Rabies death in the UK after tourist bitten by dog on Morocco holiday
A person in Yorkshire has died from rabies after contracting the infection from a stray dog while on holiday in Morocco, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) confirmed.
Health workers and individuals who had close contact with the deceased are being assessed and offered vaccinations as a precautionary measure.
The UKHSA emphasised there is no risk to the wider public, as rabies is not transmitted directly between humans.
Rabies is nearly always fatal, but post-exposure treatment is highly effective if administered promptly after exposure.
Rabies does not circulate in wild or domestic animals in the UK, and human cases acquired abroad are rare, with only six reported in the UK between 2000 and 2024.
Person dies from rabies in Yorkshire after contact with stray dog in Morocco
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
I'm a GP and this is how I'd save the burnt-out NHS
A 'national emergency' is facing the NHS. So says Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who in the coming weeks will publish the Government's 10 Year Health Plan – an 'ambitious yet essential' doctrine to bring the waiting list down from six million, harness private providers, and ensure that patients no longer 'suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them'. Streeting has also suggested that the new reforms could see GPs take over hospital trusts. 'The NHS should not be bound by traditional expectations of how services should be arranged,' he told the NHS ConfedExpo Conference in Manchester last week, describing the current divide between institutions as 'old-fashioned' and 'increasingly meaningless', in the face of the new plans. The idea is unlikely to thrill the many patients who have found themselves falling through NHS cracks as a result of departments seemingly unable to talk to one another. How this might work practically remains to be seen. Might healthcare professionals welcome a break in the divide between hospitals and GPs, or would it lead to more/inefficiencies? Here, three family doctors share their views. 'We need a new approach to chronic health issues' Martin Brunet, GP GPs think in a different way from hospital doctors, and that's our skill. We're pretty much the only people in general in medicine that look at every aspect of a patient's life; we're interested in all their physical problems, but also their social set-up and what's going on emotionally for them, and we put it all together. In the hospital, you see a cardiologist for the heart and a neurologist for the brain, but what if what's going on crosses all of those areas? Where the health system could be radically different is by challenging the current model, which is biomedical. That means when a patient has symptoms, a doctor makes a diagnosis, usually with the aid of complex tests, and then they find a definable disease with a definable treatment. This works brilliantly for conditions like cancer or pneumonia. But if you've got something like chronic pain or irritable bowel syndrome (9.1 million people are projected to have a chronic condition by 2040) it really doesn't work as well. What then happens is you have all these patients having loads of tests for their pain, none of which really get to the root of the problem, and they end up on lots of medication which doesn't help them, and is a very inefficient use of money. If you could set up holistic clinics – mostly run by GPs, but perhaps with some specialist input from people who really understand how the mind and the body work together – we could more effectively get to the root cause of why someone's brain is not allowing them to recover from chronic conditions, and make a massive difference to people's lives. GPs are very innovative, if you give them the chance. But Streeting's idea to send us into hospitals will not work if we are expected to go in and act like hospital doctors. We don't need GPs to try to pretend to be specialists. We're generalists, and that's our strength. 'We have to change the NHS culture, and how we all work together' Prof Kamila Hawthorne
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Assisted dying bill does 'not meet needs of patients', says Royal College of Psychiatrists
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' lead on assisted dying has told Sky News she is approaching Friday's vote by MPs "with professional trepidation". The medical organisation said the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in its current form did "not meet the needs of patients". It has also expressed concern over the shortage of qualified psychiatrists to take part in assisted dying panels, concerns around capacity assessment, and whether or not assisted dying will be interpreted as a treatment – because that would have a profound impact on the psychiatrist's decision-making process. Friday will be the first time the bill has been voted on in its entirety since last year's yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. MPs are allowed to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they can decide based on their conscience instead of following party lines. The bill's supporters have said it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that changes to the bill mean it is weaker than when it was first introduced. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Dr Annabel Price, the lead for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at the Royal College of Psychiatrists ( RCPsych), said: "We know that there is a strong association between a wish to hasten death and depression, and that there isn't adequate opportunity within the bill to assess somebody's needs and also to make sure that those needs are met, which might have an impact on their continued wish to want to end their life." The RCPsych was one of the first royal colleges to voice concerns about the bill in its current form. These fears have since been echoed by two more royal colleges, physicians and pathologists. It has provided written evidence to the bill's scrutiny committee, while Dr Price has provided oral evidence. She said the organisation had "actively engaged with parliamentarians throughout the process" and expressed concerns in two public statements. But despite all of this, the concerns raised have not been addressed, it is claimed. This has prompted worries because, under the bill, psychiatrists would have a leading role in assessing a patient's