How Simple Minds' Gen X Anthem, 'Don't You (Forget About Me),' Almost Didn't Come to Be
How could we forget about them? This week in 1985, Scotland's Simple Minds landed an indelible number-one on the wing of a smash that soundtracked the final scene of the era's seminal teen dramedy The Breakfast Club. Also providing big boosts: the second British Invasion, MTV, Live Aid, and charismatic frontman Jim Kerr's high-profile marriage to The Pretenders' Chrissie Hynde.
Four decades on, the band embarks on its Alive and Kicking Tour of North America this weekend and find themselves the subjects of a new documentary premiering in theaters next month. Kerr talks to THR about the 'wonderful' 2024 festival gig that paved the way to this year's 24-date trek, how he celebrated the ascension of 'Don't You (Forget About Me)' to the top of the U.S. pops, and why this Scot decided to make his forever home in Sicily.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Sean "Diddy" Combs' Ex Cassie Ventura Tells Court She Doesn't Hate Him Despite Decade of Abuse
'Bono: Stories of Surrender' Review: Andrew Dominik's Apple TV+ Doc Aims Loving Spotlight on the Music and the Man
Bruce Springsteen Biopic 'Deliver Me From Nowhere' Sets October Release
You're days away from the start of the tour, which features guests Modern English and Soft Cell, and arrives at Los Angeles' KIA Forum May 22. Simple Minds don't tour the U.S. as often as a lot of your peers do. What made you want to headline a tour this year?
Jim Kerr: Exactly a year tomorrow, we came over for one show in Pasadena: the Cruel World festival. We were putting a toe in the water, seeing how that would go, and we were blown away by the reaction we received. And we weren't the only ones, because, within days, Live Nation were talking about giving us the chance to come back and play in America. There's been a huge imbalance in terms of the touring that Simple Minds have done through the years elsewhere and in the U.S., and we couldn't have been happier to get the chance again. So here we are.
I was at Cruel World. You played during a glorious sunset! And the crowd's reaction was rapturous. You sound like you were surprised by that — were you?
That's right. I know we have great fans here, and people who know the band usually really love the band. But there was something in the air, and we sensed it before we went on. When we looked out there, there was already a much bigger crowd than we expected. And when we went on, like 14 minutes later, it felt like, Oh, God, are we in Europe here?! Because it was more the kind of situation we're used to [over there].
You're humble in saying all of this, but 40 years ago this July will be the anniversary of Live Aid. Bob Dylan played that day in Philadelphia, as did a reunited Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath. But Simple Minds got one of the biggest reactions from JFK Stadium — you personally held the crowd in the palm of your hand that day, even though the band was still quite new to the American audience.
One of the things from day one — don't ask me where we got the balls — was we wanted to be a great live band. What does that mean? It doesn't mean you just can play well or sing well; it's much more visceral than that. When you play, something happens — you transcend. We dreamed that we would be able to do that, and within a few years of playing, wherever we went, we were able to get audiences in the palm of our hands. Now I don't want to tempt fate here, but that's been the story of our life, playing live. It's a two-way thing, of course. There are some acts you go see, you listen and you watch, and that's cool. But then there's some acts that [close the gap] between the audience and themselves — this embrace goes on. Simple Minds are one of the bands that seem to be able to get that going. I've no hesitation saying [it], because it's a different art. Playing a festival, it's not your gig. You're one of many, and there's so many outside factors. You don't know what the weather's going to be, you don't know if you're going on during the magic hour or not. But we're really strong at festivals. We can just put everything to the side and get on with it and and sweep the audience up. And we'll certainly be looking to do a lot more of that in the the weeks ahead, starting next weekend, when we start the tour [May 16th at Cascades Amphitheatre in Ridgefield, Washington].
Speaking of the weekend: Sunday is the 40th anniversary of 'Don't You Forget About Me' going to number one in the U.S.. Do you remember where you were on May 18, 1985?
I do, because it's not every day you get both a telegram and a fax saying, 'Your song's number one on the Billboard chart.' I was in the south of France for my sins. We knew were going to work with Jimmy Iovine and Bob Clearmountain; we had a lot of the music down, but Iovine was really pushing for me to commit to the lyrics, and I was lagging behind. So I went to Southern France on my own, and I was just sitting on the rocks there with my Sony Walkman, writing the words to what became 'Alive and Kicking,' when phone calls came to the hotel: Looks like it's going to be number one — get ready for this.' When it happened, I thought, I gotta open a bottle of champagne, because I knew it's not going to be something that happens all the time. Now, I'm a very unusual specimen, as I'm a Scotsman who doesn't drink alcohol. Don't let the impression I was a goody goody; everything else I was up for, but alcohol just never suited me. However, that night, I went down to the bar in the hotel, where there no one there except the barman and me. I said, What's the best champagne you've got? He said, Oh, I got this.' I said, 'Open it.' He said, 'Who for?' I said, 'Me and you, and whoever else comes through the door.' And the first however-many people who came in got a glass to celebrate.
