Barrister says crimes of previous Asian grooming gangs not relevant to trial of seven men
The crimes of 'Asian grooming gangs' in Rochdale was not relevant to the cases of seven men on trial accused of historical child sexual exploitation in the town, jurors have been told.
The defendants deny various alleged sexual offences said to have been committed against two teenage girls between 2001 and 2006.
On Wednesday 7 May, Lisa Wilding KC, representing Mohammed Zahid – one of those accused – told the jury at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court that they must approach the case 'with a surgeon's precision' and solely on the evidence heard in the courtroom.
In her closing speech, she said: 'You have been told by the prosecution of the unhappy fate of Rochdale and that its name is now not synonymous with the great achievements of the Industrial Revolution but with the widespread publicity that has arisen from the prosecution of men, of what has become known as Asian grooming gangs.
'It is a fact that others have been convicted of criminal activity, more widely arising from criminal activity in Rochdale.'
Other men had also been convicted of crimes against one of the two complainants, Girl A, she said.
Ms Wilding said: 'But it's very important you must approach this case with a surgeon's precision.
The fact that other men have committed crimes is not relevant to your determination as to whether these men have committed crimes.
'You must decide this case against each defendant on the evidence you have heard in this courtroom – not on anything outside, not on anything that has gone on before.'
The barrister said to jurors they 'may easily conclude' Girl A and Girl B were 'vulnerable young girls' who had told them from the witness box they had been abused by others, 'many others' in the case of Girl A and earlier when she was 'really young' in the case of Girl B.
Ms Wilding said: 'It is not enough that (Girl A) and (Girl B) were vulnerable young women. That alone does not make any defendant guilty.'
Former market trader Zahid, 64, of Station Road, Crumpsall, Manchester, is alleged to have raped both girls.
Ms Wilding said he denied any sexual activity with either of the complainants.
He denied ever meeting Girl B, or knowingly doing so, and denied everything she alleged whether it was sex in the basement of a clothing shop, in a flat, in a house or elsewhere.
Ms Wilding said Zahid accepted he knew Girl A, but said sexual activity did not take place between them.
The other defendants on trial are Naheem Akram, 48, of Manley, Road, Rochdale; Mohammed Shahzad, 44,of Beswicke Royds Street, Rochdale; Nisar Hussain, 41, of Newfield Close, Rochdale; Roheez Khan, 39, of Athole Street, Rochdale; Mushtaq Ahmed, 67, of Corona Avenue, Oldham; and Kasir Bashir, 50, of Napier Street East, Oldham.
Earlier, prosecutor Rossano Scamardella KC told the jury the testimony of the complainants was 'compelling'.
He said: 'They are telling the truth and in telling the truth they had to have courage to come to court and give evidence, which they did for days on end.
'Their bravery shown giving evidence puts their abusers to shame.'Both had their lives destroyed by these men and others like them.
They both endured years of misery being sexually abused by almost every man with which they came into contact.
"Despite that they both gave evidence with dignity.'It was ruthless abuse of imbalance of power for instant sexual gratification. Each of these men only thought of themselves.
"They cared not for their victims. They discarded them like rubbish once they had what they wanted.'
