Saving Sukhna: Demolition drive targets unauthorised constructions in Kaimbwala village
1
2
3
Chandigarh: In a decisive move to enforce the directives of the Punjab and Haryana high court and protect Sukhna catchment area, a demolition drive was successfully carried out in the periphery of Kaimbwala village on Tuesday.
The operation was initiated under the orders of the deputy commissioner.
The demolition was executed with the help of two poclain machines and one JCB, and was supported by a strong police presence, including lady constables. The entire operation was conducted under the close supervision of SDM central, UT. During the drive, approximately 20 unauthorised commercial shops and showrooms, nine tin sheds, one boundary wall, and two khokhas were demolished.
The operation was completed peacefully and without any incident.
This action was taken in strict compliance with the orders issued by the HC, which mandates the preservation of the Sukhna catchment area to help restore Sukhna Lake to its original state. The court has prohibited the development of housing colonies or any construction activity within this ecologically sensitive zone. It has also empowered enforcement agencies to halt ongoing constructions and demolish any unauthorised structures without prior notice.
The Supreme Court has reinforced that no construction is permitted in this area after May 21, 2012. Any violations will result in immediate action against the offenders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
SC refuses to quash cheating case against senior advocate: 'Shocking! you acted like a broker', it says; rejects plea to refund
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed shock and dismay over a 69-year-old senior advocate cheating a person of 1.68 crore rupees by acting as a land broker and dismissed the plea for quashing the criminal case against him in lieu of his undertaking to refund the swindled amount. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A partial working day bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan said, 'It is not a case for settlement. You may be a lawyer, but your conduct is outrageous. You should face trial and get convicted.' 'A senior advocate is doing brokering. He is doing land transactions through his clerk. He collected Rs 1.68 crore and refused to refund. This is shocking. He even got his intern, a law student, involved in this act. And all this is happening in a senior advocate's chamber,' the bench said. The senior advocate, R Manickavel, posing as the agreement holder of the original owner of a property, promised to offer that property for a sale consideration of Rs 3.25 crore. On various occasions, a sum of Rs 1.68 crore was received by the senior advocate without introducing the title holder to the complainant. Smelling a rat, the complainant insisted on meeting the original owner. Manickavel told the complainant to pay the balance amount if he had confidence in him. If not, he could take back the advance payments of Rs 1.68 crore. The complainant sought a refund of the advanced amount. Manickavel repaid only Rs 40 lakhs. On verification, the complainant came to know that the original landowner had settled the said property in favour of her legal heirs. When the complainant demanded return of his money, Manickavel along with co-accused, refused to pay and threatened him with dire consequences. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He lodged a police complaint in 2011 accusing the lawyer of cheating. The Chennai police filed a chargesheet in 2023, of which the Egmore Magistrate has taken cognizance. The Madras HC on Apr 30 this year dismissed his plea for quashing of the case. Against this order, he had appealed in the SC.
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Brazil's court to make social media firms legally accountable for user posts
The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users, in a landmark case for Latin America with implications for U.S. top court decided to rule on two different cases to reach an understanding of how to deal with social media companies as reports of fraud, child pornography and violence amongst teenagers become rampant online. Critics warn such measures could threaten free speech as platforms preemptively remove content that could be Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing, but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. One such official is reportedly Brazilian Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has taken measures against social media outlets he deemed to have not complied with Brazilian only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is Andr Mendona and his vote was made public last week. The court is yet to decide how such regulations will be said free speech on social media is key for the publication of information that 'holds powerful public institutions to account, including governments, political elites and digital platforms.'Justice Flvio Dino, the first to vote on Wednesday, reminded his colleagues that recent cases of school shootings in Brazil were created on social media. He read out postings by one user who said he was happy by watching families of dead children 'weeping, bleeding, dying.''I think social media have not made humanity closer to what it has produced in best fashion,' he social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the current legislation states that social media companies can only be held responsible if they do not remove hazardous content after a court debate on regulating social networks increased in Brazil in the aftermath of the Jan. 8 riot in 2023, when supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro ransacked Congress, the presidential palace and the Supreme Court in the capital, need to be proactive in regulating content, said Alvaro Palma de Jorge, a law professor at the Rio-based Getulio Vargas Foundation, a think tank and need to adopt certain precautions that are not compatible with simply waiting for a judge to eventually issue a decision ordering the removal of that content,' Palma de Jorge ruling brings Brazil's approach to big tech closer to the European Union's approach, which has sought to rein in the power of social media companies and other digital platforms automatically accountable for content on their platforms may infringe freedom of speech as they could resort to preemptively removing content, according to the Sao-Paulo based Brazilian Chamber of Digital Economy, an organization that represents sectors of the digital economy.'This type of liability favors large companies with robust legal structures, to the detriment of smaller, national players, which negatively impacts competition,' said the organization, adding that the decision may increase barriers to Watch
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Shoulder responsibility and ensure justice to the Bengaluru stampede victims
Multiple investigations have been launched into the tragedy. The Karnataka High Court took suo motu cognisance and ordered the government to file a status report, the government ordered a magisterial inquiry and set up a one-man commission headed by a retired HC judge, and a probe by the police's criminal investigation department. It is hoped the inquiries bring to light the omissions and commissions, and who took the crucial decision to hold a victory parade and celebrate in the confines of the stadium. A number of issues require scrutiny: RCB's X post on free passes to the stadium, and whether top police officials' objections were brushed aside by politicians. There were many factors at play: the public rushing to collect the passes, restrictions at the stadium gates, a tired and depleted police force, and lakhs of people pouring in to celebrate the elusive IPL trophy. The Congress high command summoned Siddaramaiah and Deputy CM D K Shivakumar and sought an explanation. The opposition has been baying for the resignations of the two leaders and Home Minister G Parameshwara for turning the felicitation into a family and supporters' show, and absolving themselves of accountability. The image of the Congress government has come under severe drubbing and the leaders' stock has hit an all-time low. They should realise that it is in their interest to take responsibility and do justice to the grieving families. They may fall from grace now, but that's part of the leadership role.
