Vistra to buy 2.6GW generation capacity from Lotus for $1.9bn
Integrated retail electricity and power generation company Vistra has agreed with Lotus Infrastructure Partners to acquire its portfolio of natural gas generation facilities, with a combined capacity of 2.6GW, for $1.9bn.
The move enhances the geographical diversification of Vistra's natural gas fleet.
The acquisition includes five combined-cycle gas turbine facilities and two combustion turbine facilities strategically located across the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland region, New England, New York and California.
Vistra president and CEO Jim Burke stated: "We believe natural gas-fired generation will continue to play an ever-increasing role in the reliability, affordability and flexibility of US power grids for years to come. The addition of this attractive portfolio of combined cycle and peaking assets allows Vistra to serve growing power demand while exceeding our mid-teens levered return target."
The funding strategy for the acquisition involves assuming an existing term loan from Lotus and utilising cash on hand.
The term loan is projected to cover 50% of the closing consideration.
The purchase price of the assets suggests a multiple of around seven times the projected 2026 adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation), not accounting for any potential synergies.
The completion of the transaction is set for late 2025 or early 2026 and is contingent upon regulatory approvals from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Department of Justice, in compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.
Lotus Infrastructure Partners chairman and CEO Himanshu Saxena stated: "We are pleased to have reached an agreement to sell this gas plant portfolio to a proven operator like Vistra.
"The Lotus team has acquired, developed and operated this portfolio of high-quality assets for many years, which has helped us deliver this win-win transaction for our investors."
Barclays and Moelis & Company are acting as financial advisors, while Latham & Watkins and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton are providing legal counsel to Vistra.
Lazard is the exclusive financial advisor to Lotus Infrastructure Partners, with King & Spalding and Eversheds Sutherland offering legal advice.
In September 2024, Vistra announced definitive agreements to acquire a 15% equity interest in its subsidiary Vistra Vision from affiliates of Nuveen Asset Management and Avenue Capital Management II.
"Vistra to buy 2.6GW generation capacity from Lotus for $1.9bn" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
19 minutes ago
- WIRED
Perplexity's CEO Sees AI Agents as the Next Web Battleground
Jun 4, 2025 12:25 PM Aravind Srinivas says agents need access to apps and claims that letting OpenAI take control of Chrome would be a disaster for the open Web. Aravind Srinivas attends the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 05, 2025, in Santa Monica, California. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Photograph:Perplexity has tapped into the power of generative artificial intelligence—with all its problematic tendencies—in an effort to challenge Google as the dominant way people find information online. The AI search tool rose in prominence in 2024 and was lauded as a promising alternative to Googling. Like other AI players though, the service has been sued for alleged copyright infringement. It has been accused by Forbes of plagiarizing its news articles, closely paraphrasing other websites, and hallucinating incorrect information. Despite the furor, Perplexity today says that its service gets 650 million queries per month and is said to be chasing investment that would value the company at $18 billion. The company is pushing AI assistants for mobile devices and working on its own web browser. In April, Motorola announced that Perplexity would come bundled with its new Razr Ultra phones. Last month the company partnered with PayPal to make it easier for users to buy products using its assistant. Samsung is also said to be in talks to possibly include Perplexity on its devices, according to a report from Bloomberg. (Perplexity declined to comment on this after the interview.). Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas spoke with Will Knight, senior writer at WIRED, by phone and email. This conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity. WIRED: The PayPal deal seems important to the vision that everyone has for agents. Is ecommerce the killer 'agentic' app? Aravind Srinivas: Agents are the killer app for everything. Agents allow users to have the experience that's best for them. Some people like shopping and researching, and some people want it done for them. There's a spectrum in between, and our focus is what is the best experience for the user. Speaking of the experience, agents still make mistakes. What happens when they buy something by accident? Merchants and buyers have adapted to every new technology since ancient times. We just show both of them what is possible, and they choose. Every successful technology has had to take security and error-resolution very seriously, and that won't change. Integrating AI with personal devices is another big theme. Why does the Motorola deal matter to you? It's a big deal because Motorola is one of the largest phone brands in the world. This partnership gives us the ability to make trustworthy AI more accessible than ever. Now, by introducing Perplexity to millions of people around the world, in a native and seamless way, more people will get to see how much more really is possible with search. Would you consider developing your own devices eventually? We are focused on building the best AI assistant and answer engine. Motorola will offer other AI assistants, so how will Perplexity distinguish itself? As AI assistants become more common, accuracy and trust will become even more important. An assistant isn't very useful if it's unreliable. Worse, if an assistant is misleading or sycophantic, then it isn't an assistant—it's a manipulator. That's not just useless, it's dangerous. Inaccurate AI has a negative compounding effect, and we have always been the leader in developing AI and AI assistants focused on accuracy and verifiability. That will have a positive compounding effect. Wait though … Perplexity—like other AI search engines—has