
US judge in Facebook data privacy case rejects class action bid
Jan 27 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California has refused to allow millions of Facebook users to band together as a class in a lawsuit accusing the social media company of duping them about its privacy safeguards in order to maintain market dominance.
San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge James Donato on Friday rejected, opens new tab key evidence that the plaintiffs presented to justify certifying the case as a class action against Facebook parent Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab.
The judge ruled that the consumers could not rely on an expert's findings that Meta would have paid its users $5 a month for their personal data in a competitive market. The expert estimated nationwide damages of more than $52 billion.
Meta had called, opens new tab the expert's analysis 'junk science' and had urged Donato to bar the plaintiffs from using it. The company has denied any wrongdoing.
In a statement, Meta welcomed Donato's ruling and said the company 'faces fierce competition for the time and attention of people and businesses.'
The consumers' lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Granting class action status can place extra pressure on a corporate defendant to settle, especially in cases where a company faces claims of billions of dollars.
Donato is presiding over a consolidated lawsuit that was first filed in 2020.
The consumers told the court, opens new tab that Facebook users trusted the company's "abundant (and false) assertions that Facebook respects their privacy and gives users full control over what data it collects and who uses their data and how."
The consumer plaintiffs had asked Donato to certify a class of Facebook users between 2016 and 2020.
Meta in a court filing said the named plaintiffs in the lawsuit 'found personalized value' and enjoyment in using Facebook, and did not base their decision to use the platform on alleged misstatements about its privacy protections.
The case is Maximilian Klein et al v. Meta Platforms, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD.
For plaintiffs: Shana Scarlett of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Kevin Teruya of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
For Meta: Sonal Mehta, David Gringer and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
Meta must face shuttered photo app's antitrust lawsuit, US appeals court rules

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
13 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Former award-winning Scots bar reopens as sports pub swapping £12 cocktails for £3 pints
The much-loved venue has reopened just weeks after it closed BAR-GAIN Former award-winning Scots bar reopens as sports pub swapping £12 cocktails for £3 pints Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FORMER award-winning bar has made a comeback as a sports bar - punting pints for as little as £3. The Barologist in Leith, Edinburgh, was once a much-loved trendy boozer offering posh cocktails at prices as high as £12.95. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The former Barologist boozer has been transformed into a sports bar called The Sandport Tavern Credit: Facebook 2 And they're swapping out the old £12.95 cocktails for £3 pints Credit: Facebook It scooped several gongs including Spirit Pub of the Year and Innovation Pub of the Year, at the Greene King Night of Excellence Awards in 2022. But last month, bosses at the Commercial Street pub announced it would shut its doors after several years in business. The shutters came down on May 17, with the owners heading down south to start afresh. Now the much-loved venue has reopened just weeks later and has been transformed into a lively sports bar under new management. Now renamed The Sandport Tavern, the pub boasts a fresh new look, with £12.95 cocktails swapped out for £3 pints. Punters can now enjoy weekly pub quizzes and live sports screenings. The revamped boozer has also partnered with local favourite Pizza Geeks to serve freshly made pizzas. The new owners are set to unveil a new drinks menu which will also include a selection of cocktails to complement the offerings. The Sandport Tavern is serving pints of Tennents for just £3 throughout the month of June. We told previously how the Leith boozer's former owners will be opening a new venue up in Harrogate, North Yorkshire. Historic Glasgow pub known for its cheap pints & famous customers sold And they will still be stopping around the country as they take their drinks on tour. Elsewhere, a popular Scots beer brand is offering unlimited steak on Father's Day. Beer legends Innis & Gunn is dishing out refills of their 35-day dry-aged Scottish steak and bottomless garlic butter fries at taprooms in two major cities.


Belfast Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
Filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, the complaint claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars and the Minions from Despicable Me. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing,' the companies state in the complaint. The studios also claimed the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In a 2023 interview with The Associated Press, Midjourney CEO David Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Mr Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. 'To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' Major AI developers do not typically disclose their data sources, but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. The case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms — such as OpenAI, Anthropic — in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is under way in London, pitting Getty Images against artificial intelligence company Stability AI.


South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
Filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, the complaint claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars and the Minions from Despicable Me. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing,' the companies state in the complaint. The studios also claimed the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In a 2023 interview with The Associated Press, Midjourney CEO David Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Mr Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. 'To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' Major AI developers do not typically disclose their data sources, but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. The case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms — such as OpenAI, Anthropic — in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is under way in London, pitting Getty Images against artificial intelligence company Stability AI.