. Mr. Carney said that his government will do everything it can to have the bill passed before the summer break. If Parliament needs to sit longer to do so, it should, he said. Ms. Woodhouse Nepinak said it's important that Parliament take the time needed to make sure First Nations can properly review and propose amendments before it passes. It comes as many communities are also dealing with the wildfires, she said. 'We fear attempts to ram legislation through Parliament may have significant consequences,' she said, adding that rights are at stake and 'failure to obtain free, prior and informed consent will likely result in protracted litigation.' Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict, who heads the Chiefs of Ontario, called the federal government's move to introduce the bill 'disappointing' and 'unfortunate.' First Nations, environmental groups denounce passing of Bill 5 in Ontario He said Ottawa is well aware of the criticism of Ontario's recently passed Bill 5, which also seeks to speed up mining and resource development by creating 'special economic zones' where provincial laws can be suspended. That bill, which passed this week, has sparked significant backlash from Indigenous groups, who warned it could reignite a wave of 'Idle No More' Indigenous protests first launched in 2012. Mr. Benedict said in an interview that both the federal government and the province should have reached out to First Nations to draft the bills in conjunction with them, and that Ottawa's outreach to Indigenous communities beforehand was not sufficient. 'The government has to come forward to the table and have conversations with rights holders ahead of the legislation being implemented or even considered, so that they can best understand the concerns we have, and that we can come to some mutual understanding of what the legislation's intent is, and what is going to be possible and what's not,' he said. He said his group was copied on a letter to the national chief from the federal government that solicited feedback on the bill, but his view is that the bill needs to be drafted in conjunction with First Nations. He added that First Nations are considering legal options, advocacy and 'direct action,' including protests. With a file from Stephanie Levitz and Steven Chase