been criticized for hallucinating and getting things wrong. We welcome this criticism, because it's the best way for us to continually improve. In reality, errors account for a small fraction of results, and our answers are far more accurate than 10 blue links polluted by decades of SEO-optimized content. [In response to a follow-up request, Perplexity did not provide further details on error rates, but Jesse Dwyer, a spokesman, said that reliability is improving constantly]. But the fact is, accuracy and trust will only become more important as AI integrates into more of our lives, so this is something we're relentlessly focused on. We can't get there without this feedback. Perplexity also cribs from copyrighted news articles with its 'discover' section. Do you understand why some publishers are upset? We've answered that before. See our blog post on how we respect [a file added to websites that specifies whether web crawlers should access their content]. The Perplexity assistant for Android and iOS seems 'agentic' because it can take actions. How big of a shift is this? AI is pretty good at answering questions now. What really needs to be done is get AI to take actions. People use the word 'agents'; you can go with whatever you want—'agent' or 'assistant'—but in the end, it needs to string together tools and execute actions. That's why we're [also building a] browser, and an assistant on iOS, Android. Do Apple and Google have too much control over their mobile platforms compared to outsiders looking to build agents? With iOS it's particularly challenging, because you have to string together a bunch of event APIs. On iOS, Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Podcasts, all that stuff is natively available through the Apple SDK [software development kit used to build applications], so you can actually at least draft emails, schedule meetings, move meetings, set reminders, all this stuff, open podcasts pretty easily. You can do searches for podcasts … 'get me the one where Mark Andreessen discusses de-banking with Joe Rogan.' It can get you that pretty quickly. It's mostly difficult because you cannot access other apps. iOS is not very different from Android, because AI cannot access most apps on Android either (meaning that the Perplexity assistant can interact with some apps more easily than others). [But] third-party apps can build their SDKs to be accessible on the Android SDK. For example, our Android system can display a song on Spotify. On iOS, you can only link to a specific Spotify song, and you have to manually start playing the audio. Oh, so it's app-makers that are holding AI agents back? That's the challenge. If people are offering us APIs—say, Open Table, Uber, DoorDash, or Instacart—where we can access information within the app without even having to open the app. On the back end, that's pretty powerful. For example, if we can access information on Uber and find that Uber comfort doesn't cost more than 5 or 10 percent of Uber X, then we can just book Uber comfort for you—if that's a preference that you set on Perplexity. Or similarly [we can] find the best Thai place near you and get me a dash [delivery] a lot faster than going to DoorDash app, searching for Thai food and scrolling through all these options, reading all those reviews and then putting your address, doing the checkout, all that stuff. We could honestly do all that in our system and just make the experience a lot more seamless and simple. I think that's where things are headed, but people need to open up their apps to us, and we'll have to see who's willing to do what. Isn't the biggest problem that AI agents just aren't very smart and useful yet? My analogy [for AI agents] is that we are at a point where Perplexity was in 2022 [just before it took off]. It's not like we got all the answers right, people made fun of hallucinations and some people call it 'Google in macro seconds.' It was not quite there. It only took off many months later, when models got better, and I expect the same trend with the agents and assistants. There's going to be some set of things that really work, daily use cases, and there'll be a long tail of things that don't work, that we're going to keep fixing over time. But that's exactly why we are building a [web] browser, because the browser front end will let you do the work on your own too, if you're not happy with what the AI did. So, then we can learn from that and fix that over time. Waymo and Tesla self driving did not work for a long time. Now, people take them for granted. I think it is a similar trajectory for us. Is this why you floated the idea of Perxplexity taking control of Chrome—if Google were forced to divest it? We're not saying we're interested in buying Chrome. We're saying that if there's no other path, if Google is put in a situation where they have to divest Chrome, then we'd be open to running it. But Google should not have to divest Chrome, because Chrome and Chromium are tied to each other. Chromium is an open source project that's being run very [well] by Google, and it is the reason for Microsoft Edge and the Brave browser. OpenAI has also shown an interest in taking control of Chrome. Giving ownership of Chrome or Chromium to a company like OpenAI would be a disaster, because open source and OpenAI are an oxymoron at this point. [OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment. The company says it will release an open source AI model this summer.] There are only two companies that can really potentially run Chrome: Microsoft and Meta. Honestly, Microsoft would spoil it, just like it spoiled Edge. And transferring Chrome to Meta is transferring Chrome from one monopoly to another. [The FTC has filed a lawsuit that accuses Meta of acting as a social networking monopoly; the company argues this is not the case.] What do you expect agents to be useful for first? I think [they will make] a lot of your personal searches a lot better. Like asking, 'What was the article I read last week about this one particular company?' or 'Can you summarize my X feed for me so that I know what's trending?' because you don't want to go to X and get distracted by it. Or 'Can you schedule this meeting for me with this person and if there's a conflict send them an email asking for a different time?' All these boring things, I feel we will be able to automate [them] pretty quickly [in future].
