RAF jets bomb Yemen for first time under Labour
The attack on Tuesday night was the first such raid by British warplanes since Labour took office and comes after US president Donald Trump ordered a sustained campaign of action against the Houthis.
Defence Secretary John Healey said the raid was in response to the Houthi threat to shipping in the Red Sea, which was causing 'regional instability and risking economic security for families in the UK'.
File photo of a Typhoon FGR4, the type of aircraft used in the strike against the Houthis (Image: PA)The Houthis have targeted shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, busy sea lanes on the route from Asia to Europe using the Suez Canal.
The attacks have led to vessels being diverted around the southern tip of Africa, adding delays and costs to shipments of goods.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the action was part of a joint operation alongside US forces, who have struck more than 800 Houthi targets since March.
READ MORE: 'Hell of a commute': Labour pick London councillor to contest Highlands seat
It is the first time the RAF has stuck Houthi targets in Yemen since May 2024 under Rishi Sunak's administration.
The MoD said 'careful intelligence analysis' identified a cluster of buildings used by the Houthis to manufacture drones around fifteen miles south of Sanaa.
The strikes were conducted by Royal Air Force Typhoon FGR4s, which used Paveway IV precision-guided bombs.
Healey said: 'This Government will always act in the interests of our national and economic security.
'Royal Air Force Typhoons have successfully conducted strikes against a Houthi military target in Yemen and all UK aircraft and personnel have returned safely to base.
'We conducted these strikes, supported by the US, to degrade Houthi capabilities and prevent further attacks against UK and international shipping.
'This action was taken in response to a persistent threat from the Houthis to freedom of navigation.
'A 55% drop in shipping through the Red Sea has already cost billions, fuelling regional instability and risking economic security for families in the UK.
READ MORE: Seamus Logan: Independence is needed to secure Scotland's green future
'The Government is steadfast in our commitment to reinforcing global stability and protecting British working people.
'I am proud of the dedication and professionalism shown by the servicemen and women involved in this operation.'
The strikes come ahead of the expected passage of the Royal Navy's flagship HMS Prince of Wales through the Red Sea.
The aircraft carrier and its escorts are conducting exercises in the Mediterranean before heading to the Indo-Pacific later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Zia Yusuf: Reform UK burka row is 'storm in a teacup'
Former Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf has called a row over a social media post - in which he said it was "dumb" for one of his MPs to call for a burka ban - a "storm in a teacup". Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Yusuf said he regretted the post and that "exhaustion led to a poor decision". Shortly after criticising MP Sarah Pochin, Yusuf quit as chairman saying that trying to get Reform UK elected was not "a good use of my time".However, two days later he returned to work for the party albeit in a different role, leading the party's Doge unit, a team inspired by the US Department of Government Efficiency, set up by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The initiative aims to cut wasteful spending in the councils Reform now why he had resigned as chairman, Yusuf said: "I've been working pretty much non-stop, virtually no days off."It is very difficult to keep going at that pace."He said one of the reasons he had "changed his decision so quickly" and returned to work for the party, was that he had been "inundated" by supportive messages from Reform voters and members. The series of events began last Wednesday when Pochin, the newly-elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer if he would join France and Denmark in banning the burka, a veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face and body, "in the interests of public safety".The following day Yusuf, who is a Muslim, posted on X: "I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do".Speaking to the BBC on Monday, Yusuf said "the thing that frustrated me at the time" was that Pochin had not chosen to ask something that was party for his views on a ban, he said: "If I was an MP I would think about it very deeply, I think I probably would be in favour of banning face coverings in public writ large, not just the burka."I'm very queasy and uneasy about banning things that for example would be unconstitutional in the US but we have a particular situation in the UK."He said he did not believe Islam was "a threat to the country" but added that the UK had "a problem with assimilation". Over the weekend, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch was also asked her views on banning the burka. She told the Telegraph: "People should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear."However, she said that organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear and that she asked people coming to her constituency surgeries to remove face coverings "whether it's a burka or a balaclava". "I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face," she Muslim Council of Britain accused her of "desperation" adding: "Kemi Badenoch isn't setting the agenda - she's scrambling to keep up with Reform UK's divisive rhetoric."
