logo
Trump is getting the military parade he wanted in his first term

Trump is getting the military parade he wanted in his first term

Straits Times5 days ago

US President Donald Trump will be getting a military parade on his birthday, which is also the Army's birthday parade. PHOTO: AFP
Trump is getting the military parade he wanted in his first term
WASHINGTON – In President Donald Trump's first term, the Pentagon opposed his desire for a military parade in Washington, wanting to keep the armed forces out of politics.
But in Mr Trump's second term, that guardrail has vanished. There will be a parade this year, and on the president's 79th birthday, no less.
The current plan involves a tremendous scene in the centre of Washington: 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks; 28 Stryker armored personnel carriers; more than 100 other vehicles; a World War II-era B-25 bomber; 6,700 soldiers; 50 helicopters; 34 horses; two mules; and a dog.
But critics say it is another example of how Mr Trump has politicised the military.
The Army estimates the cost at US$25 million (S$32.2 million) to US$45 million.
But it could be higher because the Army has promised to fix any city streets that the parade damages, plus the cost of cleanup and police are not yet part of the estimate.
While US$45 million is a tiny fraction of Mr Trump's proposed Pentagon budget of US$1.01 trillion for fiscal year 2026, it comes as the administration seeks to slash funding for education, health and public assistance.
'It's a lot of money,' the Army spokesperson Steve Warren acknowledged. 'But I think that amount of money is dwarfed by 250 years of service and sacrifice by America's Army.'
The Army is not calling the event a birthday parade for Mr Trump. It is the Army's birthday parade. The Continental Army was officially formed on June 14, 1775, so June 14 will mark 250 years.
That also happens to be Mr Trump's birthday.
There was no big parade in Washington back when the Army turned 200 in 1975, when Vietnam War scars were still raw.
While smaller commemorations were held at Army bases around the country, complete with dinner dances, barbershop quartets and cake cutting, few people were looking to glorify the military so soon after the Kent State shootings.
Besides, the country was gearing up for big bicentennial celebrations in 2026 .
If things were going to be similarly low-key this time around, Fort Myer, across the Potomac in Arlington, Virginia, might be an ideal location, 'where the Old Guard could march with some veterans,' said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the leading Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, in a reference to the 3rd Infantry Regiment, the Army's oldest active duty infantry unit.
'But this is Trump,' Mr Reed added, speaking to reporters last week at the Defence Writers Group. 'It's consistent with so much of what he's doing.'
Army officials say the parade will cross in front of Mr Trump's viewing stand on Constitution Avenue, near the White House, on the evening of Saturday, June 14, part of a big bash on the National Mall.
There will be marching troops who will be housed in two government buildings, officials say. They will sleep on military cots and bring their own sleeping bags, a topic of much merriment on late-night television.
There will be Paladins, the huge self-propelled howitzers, and nods to vintage style. Army officials want to outfit some troops in uniforms from the wars of long ago, like the one in 1812 or the Spanish-American War.
For more than two years, the Army has been planning national, global and even interstellar aspects of the celebration – an Army astronaut on the International Space Station will be phoning in, Mr Warren said.
But those planned celebrations focused on festivals, a postal stamp, various fun runs, military bands and the like. At some point this year, Army officials said, a military parade in Washington appeared in the plans.
Still, officials say there are no plans at the moment to sing 'Happy Birthday' to Mr Trump, or to the Army, during the parade. One plan does, however, call for paratroopers from the Golden Knights, the Army parachute team, to land amid the festivities and hand Mr Trump a flag.
In 2017 during his first term, Mr Trump watched the Bastille Day parade in Paris with President Emmanuel Macron of France and returned home wanting his own.
But the Trump 1.0 Pentagon shut him down. Mr Jim Mattis, the defence secretary at the time, said he would 'rather swallow acid', according to 'Holding the Line', a book by Guy Snodgrass, Mr Mattis' former speechwriter.
'We're all aware in this country of the president's affection and respect for the military,' Mr Mattis said tersely when reporters asked about Mr Trump's wishes.
'We have been putting together some options. We will send them up to the White House for decision.'
General Paul J. Selva, then the vice-chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Mr Trump during a meeting at the Pentagon that military parades were 'what dictators do', according to 'The Divider', by Peter Baker, a New York Times reporter, and Ms Susan Glasser.
When Mr Mattis was gone, Mr Trump brought up the idea again.
Mr Mattis' successor, Mr Mark T. Esper, responded with an 'air parade' as part of July 4 celebrations in 2020, Pentagon officials said.
An array of fighter jets and other warplanes flew down the East Coast over cities that played roles in the American Revolution, including Boston, New York and Philadelphia.
Officials in Mr Trump's first Defence Department resisted his parade suggestion – it was never a direct order – because they viewed it as putting the military in the middle of politics, something the Pentagon historically has been loath to do.
But now Mr Trump has Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and military leaders who have been more willing to put his musings into action.
This 'raises the question, 'Is the US military celebrating Trump?'' said Dr Risa Brooks , an associate professor of political science at Marquette University.
'Having tanks rolling down streets of the capital doesn't look like something consistent with the tradition of a professional, highly capable military,' Prof Brooks said in an interview.
'It looks instead like a military that is politicised and turning inwardly, focusing on domestic oriented adversaries instead of external ones.'
There have been big American military parades in the past, but the last one was almost 35 years ago, to commemorate the end of the first Gulf War.
Military parades in the United States have traditionally followed the end of major conflicts, such as the Civil War and the two World Wars.
There were also military parades during three presidential inaugurations during the Cold War. And small-town festivities also sometimes commemorate the military with a few armored vehicles and troops.
'I don't actually see the problem with a military parade,' said Dr Kori Schake , a former defence official in the George W. Bush administration who directs foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Dr Schake said more Americans need to see the troops who serve the country.
'If seeing our fellow Americans in uniform encourages public knowledge and connection, or inspires volunteering, it would be beneficial,' she said.
At the end of the day, 'the military won't die on this hill even if they do not like it,' said Dr Peter Feaver , a political-science professor at Duke University who has studied the military for decades.
'Trump's 2.0 team is better at giving the president what he wants whether or not it is best in the long run.' NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

