Mahmoud Khalil's Wife Still Hasn't Heard From Columbia
Noor Abdalla, a dentist based in New York City's Morningside Heights, says that no one from Columbia University's administration has contacted her since her husband, former Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, was detained earlier this year.
While Columbia students have rallied around Khalil, the school's leaders haven't reached out, Abdalla told The Cut in a May interview. During Columbia's graduation ceremonies, acting President Claire Shipman drew boos while referencing free speech and Khalil's case.
Columbia University declined to comment to HuffPost.
Khalil and seven other graduate students sued Columbia earlier this year to prevent the school from releasing private disciplinary records to a House Republican committee.
Khalil, who earned a master's from Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over his involvement in pro-Palestinian campus protests this past March. His detention also comes as Columbia has opted to acquiesce to the Trump administration's demands over issues including campus security. Khalil has been one of the most high-profile examples of the White House targeting legal immigrants over their speech.
Khalil is a lawful permanent U.S. resident and faces no criminal charges.
For now, Abdalla said, she has no idea when she'll see her husband again. Although a federal judge ruled Wednesday that his detention was likely unconstitutional, he also determined that Khalil could remain in detention. In a second case, an immigration court is weighing the government's arguments for Khalil's deportation.
'We don't know if Mahmoud's going to be deported,' Abdalla told The Cut, adding that she's preparing a passport for their 1-month-old child just in case. 'We don't want to end up needing it and not having it,' she said.
Read her full interview with The Cut here.
Trump's Bid To Deport Columbia Activist Mahmoud Khalil Is Likely Unconstitutional, Judge Says
Graduates Boo Columbia President At Commencement While Noting Mahmoud Khalil's Absence
Agents Didn't Have Warrant To Arrest Activist Mahmoud Khalil, Documents Show
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Several Burned in ‘Targeted Terror Attack' as Pro-Israel Demonstrators March at Colorado Pedestrian Mall
Several people suffered burn injuries at a busy outdoor mall in Boulder, Colorado, and a man was taken into custody Sunday in what the FBI called a 'targeted terror attack' as a group of demonstrators walked in support of hostages still being held in Gaza, according to multiple media reports. Witnesses were still being interviewed and it was too early to definitively determine a motive, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn said, according to the Associated Press. 'It would be irresponsible for me to speculate on motive this early on,' he said. The attack took place at a popular pedestrian mall that attracts tourists and college students. Demonstrators with a volunteer group called Run For Their Lives – with multiple chapters across the world that regularly meet to advocate for the release of hostages in Gaza – had gathered to call for their release. 'The initial callers indicated that there was a man with a weapon and that people were being set on fire,' Redfearn said. 'When we arrived, we encountered multiple victims that were injured with injuries consistent with burns … [and] a suspect was pointed out to our officers on the scene. Our officers immediately encountered that suspect, who was taken into custody without incident.' Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said he was monitoring the situation, adding that 'hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable.' Redfearn said the suspect was taken to the hospital with minor injuries, but was not able to release his identity. 'The scene itself is contained, but we have a large area here in downtown Boulder closed off right now,' he added. 'Businesses have been closed, and we have asked people to avoid the area. It is not—this area is not safe yet. We're dealing with a vehicle of interest. We're dealing with a large area that we are making sure is safe before we allow people to come back.' The ADL said it reviewed videos from the scene, and believe it heard the suspect saying: 'How many children you killed?,' 'We have to end Zionists,' and 'They are killers.' The post Several Burned in 'Targeted Terror Attack' as Pro-Israel Demonstrators March at Colorado Pedestrian Mall appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FBI investigating attack on Colorado pro-Israel gathering as terrorism
The FBI and law enforcement in Colorado are investigating a possible act of terrorism after multiple people attending a weekly pro-Israel gathering in Boulder to honor hostages kidnapped by Hamas were attacked by a suspect seen throwing Molotov cocktails in their direction. FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X that the bureau was 'fully investigating' what he described as a 'targeted terror attack' in Boulder on Sunday, while FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said they were probing the incident as an 'act of terror, and targeted violence' while asking for anyone with information to contact the bureau. One person has been arrested after throwing a Molotov cocktail towards the pro-Israel demonstrators, according to Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn. Speaking to reporters from the scene of the attack, Redfearn said authorities were called to the area responding to calls 'that people were being set on fire' by 'a man with a weapon.' Redfearn also said that victims, attendees of the weekly Boulder Run for Their Lives event calling for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza, had 'injuries consistent with burns and other injuries,' though he could not provide an estimate for the number of individuals who were harmed in the attack. He warned that some of those injuries could be life threatening. Videos circulating on social media of the attack showed a man shouting 'end Zionists,' though the footage could not be independently verified by Jewish Insider. