Kansas Reflector staff rakes in recognition with 16 awards in statewide journalism contest
Tecumseh South Elementary Students wheel the "moon tree" across a field before planting it May 28, 2024. The field is adjacent to the school, which is just east of Topeka in Shawnee County. This photo was part of an entry that won third place for best story/picture combination in the 2025 Kansas Press Association awards. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
The width and breadth of Kansas Reflector journalism was recognized in the annual Kansas Press Association contest results announced Wednesday.
From business reporting to commentary to overall recognition, a swath of Reflector reporters, editors and contributors shared the 16 awards in the Division VII category. The task of writing these award summaries has fallen to me over the years, and you might think that the excitement fades, but it hasn't yet. Being part of this staff and effort to bring free, nonprofit journalism to the Sunflower State remains a spectacular privilege.
Editor in chief Sherman Smith was named Kansas journalist of the year, his third time winning that award since founding the Reflector in the summer of 2020. He also won first place in the series category for coverage of the Marion County Record newspaper raid anniversary. He shared that award with independent journalist Marisa Kabas.
Former Reflector and Missouri Independent reporter Allison Kite and Stateline's Kevin Hardy won first place for local business story.
Finally among the first place finishers, opinion contributors Eric Thomas and Mark McCormick were both recognized for column writing. I'm delighted to see Eric and Mark recognized for their determined, consistent and ever-readable pieces. I finished third in the category, which translates to a Reflector sweep of the top three finishers.
'I have the best job in the world because I get to work with all my favorite journalists in a tireless quest to speak truth to power and lift Kansans' voices,' Smith told me Wednesday evening.
I couldn't agree more.
Further staff members were honored with an array of second-place finishes. Reporter Anna Kaminski received the distinction for her entry in the military story category, while former reporter Rachel Mipro placed for an environmental story. Mipro departed in July, and Kaminski arrived in August. Working with both has been a joy.
Now we come to an eternally tricky piece of any awards story. That would be the writer covering his or her own awards. I placed second for journalist of the year for the second time in a row. In this case, however, I'm right behind Smith. I'm sure I'll never hear the end of it. I also finished second in editorial writing.
Other Kansas Press Association awards for Kansas Reflector staff included:
New Journalist Award: Third place, Anna Kaminski
Investigative Story: Third place, Sherman Smith
Education Story: Third place, ''Unapologetically loud': How student journalists fought a Kansas district over spyware and won,' Sherman Smith
Column Writing: Third place, Clay Wirestone
Column Writing: Third place, Max McCoy
Best Story/Picture Combination: Third place, 'Kansas elementary school students plant exclusive sweetgum that traversed the moon,' Sherman Smith
Military Story: Third Place, 'Bill protecting Kansans veterans from 'claim sharks' vaporized after flat tax failed,' Sherman Smith
Each year I repeat some variant on the journalistic truism that no one does these jobs for awards. The most important recognition I receive comes from our readers, both in person and through email. But only the must curmudgeonly of codgers would refuse such distinction when offered.
On behalf of Reflector staff, thanks to the KPA, and we hope to keep serving you all.
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court shuts down Mexico's lawsuit against American gunmakers
The Supreme Court on Thursday tossed out a lawsuit from the Mexican government that alleged American gun manufacturers should be held responsible for cartel violence on the Southwest border, a decision that shields the companies from a suit that had claimed billions in damages. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for a unanimous court explaining why the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which allows suits to go forward if they're based on an underlying violation of a state or federal law, doesn't allow the suit against Mexico to proceed: 'Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers,' Kagan wrote for the court. 'We have little doubt that, as the complaint asserts, some such sales take place – and that the manufacturers know they do.' 'The predicate exception allows for accomplice liability only when a plaintiff makes a plausible allegation that a gun manufacturer 'participate[d] in' a firearms violation 'as in something that [it] wishe[d] to bring about' and sought to make succeed,' Kagan added. 'Because Mexico's complaint fails to do so, the defendant manufacturers retain their PLCAA-granted immunity.' Mexico's suit landed at a particularly fraught moment in its relationship with the US, as President Donald Trump has leaned on the country to further scale back the flow of migrants and drugs heading north. The litigation, filed in 2021, was something of a counterpoint, focusing on an American product that is contributing to the chaos at the border. Generally, such lawsuits against the gun industry are barred by a 2005 law, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, that prohibits plaintiffs from suing companies over crimes committed with the guns they make. Mexico was attempting to navigate its suit through a narrow exception in that law. Mexico sued Smith & Wesson and six other US gunmakers for $10 billion in damages, alleging that the companies design and market their guns specifically to drug cartels that then use them in the 'killing and maiming of children, judges, journalists, police, and ordinary citizens throughout Mexico.' That, Mexico said, amounted to 'aiding and abetting' firearms trafficking to the cartels – an act