logo
‘My son went to get flour. He came back in a coffin': As the world focuses on Iran, Palestinians are being shot dead seeking aid

‘My son went to get flour. He came back in a coffin': As the world focuses on Iran, Palestinians are being shot dead seeking aid

Independent3 days ago

'My son went to get some flour for his family, but came back in a coffin and a death shroud.'
These are the words of father-of-six Iyad Abu Darabi describing how Israeli forces killed his 25-year-old son Mussa in southern Gaza in the first few weeks of June.
Desperate and starving, the young man had snuck off against his family's will to collect food from a specially designated distribution site backed by Israel and run by the deeply controversial US-based non-profit Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
Almost all aid going into Gaza now runs through the American aid group, which started operations in May following a months-long Israeli blockade of nearly all food and aid. Food is handed out at overcrowded and deadly sites overseen by American private security contractors and the Israeli army.
Gazans have described the sites as 'American death zones' because of the contractors who patrol them.
The foundation has been shrouded in secrecy, with obscure sources of funding and several changes in leadership and management since its launch.
Gaza's health ministry said that Israeli forces opening fire on crowds trying to reach the GHF food distribution points have killed nearly 400 Palestinians and wounded more than 3,000 since aid deliveries were reinstated in late May.
Several videos from the sites show people cowering or running from gunfire, struggling to carry bags of food as they escape.
Despite the carnage, the Trump administration is said to be considering funding the organization to the tune of $500 million through the recently downsized US Agency for International Development (USAID).
This week though, the world's focus has been on the growing clashes between Israel and Iran. The two sides have traded thousands of missiles, drones and bombs in a raging conflict that threatens to engulf the entire Middle East and draw in countries from around the world.
It has overshadowed the desperate events in Gaza, where the two-million-strong population is trapped in the snare of famine, according to the United Nations. An unprecedented Israeli bombardment of the tiny 35-mile-long strip has killed over 55,000 people since Hamas militants' bloody attacks on southern Israel in October 2023.
Mussa was just one of hundreds who have lost their lives in the desperate search for food.
Witnesses and families of those killed say Israeli forces opened fire on the massive crowds gathered that day as hungry civilians scrambled for food in a desert wasteland. He was hit by tank fire, and killed instantly alongside women and children, Iyad says.
'The aid is a death trap for young people: in a barren land surrounded by fences, the gates are opened for tens of thousands to fight over supplies without any order. Israel leaves people fighting each other over food,' Iyad says in desperation.
'He went without my knowledge and because of extreme hunger. But this is not aid, it is an opportunity for more killing.'
The Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots at people gathered for aid, but denies targeting civilians in Gaza or turning aid distribution sites into 'death traps'. It told The Independent that at least one incident is 'under review.'
'The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and operates to minimise harm as much as possible to them, while maintaining the safety of our troops,' it added.
The GHF said this incident did not occur at a GHF site and in a press release Monday claimed it had distributed more than three million meals at its four distribution sites 'without incident'.
The latest – and deadliest – incident took place on Tuesday. The health ministry said that 59 people were killed and more than 200 wounded while waiting for United Nations and commercial trucks to enter the territory with desperately needed food.
Palestinian witnesses said that Israeli forces carried out an airstrike on a nearby home before opening fire towards the crowd in the southern city of Khan Younis.
While the shooting did not appear to be related to the newly launched Israeli-backed GHF network — it is an indication of the deadly struggle Palestinians face every day to get food, at a time when a kilo of sugar is now $70. Randa Youssef, 42, a single mother-of-three, says her cousin Mohammed was killed on 5 June while attempting to get food from a GHF site in Rafah. She said Mohammed was due to be married just three days later.
'He was shot in the back and fell to the ground. There was no means of transport. He bled to death for three hours amid continuous gunfire,' Randa explains.
'We can't afford the basic necessities. A kilo of sugar costs $70 today. That's why we risk our lives. My son sometimes cries. I honestly don't know what to feed him.
'This American aid is deliberate chaos.'
The Biden administration paid lip service to trying to convince Israel to allow aid into Gaza without achieving much in the way of results, but the Trump administration has largely taken a hands-off approach.
Israel cut off the supply of most food and aid to Gaza in March, causing hunger to skyrocket across the Strip. Humanitarian groups have warned that most of Gaza's 2.2 million people are at risk of starvation unless aid deliveries are ramped up.
The GHF system began in May, but aid groups have warned it is wholly insufficient to meet the needs of the population. The UN and other humanitarian organisations have also warned of the risk of friction between Israeli troops and civilians seeking supplies, and continue to call for an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted aid access.
Former officials from the US State Department and USAID who have worked on emergency aid delivery described the new system as 'grotesque,' 'dangerous,' and part of a larger plan to use desperately needed aid to control the movement of Palestinians.
'What is so infuriatingly tragic about this is that it's playing out exactly as any experienced humanitarian could have predicted,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, who oversaw famine relief for three years during the Obama administration and is now president of Refugees International.
'When you have an aid distribution model that is premised on forcing huge crowds of desperately hungry people to cluster directly adjacent to IDF military installations, you're going to get massacres,' he added.
Konyndyk said it was 'not a coincidence' that most of the distribution sites were in the south of Gaza, at a time when the Israeli army is trying to force Palestinians out of the north of the territory.
'A basic principle of humanitarian response is you move the aid as close to you can to where the people are. They're doing the opposite of that, the diametric opposite of that, which suggests that they want to draw people to the south,' he said.
'I think that is highly suggestive of the longer-term agenda here,' he added.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans last month to force Palestinians to move to southern Gaza after his security cabinet approved an expanded military operation in the northern and central parts of the territory.
'There will be a movement of the population to protect them,' Netanyahu said of the operation.
Stacey Gilbert, who resigned from the State Department in 2024 over the Biden administration's failure to hold Israel accountable for blocking aid to Gaza, called the sites 'another stunt' along the lines of previous efforts by the Biden administration.
'It's a stunt like the air drops. It's a stunt like the floating pier debacle. These are all ways that both the Biden administration, now the Trump administration, are using to try to obscure the fact that they're going to these extraordinarily dangerous and extraordinarily expensive efforts because Israel is blocking aid. There's no other way to see it,' she told The Independent.
' It is so humiliating and undignified and just dangerous, straight out dangerous for everyone involved,' she added.
Gilbert, too, believes the sites are located primarily in the south to draw Palestinians away from the north.
'This is trying to draw them all to one area, to get them away from the area that Israel doesn't want them in,' she said.
Despite hundreds of deaths at the GHF sites and an insufficient level of aid getting into Gaza, the Trump administration appears to be leaving the door open to backing it financially.
A State Department spokesperson told The Independent that the GHF was 'an independent organization. It does not receive USG funding.'
'Nevertheless, we are constantly looking for creative solutions to get aid into Gaza without it being looted by Hamas,' the spokesperson added.
Israel insists the new system was necessary because aid was being diverted to Hamas under the previous long-established system, managed by the United Nations — a charge denied by the UN and by Hamas.
For Salwa al-Daghma, from the southern city of Khan Younis, 'this aid is a morsel of food soaked in blood.'
Her brother Khaled, a father-of-five, was shot dead by a sniper earlier this month at another GHF site in Rafah when he tried to get just a kilo of flour for his children – the youngest just over two years old.
Again, Israeli forces opened fire on the massive crowds when chaos broke out.
'He was hit by a bullet directly in the head. His brain came out the other side, and he was killed instantly,' she said. 'Israel closed the crossings and banned food, and they came to us with a method to kill our children and families.'
'This is a death trap, not an aid point. They don't want to help us – they are actually killing us.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran strikes back: Foreign minister brands Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed diplomacy' after US blew up three nuclear bases in overnight strike
Iran strikes back: Foreign minister brands Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed diplomacy' after US blew up three nuclear bases in overnight strike

