Israel's Missile Defenses Running Short as Iran Fires Hypersonics: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Israel is running low on its supply of Arrow missile interceptors just as Iran unleashes hypersonic missiles in its latest attack, according to The Wall Street Journal. Citing a senior U.S. official, the report said American defense leaders have known for months about the shortfall, raising urgent questions about Israel's ability to defend itself from high-speed, long-range threats.
The revelation coincides with Iran's announcement that it fired Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles at Israel on Wednesday. The missiles, which travel at more than five times the speed of sound and can maneuver mid-flight, pose a serious challenge to even advanced missile defense systems.
Newsweek has reached out to the Israel Defense Forces and Iran's foreign ministry.
Why It Matters
Israel's Arrow system is a key part of its multi-layered missile defense, built to intercept long-range ballistic threats. A shortage of interceptors during the sixth day of active conflict with Iran could leave major population centers increasingly vulnerable—especially as Iran now deploys faster, more evasive hypersonic missiles.
The introduction of such advanced weapons has reshaped the threat landscape. As both nations trade strikes and diplomacy stalls, military readiness—and the ability to intercept incoming fire—has become a defining factor in the escalating confrontation.
Iranian missiles face off israeli interceptive missiles over Beirut, Lebanon. June 14 2025.
Iranian missiles face off israeli interceptive missiles over Beirut, Lebanon. June 14 2025.
Nael Chahine/AP Photo
What to Know
The shortage of Arrow interceptors stems from intense missile barrages in recent days combined with limited production capacity. A senior U.S. official told the Wall Street Journal that Washington has been aware of the issue for months and has responded by deploying additional American assets across land, sea, and air in the region. However, the official did not specify how many interceptors remain or when production might replenish Israel's stockpile.
Defensive Missile System
It [Israel] will expand its target sets to increase the pain and force the Iranian regime to change its behavior.
Seth Krummrich, Retired U.S. Army Colonel
Jointly developed by Israel and the U.S., the Arrow system defends against long-range ballistic threats with layered coverage beyond Patriot and David's Sling. Arrow 2 targets missiles in the upper atmosphere, while Arrow 3 intercepts them in space. Both use high-speed "hit-to-kill" technology and support Israel's broader missile shield, including Iron Dome.
Hypersonic Retaliation
Yet hypersonic missiles like Iran's Fattah-1 pose a new and serious challenge. Their extreme speed—over five times the speed of sound—combined with mid-flight maneuverability makes them far harder to track and intercept, even for advanced systems like Arrow.
Iran said it had fired Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles at Tel Aviv, saying the strikes "shook the shelters" across the city. Iran state media released video footage of the launches, highlighting Tehran's expanding military capabilities. Alongside the hypersonic missiles, Iran also deployed a "swarm of drones" targeting Israeli territory, further complicating the defense landscape.
Video released by Iran's IRGC show the moment Iran launched missiles against Israel
Follow https://t.co/B3zXG74hnU pic.twitter.com/Cc1DXZyGek — Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) June 18, 2025
Israel retaliated with strikes on weapons factories and a centrifuge plant in Tehran, after warning civilians to evacuate the area. The IDF also intercepted two drones over the Dead Sea. Though casualties were minimal, the use of advanced missiles and drones marks a sharp escalation in the conflict's intensity and sophistication.
US Weighs Options
Amid the intensifying conflict, President Donald Trump reiterated his support for Israel but signaled growing impatience with Tehran. While the administration has so far avoided direct military engagement, U.S. officials confirmed that the USS Nimitz carrier strike group has been deployed to the region, and Trump convened his National Security Council to discuss possible options. No decision on intervention has been announced, but officials say military involvement remains under consideration. The developments came as Iran claimed to have struck what it described as a Mossad intelligence facility inside Israel, escalating tensions further.
Rescue team work at the site where a missile launched from Iran struck Tel Aviv, Israel, Monday, June 16, 2025.
Rescue team work at the site where a missile launched from Iran struck Tel Aviv, Israel, Monday, June 16, 2025.
Baz Ratner/AP Photo
What People Are Saying
Seth Krummrich, Retired U.S. Army Colonel and Vice President at Global Guardian told Newsweek: "Initially, Israel focused primarily on military and nuclear targets. If Israel does not achieve the effects it wants, it will expand its target sets to increase the pain and force the Iranian regime to change its behavior. I expect to see expanded targeting of governmental facilities and oil and gas infrastructure to continue to increase the pain level to an intolerable level that Iran has to negotiate. Iran will continue to launch ballistic missile strikes against any Israeli targets with the goal of wearing down Israel's will and reducing Israel's interceptor stockpile to do more damage."