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, said in a post on X that he was 'closely monitoring the situation in Boulder' and said that his state was working 'with local and federal law enforcement to support this investigation.' In a second statement on his personal account, Polis wrote that, 'As the American Jewish community continues to reel from the horrific antisemitic murders in Washington, D.C., it is unfathomable that the Jewish community is facing another terror attack here in Boulder, on the eve of the holiday of Shavuot no less.' 'Several individuals were brutally attacked while peacefully marching to draw attention to the plight of the hostages who have been held by Hamas terrorists in Gaza for 604 days. I condemn this vicious act of terrorism, and pray for the recovery of the victims,' he continued. Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), who is running to replace the term-limited Polis, described the incident as a 'horrifying terror attack' in a statement posted to X. 'My thoughts are with the victims of the horrifying terror attack that occurred this afternoon in Boulder. Hate and violence of any kind will not be tolerated in Colorado,' Bennet wrote. Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) wrote on the platform that, 'Hate of any kind has no home in Colorado. We're monitoring the reports of a horrific terror attack in Boulder this afternoon. Our thoughts are with the victims and their loved ones.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) also said that he was 'closely monitoring the situation in Boulder,' adding, 'This is horrifying, and this cannot continue. We must stand up to antisemitism.' The attack comes less than two weeks after the murder of two Israeli Embassy staffers attending an American Jewish Committee event in Washington. The alleged shooter yelled 'Free Palestine' shortly after committing the crime. In April, during the first night of Passover, an arsonist tried to burn down Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence. The perpetrator cited the governor's support for Israel as his motive.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After lawmakers pass budget with cuts and tax hikes, Gov. JB Pritzker blames state's fiscal challenges on Trump
SPRINGFIELD — While offering a sunny take on the passage of a roughly $55 billion state spending plan balanced in part by cutting back on some of his own priorities, Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday blamed Illinois' latest fiscal challenges not on a state tax system he once described as 'unfair' and 'inadequate' but on economic headwinds created by President Donald Trump. 'This year has been hard across the entire Midwest — indeed, the entire country,' Pritzker told reporters in his state Capitol office, nodding to cuts in areas such as public health and higher education in neighboring red states Indiana and Iowa. 'Donald Trump's incomprehensible tariff policies have put a tax on our working families and dampened the nation's economic outlook,' he said. 'The Trump slump is affecting every state, and the chaos and uncertainty of the Republicans' proposed cuts to health care and education and jobs have made budgeting, well, harder than ever before.' The spending plan, which was passed by lawmakers on Saturday shortly before a midnight deadline and awaits Pritzker's signature before the state's fiscal year begins July 1, makes nearly $400 million in spending cuts, including $193 million in operational cuts across state agencies, beyond what Pritzker proposed in February, according to budget negotiators. It also relies on increased taxes on tobacco products, online sportsbooks, and overseas and out-of-state corporate earnings as well as one-time revenue measures, which together total more than $800 million. Pritzker's efforts to blame Trump for Illinois' latest budget woes and contrast the state's spending decisions with those of neighboring Republican-led states came at the end of a spring legislative session during which the governor continued efforts to raise his national profile. His relentless criticisms of Trump — particularly in a fiery speech to New Hampshire Democrats and appearances on cable news, late-night TV and podcasts — have stood in contrast to the softer tone employed by some other prominent Democratic governors and further fueled speculation Pritzker is eyeing a White House run in 2028. Before that, however, the billionaire Hyatt Hotels heir must officially decide whether to run next year for a third term as governor. It's widely expected he will, though he didn't answer when asked about it as he departed his Sunday morning news conference. Pritzker's reluctance to embrace a more comprehensive approach to overhauling the tax system after his failed effort to amend the state constitution in 2020 to allow for higher rates on larger incomes suggests a wariness about giving credence to political opponents