$13M in federal funding brings Elmwood Park railroad crossing project closer to reality
ELMWOOD PARK, Ill. - A major project to eliminate one of the country's longest and deadliest railroad crossings is $13 million closer to becoming a reality.
What we know
The Grand Avenue crossing in Elmwood Park, where Metra and freight trains pass about 120 times a day, has earned a reputation for its dangerous configuration.
The tracks intersect the road at a 10-degree angle, creating a 366-foot-long crossing, the second deadliest in Illinois. Since 2018, the area has seen 160 collisions, including several fatalities.
For decades, local officials have fought to make the crossing safer, but the project requires massive engineering work.
On Saturday, Elmwood Park Mayor Skip Saviano joined state and federal officials to announce the next step in the plan.
"We're incredibly grateful for all the work to be able to announce this big victory for Elmwood Park. $13.1 million in federal funding from the Department of Transportation to the Village of Elmwood Park!" said Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Illinois).
The funding will help pay for phase two of the Grand Gateway Project, which will create an underpass at the crossing.
The $120 million project is designed to separate the road from the tracks, improving safety and easing congestion.
"It is an underpass, so we're gonna go about 30 feet below the railroad tracks. We're gonna have continuous sidewalks on both sides," said
"It will save 250 hours of congestion every year. It will allow Metra and freight trains to move faster. It will allow first responders to respond faster and most of all, it will prevent crashes and it will save lives," said Saviano.
So far, half of the project's estimated cost has been secured through federal, state, and Cook County funds. The $13 million announced Saturday will help acquire land and prepare for construction.
Once phase two is complete, officials hope to secure the remaining funds to finish the project, which could be completed by 2029.
"It has a tragic history of crashes and it's important that we build this grade separation to eliminate the main point of conflict so that trains and cars will never again collide," said Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle.
What's next
If all goes according to plan and they're able to secure the rest of the funding, the project could be finished by the year 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
Trump's DOT Threatens to Pull Funding for California's High-Speed Rail
California's long-promised high-speed train project, first approved in 2008, has hit lots of roadblocks in its development process, and now it may be looking at the end of the road. The Trump administration's Department of Transportation released a report this week that does not paint a pretty picture of the project, and DOT head Sean Duffy has given California just over a month to respond to concerns or face having $4 billion in government funding rescinded, according to Reuters. The threat to cut off California follows a 315-page report published by the Federal Railroad Administration that claims California has missed several deadlines related to the high-speed rail and has failed to identify how it will secure $7 billion in funding to build a segment of rail between Merced and Bakersfield, California, which it needs to secure by next summer in order for the project to move forward. The report concludes, in quite Trumpian language, that California 'conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time.' The Department of Transportation gave California until mid-July to respond to the report, threatening to terminate federal contracts if it fails to sufficiently address concerns raised in the report. The California High-Speed Rail Authority called the report 'misguided,' according to a report from the Los Angeles Times, and said it will issue a formal response soon. 'We remain firmly committed to completing the nation's first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state,' a spokesperson for the agency said. Trump has been on California's ass about the rail project basically since he returned to office. His administration launched a yet-to-be-completed review of a $3.1 billion federal grant to help fund construction back in February, and last month he singled out the project during a joint appearance with Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada, stating, 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' and 'This government is not going to pay.' The scrutiny from Trump and company isn't exactly a surprise to officials involved in the high-speed rail's buildout, as officials signaled earlier this year that there may be funding shortfalls from the federal government on the horizon. And while plenty of people are frustrated by how long the California rail project has taken to come together and how much it costs, the federal government really is not on the hook for that much of it. Per the LA Times, California has paid for 82% of the project, relying on federal grants for just 18% of funding. While California's high-speed rail has had plenty of issues—mostly inflicted by politics—the 'train to nowhere' label that it often gets hit with no longer matches the picture on the ground. More than 119 miles of rail have been laid between Merced and Bakersfield, and the project is close enough to completion that abandoning it at this point would be more wasteful than finishing it, especially with communities along the route expecting a potential economic boom once it is up and running. But good luck telling that to Trump (and Elon Musk who has opposed it from the beginning).
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans propose eliminating penalties for violating fuel efficiency rules
Senate Republicans are proposing to terminate penalties for automakers whose fleets are not efficient enough to meet national standards. Automakers' car fleets are required to meet fuel mileage standards set by the Department of Transportation. Text for the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' put forward Thursday by the Senate Science, Commerce and Transportation Committee Republicans brings the penalty for not complying with these rules down to zero. How stringent the standards for car fleets should be is a question that has ping-ponged in recent years between Democratic and Republican administrations. However, the bill text goes a step further, effectively wiping out the standards entirely by charging companies zero dollars if they don't meet them. In recent years, some automakers have had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties related to the vehicle efficiency rules. In a written statement on the legislation, Science, Commerce and Transportation Committee Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said the bill would help to 'unleash America's full economic potential.' Automakers could still be governed by tailpipe emissions rules put forward by the Environmental Protection Agency. Text from the Environment and Public Works Committee, which has jurisdiction over that separate standard, seeks to wipe out the Biden-era requirements but does not go as far as getting rid of the entire regulatory program. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
E&E News
2 days ago
- E&E News
Trump admin launches fuel economy standard rollback
The Department of Transportation formally started the process of rewriting the fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, issuing a rule that said the Biden administration's standards are legally flawed. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy ordered the department to revise the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard when he took office in January, and the department hinted at its strategy in a May 19 announcement. The 'interpretive rule' released Friday says the two most recent rounds of CAFE standards, which cover model years 2022 through 2026 and 2027 through 2031, went beyond the letter of the law. The Transportation Department won't enforce them until it writes new versions of the standard, a spokeswoman said. Advertisement The crux of the argument is that the Biden administration considered the performance of electric vehicles when it wrote the rules, which made them more stringent than they should've been, according to the text of Friday's rule.
