
Chan Chun Sing on defence: 'We are not at war, but neither are we at peace', Singapore News
While Singapore may not be fighting a war now, that doesn't mean we should be complacent, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said in an interview with the media at the Ministry of Defence (Mindef) headquarters at Bukit Gombak on Wednesday (June 25).
Chan, 55, highlighted some new developments in the global security order ahead of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) Day on July 1, stating that there are more conflicts today — not just conventional, but also in cyberspace.
"Today we are not at war, but neither are we at peace," he said. "Today — and every day — the SAF is operating somewhere in-between.
"On the cyberspace, the number of threat incidents that we have to deal with every day with other government agencies is not a small number."
Chan, previously Education Minister, was appointed Defence Minister following Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's cabinet reshuffle on May 21.
The defence minister added that these "information operations" that are conducted on Singapore or when Singapore becomes a collateral are not something that Mindef will take lightly. Hundreds of threats every year: RSAF
But threats in cyberspace aren't the only dangers that the SAF face.
The Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) deals with hundreds of threats every year to ensure the safety of our airspace, while the Republic of Singapore Navy keeps our seas clear amid the thousands of ships that the Maritime Security Task Force must deal with.
Meanwhile, the SAF works behind the scenes with numerous operations to make sure "nothing appears in your news cycle", Chan said, explaining that this may mean many Singaporeans may not appreciate what the SAF is doing to keep the country safe.
"There are many day-to-day activities that the SAF has to be on alert for in order to keep Singapore safe, and that our way of life, at least, won't be disrupted."
Although some of the threats that we face in the present may be new, the concepts behind them are not, the minister said.
"Frankly, even when I was in the SAF, we were talking about these kinds of threats 20, 30 years ago… I was dealing with these kinds of issues even when I was a major in the force in the 1990s.
"But the volume and the intensity — these have changed."
Chan served with the SAF between 1987 and 2011 where he became Chief of Army before leaving to run in the 2011 General Election. He was the Chief of Army from 2010 to 2011. Conflicts elsewhere can affect Singapore
Chan also explained that conflicts across the globe may not directly involve our country, but can impact us.
"A more uncertain global security environment will certainly lead to or reinforce the uncertainties in the economic environment," he said, explaining that job opportunities, wages and commodity prices here would all be impacted.
"What is happening on the security front is closely intertwined with what is happening on the economic front," he added.
He was referring to multiple conflicts around the world such as the Israel-Iran war which went on for 12 days before a ceasefire came into effect on Wednesday (June 25).
Aside from the heightened security concerns, Chan also looked at the economic impact of the Iran conflict — among other conflicts — has had on the world.
He explained risks of uncertainty in the global economic system and the global supply chain.
"Once you start to break up the global supply chain, everybody is working on what we call the local optimum, rather than the global optimum.
"Prices are likely to go up rather than down, so the impact is not to be underestimated," he said.
"If prices go up, jobs go down, wages don't grow — it's a very tricky situation." Tokenism an 'injustice' to both individual and system
Chan also dealt with questions raised by reporters about tokenism within the SAF and how individuals are promoted.
Tokenism in this context refers to the hiring or promotion of an SAF employee who is also part of a minority in order to make the SAF appear more inclusive.
He emphasised that selection in the SAF is based on merit, explaining that there are two fundamental considerations when selecting people.
The organisation looks at a person's capacity to carry out his duty, which is based on merit, as well as how this person's abilities can be best applied when deployed, Chan stated.
"We will never apply tokenism to any deployment," he said. "It does injustice to the individual, it does injustice to the system.
"The SAF will continue to broaden our recruitment of people from diverse pools and walks of life." NS for women?
On the topic of women serving National Service (NS), Chan said that even though the constitution says that "all able-bodied Singaporeans can be conscripted", women may not be needed to enlist, yet.
"Whether it is men or women, if we want to do conscription, there must be a real operational need for it — that must always drive it," he explained.
But even without full conscription, there are calls for more women to be given the chance to experience NS.
"I think many of them want to experience, see and also contribute, that's why I think we have such strong support for the SAF Volunteer Corps."
