logo
The Ukraine war is showing Polish paratroopers that light infantry skills still matter, general says

The Ukraine war is showing Polish paratroopers that light infantry skills still matter, general says

In a war where tanks struggle to move without drawing the attention of a drone, missions sometimes fall more to small, agile, light infantry units.
That's one of many lessons that NATO militaries are taking from the Ukraine war. A top Polish general overseeing the country's paratroopers said that a big takeaway is that light infantry skills, like those brought by airborne forces, still matter.
Brig. Gen. Michal Strzelecki, commander of Poland's 6th Airborne Brigade, told Business Insider that he is seeing in Ukraine "a kind of refreshment of the light infantry skills."
Light infantry troops are rapidly deployable forces. They can move quickly and fight without the support of heavy armored vehicles, like tanks or infantry fighting vehicles. These troops are often lightly armed and equipped for versatility and swift, flexible operations that include surprise attacks and raids. For airborne forces, missions can involve insertion operations from planes or helicopters.
US and other NATO forces used highly mobile light infantry for remote patrols and small-unit engagements during counterinsurgency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Ukraine war, as a large-scale conventional fight, is very different from America's post-9/11 conflicts, but the war is showing that there is still a role for lighter infantry forces and a need for those skills in big potential future fights.
For instance, mobile light infantry units operating between strongpoints played an invaluable role in helping defend Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region during the early days of the full-scale invasion. Light infantry was also involved in urban warfare operations around the eastern city of Bakhmut.
And in multiple instances, airborne and air assault brigades have conducted successful night assaults, small-unit ambushes, and rapid strategic deployments.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Lively Sabre 25 exercise in southern Finland last week, Strzelecki said fighting in Europe has been historically heavily focused on maneuver warfare, "which requires a lot of, let's say, mechanized units, armored units."
Tanks played a prominent role in both World War I and World War II, supporting dismounted infantry forces by delivering an armored punch to break through enemy lines. During the Cold War, Soviet armored assets were a major concern for NATO and factored into how allies developed their own armored capabilities. And amid the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s, tanks and other armor again found themselves useful in the European theater.
Strzelecki said that the Ukraine war shows that the skills of light infantry units have not been forgotten. "It must be developed better, and this is what we are doing in the 6th Airborne. We are very focused on [those kinds] of operations."
"We are light infantry, airborne infantry. So that's why we have to be focused on that," he added.
The scarred battlefields of Ukraine have been far less permissive for tank and armor operations than some other conflicts. Not only have the Soviet tank designs struggled, but so have top Western tanks like the American Abrams and German Leopards.
Heavy Russian defenses during Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive derailed Ukrainian efforts to breach enemy positions with armor and mechanized or motorized infantry assaults. Forces sometimes abandoned their vehicles and took the fight to the enemy on foot. Light infantry assaults saw mixed results.
The situation for armored assets has only become more difficult with time and the growing proliferation of uncrewed systems. The Ukraine war has been defined by the heavy use of drones, enabling near-constant surveillance and atypical strike options. This is a difficult operating environment for armored vehicles. Thousands of these combat vehicles have been damaged and destroyed, with many taken out by small drones strapped with explosives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You're not Elon Musk: Here's how normal people should critique their superiors
You're not Elon Musk: Here's how normal people should critique their superiors

