logo
Opinion: Making HS Grads Pass Citizenship Test Is Fine. But Civics Ed Must Start Earlier

Opinion: Making HS Grads Pass Citizenship Test Is Fine. But Civics Ed Must Start Earlier

Yahoo19-02-2025

A version of this essay originally appeared on Robert Pondiscio's Substack.
Answer these questions without Googling them:
What are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution called?
What did the Emancipation Proclamation do?
Who was the first president of the United States?
What ocean is on the West Coast of the U.S.?
Name one branch of government.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Not hard, are they? These are a representative few of the 100 questions on the U.S. Citizenship Test. Immigrants must answer six out of 10 correctly to become citizens. It's not an esoteric academic exercise — it is a straightforward test of basic knowledge about the country's government, history, geography and democratic principles.
By now, it has become a bromide (and, in some quarters, a sore point) that a substantial number of Americans graduate high school without being able to demonstrate the kind of rock-bottom grasp of civics and history that these questions imply, and which would-be citizens handle with ease. Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds recently announced a bill that would require high school students to pass the citizenship test to graduate; if it passes, Iowa will become the 14th state to adopt such a measure.
But if 17-year-olds are cramming basic facts as a last-minute requirement to graduate, we've already missed the boat. My recommendation for Iowa and other states that want to raise their students' civics IQ is to start much earlier. The knowledge demands of the U.S. Citizenship Test should be well within the grasp of children attending an elementary school committed to a knowledge-rich curriculum — with handsome dividends for literacy in addition to civics and citizenship.
To demonstrate how basic the knowledge needed to pass really is, I uploaded the 100 questions on the U.S. citizenship exam and the Core Knowledge Sequence — a pre-K-8 curriculum designed to build a strong foundation in history, civics, science, literature and the arts — to ChatGPT for a side-by-side comparison. Rooted in the idea that knowledge is essential for literacy, and literacy for engaged citizenship, the Sequence seeks to ensure that schools are prepared to arm students with the background information necessary to comprehend complex texts and participate meaningfully in democratic life.
Related
Comparing the two documents shows that many of the topics needed to pass the test are recommended in the Sequence for first graders, with 75% included by fifth grade:
I. Principles of American Democracy (questions 1-12 on the test): Core Knowledge introduces concepts such as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and democratic principles by Grade 2. By Grade 5, students have a firm grasp of self-government, checks and balances, and individual rights, aligning closely with questions on the test.
II. System of Government (questions 13-47): By Grade 3, students learn about the three branches of government, the legislative process and the role of the president. More advanced topics like federal versus state power, Supreme Court justices and election processes appear in Grades 4-6.
III. Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens (questions 48-57): Core Knowledge covers the First Amendment, voting rights and responsibilities of citizenship in Grade 3, reinforcing them throughout middle school. This aligns directly with questions regarding freedoms, voting and civic duties on the test.
IV. American History: Colonial Period and Independence (questions 58-70): Students study early American history starting in Grade 1, with more depth added in Grades 4-5. The Revolutionary War, Declaration of Independence and founding of the U.S. government are covered extensively, preparing students to answer citizenship test questions on these topics.
V. The 1800s and the Civil War (questions 71-80): Core Knowledge introduces the Civil War and Reconstruction in Grade 5, covering key events like the abolition of slavery, the role of Abraham Lincoln and the impact of the Emancipation Proclamation.
VI. Recent American History and Other Important Historical Information (questions 81-100): 20th Century history, including both World Wars, the Cold War and Civil Rights Movement, is introduced in Grades 6-8, aligning well with the later questions on the test.
By the end of elementary school, students in a Core Knowledge school will have encountered nearly all concepts necessary to succeed on the test. Though there are some missing pieces, such as certain government officials, Selective Service registration and various geographic details, elementary school students using the Sequence would likely be able to answer 75% to 85% of the test's 100 questions correctly. Considering that the actual exam requires answering only six of 10 randomly selected questions correctly, a Core Knowledge student would almost certainly pass with ease.
Academics and scholars who study and advocate for civic education tend to reject making the citizenship test a graduation requirement, viewing it as a meaningless exercise in rote memorization or a distraction from meatier curricular fare. But if a student reaches the end of 12th grade without a command of these basic facts, something has gone awry. The knowledge accumulated over years of systematic instruction should serve as an effective preparation, making the test less an obstacle and more an affirmation of what has already been learned.
This is not the case at present. Naturalized citizens consistently outperform native-born Americans on the test. The disparity underscores a deep failure in civics education in U.S. schools, where fundamental knowledge about democracy, governance and history is clearly neglected.
A few years ago, recognizing this gap, Arizona's Joe Foss Institute pushed more than a dozen states to make passing the U.S. Citizenship Test a high school graduation requirement. In some states, students are supposed to achieve a minimum score; in others, simply taking the test is enough. Either way, making high school students scramble to learn what they should have been taught in elementary school is a remediation effort, not an indicator of educational success.
Related
If states see value in students taking and passing the U.S. Citizenship Test, it should be administered in fifth grade, or eighth at the very latest — when there's still time to send a powerful signal that every student-citizen should know, share and value the basic principles of our system of government and every school show a minimal commitment to civic education. Moving the test to elementary school would also demonstrate a renewed commitment to what should have been there all along — a coherent, content-rich K-5 curriculum.
Let's give kids the knowledge they need when they need it — early, often and unapologetically. The dividends will be measured not just in civics scores, but in literacy, citizenship and the long-term health of the republic.
For a closer look at how the U.S. Citizenship Test's 100 questions and the Core Knowledge Sequence sync up at various grade levels, click here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No Kings' protest planned in Saint Clair
‘No Kings' protest planned in Saint Clair