The Verge
32 minutes ago
- The Verge
Surface Pro 12-inch review: heart warmer
Tom Warren is a senior editor and author of Notepad, who has been covering all things Microsoft, PC, and tech for over 20 years. I have always had a soft spot for the Surface Pro X. It was the thinner, lighter, and fanless Surface tablet that I had always wanted Microsoft to make, but when it came out nearly six years ago, Windows wasn't ready to handle the Arm chip inside — and vice versa. Sluggish performance and app compatibility issues kept the Surface Pro X from living up to its beautiful design. It was a heartbreaker. Microsoft is once again trying to perfect the Surface Pro design with a $799 12-inch version of its tablet and laptop hybrid that ditches the fan and uses Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon X Plus chip. This time around, it's warming my heart instead of breaking it, thanks to a redesign of the entire tablet and the performance and battery life to match. The result of the overhaul is a tablet that combines some of the best design elements you'll find on an iPad or Samsung's tablets, with the versatility of Windows. While the competition has been trying to copy the Surface Pro for years, Microsoft has now borrowed from the best tablets to improve its own laptop and tablet hybrid even further. Last year's Surface Pro 11 (now the Surface Pro 13-inch) had the same basic design Microsoft had been using since the Surface Pro 8 in 2021, with an airflow vent wrapped around the top half of the chassis that your fingers would tend to find if you were using it as a tablet. The most obvious design change to the 12-inch Surface Pro, other than its smaller display, is that it doesn't have those vents. It's sealed off and rounded in a way that an iPad is, so it feels a lot softer to hold. I love this new design. The lack of a fan has allowed Microsoft to push ahead with this change, and it's one that I really hope sticks for all future models because I never want to use a Surface Pro with a fan ever again. While the kickstand is largely unchanged, this new rounded design also enables some big changes to how the stylus and keyboard work on the 12-inch Surface Pro. Microsoft has moved the stylus storage and charging to the top rear of this smaller Surface Pro, much like Samsung's Galaxy Tab devices. It's more convenient than having to dig into the keyboard and fiddle to get the Surface Pen out, and Microsoft has managed to use strong enough magnets that the stylus never once dropped inside my bag over the past few weeks. However, that does mean that if you're in tablet mode but not actively using the pen, it's often in the way. The keyboard cover won't sit flush with the back of the Surface if you fold it back while the pen is attached; there's a gap at the top where it rests against the pen, and it feels a bit wobbly. And if you use the Surface Pro as a pure tablet, but don't use the stylus, then you'll probably end up resting your fingers on it or shaking the slightly loose button. It's not a big deal, especially when you consider that the Surface Pro ships without a keyboard ($149) or stylus ($129), and you have to purchase them separately or in a $249 bundle. Most people probably won't bother with the stylus, but if you do, that's something to be aware of. Repositioning the stylus has allowed Microsoft to make some significant changes to the keyboard on the 12-inch Surface Pro. While it still magnetically clicks into place on the bottom edge of the tablet, it now lays perfectly flat. The keyboards of previous models had a second magnetic attachment point at the bottom of the front bezel, optionally giving the keyboard a slight angle. Without it, the keyboard feels a lot sturdier. Previous Surface Pro keyboards also had a lot of flex to them, which always put me off using the Surface Pro on work trips where I'd be writing thousands of words for stories. The new keyboard has no flex whatsoever. Even on my lap, it feels sturdier for typing, though the kickstand prevents you from having it far back on your legs as you would a regular laptop, and I quickly got used to the slightly smaller size. The other big change is that it's no longer lined with alcantara fabric on the palm rests. The rear cover still has alcantara, but Microsoft is now using a plastic for the palm rests instead of the fabric that could easily get dirty. I think I still prefer the softer touch of the alcantara palm rests, though. You can't use the keyboard wirelessly like you could with the 13-inch Flex keyboard, and Microsoft has also ditched the haptic touchpad. I never used the wireless option, but the lack of haptics really makes the touchpad feel a lot more bland, and it's something I've missed a lot over the past few