Business Insider

time31 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

You're not Elon Musk: Here's how normal people should critique their superiors

Disagree with the boss? Badmouthing a higher-up publicly, like how Elon Musk this week called President Trump's signature bill "a disgusting abomination" on X, won't make sense for most people. But career experts said there are other, more practical ways to deliver negative feedback to a superior. "No one recommends taking to social media to criticize your boss," said organizational psychologist Alison Fragale, especially if your name is attached and you're seriously looking to drive change. "Though you might get a lot of thumbs up, it also comes with a lot of risky downside," Fragale told Business Insider. Getting loud generally isn't the best strategy As one of the world's richest men, Musk is uniquely insulated when airing grievances. The CEO of Tesla, Space X, and several other companies wields exceptional power and status, and being outspoken is part of his personal brand. For the rest of us, taking an offline, confidential approach to voicing discontent is generally best since it avoids embarrassing the recipient and inviting backlash, said Yale University management professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. That's a lesson many big-company CEOs have used in recent weeks to push back against the president's significant tariff hikes. "They've managed through private collective action to get him to move considerably," said Sonnenfeld. "They went in with the facts. They didn't try to publicly humiliate him." Musk didn't call out Trump by name in his social-media posts criticizing the president's bill, which includes cuts to Medicaid and an extension of the tax cuts that Trump and Republicans enacted in 2017. His messages, though, land as a personal attack because Trump has been aggressively touting the bill, calling it "beautiful" and pushing for Congress to pass it. "It will be the biggest Tax Cut for Middle and Working Class Americans by far," Trump wrote on Truth Social last month. Musk has said that the bill will increase the nation's already bloated deficit, undermining the months of work he put in at the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. On Wednesday, Musk asked Americans to take action to try to stop the bill from passing. "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL," he said on X. When and how to raise concerns In the workplace, career gurus generally advise people to only pipe up about concerns that impact multiple workers or a company at large. Personal grievances are best handled through a direct manager, human resources, or an employer's complaint hotline. "Not every truth needs to be said out loud," said Fragale. A collective voice creates legitimacy, which is why she also recommends gathering allies and having at least one by your side when you're ready to speak out. Consider whether you're the best person to raise the matter to someone at the top of the corporate ladder if you lack status or haven't earned the person's respect. "I have outsourced almost every aspect of my kids' education, not because I don't know how to swim or ride a bike, but because they won't listen to me," Fragale said. Meanwhile, keep in mind that you may not have all the facts as to why a superior made whatever decision you have beef with, said Bill George, an executive fellow at Harvard Business School. It's possible your criticism is unwarranted, so he recommends couching your critique as being based on what you know. "Sometimes CEOs have to make decisions for reasons that aren't apparent," George, who was CEO of the health-technology company Medtronic earlier in his career, said. "You have to understand the whole context." Only speak up to a superior when you have something meaningful to point out, said Candice Pokk, a senior consultant at human-resources consulting firm Segal. "It needs to rise to the level of their position," she said. Some business leaders say they are receptive to negative feedback as long as it's conveyed respectfully. When George was Medtronic's CEO, a manager privately told him that he'd hurt several employees' feelings during a group meeting. Though he stood by the substance of his remarks, he apologized for how he relayed them and said the feedback made him think differently about his communication style. "It caused me to reflect on it," he said. To share negative feedback, start with something positive and authentic about the individual before launching into critisicm, and keep it brief, Pokk said. "Executives want information that's bite-sized and easy to understand," she said. Dishing criticism to someone in a more powerful position can be nerve-racking, no matter how prepared and confident you are. "Couriers of bad tidings are often fearful that the messenger will get shot," said Sonnenfeld. Yet being forthcoming can pay off.

Donald Trump's Travel Ban: Exceptions Travellers Need to Know
Donald Trump's Travel Ban: Exceptions Travellers Need to Know

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Travel Ban: Exceptions Travellers Need to Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some 19 countries have been affected by Donald Trump's new travel ban —Newsweek has broken down all the exceptions travellers need to know about. The Context The president announced on Wednesday that travel would be fully restricted from 12 nations: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Meanwhile, travel for people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. The new rules, which Trump said are to "protect the nation from foreign terrorist and other national security and public safety threats," come into effect as of June 9. He cited a recent attack in Boulder, Colorado that targeted a group advocating for the release of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, is facing attempted murder and federal hate crime charges related to the attack. Exceptions To Donald Trump's Travel Ban Exceptions to these new restrictions apply to the following groups of people: Any permanent resident of the United States and anyone with dual citizenship Foreign nationals with diplomatic visas (A-1, A-2), such as ambassadors, ministers or military personnel People with transit visas (C-2, C-3) People who work for international organizations such as the United Nations or the World Bank (G-1, G-4) People with NATO visas (NATO-1, NATO-6) Athletes and their teams, including supportive members and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State Holders of immediate family immigrant visas (IR-1/CR-1, IR-2/CR-2, IR-5) "with clear and convincing evidence of identity and family relationship" Children who have been adopted abroad (visas IR-3, IR-4, IH-3, IH-4) People with Afghan Special Immigrant Visas, given to Afghans who helped the U.S. government during the war there Iranians fleeing persecution because they are part of a religious minority, such as Christians United States Government employees U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also both have the discretion to put individuals forward for exception based on whether they would "advance a critical United States national interest," the White House proclamation says. For example, Bondi could make an exception for someone required to be present in criminal proceedings as a witness. What Happens Next Several of the countries affected by the ban have responded. Somalia has pledged to work with Washington, while Venezuela has hit back with Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello saying "being in the United States is a great risk for anyone." Trump said that "the list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made and likewise, new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world."