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘No Kings' protest planned in Saint Clair

Schuylkill County Democrats are planning a 'No Kings' protest rally against President Donald Trump's administration. The plans calls for protesters to gather from 11 a.m. until noon at the pedestrian bridge at the Coal Creek Commerce Center off Route 61 in Saint Clair. 'No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance,' according to the website The idea evolved from Trump comparing himself to a king. Protests will occur all over the nation. The website lists York, Lancaster, Harrisburg, Carlisle and Jim Thorpe among the cities planning protests in Pennsylvania. Information about Saturday's event in Saint Clair was submitted to the national website, but for some reason did not make the list, said Todd Zimmerman, chairman of the Schuylkill County Democratic Committee. 'It's all free speech,' Zimmerman said about the objectives of the event. The rally coincides with Trump's 79th birthday and his administration's planned military parade and celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th birthday in Washington, D.C. Zimmerman expects some passerby on Route 61 during Saturday's rally will show support by honking their car horns, while others may be less enthusiastic. 'We created a constitution to prevent a dictatorship,' Zimmerman said, adding that the actions taken by the Trump administration have real world consequences. Democrats contend that the Trump administration is testing the tenets of the U.S. Constitution regarding the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government. News of immigrants being arrested has sparked protests around the county, most recently in Los Angeles. Here at home, Ruben Rojas-Vargas, of Pottsville, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on May 30. Rojas-Vargas, 32, who has been in the United States for 16 years, was sent to a processing center in Phillipsburg, Centre County, where he remains, according to online records. 'We need immigrants,' Zimmerman said. 'I think the arrest of law-abiding immigrants is going to affect our economy.' With regards to security concerns for Saturday's rally, Saint Clair Borough Manager Roland Price said he has no plans to provide extra police presence for the event. 'I don't anticipate major issues,' Price said Friday. 'We have no objections to them protesting.'

Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency
Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency

A federal judge in Maryland on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump lacked the authority to fire three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and ordered their reinstatement — teeing up another high-stakes court clash centered on Trump's ability as commander-in-chief to remove or otherwise control the members of independent agencies. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee, sided with the three ousted members of the board — Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. — in ruling that their firings were unlawful and ordered all three members to be reinstated to their posts. In his ruling, Maddox said that the tenured design and protection of the five-member, staggered-term CPSC board does "not interfere with" Trump's executive branch powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Appeals Court Blocks Trump From Firing Federal Board Members, Tees Up Supreme Court Fight The decision is a near-term blow for Trump, and comes just weeks after the Supreme Court last month agreed to uphold, for now, Trump's removal of two Democratic appointees from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protections Board (MSPB). Both board members had challenged their terminations as "unlawful" in separate lawsuits filed in D.C. federal court. The Supreme Court voted 6-3 in May to temporarily allow the firing of both board members, siding with lawyers for the Trump administration, who had urged the justices to keep both members on the job while the case continued to move through the lower courts. Read On The Fox News App In his ruling, Maddox sought to distinguish those cases from the terminations of members of the CPSC board and said that the Trump administration, in this case, had failed to identify neglect or malfeasance by any other Senate-confirmed commissioners on the CPSC, which is required by law to justify their removals. Judges V Trump: Here Are The Key Court Battles Halting The White House Agenda "For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds no constitutional defect in the statutory restriction on Plaintiffs' removal and that Plaintiffs' purported removal from office was unlawful," he said in the order. "The Court shall enter an Order granting Plaintiffs' motion, denying Defendants' motion, and providing declaratory and injunctive relief permitting Plaintiffs to resume their duties as CPSC Commissioners." The decision clears the way for the members to return to their roles on the board, pending an appeal to higher courts by the Trump administration. The case is the latest in a string of challenges centered on Trump's ability to remove members of independent boards. Like the NLRB and MSPB rulings, it centers on the 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor, in which the court unanimously ruled that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. Maddox invoked the uncertainty created by the preliminary posture of the NLRB and MSPB cases, which saw both plaintiffs removed and reinstated to their positions multiple times — which he said was the basis for ordering more permanent injunctive relief. "Disruption might have resulted in the instant case if Plaintiffs had been reinstated while this case was in its preliminary posture, only to have the Court later deny relief in its final judgment and subject Plaintiffs to removal again," said Maddox. "The risk of such disruption is no longer a factor now that the Court is granting permanent injunctive relief as a final judgment."Original article source: Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump's attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency

