Teachers will rally against Labour over pay, says NEU leader
The UK's largest teaching union will "make Labour MPs pay a high political price" if the government does not offer teachers in England a fully funded, above-inflation pay rise, its general secretary has said.Daniel Kebede said members of the National Education Union (NEU) "expect better from a Labour government" than the pay recommendation ministers have made.He said NEU members would campaign in Labour constituencies if it did not change - and "stand ready to strike".Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has said "any move towards industrial action by teaching unions would be indefensible".
The government has recommended a 2.8% pay rise for teachers in England and expects most schools will need to make "efficiencies" to fund it.The NEU agreed at its conference in Harrogate this week that it would hold a formal ballot on strike action if the offer remains "unacceptable", or if no extra funding is announced.
Phillipson has said: "With school staff, parents and young people working so hard to turn the tide on school attendance, any move towards industrial action by teaching unions would be indefensible."Following a 5.5% pay award in a hugely challenging fiscal context, I would urge NEU to put children first."Responding to her comments, Mr Kebede told conference it was "indefensible for a Labour government – a Labour government – to cut school funding"."After 14 years of Conservative austerity, we expect better from a Labour government," he said.He said the final pay award must be above inflation and fully funded, representing a "correction" of teacher pay and helping to recruit and retain staff, otherwise "we stand ready to act industrially"."We will make Labour MPs pay a high political price through our campaigning in their constituencies, with our parents, across this country," he said."No teacher wants to strike, but we stand ready."Mr Kebede accused the government of a "betrayal" when it came to education funding.
Mr Kebede also commented on a row with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage on Tuesday after the NEU branded Reform UK a "racist and far-right" party.During the clash, Mr Kebede called Farage a "right-wing populist" but did not describe him as racist, while Mr Farage vowed to "go to war" with the teaching unions if it won the next general election.On Thursday, Mr Kebede told NEU members that Farage "knows nothing about education"."And whilst this government might be rolling out the red carpet for Nigel Farage to walk into No 10, through their austerity agenda, we won't stand for it," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer and Farage have doomed Britain to a spiral of decline
The Government's decision to U-turn on the winter fuel allowance is absurd – and, sadly, a big indicator that Reform UK is not going to be the party which breaks Britain out of its spiral of self-inflicted decline. Rachel Reeves plans to restore the WFA to all pensioners with an income up to £35,000 a year. It will then be clawed back from the wealthiest retirees via the tax system. Overall, around 7.5 million older people who missed the payment last year are set to receive it again – at an apparent cost in the region of £1.25 billion a year. Paul Johnson, the Chair of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, puts it well: 'It wouldn't even be in the top 100 of things that I would do with my £1.25bn if I wanted to act on poverty. Almost none of the people impacted by this will be in poverty.' He's right. The Government's decision to means test the WFA removed the payment from some ten million people; of these, its own analysis suggested that only 50,000 or so were placed into 'relative fuel poverty'. And remember, 'relative poverty' is merely an income inequality metric; it doesn't mean someone is necessarily unable to afford heating. Even on the face of it, therefore, Reeves is hosing money at 7.5 million people for the sake of lifting just 50,000 out of 'relative' poverty. But closer consideration of the numbers reveals even deeper absurdities. Take the income requirement of £35,000. From the off, that is only a couple of grand less than the national average wage of £37,430. Why should pensioners on that income receive a fuel payment when working-age people on similar incomes do not? If anything, those working-age people are more deserving of help – for their cost of living is often substantially increased by costs from which many pensioners are exempt. How many of those 7.5 million beneficiaries, for example, are living mortgage-free? Retirees are also exempt from National Insurance, and that has big implications for their real income. Without NICs, that £35,000 becomes about £2,500 a month post-tax; for a working person to be in a similar position, they would need to earn quite a bit more than the average wage (enough to be in the top 37 per cent of earners, or thereabouts). Pensioner poverty was a real problem in 2010, when the Coalition Government first introduced the Triple Lock. But whilst there are some struggling pensioners today, it is absurd that the State continues giving indiscriminate welfare to what has become, on average, this country's wealthiest age cohort. Our pathological inability to cut entitlement spending, even to people who obviously don't need it, is one of the main reasons our country is in such a sorry state. We are all but conducting a controlled experiment in how much of the state can be all but dismantled – prisons, courts, the military – in order to avoid touching the big revenue expenditure accounts. Arresting British decline will require breaking out of this cycle. But it's a prisoner's dilemma for politicians: try to do the right thing, as Theresa May did on social care, and it creates an all-too-tempting opening for opportunistic opponents to exploit – as Labour did then, and as Reform UK has done now. Now forced to govern in the long shadow of wildly unrealistic voter expectations, Labour is probably quietly regretting its game-playing over the 'dementia tax'. If Nigel Farage ever becomes prime minister, and is forced to admit the extravagant savings he claims he can get from abolishing DEI and net zero are for the birds, he may well regret killing off such an obvious cut as the winter fuel allowance.
