
Is there any escape from Donald Trump? It's complicated for Scotland
The date is June 2008. The Orange One, tie at full length and combover at full strength, is raising his arm at the gate of his mother's pebbledash house on the Isle of Lewis.
In the background, one of his cousins keeks out the front door. Trump has been inside for a grand total of 97 seconds.
You could be forgiven, these days, for thinking the image was some digital composite. Indeed, morph the hand into a fist, pixelate in some blood, and it's not so far away from Trump's physical reaction to the attempted assassination in July last year.
His iconicity is so overwhelming – from the cheapest shots on social media, to the most momentous shifts in geopolitics and world trade – that I often have to shut him out of my mind, just to recover some sense of agency or citizenship.
Even an old picture of him posing before a humble Scottish home produces, in the present, an authoritarian effect. Is there no fucking escape from this man?
The excellent set of articles in this week's paper provides the answer: no, there isn't much. But if escape is difficult, engagement seems even more complex than that.
The Scottish establishment already has a tawdry, pawky, cheesy relationship with Trump. The 2008 photo occurred during one of the Don's many dealings around his golf courses in Scotland, encouraged by first ministers McConnell and Salmond.
Golf! Other than grouse shooting, is Scotland's territory ever more supine and passive to the executive classes than this?
We not only host Trump Turnberry, but a second golf course at his resort in Aberdeenshire is about to open, titled after his mother's maiden name. The knot of mediocrity and sentimentality is pulled tight.
READ MORE: What I saw when I visited Donald Trump's new Scottish golf course
In these enterprises, Trump has predictably undershot the promises he made on jobs and revenue. But as the Scottish Greens' Patrick Harvie wrote earlier this week, there is deeper due diligence to be conducted.
The New York State Supreme Court has found Donald Trump to be guilty of civil fraud – one of his misdemeanours being 'a false inflation of the value of his assets, including his Scottish golf course', reports Harvie.
Patrick believes this justifies an unexplained wealth order to be raised against Trump by the Scottish Government. This is 'a mechanism that allows investigations into 'politically exposed persons', who are suspected of involvement in serious crime'.
Can you imagine this happening? We've had a week when the UK Government agreed a trade deal (or call it a reasonably light punishment-beating) with the Trump regime. Tributes – a state visit and a dose of Balmorality – have been offered up.
The notion of Scotland holding the US president's feet to the fire of his own criminality, amid all this vassalage… Well, I like it. It accords with the moral character I ascribe to Scottish sovereignty, now and in whatever more independent future.
READ MORE: Scottish distilleries eye zero tariffs on whisky after US-UK trade deal
But there's little doubt in my mind that an unexplained wealth order would trigger this capricious, thin-skinned autocrat. Who could then easily swing one of his many wrecking balls in Scotland's direction.
Whisky and salmon are still labouring under the 10% tariff in this week's US-UK trade deal. Who's to say, if His MAGA-jesty's ire is raised by Scottish lawyers poking around in his financial affairs, that he wouldn't arbitrarily raise tariffs on these key Scottish imports?
Yet Trump's petulant fiats raise deeper questions about business-as-usual, for Scotland as for many other countries.
One of the more startling articles this week seemed to be investigating the effect of Trump's anti-woke zeal on Scottish universities. But it also contained information on how much research is funded by US defence grants.
Between 2012 and 2022, Glasgow University received $9.4 million for research into various forms of drones and 'human performance enhancement'. Edinburgh University took $11.2m for studies that included 'ballistic modifiers' and 'amorphous explosives'. Several more defence millions were brought in across Strathclyde, Heriot-Watt, Aberdeen, Robert Gordon and Dundee universities.
For those of us who took to heart a previous American president's warning about the rise of the 'military-industrial complex', all of that spend is good to know about. And no great loss if it disappears.
What would really make the Eye of Sauron blink is a new Scottish nation-state, setting a timetable to remove Trident nuclear missiles from our soil – still the official policy of the independence-supporting parties, in or out of government.
It was dispiriting to hear the voices of 'SNP insiders' render up wee hard-man quotes to our reporters. 'I was expecting an absolute fucking uproar… Don't get me wrong, you got cybernats online giving it laldy but there wasn't actually that much pushback.'
As ably described by vice-president Grace Penn (The West Wing's Allison Janney) in Netflix's The Diplomat, Scottish nukes are seen by the US state as the last line of deterrence against a naval Russia sweeping through the North Atlantic.
Scottish independence is rendered as a direct and truculent threat to that deterrence. This threat triggers VP Penn's black-ops skullduggery, discovered in the closing episode. (The third series is imminent.)
READ MORE: Labour MP slapped down over claim UK-US trade deal 'great for Scotland'
As I've written several times in this space: what exactly is gained from softening Scottish principle over Trident? There is at least as strong a case to be made on the other side.
In a world recoiling from Trump's strong-arm tactics and toxicity, a Scotland that commits to nuclear prohibition sends an attractive message to hundreds of countries across the globe. Our soft power is profoundly enhanced by our moral removal of the hardest and most exterminist power from our territory.
The other conclusion to draw from this week's series is that Scotland, more than ever in the Trumpian era, needs to find shelter and solidarity in a European context.
The British state's indignities and compromises, involved in working the 'special relationship' with a rapacious, deal-oriented Trump regime, can be avoided if our indy seeks integration with the EU bloc.