Nuclear Arms Race Warning as Warheads Increase
Nuclear Arms Race Warning as Warheads Increase

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Nuclear Arms Race Warning as Warheads Increase

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The number of nuclear warheads ready for use by nine countries has slightly increased from last year, reaching over 9,600 warheads, according to an estimate by a Japanese think tank. Russia, the United States and China remain the world's three largest countries in terms of the size of their nuclear arsenals. Newsweek has contacted the U.S. Department of Defense, the Chinese Defense Ministry and the Russian Defense Ministry for comment via email. Why It Matters The estimated number of nuclear warheads came from the Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition at Nagasaki University. Nagasaki was the second city in the world—after Hiroshima—to come under a nuclear attack when the U.S. detonated an atomic bomb there on August 9, 1945, prompting Japan's surrender and officially ending World War II. This year marks 80 years since the first use of a nuclear weapon in human history. While there has been no use of this type of weapon of mass destruction against another country since the war, two nuclear rivals in South Asia—India and Pakistan—exchanged large-scale fire last month, while other nuclear-armed countries continue to modernize their arsenals. This photo shows the radioactive plume from the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in Japan on August 9, 1945. This photo shows the radioactive plume from the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in Japan on August 9, 1945. Hiromichi Matsuda/Handout from Nagasaki AtomicIn addition to the aforementioned five countries, France, the United Kingdom, Israel—which are U.S. allies—and North Korea are confirmed or believed to possess nuclear weapons. What To Know The Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition announced its estimate on Wednesday, saying the number of deployable nuclear warheads—those ready for immediate use or stored for potential deployment—had increased by 32 from last year, reaching 9,615. With regard to the three largest deployable nuclear arsenals, Russia had 4,310 warheads, a decrease of 0.8 percent from 2018, while the U.S. possessed 3,700, a decrease of 2.6 percent. In contrast, China's arsenal increased by 150 percent, reaching 600 warheads. Among all the nuclear powers, China has seen the most significant increase in its number of warheads, adding 360 to its arsenal. Chinese President Xi Jinping ordered the country to accelerate the buildup of nuclear forces, even as Beijing called on Russia and the U.S. to pursue nuclear disarmament. Meanwhile, North Korea—which tested nuclear weapons between 2006 and 2017—has seen the highest percentage increase in its number of warheads, rising by 233 percent. However, with 50 warheads, the Northeast Asian nation possesses the world's smallest nuclear arsenal. According to the Japanese think tank, the number of deployable nuclear warheads worldwide has been trending upward since 2018. The most recent estimate, as of this month, shows an increase of 364 nuclear warheads—designed for operational use—in just under a decade. By including non-deployable nuclear warheads—those retired or awaiting dismantlement—the total number of nuclear warheads across all nuclear-armed countries reached 12,340. An unarmed but nuclear-capable United States Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launching during an operational test at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on May 21. An unarmed but nuclear-capable United States Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launching during an operational test at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on May 21. Senior Airman Kadielle Shaw/U.S. Space Force What People Are Saying The Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition said in a news release on Wednesday: "The United States and Russia account for more than 80 percent of the total number of active nuclear warheads and needless to say bear a special responsibility for nuclear disarmament, but the remaining seven countries' share also increased from 12 percent in 2018 to 17 percent in 2025." U.S. Air Force General Anthony J. Cotton, the commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, testified at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on March 26: "To effectively deter adversaries across the spectrum of threats requires sustained legacy triad systems and urgently completing the multigenerational, decades-long modernization of all three legs of the nuclear deterrent and its critical [nuclear command, control and communications] systems." Senior Colonel Wu Qian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Defense Ministry, said on February 27: "On defense budget, the U.S. military spending has topped the world for many years in a row and is higher than that of the following eight countries combined, which deeply concerns the international community. I believe that the U.S. should put 'America First' into practice in this regard, and be the first to cut its nuclear arsenal and military expenditure." What Happens Next All nuclear-armed nations are expected to continue modernizing their arsenals amid conflicts around the world, such as the war in Ukraine, tensions on the Korean Peninsula and in the Taiwan Strait, and the great power competition among the U.S., Russia and China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store