weeks. One thing I haven't missed is the larger OLED display found on the 13-inch model. I really hate the grainy effect that the OLED has, especially around black text on a white background. On the 12-inch model, Microsoft is using a regular 3:2 PixelSense LCD display, and while it's a slightly lower resolution and a 90Hz panel instead of 120Hz, I far prefer it for reading text. I do wish the bezels were a lot slimmer, but Microsoft has at least made them the same size all around the 12-inch display, so they feel a little less distracting than on the 13-inch model. In keeping with Microsoft borrowing ideas from other tablets, the company has repositioned the rear camera on the 12-inch Surface Pro so it's in the corner like on Samsung's tablets or Apple's iPads. I still wouldn't be caught dead taking photos using a tablet, but it makes more sense like this, rather than centered on the long edge, so you can at least hold the Surface Pro vertically if you really want to take photos or videos. The front-facing 1080p camera isn't ultrawide this time around, so it doesn't have the unflattering fish-eye effect and framing found on the 13-inch Surface Pro. I've used it for plenty of calls, and while I'm still not a fan of the way the eye contact feature changes the shape of my eyes, the other Windows Studio Effects are super useful for improving your lighting or blurring out the background automatically. Inside the 12-inch, Microsoft is using Qualcomm's eight-core Snapdragon X Plus chip. It's an Arm-based processor, so that means apps will run emulated unless a developer has natively compiled their app for Arm64. That used to be a big issue with the Surface Pro X in 2019, but a lot has changed over the past 12 months, let alone six years. Most of the apps I use on a daily basis are now native Arm64. The big exceptions for me include Discord and Premiere Pro. While Discord has been busy adding currencies for ads instead of releasing a native Arm version of its app, that might be about to change. I've been using an early Arm-native development build of Discord recently, and it totally solves all of the sluggish performance issues. The same can't be said for Premiere Pro, though. While Adobe has created an Arm64 version of Photoshop, you still have to install the Intel-based version of Premiere Pro. It's not totally unusable, but I wouldn't recommend any Arm-based machines for Premiere Pro usage until Adobe finally addresses this. The Snapdragon X Plus chip inside the 12-inch Surface Pro has two fewer cores than the base LCD 13-inch model, and four cores less than the 12-core OLED variant. I've been using a 10-core Surface Laptop regularly over the past year, and this Surface Pro hasn't felt slower at all. As this is a Copilot Plus PC, Microsoft also uses the neural processing unit (NPU) built into Qualcomm's chip to enable a bunch of AI-powered features in Windows. The controversial Recall feature is now available, which takes snapshots of mostly everything you do on the Surface Pro to create a scrollable timeline. I've found Recall to be creepy, clever, and compelling, but it's not a big reason to buy a Copilot Plus PC. I've loved using the improved AI-powered Windows Search though, which lets me search for text inside files or photos, and find documents a lot more quickly. If you're like me and most of your work is in the browser or involves apps that are native Arm64, then the Surface Pro 12-inch feels like the performance of a laptop squeezed into a tablet. I've found that I get around nine hours of battery life with mixed usage of the browser, apps like Photoshop and Slack, and maybe the odd Teams call here or there. I've never really worried about charging the Surface Pro 12-inch, and on some days I even used it for an eight-hour working day and still had 30 percent battery remaining. I'd wake up the next day and it still had that 30 percent, or close to it, ready for the day ahead. Microsoft has also ditched its magnetic Surface Connect charging cable, but there are two USB-C ports that can be used to charge up the Surface Pro. I only use USB-C to charge my devices, so I don't think I'll miss the Surface Connect port other than the neat way it attaches on the 13-inch model. While the Surface Pro is great at resuming instantly and not draining battery life in your bag or overnight, if you don't use it for a couple of days over a weekend then you'll have to wait 30 seconds or so for it to be ready to use on a Monday morning. This isn't a huge issue, but the iPad never goes into a deep sleep mode like this, and on a couple of occasions I've resumed the Surface Pro on a Monday and the Windows Hello camera has failed to work. I kept getting a 'something went wrong' message, but rebooting the device