eager to brand him as a tax-raiser. Indeed, the governor vowed to use his veto pen this year if lawmakers sent him a spending plan that relied on 'broad-based' increases to sales or income taxes. Pritzker's hesitancy over taxes extended to the unresolved debate about how to overhaul governance and increase funding for Chicago-area mass transit systems facing a looming fiscal cliff of more than $771 million. While echoing the need for changes to the disjointed board structure of the city and suburban bus and train systems, the governor hasn't publicly endorsed a funding plan, and legislators left town without sending one to him. As for the state's longer-term financial picture, the kind of deeper cuts Republicans espouse are anathema to Pritzker and the legislature's Democratic supermajority. But rather than expending political capital on broader revenue-generating efforts such as a renewed push for a graduated-rate income tax or an attempt to expand the sales tax to cover more services, both common practices in other states, Pritzker's answer on Sunday for state budget stability is 'more stability out of Washington, D.C.' 'We would not have suffered this problem had we not had the Trump slump affecting us,' Pritzker said. 'There are $500 million of reduced revenues to the state of Illinois as a result of what Donald Trump has done to a booming economy.' Throughout the closing days of the legislative session, which adjourned in the early morning hours Sunday, Democrats repeatedly pointed the finger at Trump and congressional Republicans for the difficulties the General Assembly faced in crafting the upcoming year's budget. Presenting the spending plan on the House floor late Saturday, Majority Leader Robyn Gabel of Evanston said a big reason for many of the proposed cuts was the uncertainty over whether the Trump administration would deprive Illinois of critical federal funding for Medicaid and in other areas. 'I want to emphasize that these were not decisions made lightly or made hastily. These are strategic efficiencies so we can invest in the needs of our working families and seniors on fixed incomes,' Gabel said. 'Of course, we do not know the full extent of the cuts Washington is preparing. But we do anticipate that health care access and infrastructure will be most directly impacted.' Democrats cut back on the $350 million annual increase in school funding required under a 2017 state law, withholding $43 million that normally would go to a grant program designed to help school districts with high property tax rates and low real estate values. They characterized the move as a pause to allow for a study of whether the program is working as intended. The overall spending plan followed Pritzker's recommendation to pause one of his key priorities: a $75 million annual increase to boost the number of seats in state-funded preschool programs. The budget would keep the spending level with the current year. The budget also cuts back on another Pritzker priority, suspending monthly contributions to the state's 'rainy day' fund for a year. Instead, about $45 million would be held in the general fund, which pays for day-to-day operations. Funding for a program that provides Medicaid-style health insurance for noncitizens ages 42 to 64 also was zeroed out, a savings the governor's office estimated at $330 million, though the budget includes $110 million to continue coverage for those 65 and older. During the House debate, Rep. Dagmara Avelar, a Democrat from Bolingbrook and member of the legislative Latino Caucus, said she was supporting the overall spending plan even though it was 'not a perfect budget.' 'In fact, it's painful. It eliminates a program that has been a lifeline for many, including people that I have fought alongside for years,' she said. 'But I'm voting 'yes' because leadership requires hard choices. And this budget protects more than it cuts.' To that end, the budget includes an 80-cent-per-hour wage increase for direct support professionals who work with people with developmental disabilities. But it reduces the hours the state would pay for by 35%, which Gabel, the House majority leader, characterized as 'rightsizing.' Advocates and unions have said wages needed to be raised by $2 an hour to meet recommendations that those workers be paid 150% of minimum wage. At a Senate committee hearing on the plan Saturday afternoon, Sen. Chapin Rose of Mahomet, a GOP budget negotiator, called the reduction in hours a 'cynical sleight of hand.' Safety-net hospitals serving low-income patients and communities are set to receive $118 million in grant funding, less than the roughly $160 million some lawmakers were hoping for. The Monetary Award Program, which provides grants to lower-income college students, will see a $10 million boost to a total of nearly $722 million. The budget also will devote $75 million to help ensure pensions for newer state employees meet a federal requirement to be on par with Social Security benefits, and it sets aside $100 million for a 'bridge fund' to cover unexpected shortfalls in the coming year. Despite the fiscal challenges, the Democratic plan includes $8.2 billion in new spending on infrastructure projects, which are separate from the operating budget and funded by dedicated taxes and borrowing. Republicans accused the majority party of once again hoarding that money for projects in their own districts. 