The SAF Volunteer Corps is a uniformed volunteer scheme to give Singaporeans and Permanent Residents a chance to contribute to national defence.
"It's very heartening to see the support for the SAF Volunteer Corps," Chan added. "More and more women are coming forward not just to serve in the Volunteer Corps, but also in the regular corps."
Mindef has also continued to expand deployment of female officers across the four services of the SAF, which has given them more opportunities to make contributions, he said.
[[nid:718746]]
khooyihang@asiaone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Trump says he would consider bombing Iran again, drops sanctions relief plan
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump sharply criticised Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamanei, on Friday (Jun 27), dropped plans to lift sanctions on Iran and said he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran is enriching uranium to worrisome levels. Trump reacted sternly to Khamanei's first remarks after a 12-day conflict with Israel that ended when the United States launched bombing raids last weekend against Iranian nuclear sites. Khamanei said Iran "slapped America in the face" by launching an attack against a major US base in Qatar following last weekend's US bombing raid. Khamanei also said Iran would never surrender. Trump said he had spared Khamanei's life. US officials told Reuters on Jun 15 that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the supreme leader. "His country was decimated, his three evil nuclear sites were obliterated, and I knew exactly where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the US armed forces, by far the greatest and most powerful in the world, terminate his life," Trump said in a social media post. SANCTIONS RELIEF DROPPED Trump also said that in recent days he had been working on the possible removal of sanctions on Iran to give it a chance for a speedy recovery. He said he has now abandoned that effort. "I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more," he said. Trump said at a White House news conference that he did not rule out attacking Iran again when asked about the possibility of new bombing of Iranian nuclear sites if deemed necessary at some point. "Sure, without question, absolutely," he said. INSPECTION DEMANDS Trump said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency or another respected source to be able to inspect Iran's nuclear sites after they were bombed last weekend. Trump said he believes the sites were "obliterated". He has rejected any suggestion that damage to the sites was not as profound as he has said. But Trump said he would support the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, going in to check the sites that were bombed. The agency's chief, Rafael Grossi, said on Wednesday that ensuring the resumption of IAEA inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since Israel began bombing on Jun 13. However, Iran's parliament approved moves on Wednesday to suspend such inspections. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi indicated on Friday that Tehran may reject any request by the head of the agency for visits to Iranian nuclear sites. Trump also said he does not believe Iran wants to still seek a nuclear weapon after US and Israeli bombing raids. He described Iran as "exhausted".


CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Singapore is not at war, but neither is it at peace: Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing
Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said global tensions are creating economic uncertainty that threatens jobs, wages and prices in Singapore. He highlighted that while the country is not at war, neither is it at peace. Mr Chan said the Singapore Armed Forces needs to remain vigilant and strengthen defence ties to keep Singapore an "oasis of calm" amid growing security threats. Aslam Shah reports.


New Paper
9 hours ago
- New Paper
PAP leads GE2025 campaign spending with $9.4m, more than double opposition's combined $3.6m
Candidates spent slightly over $13 million at 2025's general election in a bid to garner votes from Singaporeans, with almost half of this going to non-online advertising such as posters and banners. Online advertising made up about 16 per cent of total costs, while political parties spent a combined $1.7 million - or about 13 per cent - on physical rallies, which made a return after being ruled out at the last general election due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The remaining spending went to other costs such as office rental, equipment, supplies and transport. Overall, spending by parties increased by about 42 per cent from the 2020 General Election, where total expenditure was $9.2 million. A total of 211 individuals contested the May 3 polls, and the full list of election expenses was posted on the Elections Department (ELD) website on June 27 for public inspection. The ruling People's Action Party spent the most - $9.4 million in its contests for all 97 seats in the House - against a combined $3.6 million from the 10 opposition parties and two independent candidates. The Workers' Party spent the most out of opposition parties, forking out a total of $1.6 million for its 26 candidates. Next up was the Singapore Democratic Party, which spent $583,440 for its 11 candidates, followed by the Progress Singapore Party, which spent $441,548 for 13 candidates. ELD had earlier released two tranches of election expenses for public inspection online. All parties spent below the limit of $5 per voter, which was raised from $4 at the last election to account for inflation.