There's a number one song every week, but 'Don't You (Forget About Me)' is a Generation X anthem. I feel 'Don't You (Forget About Me)' is to the '80s what 'Smells Like Team Spirit' is to the '90s.
It was a huge hit in all around the world. Even now, radio stations will get in touch and say, 'We just had our poll of the best song of the '80s, and we've lost count of how many times 'Don't You' was mentioned,' which is remarkable, considering the amount of great songs from that decade. I guess the thing is, not only did we have the song, but it's from a movie that's also so iconic to not only that generation but subsequent generations, with Judd Nelson punching his fist in the air at the end. It's rather thrilling that we've got a song that's viewed that way, albeit, when it was first brought to us, we were a bit reluctant and wary.
Talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth!
A big part of the reluctance was the approach. It didn't come from the record company. [The songwriter] Keith Forsey came backstage one night and — how can I say this? — he was a little inebriated. We didn't know who he was. There's always someone backstage saying they want to work with you, and stuffing a cassette in your pocket, and you think, who's this guy? And that cassette remained in someone's pocket for about a month, and we didn't get in touch with them. Then, when the record company got in touch, we had this song 'Alive and Kicking, and we thought, Hey, if you want to work with us, you work with this. And they were saying, 'No, that won't work with the script,' which, of course, absolutely made sense. But you know, the attitude turned on a dame once we spoke to John Hughes, and Keith came over and was a lot more coherent.
What did you think of the song when Forsey first played you the demo?
There was nothing wrong with it; just sounded a bit generic. We thought, let's go in [to the studio] for a few hours; nothing ventured, nothing gained. And it was a few hours, no more. Yet here we are all this time later talking about it.
Tell me about the new documentary, , which premieres in U.S. theaters on June 13th.
You'll see a pattern here, as we were reluctant to do that as well. We just thought, how do you do make it in any way unique? But there is a great humility about it that I don't often see in rock documentaries. And the director, Joss Cowley — despite us thinking this young kid will never capture the safe case of the times he did. He also captured monochrome Glasgow in the '70s and '80s, where we came out of, dreaming big. And he captured all of that. And then, you know, it, it in a condensed way. It gives the story of the bands, the ups, the downs, the sideways and stuff. And by the end, we had to put our hands up and say, 'Really good job.'
Simple Minds is Scottish, but you live in Sicily now. How did that come to be?
Don't ask me how my mom and dad scraped together the money, but they did, and we went there on this school trip when I was wasn't quite 14. Getting off the plane in Italy, I realized the world was in color because, being brought up in Glasgow, which I loved, it's just a different world. I immediately envisioned myself living there in the years to come. Don't ask me how I would have done that or anything, because no one I knew did things like that.
