Ryanair introduces £500 fines for disruptive passengers
The carrier said this will be the 'minimum' punishment, and it will continue to pursue passengers for civil damages.
Ryanair expressed hope the new policy will 'act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behaviour'.
A spokesperson for the airline said: 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behaviour.
'To help ensure that our passengers and crew travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment, without unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers, we have introduced a £500 fine, which will be issued to any passengers offloaded from aircraft as a result of their misconduct.
'While these are isolated events which happen across all airlines, disruptive behaviour in such a confined shared space is unacceptable.'
Ryanair has repeatedly called for a limit of two alcoholic drinks per passenger to be introduced at airport bars in response to an increase in disorder on flights.
It claims this would result in 'a safer travel experience for passengers and crews'.
Passengers causing disruption during flights can cause aircraft to be diverted, which often costs the airline thousands of pounds.
Ryanair announced in January it had started taking legal action to recover losses from disruptive passengers, as part of what it described as a 'major misconduct clampdown'.
It said it filed civil legal proceedings against a passenger in Ireland to seek 15,000 euros (£12,600) in damages related to a flight from Dublin to Lanzarote which diverted to Porto in April last year.
Ryanair contends the passenger's behaviour caused the diversion.
It said the 15,000 euros consists of costs such as overnight accommodation for the more than 160 passengers and six crew members (7,000 euros or £5,900), Porto airport landing and handling fees (2,500 euros or £2,100) and Portuguese legal fees (2,500 euros or £2,100).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Failings over search for missing Madeleine McCann as cops in race against time
Investigators vowed to the Mirror in 2021 that Christian Brueckner would be charged in months, but four years later they are still searching for evidence as his release date looms It was a drizzly, autumnal day when I met with Hans Christian Wolters in his office in Braunschweig in October 2021. The quietly-spoken German prosecutor was in an unusually bullish mood. 'We're 100% convinced Christian Brueckner killed Madeleine McCann,' he told me. Noting the look of surprise of my face, he continued: 'There's no other possibility. There is no hope she is alive.' Mr Wolters went even further, directly addressing Madeleine's parents Kate and Gerry McCann. 'We are confident we have the man who took and killed your daughter,' he said. There was the headline. He then added: 'All I can do is ask for your patience. I personally think a conclusion will be reached next year.' Next year. As in 2022. But nearly four years on from that exclusive interview, a conclusion of a different kind appears to be on the horizon. And it is not one that Mr Wolters, the McCanns or the wider public are hoping for. Christian Brueckner - the paedophile, rapist and only suspect in Madeleine's disappearance - is about to walk free from prison. And it increasingly appears there is little the authorities can do to stop it happening. It is a nightmare scenario for them - and one that Mr Wolters insisted back in 2021 would never happen. But even during our interview, I was beginning to have doubts about just what police 'had' on Brueckner. When naming him as their prime suspect in June 2020, prosecutors said they had 'evidence' Madeleine is dead. But when I pressed Mr Wolters on what evidence they had that proved she was dead but was not enough to charge Brueckner, he backtracked. 'It is circumstantial evidence - there are witnesses, demonstrative evidence, forensic experts, and other types of evidence,' he admitted. 'We have no scientific evidence. If we had a video of the act [killing] then we would not have had to make a public appeal. 'If we had a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, then obviously the same would apply. But we only have circumstantial evidence. We have no body and no DNA but we have other evidence." That was the first glimpse of things not being quite as rosy as billed in the Madeleine investigation. Now, at least publicly, the entire case appears to be in disarray. Last week I watched as a team of German detectives searched for clues on disused farmland in Portugal. T he three-day search, costing a reported £300,000, involved the use of a JCB, pick-axes and ground-penetrating radar. It ended in apparent failure, with nothing of significance found. The Germans shook hands with their Portuguese counterparts, handing them a crate of pilsner beers as a thank you. As I watched the search peter out, I could imagine the glee on the faces of Brueckner and his legal team. His current release date from Sehnde Prison, where he is serving a rape sentence, is September 17. That gives prosecutors just 96 days to charge their prime suspect or watch powerlessly as he walks free from jail. Last week's search suggests they still do not have enough circumstantial evidence to confidently take the case to court. The main 'evidence' they have reportedly revolves around the testimony of German drifter Helge Busching. He claims Brueckner said 'she didn't scream' when they discussed the case while sitting around a campfire at a hippy festival in Spain in 2008. It was another nine years before recycling worker Busching gave police this 'smoking gun' nugget of information. After watching a tenth anniversary Crimewatch TV special on the Madeleine case, he decided to alert cops. He rang Scotland Yard's Operation Grange team, who have been investigating the case since 2011, and left a bombshell voicemail. Det Con Mark Draycott recalled: 'Back then we still had a public phone number which was publicised around the world. 