that, the country said, should qualify for an exemption to the 2005 law. The Mexican government said that between 70% and 90% of guns recovered at crime scenes in its country are made in the US. There is only one gun store in all of Mexico, its lawyers said, and 'yet the nation is awash in guns.' Some of those weapons, Mexico said, appeared to be marketed directly to gangs, with advertisements focused on their 'military-grade' and with names like the Super 'El Jefe.' But even some of the Supreme Court's liberals, who have tended to side with gun control groups in the past, said during oral arguments in March that they were concerned with the implications of Mexico's suit. Though the case did not involve the Second Amendment, gun rights groups, including the National Rifle Association, said the lawsuit was an indirect effort to 'destroy' the American firearms industry by making it easier to sue companies for huge sums. A federal district court backed the gunmakers, blocking the suit from moving forward. But the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals concluded Mexico's suit could proceed. The gun companies appealed to the Supreme Court last spring. The Supreme Court has been hesitant to allow people to sue companies for indirect damages in other contexts as well. In 2023, the high court rejected a suit from the victim of a 2017 terrorist attack in Turkey who claimed the social media company then known as Twitter contributed to the attack by hosting content tied to ISIS. In a unanimous decision, the court said the connection between the content at issue and the attack was too tenuous to allow the family to sue. This story is breaking and will be updated.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court rejects Mexican govt suit against gun makers
The US Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a $10 billion lawsuit by the Mexican government accusing American gun manufacturers of fueling drug cartel violence. In a unanimous 9-0 opinion, the top court said a federal law -- the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) -- shields the gun makers from liability. "Mexico's lead claim -- that the manufacturers elect to sell guns to, among others, known rogue dealers -- fails to clear that bar," said Justice Elena Kagan, the author of the opinion. "Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers." Gun maker Smith & Wesson and gun distributor Interstate Arms had sought dismissal of the Mexican government's suit, which has been winding its way through US courts since 2021. Mexico, which is under mounting pressure from President Donald Trump to curb drug trafficking, had accused the firearms makers of "aiding and abetting" illegal gun sales because they allegedly know that some of their products were being unlawfully sold to the drug cartels. A federal judge tossed out the case in 2022 saying Mexico's claims failed to overcome the protection of the PLCAA, which was passed by Congress in 2005 and shields US gunmakers from liability for criminals misusing their products. An appeals court revived the case citing an exception to the law, and Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms sought relief from the Supreme Court. A majority of the justices on the conservative-dominated top US court appeared to side with the firearms companies during more than 90 minutes of oral arguments in March. Mexico maintains that 70-90 percent of the weapons recovered at crime scenes have been trafficked from the United States. The US southern neighbor tightly controls firearms sales, making them practically impossible to obtain legally. Even so, drug-related violence has seen more than 480,000 people killed in Mexico since the government deployed the army to combat trafficking in 2006, according to official figures. Catherine Stetson, representing the Mexican government before the Supreme Court, said 600,000 US guns are illegally trafficked into Mexico every year and some companies are even "designing certain guns to target the Mexican market," giving them Spanish names such as "El Jefe." The case comes against a backdrop of US-Mexico trade tensions with Trump threatening tariffs on imports from Mexico, citing a lack of progress in stemming the flow of drugs such as fentanyl into the United States. cl/md
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Supreme Court rejects Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. gun makers
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out the Mexican government's lawsuit against U.S. firearms manufacturers accusing them of aiding and abetting gun violence. The court ruled unanimously in a ruling authored by Justice Elena Kagan that the lawsuit is barred by a 2005 federal law that shields gun companies from legal liability. The 2021 lawsuit accused Smith & Wesson, Colt and other companies of deliberately selling guns to dealers who sell products that are frequently recovered at Mexican crime scenes. The Mexican government accused the companies of "aiding and abetting" violations of U.S. law, which they had argued means the gun makers were not protected by the federal immunity shield, called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Mexico is seeking up to $10 billion in damages. The case at the Supreme Court involved two companies — Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms. Other manufacturers, including Glock and Colt, successfully had claims against them tossed out. A federal judge initially ruled for the manufacturers, but the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived the case last year, saying the liability shield did not extend to Mexico's specific claims. The case reached the Supreme Court following increased tensions between American and Mexican leaders after the election of President Donald Trump, who has cited drug trafficking and gang violence in Mexico amid his crackdown on illegal immigrants. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation intended to reduce the flow of guns across the border, which they estimate to total at least 200,000 a year.