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Newsom taunts Trump's ‘tough guy' border czar to ‘come get me' after arrest threat
California Governor Gavin Newsom has escalated his war of words with Donald Trump 's administration over its handling of this weekend's tensions in Los Angeles by challenging the president's border czar Tom Homan to arrest him. Homan had told the media on Saturday that he was prepared to apprehend 'anybody' who interfered with the illegal immigrant crackdown in the city being carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, not excluding Newsom or Mayor Karen Bass. 'It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job,' he said. The Democrat shot back on X on Sunday by saying: 'Trump's border czar is threatening to arrest me for speaking out. Come and get me, tough guy.' 'I don't give a damn. It won't stop me from standing up for California.' The taunt accompanied a clip of an impassioned Newsom speaking to MSNBC in which he said: 'What the hell are they doing? These guys need to grow up, they need to stop and we need to push back and I'm sorry to be so clear but that kind of bloviating is exhausting. So Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' In the same interview, the governor denounced Trump's decision to send in the state National Guard to assist local law enforcement in maintaining order after three nights of angry demonstrations against ICE's latest drive to arrest alleged undocumented migrants. Newsom posted a number of other clips from the same segment last night, in one of which he said the president had 'manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions' through his actions and rhetoric and in another called Trump 'a stone cold liar.' The governor further posted a video of Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and accused them of provoking violence and chaos, 'militarizing cities' and arresting their opponents, before declaring: 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a president.' Elsewhere, Newsom reported that he had formally requested that the president stand down the Guard, posted a letter of support from leading Democrats and attacked other top Republicans including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and House Speaker Mike Johnson, scoffing: 'Smart guys running the operation.' Trump retaliated on Truth Social, writing: 'Governor Gavin Newscum [sic] and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots. These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists. Remember, NO MASKS!' He branded Newsom and Bass 'incompetent', criticized their handling of wildfires in the same city earlier this year and said the federal government would have to step in if they 'can't do their jobs.' The mass resistance to ICE's actions since Friday has seen vehicles set alight and protesters throwing fireworks at armed law enforcement officers, holding aloft placards bearing hostile slogans and shouting: 'Shame on you!' Officers in riot gear have responded by firing tear gas and flash grenades in attempts to disperse the crowds. ICE operations across Los Angeles County have so far resulted in the arrests of 118 accused illegal immigrants despite the clashes, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
New Statesman
39 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Rachel Reeves wants to teach her critics a lesson
Photo by Hannah McKay -. The toughest job in politics is usually said to be the leader of the opposition – an impression that Kemi Badenoch's tenure has done nothing to dispel. But it is arguably rivalled by that of chancellor. Every incumbent since the 2008 financial crisis has faced a version of the same dilemma: the UK is a poorer country than it once expected to be. At last year's Budget, Rachel Reeves escaped her fiscal straitjacket through two manoeuvres: she raised taxes by £41.5bn and loosened her debt rules to increase investment. The Spending Review is the moment at which the Chancellor gets to distribute the bounty that resulted. Reeves has already launched a pre-emptive strike against critics who liken her to the flinty George Osborne. A graph shows how Labour's spending far exceeds that planned by the Conservatives before the election (one aide calls it 'the honesty chart'). This isn't just spin: Reeves intends to increase day-to-day spending by £190bn – the biggest real-terms rise since Gordon Brown occupied the Treasury in 2000 – and capital investment by £113bn. Austerity this is not. But two things can be true. Yes, overall spending is rising by £303bn but some must lose in order that others may win. The latter includes the NHS – which has secured a 2.8 per cent real-terms rise – and defence (even if plenty regard 2.5 per cent of GDP as inadequate). Ed Miliband's energy security department will enjoy a large increase in capital investment including on nuclear power (allies point to the Energy Secretary's long-standing support for the sector as part of 'the sprint for clean energy abundance'). Other departments, however, face average real-terms cuts of 0.3 per cent to day-to-day spending. Hence the fraught negotiations of the last week. Angela Rayner – that former trade union negotiator – reached a settlement with Reeves last night having warned that cuts to affordable housing would render Labour's target of building 1.5 million new homes impossible. Yvette Cooper – who knows her way around the Treasury as a former chief secretary – is still holding out. After public dissent, the police will receive a real-terms increase but this will entail cuts to other Home Office areas. Last week I detailed Andy Burnham's rhetorical fusillades against the government. This week it's Sadiq Khan who is unhappy, with concern inside City Hall that Reeves will announce no new projects or funding for London at the Spending Review (key demands include Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line extensions, a tourist/visitors levy and a significant rise in funding for the Met Police). 'We must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government, which would not only harm London's vital public services, but jobs and growth across the country,' one person close to the Mayor tells me. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Here is further evidence of why some inside government believe that Reeves needs an 'economic reset' – abandoning her tax lock or further loosening her fiscal rules. But the Chancellor will have a message for such critics in her speech, which aides describe as a chance to 're-educate' these errant foes. Rewriting the UK's fiscal rules, Reeves will warn, would not be a cost-free choice, but one that would entail higher borrowing and higher mortgage rates. An ally speaks of a 'terrifying' gap between a commentariat that pleads for more taxes and more borrowing, and a much more sceptical electorate. 'They think we tax too much, they think we borrow too much, and a lot of people probably think we spend too much.' The Chancellor is seeking to pull off a tricky double act – assailing those who accuse her of austerity while reassuring those who fear Labour profligacy. This week will test whether she can keep her balance. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Rachel Reeves wants to level up your commute. Does she have the money?] Related
