Zelenskyy will sign off on special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to formally approve plans Wednesday to set up a new international court to prosecute senior Russian officials for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The special tribunal will be created through an agreement between Ukraine and the Council of Europe, the continent's top human rights body. Zelenskyy is visiting the Strasbourg-based organization for the first time as part of the announcement.
The special tribunal aims to target senior Russian leaders for the 'crime of aggression,' which underpins the countless war crimes Ukraine accuses Russian forces of committing since the start of the war in 2022. Existing international courts, including the International Criminal Court in The Hague, lack jurisdiction to prosecute Russian nationals for that specific offense.
Since early in the conflict, Kyiv has been pushing for the creation of a special tribunal that goes beyond prosecuting war crimes that Ukraine alleged Russian forces committed — including bombing civilian infrastructure, killing civilians, rape, taking hostages and torture. Russia denies those claims.
There are logistical details still to be resolved, including where the court will be based. The Hague has been suggested due to its existing legal infrastructure, but no final decision has been made.
Russia does not extradite its own citizens, and whether or not Russian President Vladimir Putin will ever end up in the dock remains to be seen.
Under international law, sitting heads of state and certain other top officials — often referred to as the 'troika,' including a country's head of state, head of government, and foreign minister — enjoy immunity from prosecution. That means any potential indictment of Putin could only move forward if he leaves office.
There is no statute of limitation on the crime of aggression.
The institution will be funded by supporting countries known as the Core Group, including the Netherlands, Japan and Canada. The United States backed the project under former President Joe Biden, but President Donald Trump's administration did not support the initiative.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
17 minutes ago
- News24
Trump celebrates ‘great victory' at NATO summit as allies promise spending increase
US President Donald Trump expressed a friendly tone toward NATO allies. NATO members agreed to increase military spending. NATO chief Mark Rutte praised Trump. US President Donald Trump struck a conciliatory tone toward NATO allies on Wednesday, framing an expected deal on increased defence spending as a 'great victory for everyone' at their summit. Everything has been carefully choreographed at the gathering in The Hague to keep the volatile US president on board: From chopping back the official part of the meeting to putting him up overnight in the royal palace. The strategy seemed to be working - for now - with Trump seeming keen to share the plaudits for a deal set to see the 32 countries commit to spending 5% of output on defence by 2035. 'It's a great victory for everybody, I think, and we will be equalised very shortly, and that's the way it has to be,' said Trump, as European allies seek to catch up with US spending on defence. 'I've been asking them to go up to 5% for a number of years, and they're going up to 5%... I think that's going to be very big news,' he said. Hosting the meeting, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters that Trump was in an 'excellent mood' at the dinner hosted on Tuesday by King Willem-Alexander in his royal palace, and that the US leader appeared inspired by his hosts. 'The day begins in the beautiful Netherlands. The King and Queen are beautiful and spectacular people. Our breakfast meeting was great!' he posted on the Truth Social network. Entering the meeting, leaders lined up to declare the summit's planned spending hike as 'historic'. NATO allies say the increase is needed to counter a growing threat from Russia but also to keep Trump engaged, with the US leader long complaining that Europe spends too little on its own defence. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said: 'As Europeans, we should realise that our long break from history is over.' The continent needed to take responsibility for its own security 'in a very difficult time', added De Wever. Kin Cheung/Pool/Getty Images The pledge divides up the spending into 3.5% of GDP on core defence costs - just above the current US level - plus another 1.5% to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. With that deal all but clinched, attention turned to the basic foundation of the alliance - its mutual defence clause that says an attack on one is an attack on all. Trump rattled his allies by appearing to cast some doubt on the validity of this promise - known as Article Five of the NATO treaty - telling reporters on the way to The Hague that it 'depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five.' But Rutte played down the comments, saying he believed that Trump and the US were still 'totally committed' to Article Five. And when pressed about the collective pledge while meeting Rutte on Wednesday, Trump said: 'We're with them all the way.' Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer dodged multiple questions seeking clarity over Washington's stance. We live in a very volatile world and today is about the unity of NATO, showing that strength. Keir Starmer In an earlier message, probably not designed for public consumption, Rutte heaped flattery on Trump, praising him for bringing everyone on board for the spending hike. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a gushing, caps-filled missive to Trump, who promptly posted it on social media. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague,' wrote Rutte. Underpinning the leaders' discussions on defence was Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with Trump poised to meet the war-torn country's president Volodymyr Zelensky on the summit sidelines. Zelensky is playing a less central role here than at previous summits, to avoid a bust-up with Trump after their infamous Oval Office shouting match. But Trump described him as a 'nice guy' and added that he was talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war, saying: 'I think progress is being made.' Rutte said that allies would send the message that support for Kyiv was 'unwavering and will persist'. But despite his insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains 'irreversible', NATO will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. Hungary's Kremlin-friendly Prime Minister Viktor Orban was more categorical. 'NATO has no business in Ukraine,' he said. 'My job is to keep it as it is.'
Wall Street Journal
40 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Weakened Iran Poses an Alliance Test for China, Russia and North Korea
As Iran reels from its gravest threat in decades, its alliance with China, Russia and North Korea—an axis that has increasingly alarmed the U.S. and allies—is facing a vital test: Will its partners come to its aid? Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang could offer Iran crucial assistance to recover from the damage inflicted by U.S. and Israeli strikes on its nuclear program and arsenal of conventional weapons. That could deepen the alliance, sending a powerful signal for potential conflicts in Taiwan, the Korean Peninsula and Eastern Europe.
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
US, Iran talks ‘promising': Trump envoy
Steve Witkoff, U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, said Tuesday that talks with Tehran for a long-term peace agreement are 'promising' — a day after President Trump announced a temporary ceasefire agreement after 12 days of conflict between Iran and Israel. In an interview on Fox News Channel's 'The Ingraham Angle,' Witkoff said discussions with Iranian officials were already underway, as the fragile U.S.-brokered ceasefire appears to be holding. 'The president has said unequivocally that he wants to see — and he's hopeful for — a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire,' Witkoff told host Laura Ingraham. 'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' he continued. 'I think that the conversations are promising.' The envoy, who has participated in negotiations with Iran on the Trump administration's behalf, said he's 'confident' about the prospects for a deal, which he said would ensure 'long-term prosperity' for Iran. 'We're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement that resurrects Iran, that brings it into the League of Nations, that creates long-term prosperity for Iran and, most importantly, allows for the GCC to grow economically,' Witkoff said, using an acronym for the Gulf Cooperation Council. He also touted Trump's authorization of U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, saying, 'Eliminating this risk was crucial to the economic future and prosperity of the entire Gulf region.' 'And we've achieved that,' Witkoff continued. 'So, I think now it's time for us to sit down with the Iranians and get to a comprehensive peace agreement.' He added, 'And I'm very confident that we're going to achieve that.' Ingraham then asked Witkoff whether a potential deal with Iran would allow for any uranium enrichment. 'No,' Witkoff said, without hesitation. 'They don't need it,' the special envoy, who has also been instrumental in Russia-Ukraine peace talks, continued. 'What they need is a civil, non-enrichment program, just like Abu Dhabi has. They're running a reactor like that, called Bushehr, where they don't have enrichment, and they're getting fuel from the outside. And we're going to work with them on this. But what they don't need is enrichment.' His comments come as multiple outlets reported that Saturday's strikes likely only set Tehran's nuclear program back by a few months. The administration has vowed to investigate the reports, which contrast Trump's rhetoric that the attacks 'destroyed' Iran's nuclear capabilities. Witkoff and others have called the leaks 'treasonous.'