Texas politicians react to Israel's attack on Iran
Texas politicians react to Israel's attack on Iran

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas politicians react to Israel's attack on Iran

AUSTIN (KXAN) — Several Texas leaders have shared their thoughts and reactions after Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Israel struck Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz, and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel will face a 'severe punishment' over its attack on the country. Iranian missiles later struck Israel in retaliation. The Latest: Israel hit by missiles as Iran retaliates for strikes on nuclear sites News of the attacks has stirred up concern on social media, and several world leaders have posted their reactions. Lawmakers and politicians in Texas have also taken to the internet or issued statements in response to the attacks. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott posted on X Friday morning, 'Israel was forced to defend itself — and American interests — from the Iranian regime that was hell bent on building nuclear weapons that would have endangered the globe. Texas stands with our ally taking necessary action to protect its people & restore global stability.' Congressman Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, released the following statement: 'President Trump gave Iran every chance to negotiate in good faith and to dismantle their nuclear program. 'Prime Minister Netanyahu was also clear: The alternative to diplomacy would be strikes on Iran — a message he reiterated to me when I met with him this month. Unfortunately, the regime chose not to take the path of peace — to prioritize their own interests over their people's. They brought this calamity on themselves. 'One thing is certain: Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon, and our world is safer for it. They would be wise to come to the table and make an agreement with President Trump while the offer still stands. If they instead choose to harm U.S. troops in the region, they will once again regret it.' Senator Ted Cruz appeared on Newsmax with Greg Kelly late Thursday and posted the clip on X. 'Iran said they would not dismantle their advanced centrifuges. That was a giant middle finger to President Trump,' Cruz said in the post. 'Tonight, we saw the consequences of Iran's defiance.' He also appeared on Fox News, asking viewers to pray for Israel, posting the same message in a another post on X. 'Here's my message to the Ayatollah: If you strike at America, I have every confidence that President Trump will respond with overwhelming force,' Cruz said in the post. Senator John Cornyn posted a message in solidarity with Israel on X Thursday night. 'Israel has an unquestionable right to defend itself. I am proud to stand with Israel. #AmYisraelChai,' the post said. Democratic Congressman Greg Casar posted in opposition to Israel's strikes. 'Netanyahu's reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States. Trump must oppose Netanyahu's escalation and pursue a diplomatic path to deal with Iran's nuclear program. Trump must not violate the Constitution by involving American troops in Netanyahu's war without coming to Congress,' Casar said in a post on X. Casar followed that up with another post, criticizing President Trump. 'Trump promised peace and stability. Then, he picked reckless partisans for top foreign policy jobs. Now he's egging on escalation in a conflict he already made worse by tearing up a nuclear deal that was working. Trump's recklessness is undermining stability abroad and putting American lives at risk. Trump must reverse course and deescalate the situation.' Rep. Lloyd Doggett also opposed Israel's preemptive strike and criticized President Trump. Doggett posted the link to a New York Times story headlined, 'What to Know About Israel's Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Program and Military Leaders,' along with his thoughts on the strikes. 'Trump's weakness again on full display,' Doggett said in the post on X. 'Just as he is too weak to stand up to war criminal Putin on Ukraine, Trump is too weak to restrain Netanyahu from interfering in ongoing negotiations for a peaceful way to prevent Iran from going nuclear. George W. Bush restrained Netanyahu from launching such an attack, but Trump is incapable of doing the same. Trump's weakness heightens the danger of the US being pulled into another deadly and costly Mideast war.' Rep. August Pfluger backed Israel. 'Israel has every right to defend itself. The United States stands firmly behind Israel,' he said in an X post. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store