logo
Perspective: Media ‘chew toy' or ethical debacle? Either way, the optics of the Qatar jet are terrible

Perspective: Media ‘chew toy' or ethical debacle? Either way, the optics of the Qatar jet are terrible

Yahoo12-05-2025

On Monday, author and commentator Walter Kirn asked his followers on X what 'chew toys' President Donald Trump would throw to the media this week to distract them from other things going on.
There was an obvious answer in the form of a shiny new jet — dubbed a 'flying palace' — that Trump is considering accepting from the royal family of Qatar to serve as Air Force One while Boeing builds more.
To accept an aircraft valued at $400 million for personal use would clearly be a gross violation of ethical standards set for all government employees, even if it goes to his presidential library after his term ends, as some news outlets have reported.
But it's not clear that this will happen, or even if the Department of Defense will accept the use of the plane on behalf of the U.S. government. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday that the arrangement is under review, adding 'of course, any donation to this government is always done in full compliance with the law.'
A social media post by Trump over the weekend was less reserved: 'So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane. Anybody can do that! The Dems are World Class Losers!!!'
CBS News confirmed with Ali Al-Ansari, Qatar's media attaché to the U.S., that the discussions are taking place, but no decision has been made. He told CBS News that reports that Trump would receive the aircraft during his trip to Qatar this week are 'inaccurate.'
It might well be that, as Kirn suggested, Trump is playing with the media, like some say he is doing when he talks about running for president again in 2028. Despite his accessibility to the media — Leavitt calls him 'the most transparent and accessible president in American history' — his relationship with the press remains adversarial, and there often seems to be a bit of trolling involved in his public statements.
'You know what he cares about? Making idiots mad. And he's really, really good at it,' podcaster Ben Shapiro said recently, arguing that the 'Trump 2028″ ballcap and the talk about restarting Alcatraz were examples of the president needling his critics. More chew toys, in other words.
That said, there is something that smacks of truth in Trump's posts about the jet. The president is a man who enjoys luxury, and he has been frustrated with the government's air travel options since his first term. Boeing has been under contract to deliver two new aircraft since 2018; it was supposed to deliver them in 2024, but that's been pushed back to 2027, per CNN.
'The two jets now in use, which have the code letters VC-25A and carry the Air Force One designation when the president is on board, have been in service for nearly 35 years, starting during the term of President George H.W. Bush,' Chris Isidore reported for CNN.
That's older than the average age of planes in service globally — which is just under 15 years, according to the International Air Transport Association, per Forbes.
That said, a showman like Trump should know that the optics of such a deal, if it transpires, are terrible, even if the White House lawyers find a way around the Standards of Ethical Conduct for the executive branch, which say it's OK to accept a cup of coffee and a doughnut, as well as gifts $20 or less.
'Ask yourself if the gift would have been offered if you were not working for the Government. If the answer is no, then the gift is being offered because of your Government position and, as a general rule, you cannot accept it. ... You must also turn down a gift from those who have interests that may be significantly affected by your Government duties, as they are also considered 'prohibited sources,'' the policy says.
Accepting a 'flying palace' from a royal family would also be unconstitutional, The Washington Post reported, saying such a gift would violate "the emoluments clause, which forbids U.S. officials from accepting gifts or other things of value from foreign officials without congressional approval."
Republicans have spent years decrying ethical violations in the Biden administration, such as Hunter Biden's lucrative stint on the board of directors of a natural gas company in Ukraine. Now their own president is serving up ethical transgressions on a silver platter, two already this month, between the plane and a private White House dinner and tour offered to the 25 top investors in his $Trump meme coin.
Pick your battles, Mr. President. This one won't fly.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war
‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war

Washington Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times.

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

Associated Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.

Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor
Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor

Washington Post

time24 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor

Jack Ciattarelli easily won the Republican nomination for New Jersey governor on Tuesday with President Donald Trump's endorsement, setting up a November general election expected to be an early national bellwether for voters' views in the first year of Trump's second term. Ciattarelli was projected the winner shortly after the polls closed, the Associated Press reported. The winner of the crowded Democratic primary was not immediately clear Tuesday night, with six candidates splitting the vote in the most expensive election in New Jersey history. Trump played a central role in the Democrats' contest, too, as the candidates vowed to fight the White House and questioned each others' anti-Trump credentials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store