Hamilton woman Sharryn Ngariki jailed for brutal beatings of children
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice multimedia journalist of
Sharryn Ngariki threw one child off a bed and into a wall with such force that they felt their back crack.
Photo:
123RF
WARNING: This story contains family violence details that may be upsetting to some readers
A woman threw a child off a bed and into a wall with such force that the child felt their back crack.
On another occasion, Sharryn Ngariki tied a shirt around the child's head so the child couldn't breathe.
The child wasn't Ngariki's only victim. The Hamilton woman also assaulted two other young children over the course of 14 months, punching, slapping and kicking them and whacking them with a wooden spoon.
The 31-year-old had previously admitted 12 charges, many representative, in the Hamilton District Court, including assault with a weapon, strangulation, assault with intent to injure, and assaulting a child.
Ngariki, who failed in a bid for permanent name suppression, also admitted another charge of unlawful possession of ammunition from a separate incident.
She reappeared in court today for sentencing by Judge Stephen Clark.
The assaults happened between October 2022 and December 2023.
The first victim was smacked "very hard" on the hands, legs, feet and shoulders several times and "punished" all over the body and mouth, court documents state.
Ngariki also stood on the child's stomach and smacked them on the mouth with a wooden spoon on multiple occasions, causing the mouth to bleed.
Other times, she used the wooden spoon to smack the child's bottom and feet.
Ngariki also threw the child off a bed and into a wall with enough force that the child felt their back crack.
Another time, she tied a shirt around the child's head, blocking their nose and mouth.
The second victim was smacked on several occasions so hard that it would sting and leave bruising.
The child was also punched numerous times, mostly in the face. Ngariki also stood on the victim's body.
One time, she kicked the victim into a wall with enough force to create a hole.
The third victim was also smacked on "numerous occasions".
The charge of unlawful possession of ammunition is from 13 September, last year.
Ngariki was a passenger in a car that was reported acting suspiciously, driving up driveways around the Hamilton suburb of Enderly.
Police signalled the car to stop, and the occupants were taken to Hamilton police station for processing.
During a search of Ngariki, police found a single round of ammunition, 2 grams of meth and a glass pipe.
Counsel Hannah Cuthill said her client had attended a restorative justice conference with a representative of the victims, at which she apologised for what she'd done.
Ngariki had also secured accommodation in Hamilton for when she is released on parole.
"She has become very future-focused, on rehabilitation efforts and will be working in the tikanga unit once sentenced.
"She also wants to do alcohol and drug counselling."
A pre-sentence report found she was not likely to harm any other children and that her risk of reoffending would be determined by her "ability to maintain sobriety".
That was a risk factor she was motivated to focus on, she said.
Judge Stephen Clark noted that Ngariki didn't have a criminal history until "relatively recently".
It was her lapse into drug abuse that led to the offending.
She had grown up "around gang life", left school early and used heavy drugs from a young age.
Leading up to the offending, she was "feeling mentally and emotionally unstable".
"Unfortunately, your response was to get involved with drugs."
After taking a starting point of four years' jail, he applied discounts for her guilty pleas and background factors, before arriving at an end point of 30 months in prison.
*
This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
9 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Judge reserves decision on injunction on Jevon McSkimming investigation
Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming. Photo: Getty Images A High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether the media should be allowed to report the nature of the allegedly objectionable material found on former deputy commissioner Jevon McSkimming's work computer. McSkimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop last month amid a four-month investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police. His resignation came after Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended. RNZ earlier revealed pornography found on McSkimming's work computer is being investigated as alleged objectionable material. He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer. His lawyer Linda Clark was earlier granted a rare "superinjunction" by Justice Grau that prohibited reporting the nature of the allegedly objectionable material, as well as the existence of the injunction itself. A teleconference was then held by Justice Gwyn from the High Court at Wellington to discuss the injunction with Clark, the police, and legal counsel for RNZ, Stuff and NZME. Following the conference, the order prohibiting publication of the nature of the allegedly objectionable material was continued, but the order prohibiting the existence of the injunction was not continued, meaning RNZ could report the fact of McSkimming's application and the interim result. On Tuesday, a hearing was held in the High Court at Wellington before Justice Karen Grau in relation to the injunction. RNZ, NZME and Stuff were jointly represented by Robert Stewart KC. McSkimming's lawyer, Linda Clark, began proceedings by telling the court she was seeking orders extending the current interim orders prohibiting media from disclosing the nature of the allegedly objectionable material reportedly found on his work device or devices. The order was sought until further orders of the court. Clark alleged information deemed "essential" to the investigation had been leaked to the media who were intending to publish the information. She said the orders sought were