mental capacity when an assisted death has been requested. They would be on a panel alongside doctors, social workers, and a legal expert. The panel would not be expected to meet the patient during the process. Panel role 'doesn't map on to job of psychiatrist' Dr Price said the idea of making a clinical assessment of a patient's mental health ran contrary to everything a psychiatrist had been trained to do. She said: "The panel role doesn't really map on to the professional job and training of a psychiatrist. What psychiatrists are trained to do is the assessment and treatment of mental illness. "The panel role is really to check what the two other doctors have done and whether that patient meets the eligibility criteria. "And if they do, then they must be granted assisted dying. That doesn't really give room to identify meeting an unmet need, like depression for example, but there are lots of things that may be unmet, social difficulties, untreated pain and other physical symptoms, where that person might no longer want to die. "And it doesn't really give room for a psychiatrist to do what they're trained to do and where their expertise lies, which would be essentially a checking role." Clarification call Dr Price said other areas of the bill also needed urgent clarification. She said: "When somebody has a mental illness, our job is to see if we can treat that mental illness. The other area in the bill that hasn't really been addressed is the psychiatrist's responsibility around suicide prevention. "When we meet somebody who wants to end their life, we have a duty to that patient and that duty may involve assessing that patient under the Mental Health Act to try to manage the mental health aspects that may be making them want to die. And there really isn't enough detail as to how we do that, how we square those two roles and duties. That needs more attention." Dr Price added: "The Mental Capacity Act was designed to support people who can't make decisions for themselves to be able to have decisions made in their best interest for them. "There is nothing in the provision of the Mental Capacity Act that talks about a decision to end one's own life, so this is a new decision. "We don't currently have anything that maps on to that clinically and so the Mental Capacity Act, we have stated very clearly, is not sufficient to be a sufficient safeguard in assisted dying and that we need to rethink how capacity is assessed."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Inmate died after ‘restraint-related' incident in prison, inquest hears
A home office doctor has warned jurors about the 'complex' restraint-related death of a father-of-four prisoner, an inquest heard. Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley, on the Isle of Sheppey, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021. He is alleged to have attempted to commit suicide by suffocation before becoming violent and being 'restrained' by prison staff. The medical cause of death has been given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury but it is unclear when and by whom that injury was caused. On Wednesday, Home Office forensic pathologist Dr Olaf Biedrzycki told jurors at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone that medically, Mr Dawes-Clarke's case was 'about as difficult as it gets' for him. He said: 'The cause of death is given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury that's due to either the fact that his heart or lungs stopped working … and that happened very quickly after a period of third-party restraint, which happened shortly after seizure-like activity, which was treated with Diazepam. 'That all followed compression of the neck with a ligature.' There had been a previous incident where Mr Dawes-Clarke had attempted to self-harm or commit suicide two days before his death, the court heard. Body-worn camera footage taken in HMP Elmley and shown in court showed four officers kneeling on and next to Mr Dawes-Clarke, who was face down on the floor prior to his first cardiac arrest. He could be heard yelling repeatedly while restrained, until he was handcuffed and then went limp. One officer was heard saying, 'Have we got a pulse on him? We're not sure if he's breathing, we're not sure', as Mr Dawes-Clarke lay on the floor. Medical staff began CPR before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth upon his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after. Dr Biedrzycki added that the 'crux' of the inquest would be whether Mr Dawes-Clarke recovered between the suicide attempt and the restraint from prison officers. 'The restraint element is of greater importance if you conclude that the initial ligature compression did not actually cause him to be unconscious and fitting,' he added. Mr Dawes-Clarke's alleged history of self-harm and suicide attempts whilst in prison was not known to the family; he also had several physical health conditions that required ongoing treatment, the court heard. His mother, Marcia Neil, was indignant through tears as she told the court: 'Maybe if they'd phoned me, I could have helped!' Reading a pen portrait, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother was more than just family; he was my anchor, my confidant, and my unwavering source of support. He was kind-hearted and compassionate, always putting the needs of others before his own. 'Losing him in such a senseless and cruel manner has completely shattered me. The thought of him being restrained, suffering and treated without dignity haunts me every single day.' Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football, he was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up. 'I share this statement because my brother's story deserves to be heard. He was a person full of love, kindness, and potential. He was not defined by his circumstances, and he deserved so much more than the injustice he faced. His life mattered, and his memory will forever remain in our hearts,' said Ms Inico. On Wednesday, his mother, sister and uncle were in court to observe proceedings, and his brother appeared via video-link. Mr Dawes-Clarke was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his license. 'Where restraint-related deaths do occur, they're invariably erroneously complex cases,' Dr Biedrzycki warned jurors. He added: 'This is about as difficult as it gets for forensic pathologists, and I don't have all the answers.' The inquest continues and is listed until July 11.