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Iran strikes back: Foreign minister brands Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed diplomacy' after US blew up three nuclear bases in overnight strike

Iran 's foreign minister has branded Donald Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed' diplomacy after the US blew up three nuclear bases overnight - as he warned the world is facing an 'unprecedented level of danger'. In a press conference after the strikes, US President Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear weapons programme, and warned of the possibility of more attacks to come. In return, Iran targeted Israel in a set of attacks this morning - with emergency services reporting at least 16 people are injured, including a young man with shrapnel wounds to his upper body. The US will be braced for Iranian attacks on its forces in the region. Iran foreign minister Abbas Araghchi furiously condemned the US strikes during a press conference today, in which he attacked Trump and threatened to act on the attack. 'Humanity has come too far as a species to allow a lawless bully to take us back to the law of the jungle,' he said. Araghchi added that 'urgent and decisive action' must now be taken, warning that 'silence' will 'plunge the world into an unprecedented level of danger'. Digital billboards display a message thanking US President Donald Trump for his administration's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites Top US officials urged Iran to surrender today after strikes on the nation's nuclear sites 'severely damaged' its nuclear capabilities overnight. Trump broke his two-week deadline on Saturday night as he launched 'Operation Midnight Hammer', sending a fleet of B-2 bombers to key nuclear sites. The US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a morning press conference that the strikes were 'bold' and 'brilliant', and warned Iran that there would be dire consequences if it does not come to the negotiating table. Officials admitted that the strikes on the Fordow site, a deep underground nuclear enrichment facility, may not have been entirely destroyed in the operation, but described it as significantly damaged. A view shows damage to buildings and vehicles after a missile fired by Iran, in retaliation for Israeli attacks, struck the city of Ness Ziona, near Tel Aviv The press conference came as world leaders condemned Trump's decision to wade into the conflict, with Chinese President Xi Jinping saying Trump 'violated international peace'. Iran's foreign minister branded Trump a 'lawless bully' who 'betrayed' diplomacy after the US blew up three nuclear bases. Early this morning, Iran retaliated by targeting Israel in a devastating set of attacks - with emergency services reporting more than a dozen people injured. Horrific photos showed entire buildings obliterated while cars were crushed by debris and residents forced to evacuate their homes.