necessary to protect the rights of someone who is subject of an ongoing police investigation and who may yet be charged with a criminal offence. The information gathered during the police investigation was "confidential", she said. In relation to public interest, she said there was already information in the media about McSkimming. She said the public interest would be served in the event he was charged and stood trial. McSkimming was on notice that the police investigation was into material purportedly found on his devices. He had been told he would be invited to a formal interview, however, no request has been received to date. A police document, classified as "confidential", would be "the centrepiece of any criminal prosecution," Clark said. "It's on the basis of that information that the police can decide whether to continue the investigation, whether to look further and whether to charge, and what to charge." She said there was also an issue in terms of privacy, and said a person under criminal investigation, prior to being charged, has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to the investigation. Clark said she was trying to "preserve Mr McSkimming's rights to engage the Criminal Procedure act if and when he's charged". She said that every time police had provided some substantive piece of information to McSkimming it had appeared within the media "in a day or two days without exception". Clark said there was public interest in McSkimming's situation. She said public interest had been served to date. "If he is charged... there will be further opportunity for media to publish more information on charges themselves and during and after any trial," she said. "But publication now of any more information about the nature of the objectionable material found on his computer will cause serious and irreversible harm." It would harm his reputation, curtail his ordinary rights under the Criminal Procedure Act, and in the event he was charged and elected trial by trial, it could impact his chance of trial by jury. "At this time he's still an innocent man who is entitled to all of the protections of a fair trial and the right to seek suppression orders." Stewart KC said a memorandum from police said they were still investigating, and no charging decision had been made. He said there was two sorts of harm that could be considered, one of which was harm to the police investigation. He said the police had no concern that further disclosure of the material would impact their investigation, or impact their decision whether or not to charge. In relation to right to a fair jury trial, Stewart KC said juries can be trusted to obey judicial directions about only dealing with the charges based solely on the evidence and to ignore pre-trial publicity. In relation to privacy, Stewart KC said McSkimming was "quite clearly" a public figure. "There is a huge public interest in these investigations into Mr McSkimming's abrupt resignation from office, first working day after he had been provided with the material by the Public Service Commission." In an affidavit, McSkimming said he resigned because he didn't want the Prime Minister or anyone else having to see what was in the reports. "The only fair way of summarising it is he jumped before he was pushed," Stewart KC said. "The public have a right to understand a little bit more about the nature of the material that led to that." Stewart KC said his clients submitted that if the interim restraint should be continued, then "matters should be left to take their course, if there is to be any restraining at all, it should be as limited as possible for as short as possible." Crown prosecutor Stephanie Bishop, appearing for police, told the court that police did not oppose the application.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Midday Report Essentials for Tuesday 3 June 2025
money media 23 minutes ago In today's episode, there's another change for the media landscape in Aotearoa with a new marriage between Trade Me and Stuff, employers and manufacturers are describing government moves to change the focus of Worksafe as long overdue, it was the deadliest King's Birthday weekend on the roads in six years, and a petition has just been handed over at parliament calling for a ban on the public sale of fireworks - in a bid to protect pets.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Immigration authorities claim success against organised crime
Photo: NZME Authorities have claimed recent success in disrupting the illegal immigration activities of organised crime syndicates operating in New Zealand. Steve Watson, general manager of Immigration Compliance and Investigations, said a multi-agency operation had investigated 38 companies over the past three months to ensure they were complying with their immigration and employment obligations. As a result of the investigation, authorities had issued 14 infringement notices to companies employing staff in a manner that was inconsistent with a work-related condition of that person's visa, with a further two pending. Officials had also issued 38 deportation liability notices for people unlawfully in New Zealand or breaching visa conditions. Two people unlawfully in New Zealand had voluntarily left the country, officials said. Immigration officials had cancelled 62 visas for people who were not currently in the country, while a further eight visas were cancelled at the border. Eight passengers were offloaded from their flights to New Zealand, officials said. Watson said the investigation was key to preventing further harm and vulnerable migrants being exploited by unscrupulous employers. "Migrant workers need to be aware of those who may seek to exploit them," Watson said. "If you are asked to pay large amounts of money to an offshore agent to travel and work in New Zealand, it is highly likely that this is part of a scam." Watson said many of the groups had links to crime syndicates who exploited vulnerable migrants by using them to live in residential properties to set up sophisticated indoor cannabis growing systems.
