How much does a Real ID cost in Rhode Island? What to know ahead of May deadline
In just a few weeks, most travelers around the country will need to have a Real ID.
Starting May 7, domestic flyers will be required to have a Real ID seal on their identification card or driver's license, unless they choose to use a passport or another accepted alternative.
The requirement is part of The Real ID Act of 2005, which put in place certain security standards for licenses and identification cards, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
While it's a national standard, each state has a different fee associated with upgrading to a Real ID.
The cost of upgrading to a Real ID in Rhode Island depends on whether or not the license is also being renewed, according to the Division of Motor Vehicles.
Customers who are applying for it within their renewal period — which is the 90 days before it expires — don't have to pay any additional costs.
Outside your renewal period, it will cost $27.50 to upgrade to a Real ID.
A Real ID is a form of identification that meets certain security standards to enter federally-regulated buildings, aircrafts and nuclear power plants.
They are easily distinguishable from regular IDs because they have a yellow star in the corner.
The original Real ID deadline was set to take effect in 2020 but was pushed back several times due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Melina Khan is a trending reporter for the USA TODAY Network - New England, which serves more than a dozen affiliated publications across New England. She can be reached at MKhan@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: How much does a Real ID cost in RI? Deadline to switch is coming up
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
23 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
North Perth council joins push for reinstatement of MPAC assessment cycle
LISTOWEL - After receiving a letter from the Municipality of West Perth, North Perth Council decided during its May 26 meeting to join its neighbour in lobbying the province to reinstate the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation's (MPAC) property assessment cycle. MPAC administers property assessments to determine assessment values which are used for municipal taxation rates across the province of Ontario. Property assessments have remained based on 2016 valuations since the provincial government postponed the 2020 MPAC reassessment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The letter from West Perth requests that the province restore the integrity of Ontario's property assessment system. 'This continued delay has resulted in significant inequities across the property tax base, undermining the fairness, accuracy, and transparency of the municipal property tax system,' West Perth Director of Legislative Services/Clerk James Hutson wrote in the letter, which was shared with North Perth. Coun. Allan Rothwell echoed this sentiment at the North Perth meeting. 'I believe that we've had conversations at this council table regarding concerns about the fact that our assessment cycle has not kept pace with the normal schedule, and as a result of that, there are issues in our taxation standpoint, where assessed properties are not up to our current standard, therefore the amount of tax dollars that would be coming into the municipality to operate our works for the municipality, and they are not up to where they possibly should be in terms of the assessed values,' he said. 'I believe that this council should lend our support to the Municipality West Perth in the resolution and put that request through to Municipal Property Assessment Corporation to confirm that they will be proceeding soon regarding the newest assessment cycle.' North Perth Mayor Todd Kasenberg said the province gave an explanation for the delay in the fall 2024 economic update, which stated the province was continuing its review of the property assessment and taxation systems, and identified three areas of priority: affordable rental housing, student housing and information sharing, and province-wide property tax assessments will continue to be deferred until this work is complete. 'So other words … the province told us 'not yet, we have some things to get done first,'' he said. 'I just want to make sure that council is aware that that was the most recent provincial statement that I understand anyway.' Despite the reasoning provided by the province, Kasenberg said there is no technical reason why the assessment cycle hasn't been reinstated. 'It's really just a push of a button for them to generate the new property values for every residence, every business, every farm property in Ontario. There's no technical delay or lag. That's what I've been told by their officials. So it can be done.' Coun. Sarah Blazek said, 'The province may not be in a hurry to get us up to date with our assessments and make sure that municipalities are receiving the tax base that they should be, but they continue to download a lot of financial responsibilities to municipalities, and so I think that we should absolutely do our due diligence and at least have our voice be heard.' Rothwell offered context by explaining that municipalities across Ontario own MPAC. 'The M in MPAC is for municipal,' he began. 'Municipal Property Assessment Corporation. It used to be called the Ontario Property Assessment Corporation when it was run by the province of Ontario. There was a change wherein all the municipalities in the province own the MPAC. 'So therefore, with respect to the Province of Ontario having various other issues that they want to focus on. Nevertheless, the prime focus of MPAC should be assessment. And all of the people, the assessors that are part of MPAC, their role and responsibility is to assess property. 'So therefore, I would underline again the importance that we need to get back on track as soon as possible, and if not for these three priorities that you've listed here and so on, it should be a number one priority in terms of what the municipal assessment corporation does.' North Perth Council passed a resolution urging the province to immediately resume the property assessment cycle and direct MPAC to undertake a province-wide reassessment reflecting current market conditions. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CT business owner admits to using $1.1M in COVID relief funds for travel, jewelry, cars
