SpaceX launches second mission in 2 days from same pad, breaks own record
SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket with Starlink satellites from Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40 at 12:26 a.m. EDT Saturday. Screenshot from SpaceX
June 28 (UPI) -- SpaceX early Saturday launched another 27 Starlink satellites, breaking it's own record by preparing the launchpad for another liftoff two days after a launch from the same pad in Florida.
The mission went off from Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40 at 12:26 a.m. EDT. This was just two days, eight hours, 31 minutes and 10 seconds after the launch of a Starlink mission from the same pad, besting a previous SpaceX record set in March by 28 minutes.
Watch Falcon 9 launch 27 @Starlink satellites to orbit from Florida https://t.co/wPutk3tYqY— SpaceX (@SpaceX) June 28, 2025
SpaceX also uses a pad at nearby Kennedy Space Station.
The launch occurred despite inclement weather that passed through Florida's Space Coast on Friday night.
The first stage flew for a fifth time, which has included Starlink missions.
About eight minutes after liftoff, the booster landed on the droneship "A Shortfall of Gravitas" stationed in the Atlantic Ocean. This was the 115th landing on the drone ship and 469th booster landing since, according to Spaceflight now.
The first droneship landing was on April 8, 2016, on "Of Course I Still Love You" in the Atlantic, which is used in the Pacific Ocean.
Ten years ago on June 28, a Falcon 9 that launched from the Cape Canaveral site broke apart in an explosion during a NASA resupply mission to the International Space Station. The first Falcon 9 launch was five years earlier on June 4, 2010, from Cape Canaveral.
SpaceX's next launch is scheduled for Saturday afternoon from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The Falcon 9 with 26 Starlink satellites is set to lift off at 10:13 a.m. PDT.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
How Starship can stay on schedule for Musk and NASA's ambitions
On June 18, SpaceX rolled out the latest iteration of its Starship spacecraft to the test stand for a static fire test in preparation for a test flight scheduled for June 29. Then, around 11 pm Central Standard Time, the spacecraft exploded in a fireball, taking itself and the test stand out in a spectacular conflagration. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's initial reaction was an attempt at humor when he posted on X, 'Just a scratch,' channeling a line from Monty Python. Later, in a more serious post, Musk revealed the likely cause of the explosion: 'Preliminary data suggests that a nitrogen [composite overwrapped pressure vessel] in the payload bay failed below its proof pressure.' Peter Hague, an astrophysicist and a follower of space commercialization, notes that the failure stemmed from quality control issues with the specific component and not, as some suggest, an inherent design flaw in the Starship vehicle. If so, the problem should be easy to fix. What happens next? When will SpaceX test another Starship? How does the accident affect NASA's Artemis program to return to the moon and Musk's ambitions to found a settlement on Mars? SpaceX will have to repair the test stand and surrounding infrastructure before proceeding with another test flight with a new version of Starship, unless it intends to skip the static fire test, a risky move. It will also have to make the next Starship ready for flight. Finally, it will have to satisfy the Federal Aviation Administration and other regulatory agencies that it understands the root cause of the accident and can proceed. Opinions vary about how long those tasks will take, but most guesses range from one month to two months. However, the accident on the test stand is just the latest in a string of failures that have bedeviled the Starship test program. Hague opines, 'Make no mistake though; this is a serious setback. A failure of this kind should not be happening at this stage in the program, and it's no good glossing over it with references to 'fail fast.'' He said the company 'needs to get Starship back on track — but based on past performance, we can expect that they will.' Indeed, SpaceX has suffered a number of failures during its early years, from which it has bounced back. The Falcon 9 and the Falcon Heavy are the cheapest, most reliable launch vehicles in the world. But that quality was bought by failures that proved to be the parents of success in the long run. So, it will likely be for Starship. The question of Starship becoming an operational vehicle has not been an if but a when proposition. When Starship is available depends on how quickly SpaceX can recover from the latest accident and how soon it can rack up a series of successful tests. Musk would like to send the Starship to Mars during the next transit window, which lasts from November 2026 through January 2027. The flights (Musk plans on sending several Starships) would be uncrewed, perhaps carrying robots such as the humanoid Optimus. If SpaceX misses the window, the next one occurs 26 months later. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter if we see boots on Martian soil 26 months later than Musk's current timeline. Not so the return to the moon. Currently, the Artemis III moon landing is scheduled for 2027. Even before the Starship accident, that date was very much in doubt. Still, if Americans could return to the moon in 2028, the event would not only be well in advance of a potential Chinese moon landing but also during the Trump presidency. President Trump, always on the lookout for a legacy enhancer, would love to ring out his presidency with Americans on the lunar surface. The Starship accident puts that prospect in jeopardy. Wouldn't it be nice if NASA had a permanent administrator, respected by the aerospace community, experienced in space flight, who could make decisions for the Artemis program that could account for the schedule disruption wrought by the Starship accident? Trump may well have committed the most heinous act of self-sabotage in political history by pulling the nomination of Jared Isaacman for NASA administrator at the last minute. He did so without a replacement nominee ready. Musk and his engineering team could still recover from disaster. They have done it before. But a lot has to happen before Starship is ready to open up the moon, Mars and beyond to human exploration. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
CNBC
9 hours ago
- CNBC
France is betting Eutelsat can become Europe's answer to Starlink — but experts aren't convinced
For years, France's Eutelsat has been trying to build a European alternative to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite broadband service. The company merged with British satellite venture OneWeb in 2023, consolidating the region's satellite communications industry in an effort to catch up to Starlink, which is owned by SpaceX. Last week, the French state led a 1.35-billion-euro ($1.58 billion) investment in Eutelsat, making it the company's biggest shareholder with a roughly 30% stake. Europe largely lags behind the U.S. in the global space race. Starlink's constellation of over 7,000 satellites dwarfs Eutelsat's. Meanwhile, Europe's launch capabilities are more limited than the U.S. The region still relies heavily on America for certain launch services, which is a market dominated by SpaceX. Eutelsat currently has a market capitalization of 1.6 billion euros, much lower than estimates for Starlink owner SpaceX's value, which was pegged at $350 billion in a secondary share sale last year. In 2020, analysts at Morgan Stanley said that they see Starlink growing to $80.9 billion in their "base case valuation" for the firm. Luke Kehoe, industry analyst at network monitoring firm Ookla, said France's investment in Eutelsat shows the country "is now treating Eutelsat less like a commercial telco and more like a dual-use critical-infrastructure provider" and a "strategic asset" in the European Union's push for technological sovereignty. However, building a European competitor to Starlink will be no mean feat. Communications industry experts tell CNBC that, while Eutelsat could boost Europe's efforts to create a sovereign satellite internet provider, challenging its U.S. rival Starlink would require a significant increase in investments in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. Eutelsat's OneWeb arm operates a total of 650 LEO satellites, which is less than a tenth of Starlink's 7,600-strong global satellite constellation. "To offer greater capacity and coverage, [Eutelsat] needs to increase the number of satellites in space, a task made more difficult due to the fact that many of OneWeb's satellites are nearing the end of their lifespan and will need to be first replaced before growing the constellation's size," Joe Gardiner, research analyst at market research firm CCS Insight, told CNBC via email. Ookla's Kehoe echoed this view. "Eutelsat's chances of achieving parity with Starlink in the mass-market satellite broadband segment within the next five years remain limited, given SpaceX's unmatched global scale in LEO infrastructure," he said. "Even with the latest injection of capital from the French state, Eutelsat continues to lag behind Starlink in several key areas, including capital, manufacturing throughput, launch access, spectrum and user terminals." Nevertheless, he thinks the company is "well positioned to succeed in European-sovereign, security-sensitive and enterprise segments that prioritise jurisdictional control and sovereignty over raw constellation capacity." The enterprise segment refers to the market for corporate space clients. That's certainly the hope. France's Emmanuel Macron has urged Europe to ramp up its investment in space, saying last week that "space