'Members of the public could ring in information in relation to Operation Grange, the Madeleine McCann investigation. "One of my jobs was to check the answer phone messages. On May 18th I checked the answer phone and there was a message. It was from a male by the sound of his voice, he spoke good English and he asked to speak to David Edgar (private investigator).' DC Draycott, who remains on Operation Grange, continued: 'He said he had information and he left a Greek mobile number. I then rang this Greek mobile number and spoke to a male I now know to be Helge Lars Busching He referred to himself as Lars and he gave information in relation to the Madeleine McCann investigation.' DC Draycott was part of a Scotland Yard team which flew to Athens three months later to question Busching in top secrecy. The interview took place in August 2017 in a hotel - after bugging equipment was brought in to check for listening devices. Busching had been released from a Greek jail weeks earlier and was on parole at the time. 'We spoke to him over two days and he gave us information in relation to the Madeleine McCann case,' DC Draycott revealed. 'He was scared, he had a distrust in the police. He was scared of giving a statement in such a high-profile case. He said he had a conversation with Christian at the Orgiva Festival in 2008.' His evidence was so explosive the Home Office gave the go-ahead for him to be flown to London to give a formal statement. It was during his interviews that Busching told detectives about other alleged crimes carried out by Brueckner in Portugal. He claimed to have found videos in his ramshackle Praia da Luz home of the German raping women. His story was backed up by Manfred Seyferth, Brueckner's partner-in-crime in Portugal, who said he had also seen the sick home movies. Scotland Yard worked in top secrecy for four months before alerting Germany's Bundeskriminalamt (BKA). Busching and Seyferth went on to become key witnesses in Brueckner's 2019 rape trial, for which he is currently behind bars. Behind the scenes, German prosecutors continued to desperately search for evidence linking him to Madeleine's disappearance. But with the case stalling, they took the dramatic decision to reveal for the first time that they had a prime suspect. Predictably, it made headlines around the world. Strict German privacy laws meant prosecutors could only identify their suspect as 'Christian B'. But it was only a matter of time before his full name leaked out. Over the following months, various people came forward making allegations against Brueckner. Three families claim he indecently exposed himself in front of their children in a playground and on a beach in Portugal. And Irish tour rep Hazel Behan told police she believed he was the intruder that raped her in her Algarve apartment. Prosecutors charged him over the attacks and also the rapes allegedly seen by Busching and Seyferth on video. However, unlike in the 2019 rape trial, their evidence flopped in court. Brueckner's defence team repeatedly accused the pair of lying and openly mocked them during proceedings. They were more sympathetic towards Ms Behan, but insisted she could not be certain the German was her attacker. So it came as no surprise to anyone when Brueckner was cleared of all charges last October. It was a disaster for prosecutors, who saw Busching - their proposed star witness in any Madeleine trial - ridiculed in court. Judge Ute Engemann branded his court testimony 'almost worthless' because he had been influenced by the Madeleine case. She said his statements were 'inconsistent' and described pal Seyferth's evidence as 'not convincing'. The judge went on to accuse Busching of 'seeking to profit' from his evidence and trying to get Brueckner locked up. Prosecutors do have other circumstantial evidence that possibly links Brueckner to Madeleine's disappearance. Mobile phone data reportedly shows his device was in the vicinity of the Ocean Club complex when she vanished in 2007. He received a half-hour phone call from a Portuguese number - +351 916510683 - an hour before Madeleine was last seen. Police have never traced the other caller. But Brueckner was living in or close to Praia da Luz at the time, so that evidence is hardly damning. More chilling is evidence discovered by chance in 2016 at an abandoned factory he owned in Neuwegersleben, near Braunschweig. Police found a hard-drive containing vile images of children, along with kids' swimming costumes and toys and firearms. Sick stories about kidnapping a mother and her young daughter outside a pre-school and abusing a young girl were also discovered on a laptop. There were also records of vile online chats, including one where he fantasised about 'capturing something small'. Given this circumstantial evidence, and with Brueckner's presence in the Algarve in 2007, it is understandable how he became the prime suspect. But is that enough to convict him of one of the most infamous crimes of the 21st century? Brueckner has already boasted he will go into hiding if he is released from prison in September. One former friend told me he expects the German to head to Cambodia or Vietnam. South America has also been mooted as a possible destination. Prosecutors are awaiting the outcome of an appeal against last year's verdicts lodged in Germany's Federal Court of Justice. If that is successful, Brueckner will remain behind bars ahead of a retrial next year or even 2027. But if, as most observers expect, the appeal fails, then charging him with Madeleine's abduction is the only chance to stop him walking free. Judging by the smirk on his face when I recently challenged him outside court, Brueckner fully expects to be released. That must be a heartbreaking prospect for Madeleine's family. We can only hope German prosecutors are withholding their trump card. But if they are, the time to play it is rapidly approaching.