As it turns out, Italy was one of the first countries that really embraced Simple Minds. But the one place no band went was Sicily, because the mafia was going to steal your equipment and you wouldn't get paid. But we went and had the time of our life, and I started going back frequently place called
Taormina, where The White Lotus was filmed. It's a stunning place, and the history is incredible: Roman, Greek. By the end of the 90s, when Simple Minds were less busy than we would like to have been, I thought, I'm going to go there and spend about a year. I'll be in my Hemingway phase: I'll get the language, I'll fish for swordfish. I got the language; I didn't get get swordfish, but that was it. Ever since then, it's been home to me.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More
Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025
Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors started deliberating Thursday in Harvey Weinstein 's New York sex crimes retrial, tasked with deciding — again — a case that encapsulated the #MeToo movement. The seven-woman, five-man jury is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape, each relating to a different accuser and a different date. In this case, the criminal sex act charge is the higher-degree felony. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty. Nearly eight years ago, a series of sexual misconduct allegations against the Oscar-winning movie producer propelled the #MeToo movement. Some of those accusations later generated criminal charges and convictions in New York and California. The New York conviction from 2020 was subsequently overturned, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy and sometimes fiery questioning of Weinstein's three accusers in the case. Jessica Mann said he raped her in 2013, when she was trying to build an acting career. Miriam Haley accused him of forcibly performing oral sex on her in 2006, when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Kaja Sokola, who wasn't involved in Weinstein's first trial, told jurors that he forced oral sex on her, too, during 2006. At the time, she was a teenage fashion model trying to break into acting. 'They all had dreams of pursuing careers in the defendant's world, the entertainment industry,' prosecutor Nicole Blumberg told jurors in her closing argument Tuesday. She contended that Weinstein let the women think he was interested in their careers when what actually interested him were their bodies, and 'he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they wanted him to or not.' Weinstein chose not to testify. His defense called other witnesses, including some former friends of Sokola's and Mann's. Weinstein's attorneys argued that all three accusers consented to Weinstein's advances because they wanted help with their Hollywood aims. All three stayed on friendly terms with him afterward, a point the defense emphasized. 'It's transactional, folks. Yes, he wants to fool around with them, and yes, they want something from him,' defense lawyer Arthur Aidala said in his summation Tuesday. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Diddy's defense cross-examines witness after explosive allegation rapper held her over balcony
incoming update… Sean 'Diddy' Combs appeared in court Thursday for the continued cross-examination of Bryana Bongolan. Diddy sat at the defense table wearing a light colored sweater. Before testimony began, his lawyers, the prosecution and Judge Arun Subramanian spoke about pending issues regarding witnesses and exhibits. The judge reminded the courtroom and press of the pseudonym rule for the upcoming witness, "Jane." Subramanian emphasized nobody is allowed to document Jane 'in any way, shape, or form' in notes or sketches. Bongolan, a friend of Diddy's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, took the stand Wednesday afternoon as she told the jury about her friendship with the singer-songwriter and the alleged violence she often witnessed from Combs. Bongolan testified that Diddy once dangled her off the 17-story balcony of Cassie's apartment. She also claimed Diddy allegedly threw a knife at Cassie after showing up to the singer-songwriter's apartment in another violent outburst. Her friendship with Cassie was also scrutinized, including their drug use. Bongolan claimed she procured hundreds of pills for Cassie throughout their relationship. She testified that she got sober in 2018 after doing ketamine with Diddy and the 'Me & U' singer for eight hours. As Diddy's defense began her cross-examination, Nicole Westmoreland focused on the inconsistencies between Bongolan's statements to the government and her civil lawsuit filed against the rapper in 2024. Bongolan couldn't seem to remember multiple details of the alleged balcony incident, including what drugs she was on at the time. Cassie Ventura's friend, Bryana Bongolan, returned to the stand Thursday morning after court took a late start in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial. Diddy's defense lawyer, Nicole Westmoreland, picked up the cross-examination of Bongolan by showing the jury a photo from an April 2016 photoshoot where Combs allegedly threatened her. Yesterday, the rapper's defense team highlighted inconsistencies between Bongolan's testimony and previous statements. Cassie's friend first made allegations against Diddy in a civil lawsuit filed in 2024. Westmoreland questioned Bongolan extensively about what she told prosecutors and accused Bongolan of lying. Cassie Ventura's friend, Bryana Bongolan, helped bolster the prosecution's theory that Sean 'Diddy' Combs was running a criminal enterprise using violence and threats, according to a legal expert. Bongolan testified Wednesday that Diddy barged into Cassie's apartment and allegedly dangled her over the ledge. She claimed the entire time he was saying, 'You know what the f--- you did.' 'The balcony incident was important because it was described in both the prosecution's superseding indictment and Bongolan's lawsuit,' former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani explained. 