The mutating of globalisation into a multi-lateral world, made from vast economic and continental blocs, renders the European Union even more of a haven for a small, progressive nation.
There's also something psychologically beneficial about the project of Scots indy, in the age of Trump. As he conducts his rule-by-whim, we should instead be facing the everyday challenge of arguing for, achieving, and then building an independent country.
Trump offers a slippery, maddening world, where authoritarians win by bemusing the citizenry as to what is true or false. Against this, indy can be our commitment to fact and structure.
That's the majority we need to win, the institutions we must forge, the missiles we should remove, the national resources we can manage and develop.
I believe a Scots indy will face a much more unpredictable, transformative world than any of our current politicians realise. Artificial general (or super) intelligence, and shocks from ecology and the biosphere, may radically upend the working and living norms of societies.
So. do we really want our capacity and our vision for these challenges to be sapped, as we react every time Trump goes to Crazy Town?
There's a fine American invention on my Apple phone called Clean Up. You apply your fingertip to remove an item, or person, from your photos. Up comes Trump at the gate of his mother's house – and now, some swipes later, he's gone.
Would that it were that easy. But it feels good and symbolic. Let's try to take our minds and purpose back from his endless Caligularity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer defended protester who sabotaged military aircraft
Sir Keir Starmer defended a protester who sabotaged US bombers when he was a human rights barrister. Details of the case emerged hours after pro- Palestinian activists allegedly damaged military aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Footage posted online by Palestine Action on Friday morning showed two people inside the air base, with one riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. It has now emerged that the Prime Minister represented a defendant in a similar case in 2003. A group of anti-war protesters had broken into RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire to sabotage US bombers before they flew to Iraq. Sir Keir argued that while the actions were against the law, they were justified because they were trying to stop the planes from committing war crimes. Josh Richards, who was represented by Sir Keir, was cleared after a jury failed to reach a verdict. The revelation was first made by the Politico email newsletter. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch tweeted: 'Worth noting that Keir Starmer defended an activist who broke into an RAF base to set fire to aircraft. Starmer claimed his client was legally justified because it might stop a war crime. 'If he'd won that argument in 2004, what happened at Brize Norton would be perfectly legal.' Downing Street declined to comment, except to point out the 'cab rank' rule - under which barristers have no choice but to take the next case in the queue. There were six trials into the 'Fairford Five' who broke into the airbase in the build-up to the invasion of Iraq. Two were found guilty of causing criminal damage to American vehicles at the base. Two others were acquitted, while Mr Richards - defended by Sir Keir - was cleared after two juries failed to reach a verdict. On Friday morning, Sir Keir described the 'act of vandalism' by Palestine Action as 'disgraceful'. 'The act of vandalism committed at RAF Brize Norton is disgraceful,' he said. 'Our Armed Forces represent the very best of Britain and put their lives on the line for us every day. 'It is our responsibility to support those who defend us.'


South Wales Guardian
23 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Two Middle East-related protests to be held in central London on Saturday
A protest organised by groups under the Palestine Coalition banner will gather in Russell Square from 12pm, before marching to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand for an assembly outside Downing Street. Former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and musician Paloma Faith are among those set to give speeches at the assembly. Meanwhile, a static counter-protest organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate will be held at the same time just north of Waterloo Bridge at the junction with the Strand. The group said it would meet at the location from 12.30pm onwards. Police have set out conditions for the first protest under the Public Order Act which demands that any person taking part in the procession must remain within Russell Square ahead of the protest and must not deviate from its specified route. Demonstrators must then stay in a specified part of Whitehall for the assembly, which must finish by 5.30pm, the force said. The Palestine Coalition is comprised of a number of different groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and Stop The War. Stop The War said in an advertisement for the event on its website: 'Israel's attacks on Gaza and the West Bank are intensifying. Their starvation policy continues. And now Israel attacks on Iran seem intended to lead us into a full-scale war in the Middle East. 'The UK Government has at last accepted that Israel's actions in Gaza are unconscionable. Now they must act – words are not enough.' Discussions are ongoing regarding possible conditions for the Stop The Hate protest, the Met said. In a post on X, Stop The Hate said: 'Our families in Israel are under attack: standing bravely in the face of threats and ballistic missiles, whilst the people of Iran are bravely facing down their totalitarian government — now it's our turn to stand proudly in solidarity with them.' The demonstrations come after reports on Friday that the Home Secretary will ban Palestine Action after the group vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Yvette Cooper has decided to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, after footage posted online showed two people inside the RAF base, with one appearing to spray paint into an aircraft's jet engine. PSC described the move on social media as 'outrageous', while the Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomed the news, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.'


South Wales Guardian
23 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election
'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Mr Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favourably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Mr Trump's post, made as his Republican White House is consumed by a hugely substantial foreign policy decision on whether to get directly involved in the Israel-Iran war, is part of an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Mr Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Mr Trump directed his administration to investigate Mr Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline'. Mr Biden has dismissed the investigation as 'a mere distraction'. The post also revives a long-running grievance by Mr Trump that the election was stolen even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history'. It was unclear what Mr Trump had in mind when he called for a special prosecutor, but in the event Attorney General Pam Bondi heeds his call, she may face pressure to appoint someone who has already been confirmed by the Senate. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on Friday. The Justice Department has appointed a succession of special counsels in recent years — sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency — to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by Mr Biden and by Mr Trump. Last year, Mr Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case. That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Mr Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court.