New Statesman
11 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Labour is losing Wales
Photo byIn 1900, a few months after founding the Labour Party, Keir Hardie was elected as an MP for Merthyr Tydfil, a mining town in the south Wales valleys. From then onwards, Merthyr Tydfil was a safe Labour seat; mirroring Wales as a whole, it has continually been represented by the party. Ninety-nine years after Hardie was elected in Merthyr Tydfil, the Senedd (which was initially named the Welsh Assembly) was founded. Only Labour have been in government or held the post of first minister in the 26 years since Welsh devolution began in Cardiff Bay. But over the past few years, things have begun to go awry for Welsh Labour. A recent poll from YouGov predicted the party would win just 18 per cent in next year's Senedd elections, behind Reform UK on 25 per cent and Plaid Cymru on 30 per cent. The elections in May 2026 will be the first to be held under a proportional voting system since the Senedd was founded, making it far less likely that Labour will cling on to power. If voting took place today, Wales would probably have its first Plaid Cymru first minister. Where did it all go wrong for Labour? A succession of unpopular policies including the introduction of a 20mph speed limit and the sustainable farming scheme certainly pushed away some corners of their voting base. The resignation of Vaughan Gething (after just four months as First Minister) following allegations that he had perjured himself at a Covid-19 inquiry, has equally harmed the party's standing. The longevity of Labour's time in power at the Senedd has also left voters longing for a change. Living standards in Wales have long been in decline; in comparison with the rest of the UK, waiting times in the Welsh NHS are much higher and educational performance has fallen in Wales more than any other UK nation. And with Keir Starmer now in power in Westminster, the party in Wales do not have the turbulence of a Conservative government in Westminster to take the blame. Last year's closure of the blast furnaces at the Tata Steelworks in Port Talbot also speaks to a wider sense among Welsh voters that Wales is always an afterthought. When Parliament was recalled to save the steelworks at Scunthorpe earlier this year, many in Wales asked: why wasn't the same treatment given to us? Though decisions over the fate of Port Talbot sat with the government in Westminster (and therefore were primarily made under the previous Conservative administration), many voters still blame the Labour government in Cardiff Bay. It did, after all, happen on their watch. Nigel Farage launched Reform's campaign for the Senedd in Port Talbot yesterday (he launched the party's 2024 general election campaign in Merthyr Tydfil). He told journalists that his party would re-open the blast furnaces in a move to reindustrialise Wales (a promise that will be impossible to fulfil, as once they have been switched off, blast furnaces cannot be reignited unless they have gone through a process called a 'salamander tap'). Reform do not currently have a leader in Wales (the last person to fill the role, Nathan Gill, quit the party in 2021). But in order to appear in any upcoming leadership debates, whoever is chosen must be a candidate for the Senedd. Some have speculated that Farage may run in a seat Reform are guaranteed to lose so that he can take the reins himself (if he wins, however, he will have to either resign immediately or give up his Parliamentary seat). The party has already made small gains in the south Wales valleys, winning a by-election to Torfaen council last year. Members of the Welsh Labour government look at Farage's influence with horror. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Mark Drakeford, the Welsh government finance minister (who stepped down as first minister last year, after six years in the role) told me, 'I do not believe that sending a former English public-school boy to Port Talbot is the best way to resonate with Welsh voters, I'm afraid.' To Drakeford, Farage has underestimated the strength of knowledge and feeling among residents of Port Talbot and their connection to the steelworks; 'I don't think anything he is saying will have any credibility in the minds of those people who have worked so hard in the local community to secure a long-term future for steelmaking.' The real threat to Welsh Labour, Drakeford pointed out, is not from Reform, but from other progressive parties. And as mentioned previously, current polling backs this up. 