brought it back to life again. I've used this Surface Pro on a train, on my sofa, on a desk, and in pubs and cafes over the past few weeks. I still find that I have to adjust my posture or body to use the Surface Pro in my lap because of the kickstand, but it almost feels worth this slight compromise for the versatility of using a small PC on the go. This Surface Pro redesign also presents some of the best bits of rival tablets into a piece of hardware that feels a lot more tablet-like than Microsoft has ever created. I've been using this Surface Pro in tablet mode more often as a result, simply because of the smaller size and the ease of switching between laptop and tablet modes. The operating system and apps still feel like more of a laptop, though. Microsoft also sells the Surface Pro without a keyboard, as if it's a pure tablet, but as always, you really need to purchase that $150 keyboard to unlock the best experience. That pushes the pricing up to $950, which is more than you'd pay for a 13-inch Surface Laptop, and close to the $999 launch price of the Surface Laptop 7. While the Surface pricing situation seems more complicated than ever, I love small computers, and the 12-inch Surface Pro has this allure to it that makes me want to keep picking it up for the day. I'd still like to see Microsoft improve the tablet experience in Windows 11 with a mode that's more like what existed in Windows 8. But even without those improvements, the 12-inch Surface Pro is as close as Microsoft has ever gotten to fulfilling my dream of a lightweight PC you can throw under your arm and carry around all day without worrying about battery life. It's still not perfect, but it's not the heartbreaker the Surface Pro X once was. Photography by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge
Gizmodo
33 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Anker's 3-in-1 Foldable Charging Cube Is an Apple Fan's Must-Buy While It's Cheaper Than Previous Prime Days
Three-in-one chargers for your smartphone, smartwatch, and wireless earbuds aren't new, but their design tends to range from 'a little too big' to 'takes up my whole nightstand.' Not surprisingly, the innovative, attractive, and seriously effective solution for Apple users comes from Anker in the form of the 3-in-1 Cube With MagSafe, and it's on sale right now at Amazon for just $113, a 25% drop from its regular retail price of $150. The Anker 3-in-1 Cube is exclusively designed for Apple products, ready to charge an iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods at the same time, or 2 at a time, or just the iPhone. It folds down into a neat-looking cube, roughly 2.3 inches square and weighing just 0.9 pounds. When fully folded it can give any MagSafe-enabled iPhone a brisk 15W charge, but then when you extend the retractable Apple Watch charger and tilt up the lid to reveal another charging surface for your AirPods, you suddenly have all of your Apple device charging needs amply met by a compact, reliable charger that's perfect for your travel bag. See at Amazon Home and Away Power We love the Anker 3-in-1 Cube as a travel charger. Not only does it fit neatly in a carry-on bag, it's a huge upgrade from any of the unreliable USB chargers that tend to occupy hotel nightstands. The Anker 3-in-1 Cube just needs an AC outlet for its included 30W charging block and 5-foot USB-C cable. From there it's a quick lift of the iPhone platform and press of the retractable Apple Watch stand, and that terrible USB charger in the nightstand lamp never needs to be used. Assuming you don't travel all the time, there's no reason to leave the Cube in your go bag, because it's also tailor made for your nightstand or desk, especially if you're already a little overcrowded on either. The small footprint of the Anker 3-in-1 Cube is deal for space management and the adjustable angle of the iPhone charger means you can watch content or make video calls hands-free from your desk. Secure Grip The Anker Cube charges any MagSafe enabled iPhone, meaning anything from the iPhone 12 family on up to the current 16s, but it is recommended that you not use a non-magnetic case that would impede the Cube's built-in magnet. But if you have a magnetic case or you're one of those brave souls who goes without a case, the Cube's magnet is strong enough to hold your iPhone in place for charging and viewing, both in portrait or landscape orientation. A sturdy, compact, ultra-reliable MagSafe fast charger that accommodates all of your Apple devices at once without monopolizing your nightstand or desk is a sweet deal to begin with, but tack on Amazon's 25% discount and at just $113, the Anker 3-in-1 Cube is a total steal that you'll use whether you're home or on the road. See at Amazon