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Ryanair, Wizz Air, easyJet and Jet2 exact hand luggage sizes to avoid fines
Every major UK airline has strict size rules for hand luggage and passengers who exceed them can receive hefty fines Airlines are ready and waiting to pounce on travellers carrying overweight and oversized luggage, at least that's how it feels. Fines can range anywhere from £20 to £70 or more at the gate, even if you're only marginally over the size restrictions. To avoid having your hand luggage moved to the hold and paying hefty fines for the privilege, it's important to keep up to date on the exact size requirements for each carrier. Here, we break down the hand luggage restrictions for the UK's most popular airlines. Ryanair Every Ryanair passenger is entitled to carry one small personal bag free of charge. Any item exceeding the limits outlined below will result in additional fees to place your bag in the hold. Ryanair small bag Maximum size: 40 x 20 x 25cm (must fit under the seat in front of you) Free with any fare Examples: handbag, laptop bag or backpack Ryanair cabin bag Maximum size: 55 x 40 x 20cm (must fit in overhead storage) Maximum weight: 10kg Available for purchase Examples: trolley case, sports and music equipment Benefit of Priority Boarding Wizz Air Wizz Air passengers are entitled to bring one carry-on bag free of charge and can purchase an additional cabin bag (this is free for WIZZ Priority holders) Small carry-on bag Maximum size: 40 x 30 x 20 cm (must fit under seat) Maximum weight: 10kg Examples: laptop, documents, a limited amount of clothes. Cabin bag Maximum size: 55 x 40 x 23 cm (must fit in overhead storage) Maximum weight: 10 kg. Exceeding these dimensions will result in additional fees being charged. easyJet Every easyJet passenger is entitled to carry a maximum of two cabin bags: one small cabin bag (free of charge) and one large cabin bag (if included in membership and fare benefits or added during booking). easyJet small cabin bags Maximum size: 45 x 36 x 20cm (must fit under the seat in front of you) Maximum weight: 15kg Free with any fare Examples: small trolley, handbag, backpack, laptop bag easyJet large cabin bags Maximum size: 56 x 45 x 25cm (including handles and wheels) Maximum weight: 15kg Free for easyJet Plus members or FLEXI ticket holder, or available for purchase Examples: trolley case, large rucksack Benefit of Speedy Boarding Any item exceeding these limits will result in additional fees to place your bag in the hold. In addition to your cabin bags, you can bring a selection of handheld belongings, including: umbrellas, coasts, crutches, walking sticks and one standard bag of airport goods. Jet2 Every Jet2 passenger is entitled to carry one small personal bag and one piece of hand luggage free of charge. Jet2 personal bag Maximum size: 40 x 30 x 15cm (must fit under the seat in front of you) Maximum weight: 10kg Free with any fare Examples: handbag, laptop bag, airport purchase Jet2 hand luggage Maximum size: 56 x 45 x 25cm (including handles and wheels) Maximum weight: 10kg Free with any fare Any item exceeding these limits will result in additional fees to place your bag in the hold. Subject to availability, you can also pre-book Guaranteed Cabin Luggage for an extra charge to ensure your hand baggage will not be placed in the hold (unless it exceeds the weight and size limits).
BreakingNews.ie
21 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Football supporters' Ryanair Dublin flight disruption trial collapses
Four Croatian football supporters accused of a disturbance on a plane which delayed a Ryanair flight at Dublin Airport have walked free from court after the trial collapsed on Friday. Marco Bajzec, 41, of Beechwood Park, Ballyboe, Glencar, Co Donegal, and Zvonimir Prkacin, 40, Luis Buic, 38, and Tomislav Zajec, 39, all of the same address at Confey, Leixlip, Co Kildare, were arrested on January 22nd. Advertisement The four had hoped to fly to London that morning for the Dinamo Zagreb versus Arsenal FC Champions League match at the Emirates Stadium that evening. Instead, they were charged with offensive behaviour on the aircraft but were granted bail that afternoon and pleaded not guilty. The four contested the case, which went to a non-jury hearing at Dublin District Court on Friday. Judge Susan Fay heard evidence from a cabin crew member alleging that they boarded normally. But just before take-off, one stood, asking to use the toilet. Advertisement The court heard he was advised it was not possible at that time. The captain was notified that the unspecified passenger was on his feet at the back galley. The plane could not take off, and he was advised several times, and that man was eventually given permission to use the toilet. Then his friends also wanted to go to the toilet, with one allegedly saying, "If you don't let me go to the toilet, I can urinate at the back galley", the court heard. The witness could not remember which of the four made that remark. Advertisement The captain was told they were not complying with the safety regulations, and it was not possible to proceed. A decision was made to offload them from the aircraft. However, the defence made legal submissions about lawyers for the four men not being furnished with the prosecution's witness statement before the hearing. The men's barristers opposed an adjournment, saying that one of the accused had been put on Ryanair's no-fly list, affecting his ability to travel. Barristers applied for a dismissal. Advertisement Judge Susan Fay described the disclosure issue as a "genuine oversight". She said the statement in question should have been disclosed, particularly where the issue had been ventilated before the hearing. However, she refused to grant a full dismissal of the charges and struck out the case. Ireland Parents of 25 children given leave to legally chal... Read More At their first appearance in January, Garda Emmet O'Byrne and Conor O'Neill told Judge Kelly they arrested the men at 9:15 am at stand 107L in Terminal 1. The four were brought to the airport and Ballymun Garda stations to be charged under the Air Navigation and Transport Act. The judge noted that Mr Bajzec and Buic made no reply while Zvonimir Prkacin answered, "I feel sorry for the passengers on the flight and the staff; they were delayed because of us". Mr Zajec stated to gardaí, "I have done nothing wrong"