Retaliate now, later or never: How Iran could respond to the US strikes
Retaliate now, later or never: How Iran could respond to the US strikes

BBC News

time39 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Retaliate now, later or never: How Iran could respond to the US strikes

Iran has responded furiously to the overnight US airstrikes on three of its nuclear sites, vowing what it calls "everlasting consequences".But beyond the words, there will be feverish discussions taking place at the highest level inside Iran's security and intelligence they escalate the conflict through retaliation against US interests, or, as US President Donald Trump has called on them to do, negotiate, which in practice means giving up all nuclear enrichment inside Iran? This internal debate will be taking place at a time when many senior Iranian commanders will be looking over their shoulders, wondering if they are about to be the next target of an Israeli precision airstrike or whether someone in the room has already betrayed them to Mossad, Israel's overseas spy speaking, there are three different strategic courses of action now open to Iran. None of them are risk free and uppermost in the minds of those taking the decisions will be the survival of the Islamic Republic regime. Retaliate hard and soon Many will be baying for blood. Iran has been humiliated, first by Israel, now by what it has often in the past called 'the Great Satan', its term for the US. Iran's ongoing exchange of fire with Israel continues into its tenth day but retaliating against the US brings a whole new level of risk, not just for Iran but for the whole region. Iran is believed to retain about half of its original stock of around 3,000 missiles, having used up and lost the remainder in exchanges of fire with latest on US strikes on IranWhat we know about US strikes on IranIran has a target list of around 20 US bases to choose from in the broader Middle East. One of the nearest and most obvious is the sprawling headquarters of the powerful US Navy's Fifth Fleet at Mina Salman in Bahrain. But Iran may be reluctant to strike at a neighbouring Gulf Arab state. More likely perhaps, would be to use its proxies in Iraq and Syria to attack any one of the relatively isolated US bases at At-Tanf, Ain Al-Asad or Erbil. Iran has form here. When Donald Trump ordered the assassination of Iran's Quds Force leader, Qassim Suleimani, in 2020 Iran responded by targeting US military personnel in Iraq but avoided killing any by giving prior notice. It may not do so this time. Iran could also launch 'swarm attacks' on US Navy warships using drones and fast torpedo boats, something that the Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy has practiced exhaustively over the years. The aim, if it went down this route, would be to overwhelm US naval defences through sheer numbers. It could also ask its allies in Yemen, the Houthis, to resume their attacks on Western shipping passing between the Indian Ocean and the Red secretive nuclear site that only a US bomb could hitThere are also economic targets Iran could strike, but this would antagonise its Gulf Arab neighbours who have recently reached an uneasy modus vivendi with the Islamic Republic. The biggest and most damaging target here would be choking off the vital Strait of Hormuz, through which over 20 per cent of the world's oil supplies pass daily. Iran could do this by sowing sea mines, creating a lethal hazard for both naval and commercial there is cyber. Iran, along with North Korea, Russia and China, has a sophisticated offensive cyber capability. Inserting destructive malware into US networks or businesses is doubtless one option under consideration. Retaliate later This would mean waiting until the current tension has subsided and launching a surprise attack at a time of Iran's choosing, when US bases were no longer on maximum alert. Such an attack could also target US diplomatic, consular or trade missions, or extend to the assassination of individuals. The risk here for Iran, of course, is that it would likely invoke renewed US attacks just as ordinary Iranians are returning to normal life. Don't retaliate This would take enormous restraint on Iran's part but it would spare it from further US attacks. It could even choose the diplomatic route and rejoin negotiations with the US, although Iran's Foreign Minister points out that Iran never left those negotiations, that it was, in his words, Israel and the US that blew them up. But restarting the US-Iran negotiations in Muscat, Rome or wherever, would only be worth doing if Iran was prepared to accept the red line that both the US and Israel are insisting on. Namely that for Iran to keep its civil nuclear programme, it must send all uranium outside the country for nothing after taking such a battering also makes the Iranian regime look weak, especially after all its warnings of dire repercussions if the US did attack. In the end it may decide that the risk of weakening its grip on its population outweighs the cost of any further US attacks.

UN Security Council to meet Sunday over US strikes on Iran
UN Security Council to meet Sunday over US strikes on Iran

Reuters

time43 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UN Security Council to meet Sunday over US strikes on Iran

UNITED NATIONS, June 22 (Reuters) - The United Nations Security Council is due to meet later on Sunday, diplomats said, after the United States joined Israel's assault on Iran and hit the country's main nuclear sites overnight in strikes with massive bunker-busting bombs. Iran requested the meeting, calling on the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms." Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said in a statement on Sunday that the U.S. and Israel "do not deserve any condemnation, but rather an expression of appreciation and gratitude for making the world a safer place."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store