AsiaOne

timean hour ago

  • AsiaOne

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

China said on Monday (June 2) that US President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the US had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The US government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for US semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25 per cent tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers. [[nid:717864]]

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling
Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Utqiagvik, Alaska - The Trump administration is moving to repeal Biden-era curbs blocking oil drilling across most of the mammoth petroleum reserve in Alaska that is home to an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the planned policy shift late on Sunday at a townhall meeting in Utqiagvik, a village on the Chukchi Sea coast, as he and fellow members of President Donald Trump's Cabinet visit Alaska to promote energy development in the region. The measure would open up new opportunities for oil and gas development in the 23 million acre (9.3 million ha) National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), an Indiana-size parcel in the north-west of the state that was set aside as a source of energy for the navy a century ago. The action responds to a directive that Mr Trump issued after his inauguration in January, when he signed an executive order compelling a host of policy changes meant to expand oil, natural gas and mineral development in Alaska. The reserve holds an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil, according to a 2017 assessment by the US Geological Survey. And its production is set to skyrocket, with the development of recent discoveries. Alaska has forecast that crude production from the reserve will climb to 139,600 barrels per day in fiscal year 2033, up from 15,800 barrels per day in fiscal year 2023. Mr Trump's measure would repeal a 2024 rule imposed under former president Joe Biden, who designated 13 million acres (5.25 million ha) of the reserve as 'special areas', limiting future oil and gas leasing, while maintaining leasing prohibitions on 10.6 million acres (4.3 million ha) of the NPR-A. The rule has complicated future oil drilling and production in the reserve where companies including ConocoPhillips, Santos, Repsol and Armstrong Oil & Gas have been active. ConocoPhillips is developing its 600-million-barrel Willow project in the refuge, and is expected to start producing commercial volumes of crude oil there in 2029. Mr Burgum's announcement was greeted with applause inside a heritage centre in Utqiagvik, where local residents had gathered to speak with officials from the Trump administration, as well as Senator Dan Sullivan and Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, about resource development. Mr Burgum, who leads the National Energy Dominance Council, was joined by the panel's vice-chairman, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin. Mr Wright said he anticipated increased oil development in Alaska – possibly quadrupling oil output on its prolific North Slope – and decried years of policies he said were 'smothering' the region's potential. Mr Rex Rock Sr, the head of the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, one of 13 Alaska native regional corporations created under federal law, said that the 2024 rule restricting energy development in the far north did not have the backing of the region. Environmentalists had argued that Mr Biden's rule was essential to protect a large stretch of unspoiled land in the Arctic, a vast region of tundra and wetlands that teems with wildlife. And, they insisted, in a warming world, there is insufficient justification for burning the large cache of oil the reserve contains. The new proposal will give the public 60 days to comment, setting the stage for a potentially rapid reversal and new leasing in the reserve. Conservationists who cheered the original protections could seek to challenge the pivot in federal court. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Cambodia to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute
Cambodia to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Cambodia to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute

Military clashes between the South-east Asian neighbours erupted in 2008 and have led to several years of sporadic violence, resulting in at least 28 deaths. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Cambodia to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute Phnom Penh - Cambodia will file a complaint with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over border disputes with Thailand, Prime Minister Hun Manet said June 2, after a Cambodian soldier was killed in a recent frontier clash. 'Cambodia hopes that the Thai side will agree with Cambodia to jointly bring these issues to the International Court of Justice... to prevent armed confrontation again over border uncertainty,' Mr Hun Manet said during a meeting between MPs and senators. Military clashes between the South-east Asian neighbours erupted in 2008 and have led to several years of sporadic violence, resulting in at least 28 deaths. The most recent occurred on May 28, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a location known as the Emerald Triangle – a joint border area between Cambodia, Thailand and Laos. The day after, Cambodia's foreign ministry sent a letter to the Thai embassy in Phnom Penh demanding 'an immediate and thorough investigation' into the 'unprovoked attack'. Describing the incident as 'a violation of Cambodian sovereignty', Phnom Penh said it remained committed to resolving the issue through 'peaceful and diplomatic avenues'. Prime Minister Hun Manet said that even if the Thai side did not agree on bringing the issue to the ICJ, Cambodia would still file the complaint. He added that the border dispute was being 'incited by small extremist groups in both countries', which could lead to further clashes. Thailand's ministry of foreign affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment from AFP. Cambodia's military had said they were attacked first in Wednesday's incident, while the Thai side said their soldiers were responding to gunshots. The Thai and Cambodian militaries met the following day, agreeing to ease tensions. Thailand says a Joint Boundary Committee will meet in the next two weeks to resolve the issue. The Emerald Triangle is among the areas that will be named in the ICJ complaint, Mr Hun Manet said. Another is Ta Moan Thom Temple, the backdrop for a video posted on social media earlier this year showing a woman singing a patriotic Khmer song which led to Bangkok lodging a formal protest to Phnom Penh. Cambodia and Thailand have long been at odds over their more than 800km-long border, which was largely drawn during the French occupation of Indochina. The 2008 military clashes erupted over a patch of land next to Preah Vihear Temple, a 900-year-old structure near their shared border. This led to several years of sporadic violence before the International Court of Justice ruled the disputed area belonged to Cambodia. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store