He added the abuse had taken place 'under the noses of social workers and others who should have done far more to protect them'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
20 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Driver 'used car as weapon to kill Good Samaritan' trying to help injured woman
Chris Marriott, 46, died when he was struck by Hassan Jhangur's car as he went to the aid of an injured woman following a fight at a wedding in Sheffield in 2023 A driver used his vehicle 'as a weapon' to kill a Good Samaritan who was helping the injured in a wedding brawl, a court heard today. Chris Marriott, 46, had been out walking with his wife and two young sons when he was struck by Hassan Jhangur's Seat Ibiza. Chris went to the aid of Jhangur's sister Nafeesa as she lay in the middle of the road in Sheffield. Jhangur, 25, allegedly drove his car deliberately at her, Chris, midwife Alison Norris, who had also gone to help, and his own mother Ambreen, a jury heard. He denies the murder of Mr Marriott and the attempted murder of Hasan Khan, who had married his sister Amaani earlier on Dec 27, 2023. Sheffield crown court heard that Amaani had fallen out with her mother just before the ceremony and none of her family had attended the wedding on the morning of the tragedy. Jhangurhad driven to the home of the groom and first knocked over his father Riazat Khan. He then hit the group killing Mr Marriott, before he attacked Hasan Khan with a knife, stabbing him multiple times, said Jason Pitter KC, prosecuting. He told the jury: "Mr Marriott was trying to help. It was that public spirit that brought him unwittingly into the midst of a family dispute that involved the defendant Hassan Jhangur. "It was their family on one side and a family related by marriage on the other, the family of Mr Khan. It was that family dispute that so tragically led to the death of Chris Marriott and to the serious injuries of a number of others." The jury had to decide whether the defendant "intended to cause serious harm and to kill" when his vehicle hit the victims. The prosecution say that the car, its wheels still spinning when it came to a halt with its engine running, was used 'as a weapon'. Following his arrest, Jhangur told police: "That's why you don't mess with the Jhangurs", Mr Pitter added. In a statement read to the jury, Mr Marriott's wife of 16 years Bryony told how they had gone for a walk with their sons after returning from her parents' home when they noticed a young Asian woman who was injured in the middle of the road. Their children were getting upset so he went to help while she took them back home. The last time she saw Chris, he was kneeling down asking the woman 'if she was ok'. She 'knew something was wrong' when she returned to the scene. "An officer explained that a male matching my husband's description was deceased," she said. "I came home and was waiting when an officer confirmed my husband had been killed." Alison Norris recalled being hit by the car. She told the court: "It was not stopping, I am a driver, and it kept on going at speed. I remember flying through the air backwards and thinking: 'I must have been hit'." Jhangur, of Whiteways Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, denies the murder and manslaughter of Mr Marriott, but has pleaded guilty to causing Mr Marriott's death by dangerous driving. His father Mohammed Jhangur, of the same address, denies perverting the course of justice by "hiding the knife used in the midst of his son's violence." The trial, expected to take place over two weeks, continues
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Mum 'serves deadly mushrooms to in-laws then made herself throw up with dessert'
A woman accused of poisoning and murdering her in-laws with death cap mushrooms, has said she made herself throw up after eating the lethal meal, during an Australia trial The 'mushroom murder' trial in Australia has seen the accused, Erin Patterson, 50, give her third day of testimony. The mum of two stands accused of three counts of murder, and one of attempted murder - all of which she denies, pleading not guilty to all four charges. Erin prepared a beef Wellington lunch for her guests in July 2023, before deliberately including and feeding them poisonous death cap mushrooms, the court heard. However, her legal team is arguing that the inclusion of the toxic ingredient was nothing more than a terrible accident, which had tragic consequences. Three of her lunch guests died after eating the meal; her former parents-in-law, Don Patterson, 70, and Gail Patterson, 70, and her ex-mum-in-law's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. The fourth guest, Ian Wilkinson, 71, survived, but spent weeks in hospital receiving treatment. The court heard Erin claimed that after eating a small portion of the poisoned main course, she binged on dessert - making herself "over-full" and vomit. She only had "a quarter, a third, somewhere around there" of the beef Wellington, she reportedly said, but once her guests headed home, she gorged on an orange cake her former mother-in-law had brought to the lunch. "I ate another piece of cake, and then another piece," she said, before eventually finishing the cake. "I felt sick… over-full so I went to the toilets and brought it back up again." "After I'd done that, I felt better," she said. Over three days the court heard Erin admit she lied to her guests about having cancer, because she wanted help looking after her children whilst she underwent gastric bypass surgery. "I remember thinking I didn't want to tell anybody what I was going to have done. I was really embarrassed by it," she claimed. Erin told the court she had spent quite some time deciding what to cook her guests, before landing on beef Wellington - a dish that had sentimental connotations from her childhood, as it was something her mother would make for special occasions. However, she claimed the mushrooms she included had little taste, so she added some dried mushrooms that she had previously purchased from an Asian food shop in Melbourne months before, and that she kept in a container. When asked if there could have been other sorts of mushrooms in there too, she said: "Now, I think there was a possibility that there were foraged ones in there as well." Since 2020, the accused has been regularly foraging for wild mushrooms. She said when she went to the hospital two days after the lethal lunch - for medical attention after developing stomach issues - that she was "shocked but confused" when she was asked if she might have consumed death cap mushrooms. The mushroom murder trial in Australia has captured international attention and testimony and the six-week trial has seen 50 people take the stand to provide evidence. Erin claimed during her testimony that her ex-husband, Simon Patterson, asked her if she used her food dehydrator to poison his parents, which caused her to panic, and throw the appliance away at the tip near her home. A conversation that her ex denies happened. She also erased all the data from her phone more than once, even when the police were actively searching her home - with the court hearing this was because she was afraid they would see images of the food dehydrator and the mushrooms themselves. "I had made the meal and served it and people had got sick," Erin told the court. "I was scared that they would blame me for it."