What Happens Next
As missile technology evolves and tensions rise, Israel's ability to restore interceptor supplies may shape not only the conflict's trajectory but the broader stability of the region. Whether the U.S. remains on the sidelines or steps in more directly could depend on how long Israel can hold the line.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FCC says China Mobile could face US fines for failing to cooperate in probe
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Communications Commission said on Tuesday it could fine China Mobile for failing to answer questions in the agency's probe to determine if its U.S. operations are seeking to evade American restrictions. The regulator previously barred China Mobile and other Chinese companies from providing telecommunications services in the United States, citing national security concerns. The FCC said in March it was investigating nine Chinese companies including China Mobile, Huawei Technologies, ZTE, Hangzhou Hikvision and China Telecom to determine if they are seeking to evade U.S. restrictions. The FCC citation issued to China Mobile disclosed the commission has been probing the company's U.S. operations since November 2022. In February, the FCC sent China Mobile a supplemental letter asking additional questions. The FCC accused China Mobile of misconduct and said the company failed to provide the specific information and documentation requested. "China Mobile's conduct throughout this matter exhibits a disregard for the Commission's authority and threatens to compromise the Commission's ability to adequately investigate," the FCC said. It gave China Mobile 30 days to answer numerous questions or face fines. China Mobile did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The FCC said in 2019 China Mobile was indirectly owned and controlled by the Chinese government and noted a significant possibility that Beijing's influence and control could result in "computer intrusions and attacks and economic espionage." FCC Chair Brendan Carr said in March the Chinese companies may be still operating in the United States because they do not believe the designation prohibits particular types of operations. Other companies under investigation include Hytera Communications, Dahua Technology Company, Pacifica Networks/ComNet and China Unicom (Americas).
Buzz Feed
37 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Arnold Schwarzenegger Says Immigrants Should Act Like Guests
Arnold Schwarzenegger has had his say on the ongoing ICE deportation crisis in Los Angeles, with people taking to the streets of LA earlier this month to campaign against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department's raids of numerous workplaces in the area while searching for alleged immigration violations. Hundreds of people have been detained in the raids, with LA Mayor Karen Bass previously telling reporters: 'ICE initiated enforcement actions on several workplaces. That created a sense of chaos, outrage, fear, and terror because people are very worried as to what happened to their families.'In addition, President Donald Trump ordered military force to be used against protestors, which has led to attendees being tear-gassed and arrested. In case you didn't know, Arnold served as Governor of California from 2003 to 2011 as a Republican, and during an appearance on The View on Tuesday, he was asked how he would handle the situation if he were still in power. Arnie started by saying that 'the most important thing' is to work with 'everybody,' adding: 'You have to work together with local government, the state government, and the federal government. You have to work together rather than fighting each other." He went on to say that 'immigration reform' is key going forward, explaining: 'For decades now, this country has needed immigration reform, which means we recognize the fact there's people in the south of America that want to come north to work, and we therefore should supply them with enough visas to come because we need those workers.' "Then we'd know who is here, we'd be able to get rid of the criminal elements that are here, all this stuff so we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now,' Arnie went on.'If you want to make this country better and if you want to improve this country and improve the situation of people's lives and bring the prices down, you will go and serve the people of America," Arnold concluded. "You're a public servant, that's what you're supposed to do, and that's what I would do if I was governor." Panelist Joy Behar then asked Arnold if he had a 'visceral reaction' to videos of what ICE is doing to immigrants, considering he is an immigrant himself. If you need reminding, Arnold was born in Austria in 1947, and moved to California to fulfill his bodybuilding dream in 1968, at age 21, with the star admitting that he spoke little English when he first emigrated. 'I'm so proud and happy to [have been] embraced by the American people like that,' Arnold said in response to Joy's question. 'Imagine, I came over here at the age of 21 with absolutely nothing, and then to create a career like that? I mean, in no other country in the world could you do that.' Arnie then referenced his hugely successful bodybuilding and acting careers, as well as his political venture, before adding: 'All of this is because of America, and this is why I'm so happy to see firsthand that this is the greatest country in the world.''I'm such a proud American and a proud immigrant,' he went on. 'The key thing is, at the same time, you gotta do things legal.' "Those people that are doing illegal things in America and that are foreigners, they are not smart, because when you come to America, you're a guest, and you have to behave like a guest," Arnold explained. "When I go to someone's house and I'm a guest, then I'll do everything I can to keep things clean and to make my bed and do everything that's the right thing to do rather than committing a crime or being abusive or something like that,' he said. 'That doesn't really work in this country. Arnold went on to say that immigrants come to America "for the great opportunities America has in education, jobs, creating a family," adding that they therefore have a responsibility to 'give something back.'Panelist Whoopi Goldberg attempted to push back on Arnie's comments, telling him: '90 per cent of the people who come here are trying to do the right thing, and a lot of what's happening right now is people are getting snatched — who shouldn't be snatched — out of the country.'Sunny Hostin also refuted what he'd said, pointing out that "immigrants are much less likely to commit crimes in this country than American-born citizens." What do you make of Arnold's comments? Let me know down below.