'The real struggle for voter support in Wales has always been among progressive parties,' Drakeford said, 'there has always been around 25 per cent or so of the Welsh population who opt for parties that see themselves on the right side of the political spectrum.' Instead of attempting to win those voters back from Reform, Drakeford said 'the real contest must be for the support of the other 75 per cent'. This approach contrasts with what has been recently adopted by Starmer (the Prime Minister has said that Farage is now his main opponent). It is no secret that Welsh Labour have not always agreed with the decisions taken by their counterparts in Westminster. The current first minister, Eluned Morgan criticised Starmer's 'divisive language' following his Island of Strangers immigration speech and has called for the abolition of the two-child benefit cap (one insider told me the pair are currently not on speaking terms). A Labour loss in Wales next year would be incredibly significant. For more than 100 years, the party has built a strong base there, particularly in the South Wales Valleys. But it has taken its eye off the ball. Labour's fate in Wales should sit as a warning to Starmer's government in Westminster: do not let longevity become complacency, and don't leave Labour's progressive base behind. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Reform needs Zia Yusuf] Related
Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Former Newsround and Most Haunted star becomes Reform UK's new chairman
Dr David Bull takes over from Zia Yusuf, who dramatically quit as Reform UK's chairman last week, before returning to the party in a new position just two days later A former BBC Newsround presenter has been made Reform UK's new chairman. Dr David Bull takes over from Zia Yusuf, who dramatically quit the role last week, before returning to the party in a new position just two days later. Nigel Farage welcomed Dr Bull, who was previously Reform's co-deputy leader, saying he would come to the role of Reform UK chairman with "terrific verve, energy, enthusiasm". Mr Farage, Reform's leader, added: "It's going to be great fun." Mr Yusuf said he is "hugely excited" that Dr Bull was taking the role. Some viewers might recognise Dr Bull, now 56, from his former years as a TV presenter, with his credits including Newsround and paranormal series Most Haunted. The now Talk TV presenter's broadcasting career first started in 1995, when he starred as an on-screen doctor for Sky TV giving people advice to people travelling abroad. The Reform politician then joined Newsround in the late 1990s. It followed Dr Bull having qualified as a physician in 1993 from St Mary's Hospital Medical School in London. He went to present other BBC kids shows, before joining BBC's Watchdog to present its Healthcheck spin-off. His presenting credits also include Most Haunted Live and Hospital Live. After his years as a TV doctor, Dr Bull turned to politics. He was selected as Tory candidate for Brighton Pavilion but stood down in 2009 before the election to head up a Conservative policy review on sexual health with Anne Milton, the shadow health minister. In 2019, he was elected as a Member of the European Parliament, as part of The Brexit Party, and served until the UK left the EU. He has since been Reform UK's Deputy leader and health spokesman. Mr Yusuf resigned after criticising Reform MP Sarah Pochin for asking a "dumb" question at PMQs about a burka ban. In a parting jibe, he added: "I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office." But he returned to the party just days later. Mr Yusuf said he regrets his social media post about Ms Pochin. He will now lead the so-called "Doge team", which is inspired by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency in Donald Trump's administration. Dr Bull reportedly backs "banning the burqa".