An East Granby woman has pleaded guilty to federal charges and has agreed to pay restitution in connection with a scheme in which authorities said she defrauded COVID-19 pandemic relief programs of more than $1.1 million. Karen Gaston, 44, appeared in federal court in New Haven on Thursday and waived her right to be indicted, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. She pleaded guilty to wire fraud and making illegal monetary transactions. According to federal authorities, Gaston in 2020 controlled a number of businesses, some of which were active while one was not and another had only one client. These included LNK, Elegant Clinical, Ruby Red LLC and Diamond Shine LLC. LNK and Diamond Shine LLC were operational but shared resources and employees, officials said. Ruby Red LLC had only one client and Gaston was its sole employee, according to authorities. Elegant Clinical was no longer operational. Beginning around April 2020, Gaston submitted loan applications to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and for Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) — both of which provided emergency funds under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The applications Gaston filed 'falsely represented the status of the operations, resources and employees' of the businesses she controlled, according to federal officials. She also reportedly filed loan applications at separate financial institutions 'in order to disguise the true nature of her criminal activity,' officials said. The loan applications falsely represented that her businesses were all active and operating, authorities said. They also falsely represented the number of employees and the amount of wages purportedly paid to them, which were outlined in fraudulent tax returns and tax related documents, according to officials. Authorities said Gaston also falsely represented that a family member — who was used as an applicant on an application — was a part owner of one of the businesses. Gaston reportedly received a little more than $1.1 million in PPP and EIDL loan funds through the scheme, according to officials. Instead of using the funds for payroll or other operating expenses, she reportedly spent the money on 'personal expenditures, including travel, food, luxury home goods, expensive jewelry, cars and paying off her home mortgage,' the U.S. Attorney's office said. As part of the plea deal, Gaston has agreed to pay full restitution. She also agreed to forfeit a $39,521 ring she purchased in July 2020 from the jeweler Harry Winston. Gaston is free on a $100,000 bond while she awaits sentencing, which has not yet been scheduled. She faces a maximum of 30 years in prison.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Huge global music chain closes all stores, liquidates
For a long time it seemed like sellers of musical instruments had a sort of immunity from the internet. Consumers liked to go to a store and physically hold, and even play, an instrument before buying it. Many musicians made this a sort of ritual. They might go and play a handful of instruments over multiple weeks before making the decision to buy. Related: Huge auto parts company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy That's still the case, but long-standing musical instrument chains like Sam Ash died a slow death from a thousand paper cuts. In many cases, they still served as the front-facing part of the industry where people came to play before they bought. The problem is that over time, they lost sales on accessories, sheet music, and other items to digital retailers. And, in the biggest kick in the teeth, they would sometimes provide all the labor that led to a high-priced instrument sale, only for the customer to make the actual purchase online. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter That's similar to what was happening to Best Buy over a decade ago, but that chain had the size needed to add free delivery and compete with Amazon on price. Digital music stores have lower expenses and can offer lower prices. That's something brick-and-mortar chains can't offer, and another global leader has abruptly shut down. At its height, Sam Ash had stores all over New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. The company had an online presence, but that was secondary to its brick-and-mortar locations, which were active with people playing music and testing instruments. That ended in 2024 when the Ash family could not find funding to continue operations after it filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Now, the chain exists in name only and it not longer operates stores. "As of September 2024, Sam Ash Music is now officially part of the Gonher Music Group, the largest distributor of musical instruments and professional sound equipment in Mexico. Gonher's expertise in customer service, logistics, and vendor relations will help streamline Sam Ash's online shopping experience," the company shared on its website. More closings: Popular local Dairy Queen rival suddenly closing, no bankruptcyAnother big Mexican chain closing down restaurant, no bankruptcyUPS suddenly closing more stores amid chaotic new change, layoffsPopular fast-food burger chain closes all restaurants in key area Basically, a new owner is using the Sam Ash name to front its U.S. operation. This trend is not unique to Sam Ash or the United States. Earlier this year, Bax Music, one of Europe's largest musical instrument retailers, filed for bankruptcy and abruptly ceased operations. The company blamed the Covid pandemic, which has likely played a key part in this growing trend. Now, another big global player has fallen. PMT Music, one of the largest music retailers, was placed into administration and closed all of its stores. The news was sudden and the resolution happened with little fanfare. The company did not go through a prolonged bankruptcy in the way a U.S. company might. Instead, it was quickly sold to Gear4music for roughly $3.26 million. It seems like even the acquiring company understands how jarring this might be for customers. "We're sorry – the website you were trying to visit is no longer active. S&T Audio Limited trading as 'PMT Play Music Today' ('PMT') entered administration on 11 June 2025 and is no longer trading. We understand this might come as a surprise," it posted. The new owner tried to calm customers and offer them support. "While PMT is no longer operating, we want to ensure you still have a reliable place to turn where you can find the products you were interested in, get support if you need it, and continue shopping with confidence, and hence you've been redirected to Gear4music," it added. The new owner also provided a longer statement about what it has purchased. Related: Troubled retailer puts 100s of stores at risk after drastic move "Certain assets, including some stock, branding, and websites, have been sold to Gear4music Limited. The original company, however, still legally exists and remains responsible for its liabilities, but may not have funds to meet them," it posted. "Gear4music has purchased certain stock, together with certain intangible assets including websites and trademarks from the Administrators of PMT." Gear4Music has plans to use the PMT name. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