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Reclaiming Religious Freedom—A Liberal Responsibility
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On June 17, the International Religious Freedom Summit was held in Nairobi, Kenya. Recently, 200 Christian IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) were massacred in Nigeria. Terrorist groups like Al‑Shabab frequently also target Christians in Kenya. Dr. Gloria Samdi-Puldu, president of the Nigerian-based LEAH Foundation, supports girls and women like Leah Sharibu, kidnapped by the extremist group Boko Haram in 2018 for refusing to renounce her Christian faith. Samdi-Puldu, who is exhausted by the trauma she faces daily, shared that religious persecution is finally being recognized, giving her reason for hope. What she may not realize is the actual lack of interest in combating religious persecution. Red Cross officials inspect the damage at the burnt COCIN Church building in Mangu, Nigeria, on Feb. 2, 2024, following weeks of intercommunal violence and unrest in the Plateau State. Red Cross officials inspect the damage at the burnt COCIN Church building in Mangu, Nigeria, on Feb. 2, 2024, following weeks of intercommunal violence and unrest in the Plateau State. KOLA SULAIMON/AFP via Getty Images The world is facing one of the fastest-growing human rights crises: religious persecution, increasingly escalating into ethno-religious cleansing and genocide. And it's growing in many parts of the world. Yet liberal politicians, media outlets, and NGOs too often stay silent. This abandons what former President Bill Clinton intended when he championed the International Religious Freedom Act in 1998, making religious freedom a cornerstone of American foreign policy. This has created a vacuum filled by conservative organizations, which—while doing important and lifesaving work—can also bring ideological baggage to what should be a universal human rights cause. The cost is real—120,000 Armenians were ethnically cleansed in 2023 with little Western media attention. Uyghur Muslims in China, Baha'is in Iran, Alawites in Syria, and Christians in Nigeria suffer daily atrocities. When I meet survivors of religious persecution, they ask, "Why don't Western liberals care about us?" Robert Řehák, the Czech Republic's ambassador for Holocaust issues, interfaith dialogue and freedom of religion, leads the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance (IRFBA), sometimes called the Article 18 Alliance. This intergovernmental coalition brings together 43 countries, working collectively to promote and defend freedom of religion or belief worldwide. "The struggle for religious freedom is a necessity because the world is increasingly radicalized and polarized. To combat this, we need avenues for dialogue that can counter these dangerous tendencies. It is also a fight for peace, prosperity, and the prevention of future conflicts," Řehák told Newsweek. Hard Lessons from the Field In Beirut, Lebanon, I recently met Ablahad Stayfo, an Assyrian/Syriac activist who spent 15 years opposing the Assad regime in Syria. When I interviewed him in 2012, I asked whether the opposition valued religious freedom. He dismissed the question. Now, in 2025, he told Newsweek, "You were right, Nuri. We should have made it a priority. The progressive politicians we worked with didn't care. And now Syria's future is uncertain." My organization ADFA commissioned Layal Nehme to document Christians who fled Syria and Iraq to Lebanon. When I recently asked what happened to those she interviewed, her response was devastating. "Unfortunately, most have emigrated to Canada or Australia. While I am happy for them, I am devastated that the numbers of Christians are dwindling," she said. The Price of Liberal Silence Why the silence? Too many liberals fear that talking about religious freedom will align them with religious conservatives. But this fear is morally bankrupt. The regimes that persecute religious minorities are also the ones that oppress women, LGBTQ people, journalists, and dissidents. When the movement lacks progressive voices, it risks becoming ideologically skewed. Without sustained political pressure from across the spectrum, authoritarian regimes and extremist groups face little consequence for destroying religious communities. Time to Act At the IRF Summit in Washington, D.C., this January, I urged humanitarian organizations to improve their media outreach—to keep these stories alive and visible. This benefits both the media and the communities they aim to help. I urge my progressive friends to reclaim religious freedom as a liberal value: —Show up at conferences and advocacy events. —Speak out about religious persecution. —Support bipartisan initiatives like the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). —Cover religious freedom violations with urgency. —And encourage more countries to join the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance (IRFBA). This is not a fight that belongs to the right or the left. When we think that way, we fail those who need us most. It's time for liberals to join the fight again—a cause they themselves began—and to understand that it is their struggle as well. Listening to eyewitnesses and survivors from several African countries—of different faiths—was both heart-wrenching and deeply important. Several African activists I spoke with criticized the IRF Summit, saying it should have been organized by Africans themselves. That critique matters. But if local capacity or resources were lacking, then the summit in Kenya was still a meaningful start. It laid the foundation for continued cooperation. Importantly, both Muslims and Christians were given the floor to address the attendees. To ignore the growing threat to religious freedom is to ignore Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights—and to fail those who need us most. Nuri Kino is an independent investigative multi-award-winning reporter and minority rights expert. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