has in some way become a gauge of international power." When Eutelsat announced its investment from France last week, the firm stressed its role as "the only European operator with a fully operational LEO network" as well as the "strategic role of the LEO constellation in France's model for sovereign defense and space communications." Earlier this year, Eutelsat was rumoured to be in the running to replace Starlink in Ukraine. For years, Starlink has offered Ukraine's military its satellite internet services to assist with the war effort amid Russia's ongoing between the U.S. and Ukraine soured following the election of President Donald Trump and reports surfaced that U.S. negotiators had raised the possibility of cutting Ukraine's access to Starlink. Germany set up 1,000 Eutelsat terminals in Ukraine in April with the aim of providing an alternative — rather than a replacement — for Starlink's 50,000 terminals in the war-torn country. Since then, U.S.-Ukraine tensions have somewhat cooled, and Starlink remains the primary satellite broadband provider to the Ukrainian military. Eutelsat's former CEO Eva Berneke has herself admitted that the company cannot yet match Starlink's scale. "If we were to take over the entire connectivity capacity for Ukraine and all the citizens — we wouldn't be able to do that. Let's just be very honest," she said in an April interview with Politico. Berneke was replaced as CEO in May by Jean-Francois-Fallacher, a former executive of French telecoms giant Orange. Meanwhile, even though Eutelsat has been ramping up investments in LEO satellite with its OneWeb unit, experts say its technical architectures and orbital designs are ultimately different from Starlink's. "The OneWeb constellation currently uses a bent-pipe architecture, which is not as capable as Starlink satellites; therefore, OneWeb will also need to invest in second-generation satellites," he added. The French firm's use cases also differ to Starlink's. Eutelsat operates a constellation of geostationary orbit (GEO) as well as LEO satellites. GEO satellites orbit the earth at a much higher altitude than their LEO equivalents and can typically cover more land with fewer satellites. "Eutelsat's higher altitude satellites are leveraged for specialized use cases, such as polar coverage for companies and research facilities in remote regions like Greenland and Alaska," said Joe Vaccaro, vice president and general manager at Cisco's ThousandEyes network intelligence unit. Looking ahead, Eutelsat said it plans to "build upon its operation improvements" with a "differentiated go-to-market model" and "strong European anchoring." It also noted that the U.K. government could also increase its investment in Eutelsat "in due course."
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX launches second mission in 2 days from same pad, breaks own record
June 28 (UPI) -- SpaceX early Saturday launched another 27 Starlink satellites, breaking its own record by preparing the launchpad for another liftoff two days after a launch from the same pad in Florida. And 13 hours later, the private company launched more satellites from California. Saturday's first mission went off from Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40 at 12:26 a.m. EDT. This was just two days, eight hours, 31 minutes and 10 seconds after the launch of a Starlink mission from the same pad, besting a previous SpaceX record set in March by 28 minutes. Watch Falcon 9 launch 27 @Starlink satellites to orbit from Florida SpaceX (@SpaceX) June 28, 2025 SpaceX also uses a pad at nearby Kennedy Space Station. The launch occurred despite inclement weather that passed through Florida's Space Coast on Friday night. The first stage flew for a fifth time, which has included Starlink missions. About eight minutes after liftoff, the booster landed on the droneship "A Shortfall of Gravitas" stationed in the Atlantic Ocean. This was the 115th landing on the drone ship and 469th booster landing since, according to Spaceflight now. The first droneship landing was on April 8, 2016, on "Of Course I Still Love You" in the Atlantic, which is used in the Pacific Ocean. Ten years ago on June 28, a Falcon 9 that launched from the Cape Canaveral site broke apart in an explosion during a NASA resupply mission to the International Space Station. The first Falcon 9 launch was five years earlier on June 4, 2010, from Cape Canaveral. Launch from California SpaceX launched another 26 Starlink satellites from Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 4 East in California. The Falcon 9 lifted off at 1:13 p.m. PDT. It was the eighth flight for the first-stage booster supporting this mission, including three Starlink missions. The first stage then landed on the "Of Course I Still Love You" droneship. It's the 139th touchdown on this vessel. Watch Falcon 9 launch 26 @Starlink satellites to orbit from California SpaceX (@SpaceX) June 28, 2025
