
When a university degree won't get you a decent job or home
The university degree was never a guaranteed ticket to a good career. I graduated from Cambridge about the same time as Gaby Hinsliff (We told young people that degrees were their ticket to a better life. It's become a great betrayal, 13 May). Without middle-class connections, or 'professional' work experience, I returned home after graduation to a neighbourhood counted among the 1% most deprived in England, in a post-industrial northern city with a crumbling social infrastructure. I had £30 to my name and took a job worse than the one I'd had while at school in order to live.
To get to London, where there was a greater range of jobs, I did non-graduate work for a few years, sofa-surfing to begin with. Like today's graduates, I had to do further study to get a decent job, and I was just shy of 40 when I managed to get a career job. I guess it is a better life in the end, as the alternative may well have been a cycle of bad jobs and unemployment.
Of course, this circuitous route to decent work and conditions means that I couldn't afford to live in London (I left), and won't ever earn enough for a middle-class home and a good pension.
As always, jobs, housing, pensions and other social issues become a political problem when it is deep enough to affect privileged white middle-class people in addition to those at the bottom of the pecking order who were already affected.Name and address supplied
Gaby Hinsliff writes of the increasingly disappointing prospects for new graduates. Thanks to the Blair-era policy of 'everyone must go to university', we have a massive oversupply of young graduates in the UK. We also have a massive shortage of more practical skills – Angela Rayner's ambitious housebuilding programme was scuppered before it even got off the ground because we do not have nearly enough tradespeople to build 1.5m homes.
Yet the government has just announced its intention to allow only those with a degree to immigrate to Britain as skilled workers. Astoundingly, they are going to import more graduates to compete with young British graduates for jobs, while banning the people we need most – those who do the jobs that young British people can't or won't do. I'm trying to think of a way this policy could be more stupid, but I'm not succeeding.Anne-Louise CrockerShoreham, Kent
Gaby Hinsliff notes that many graduates of the class of 2024-25 may struggle to find appropriate employment. That is true, although those who do get jobs will get better salaries over time, albeit with student loans to pay off. Hinsliff also raises the issue of whether studying for a degree is worthwhile. It is an argument put forward by the culture-war right – namely, that graduates who can't get jobs become highly educated troublemakers.
Indeed, while my first degree, nearly 50 years ago, did lead me into a professional job, it also taught me how to write a leaflet, organise a protest and speak at mass meetings. None of this was of course on the official curriculum. A reminder, and something Hinsliff misses, that there is such a thing as a liberal education, something beyond monetary value.Keith FlettTottenham, London
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves urged to rule out pensions tax raid amid mounting concern over how she will pay for her lavish spending
Rachel Reeves was last night urged to rule out a tax raid on pensions. The Chancellor is expected to launch a round of tax rises in a Budget this autumn to help fill a black hole in finances as she pours money into the public sector. That would follow a £40billion tax hike in the last Budget in October. 'More tax increases are inevitable, not just in the autumn but for years to come,' said Robert Colvile, director of the Centre for Policy Studies. It is feared this could involve a raid on retirement pots, including cutting the tax-free lump sum or reliefs on the contributions of higher earners. Savers can withdraw up to 25 per cent of their pots tax-free at 55 – up to a maximum of £268,275. Pensions grab: The Chancellor is widely expected to launch a fresh round of tax rises in a Budget this autumn as she pours money into the public sector Workers also can save up to £60,000 a year tax-free, equating to relief of 20 per cent for basic-rate taxpayers and 40 per cent or 45 per cent for those in the higher and additional income tax brackets. And experts warned of reductions in the annual allowance or the return of the lifetime allowance while salary sacrifice could also be abolished. Rumours of an attack on the lump sum proved particularly damaging ahead of Labour's Budget last autumn as savers withdrew cash from their pension pots. Investment firm AJ Bell is now calling on the Chancellor to rule out any raid on retirement savings by bringing in a pensions tax lock to provide certainty. 'This was the Chancellor's last foray into the limelight before the Budget and attention will now turn to what tax rises might be in the post,' said Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell. 'Amid growing fiscal pressure, there's a real risk that pensions tax reform speculation, especially around tax-free cash and tax relief, will return to the headlines. 'Rather than let uncertainty rattle savers, the Chancellor should introduce a pensions tax lock, ruling out changes to tax-free cash or pension tax relief for the rest of this Parliament. 'A commitment would offer investors the confidence to plan for the long term and give momentum to the retail investing revolution Rachel Reeves wants.' Tomm Adams, a partner at Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Reeves has been suspiciously quiet on the pensions front. But with an expensive funding plan, I'm not alone in asking: 'Where's the money coming from?' 'Basic arithmetic suggests that autumn tax rises look inevitable. Unfortunately, pensions tax relief is the perfect target.'


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour faces backlash after taking credit for Bank of England's interest rate cuts
The Government came under fire last night after seeking to take credit for interest rate cuts in the UK. Rachel Reeves used her spending review to claim her policies have 'helped support four cuts in interest rates ' by the Bank of England since the election. It echoed similar comments from Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions just minutes earlier. But they faced a backlash from economists. Simon French, chief economist at City broker Panmure Liberum, said that Labour's spending may have led to higher interest rates. Describing himself as 'uncomfortable with this line from the Chancellor that fiscal policy has supported cutting UK interest rates four times', he said: 'Basic economics would have it that looser fiscal policy necessitates tighter monetary policy, all else being equal.' The former Bank of England rate-setter Andrew Sentance said French's analysis was 'absolutely right' and suggested that the Bank 'has been over-hasty in cutting rates'. And Julian Jessop, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, noted that while Starmer 'is still trying to claim credit for four interest rate cuts', the European Central Bank 'has cut interest rates eight times in the past year'. The Bank's monetary policy committee is independent and Government ministers have no say in its interest rate decisions.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Affordable housing plan boosts builders but Labour is still on track to miss election target of 1.5m homes
Shares in Britain's developers soared after Rachel Reeves put a £39billion affordable housing plan at the heart of her spending review. The Chancellor said it was the 'biggest cash injection in affordable and social housing in 50 years' but figures showed Labour is on track to miss its target of 1.5m homes by the next election. Just 39,170 homes won permission in England in the first three months of 2025, the lowest quarterly figure since records began, the Home Builders Federation said. Shares in Bovis owner Vistry, which specialises in affordable housing, rose 6 per cent. Crest Nicholson and Bellway gained 4.5 per cent and 2.6 per cent respectively. Persimmon was up 1.1 per cent, while Barratt Redrow, Taylor Wimpey and Berkeley Group rose 0.7 per cent. Alex Slater, at Rightmove, said the cash 'is a really positive boost'. But Emma Humphreys, at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, said: 'Given the recent dip, there are serious concerns about an even tighter housing supply. 'Serious change is needed but it is unclear whether the spending will achieve that.'