'Let's hide this stuff. Let's hide it so that the public doesn't see it until it's too late. Let's blame everybody but ourselves. The Trump administration did this. The Trump administration did that. I call BS,' GOP Rep. John Cabello of Machesney Park, who was a Trump delegate during last year's Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, said during the House debate late Saturday. Cabello also said Republicans weren't given a chance to fund projects on behalf of taxpayers in their districts. On the revenue side, a tax amnesty program that would allow delinquent filers to pay off their tax debt without penalties is expected to generate $228 million in one-time money for the state. The plan also includes a set of tax law changes that would give the state the ability to tax more offshore and out-of-state corporate income. Taken together, those changes would bring in an estimated $336 million in ongoing revenue. Democratic Rep. Will Guzzardi of Chicago, a House budget negotiator and member of the progressive caucus, said the budget will be balanced, in part, with 'revenues paid for by the biggest and most profitable corporations that do business in Illinois, who can afford to pay a little bit more to help us fund the operations of our state, closing loopholes and going after financial tactics that those companies use to avoid paying what they should.' There's also a new per-wager tax on online sportsbooks, expected to generate $36 million in the coming year. Taxes will go up on tobacco from the current rate of 36% of wholesale price for cigarettes and 15% for vaping products to 45% across the board, including nicotine pouches, which have exploded in popularity in recent years. The $50 million in anticipated revenue would go to tobacco cessation efforts and the state's Medicaid program. Republicans criticized the use of one-time revenue streams to fill shortfalls, including the diversion of money from road projects by again delaying a shift of revenue from the sales tax on gasoline from the state's general fund to the road fund, freeing up $171 million to spend on operations. Pritzker defended the practice, saying Democrats crafting the budget tried to ensure 'any one-time revenues … really matched up with or … were diminishing of the one-time expenditures that we have to make.' Even without a substantial overhaul of the state's income or sales taxes, Pritzker said, the state has 'gotten really much closer than ever before' to erasing a structural budget deficit his administration pegged at $3.2 billion shortly after he took office in 2019. Still, some other Democrats, especially members of the party's progressive wing, believe there needs to be a deeper look at how services for residents across the state are funded, particularly given the uncertain economic times. Guzzardi, the House budget negotiator, was a co-sponsor of legislation that put the graduated income tax question on the 2020 ballot and 'fought really hard' in the unsuccessful campaign for its passage. 'I still think it's the kind of change that our state is going to need, the systemic change to our tax structure, to ease the burden on working families and to generate the revenue we need to fund vital services by asking the folks at the top to pay,' Guzzardi said Sunday. 'We have to make a more convincing case to the voters, that much is really clear.' More immediately, though, lawmakers are under pressure to address the dire financial situation facing Chicago-area mass transit with the impending expiration of federal coronavirus relief money. In the closing hours of the spring session, Senate Democrats introduced and passed a plan to address mass transit governance and funding, including a new $1.50 fee on retail deliveries. Sen. Ram Villivalam, a Chicago Democrat and point person on transit issues, called the plan 'unprecedented' and said it would create 'the world-class, safe, reliable, accessible, integrated public transit system we need for our northeastern Illinois region.' But key House Democrats said their chamber didn't take up the Senate proposal before adjourning for the spring because they wanted to focus first on overhauling the way the various transit agencies operate before allocating taxpayer money to those changes. 'I would say that the commitment has always been to do reform first. And then talk about doing revenue,' Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado, a Chicago Democrat, said. 'We worked really hard along with the Senate on putting together that reform. Unfortunately, we had different approaches to how to get that across the finish line.' Rep. Kam Buckner, another Chicago Democrat involved in transit negotiations, said it would've been 'irresponsible' for House members to vote on the Senate plan without being thoroughly familiar with its funding proposal. The measure came over from the Senate after midnight Sunday, when the threshold to pass legislation taking effect before June 2026 increased from a simple majority to three-fifths. That didn't allow enough time for House Democrats to review the proposed tax and round up the votes needed to pass it, Buckner said. Pritzker likewise said Sunday that he hadn't had much time to review the delivery tax proposal, which was met with stiff opposition from business groups and others. 'I obviously want to make sure we're lowering, not raising, taxes whenever we can,' the governor said, adding that he looks forward to reviewing future proposals in the coming months. It's important for there to be 'significant work that'll need to be done over the summer and in the fall' on governance and funding the Chicago-area and downstate transit systems, Pritzker said.
