OpenAI supercharges ChatGPT: New Canvas and Projects features unveiled: All details
OpenAI has introduced a range of enhancements to its ChatGPT platform, adding new functionality to both its Canvas and Projects tools. The latest update enables users to download content directly from Canvas in various file formats, while Project capabilities have been expanded to include advanced research tools, voice interactions, and improved flexibility on mobile.
Announced via OpenAI's official X account, the update brings long-requested features to Canvas — a live editing and formatting space within ChatGPT, initially launched in preview form in October 2024 and later rolled out to all users by December. With this update, users can now export their work in several formats, including PDF, Microsoft Word (.docx), and Markdown (.md). For developers using Canvas to write code, direct export in language-specific formats such as Python (.py), JavaScript (.js), and SQL (.sql) is now possible.
The Canvas feature is accessible across all platforms where ChatGPT is available — including the website, desktop clients, and mobile apps — allowing users to maintain a consistent workflow regardless of device.
In parallel, OpenAI has announced substantial upgrades to the Projects tool, which is exclusive to ChatGPT's paid subscribers. Projects allows users to organise conversations and store contextual information, including previous chats, uploaded files, and personalised instructions. The new update significantly extends its scope.
Most notably, Projects now supports 'deep research' capabilities. This allows users to make complex, multi-step research queries using real-time data from public web sources, improving the AI's performance in tasks that demand more than surface-level information. Additionally, the integration of ChatGPT's voice mode provides a hands-free experience, making it easier for users to interact with the assistant on the go.
Further improvements are also being introduced on mobile. Users of the ChatGPT app on iOS and Android can now upload files and switch between AI models directly within a project — two features previously limited to the desktop experience.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
44 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'They copy-pasted from AI': Tech company offers Rs 20 lakh, can't find a single techie who understands code
You Might Also Like: AI cannot replace all jobs, says expert: 3 types of careers that could survive the automation era A technology firm recently launched a hiring campaign for a well-compensated entry-level position offering a handsome Rs 20 lakh per annum. However, despite conducting a staggering 450 interviews, the company failed to find a single candidate suitable for the role. The recruitment team turned to the Developers India subreddit to share their ordeal, hoping to shed light on the complexities of hiring in the AI company had posted job listings on LinkedIn for junior-level frontend and backend developers, as well as QA roles. The salary range—up to Rs 20 lakh—attracted a wave of over 12,000 applications. From the outset, the hiring team filtered out nearly 10,000 applicants, citing reasons such as poorly tailored resumes and a lack of relevant technical abilities. According to them, the early elimination was not about being overly selective but about saving both their own time and the applicants' from fruitless interview who did make it to the interviews were tested on fundamental programming principles as well as standard data structures and algorithms topics like trees, heaps, linked lists, and graph traversal methods such as breadth-first search and depth-first search. Interestingly, the firm even permitted the use of tools like ChatGPT during assessments to simulate a real-world working this modern approach backfired. While candidates were quick to churn out working solutions—often copied directly from AI—the problems began when interviewers asked for an explanation. Most were unable to describe what their own code was doing or provide details about its time and space complexity. This led to the realization that many candidates were simply copying and pasting without comprehending the logic behind the code—a phenomenon the recruiter described as "vibe coding."This troubling pattern prompted the company to reflect on its own methods. Was the interview process too rigid or flawed? Or was it indicative of a larger issue where aspiring developers rely too heavily on AI tools, skipping the foundational learning necessary to become competent programmers?The Reddit community didn't hold back in its response. Some users questioned the company's recruitment practices, pointing out that spending 450 hours on interviews without hiring a single person suggested deeper internal problems. One user criticized the process as inefficient and misguided, arguing that the HR team might be more at fault than the candidates themselves. Another suggested that if so many interviews yield zero hires, it could be a sign that the hiring strategy—and not the talent pool—is hiring saga mirrors a broader anxiety echoed by Godfather of AI, Geoffrey Hinton, who recently warned that roles relying heavily on intellectual replication—like coding without understanding—are among the first to be replaced by AI. As companies seek talent that can think, not just code, this recruitment roadblock may signal a growing divide between tool-dependent developers and genuinely skilled professionals.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Meta's Llama 3.1 AI model reproduces copyrighted book text, raising legal alarms
Meta's latest AI model, Llama 3.1, is under scrutiny after a new study revealed it can replicate large portions of copyrighted books—including Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone—with surprising accuracy. Conducted by researchers from Stanford, Cornell, and West Virginia University, the study found that Llama 3.1 has memorized around 42% of the first Harry Potter book and can reproduce 50-word sections correctly nearly half the time. Among five major AI models analyzed for how they processed the Books3 dataset, Llama 3.1—Meta's 70-billion parameter model released in July 2024—was the most prone to output copyrighted content. By contrast, Llama 1 65B, released in February 2023, had memorized only 4.4% of the same book, highlighting a significant increase in verbatim retention over time. The model was also found to reproduce exact excerpts from other iconic works such as The Hobbit and 1984. Experts suspect this could be due to repeated exposure to the same texts during training, possibly sourced from fan sites, academic analyses, or online reviews. Adjustments to Meta's training strategy may have unintentionally worsened the memorization problem. These findings come amid growing legal pressure on AI developers. The New York Times has already filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement by training models like ChatGPT on proprietary articles. The lawsuit claims OpenAI's models can not only reproduce content verbatim but also mimic The Times' unique style. For Meta, these revelations may trigger similar legal risks as calls for transparency and ethical AI development intensify across the industry.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Why Facebook-parent Meta may face same 'AI copying' problem as ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, Microsoft
Representative image Facebook parent Meta 's newest AI model, Llama 3.1, has been found to replicate passages from well-known books, including Harry Potter, far more frequently than anticipated, as per a new report which also says that many of these works remain under copyright. Researchers claim that the AI has memorised roughly 42% of the first Harry Potter book and can accurately reproduce 50-word sections about half the time. The study, conducted by experts from Stanford, Cornell, and West Virginia University, examined how five leading AI models processed the Books3 dataset, which includes thousands of copyrighted titles. "Llama 3.1 70B—a mid-sized model Meta released in July 2024—is far more likely to reproduce Harry Potter text than any of the other four models, the researchers found . "Interestingly, Llama 1 65B, a similar-sized model released in February 2023, had memorized only 4.4 percent of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. This suggests that despite the potential legal liability, Meta did not do much to prevent memorization as it trained Llama 3. At least for this book, the problem got much worse between Llama 1 and Llama 3," the researchers wrote. Meta's Llama 3.1 has been noted for retaining large portions of well-known books, including The Hobbit, 1984, and Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. In contrast, earlier versions, such as Llama 1, only memorized around 4% of Harry Potter. This suggests that the newer model is preserving significantly more copyrighted content. Why Meta's models are reproducing exact text Researchers suggest several reasons why Meta's AI models may be copying text verbatim. One possibility is that the same books were repeatedly used during training, reinforcing memorisation rather than generalising language patterns. Others speculate that training data could include excerpts from fan websites, reviews, or academic papers, leading the model to inadvertently retain copyrighted content. Additionally, adjustments to the training process may have amplified this issue without developers realizing the extent of its impact. What this means for Meta These findings intensify concerns about how AI models are trained and whether they might be violating copyright laws. As authors and publishers push back against unauthorised use of their work, this could become a major challenge for tech companies like Meta. Earlier this year, The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging that their AI models, including ChatGPT, were trained on copyrighted articles without permission. According to the Times, OpenAI, 'can generate output that recites Times' content verbatim, closely summarizes it, and mimics its expressive style.' It said that the AI company essentially stole their intellectual property. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