North Wales Chronicle
2 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Woman on trial for mushroom murders says she was trying to improve ‘bland' lunch
Before Erin Patterson's in-laws and their relatives arrived at her home for lunch, she bought expensive ingredients, consulted friends about recipes and sent her children out to see a film. Then she served them a dish containing poisonous death cap mushrooms — a meal that was fatal for three of her four guests. Whether that was Patterson's plan is at the heart of a triple murder trial that has gripped Australia for nearly six weeks. Prosecutors in the Supreme Court case in the state of Victoria say the accused lured her guests to lunch with a lie about having cancer, before deliberately feeding them toxic fungi. But her lawyers say the tainted beef Wellington she served was a tragic accident caused by a mushroom storage mishap. She denies murdering her estranged husband's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and their relative, Heather Wilkinson. The mother of two also denies attempting to murder Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, who survived the meal. In a rare step for a defendant charged with murder, Patterson chose to speak in her own defence at her trial this week. On Wednesday, she spoke publicly for the first time about the fateful lunch in July 2023 and offered her explanations on how she planned the meal and did not become ill herself. No one disputes that Patterson, 50, served death cap mushrooms to her guests for lunch in the rural town of Leongatha, but she says she did it unknowingly. Patterson said on Wednesday she splurged on expensive ingredients and researched ideas to find 'something special' to serve. She deviated from her chosen recipe to improve the 'bland' flavour, she said. She believed she was adding dried fungi bought from an Asian supermarket from a container in her pantry, she told the court. 'Now I think that there was a possibility that there were foraged ones in there as well,' she told her lawyer, Colin Mandy. Patterson had foraged wild mushrooms for years, she told the court Tuesday, and had put some in her pantry weeks before the deaths. Patterson, who formally separated from her husband Simon Patterson in 2015, said she felt 'hurt' when Simon told her the night before the lunch that he 'wasn't comfortable' attending. She earlier told his relatives that she had arranged the meal to discuss her health. Patterson admitted this week that she never had cancer — but after a health scare, she told her in-laws she did. In reality, Patterson said she intended to have weight loss surgery. But she was too embarrassed to tell anybody and planned to pretend to her in-laws that she was undergoing cancer treatment instead, she said. 'I was ashamed of the fact that I didn't have control over my body or what I ate,' a tearful Patterson said Wednesday. 'I didn't want to tell anybody, but I shouldn't have lied to them.' The accused said she believes she was spared the worst effects of the poisoned meal because she self-induced vomiting shortly after her lunch guests left. She had binged on most of a cake and then made herself throw up — a problem she said she had struggled with for decades. Patterson also said she believes she had eaten enough of the meal to cause her subsequent diarrhoea. She then sought hospital treatment but unlike her lunch guests, she quickly recovered. At the hospital where her guests' health was deteriorating, her estranged husband asked her about the dehydrator she used to dry her foraged mushrooms, she said. 'Is that how you poisoned my parents?' she said Simon Patterson asked her. Growing afraid she would be blamed for the poisoning and that her children would be taken from her, Patterson said she later disposed of her dehydrator. She told investigators she'd never owned one and had not foraged for mushrooms before. While still at the hospital, she insisted she'd bought all the mushrooms at stores even though she said she knew it was possible that foraged mushrooms had accidentally found their way into the meal. She was too frightened to tell anyone, Patterson said. Also later, Patterson said she remotely wiped her mobile phone while it sat in an evidence locker to remove pictures of mushrooms she had foraged. Prosecutors argued in opening their case in April that she poisoned her husband's family on purpose, although they did not suggest a motive. She carefully avoided poisoning herself and faked being ill, they said. The trial continues with Patterson's cross-examination by the prosecutors. If convicted, she faces life in prison for murder and 25 years for attempted murder.