'Ventura had asked Bongolan to join her original lawsuit against Combs, but Bongolan said no. According to Bongolan, Ventura got the date and location wrong. Ventura said it happened at a hotel, and she thought there was a different person present. These inconsistencies could be a problem for the prosecution, which is why they elicited the testimony during direct examination." "The defense cross-examined Bongolan over her drug use, and she admitted that both she and Ventura had a serious drug problem. They tried to highlight even more inconsistencies in her meetings with prosecutors and her demand letter to Combs. According to the defense, Bongolan told prosecutors that Combs said he could kill her during the balcony incident, not another time, and she said Combs groped her breasts on the balcony.' The West Coast Trial Lawyers founder explained Bongolan's testimony is important because 'it's evidence of violence against someone he was not in a romantic relationship with." "This isn't domestic violence. It's run of the mill violence, and shows that Combs was running a criminal enterprise using violence and threats of violence towards others.' Sean "Diddy" Combs may benefit in court by having a woman lead his defense, criminal defense lawyer Jo-Anna Nieves previously explained to Fox News Digital. Teny Geragos, the daughter of famed lawyer Mark Geragos, signed on to represent the disgraced music mogul shortly after Diddy was arrested and charged with federal sex crimes in September. Her presence in the courtroom defending Diddy "sends an unspoken messaged to the jury that 'if a smart, credible woman like Geragos doesn't believe these allegations, maybe you shouldn't either,'" Nieves said. "This can especially impact jurors who are on the fence." Teny graduated from Loyola Law School Los Angeles in 2016 and worked with Brafman & Associates for eight years before becoming a founding partner of Agnifilo Intrater. She serves on the Board of Directors of the New York Criminal Bar Association and is certified to practice law in both New York and California. Mark Geragos was in court May 12 for opening statements. While not representing Diddy, Mark explained to Judge Arun Subramanian during the week of jury selection that he represents the rapper's mother, Janice Combs, and also speaks to Diddy "with great frequency." Mark is known for his Rolodex of celebrities, and has represented several high-profile clients, including Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, Jussie Smollett, Colin Kaepernick, and most recently, the Menendez brothers in their pursuit for a new trial or resentencing. High-powered lawyer, Nicole Westmoreland, joined Sean 'Diddy' Combs' defense team in early May, as the disgraced rapper faced federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Westmoreland's addition to his legal team is noteworthy, as she herself is an outspoken survivor of sexual assault. She filed charges against the then-president of Cash Money Records, Alfred Cleveland, after he raped her at a party in 2001 while another man stood guard. According to Westmoreland, Cleveland threatened her to not report the rape, but she did and he later plead guilty for the assault. She also later filed a lawsuit against the music label and Cleveland's brother for failing to keep the party safe. Westmoreland runs her own law firm, Westmoreland Law LLC, and was notably involved in the YLS racketeering trial in Atlanta, representing defendant Quamarvious Nichols, who ended up taking a plea deal to avoid more serious charges of murder, participation in gang activity and charges of firearm possession. During day 16 of Diddy's trial on Wednesday, Westmoreland cross-examined Bryana 'Bana' Bongolan, and questioned her about her claims that Diddy dangled her off a balcony in 2016, something she told the government during various meetings. She also questioned Bongolan about the time Diddy allegedly threw a knife at Cassie Ventura, questioning how she is unable to remember the details of the incident. Sharay Hayes, who worked as an escort named "The Punisher," testified on May 20 that Sean "Diddy" Combs would give directions during "freak offs." While on the stand during direct examination by Meredith Foster with the U.S. Attorney's Office, Hayes claimed Diddy would tell his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, how to move sexually, "like move to the left or right." He claimed once during sex, the "Victory" rapper dropped a stack of money on the bed. Cassie allegedly asked if Hayes was OK, to which Diddy responded, "I'm enjoying doing this s---." Hayes claimed his last encounter with Diddy and Cassie occurred in March 2015. He alleged that at the final encounter Diddy put two condoms on the couch and said, 'I'm ready to see you f--- her.' This interaction allegedly threw Hayes off and he couldn't get an erection. Hayes claimed Cassie appeared startled and Diddy seemed aggressive. According to Hayes, Diddy left the room and Cassie followed. When they returned, Hayes was allegedly instructed to finish and he masturbated. Later he was paid and claimed Cassie thanked him for his privacy. Hayes testified that he 'didn't do the job [he] was there for' and was worried he wouldn't be called back. He claimed he never saw Cassie and Combs after this encounter. During cross-examination, Hayes explained why the condoms on the couch threw him off. He claimed they had not previously used condoms often and Hayes had his own anxiety. Hayes said he thought it would be difficult to get an erection with a condom. Hayes said he felt pressured by Combs to have sex, and explained it was 'an aggressive suggestion.' "Freak offs" were "elaborate produced sex performances that Combs arranged, directed, masturbated during, and often electronically recorded," according to the indictment. Regina Ventura testified on May 20 that she 'memorialized' Cassie's bruises that she allegedly received from Sean 'Diddy' Combs' beatings. The jury was shown photos of a bruised Cassie as her mother testified that she took the photos to 'make sure they were memorialized.' Regina testified that Cassie told her that Diddy beat the singer. The jury was then shown more photos of Cassie's bruises. Regina claimed she first learned of Diddy's alleged beatings in December 2011. She testified that she had previously read an allegation that Diddy hit Cassie in a blog and called her daughter, but Cassie denied it. Live Coverage begins here


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Why this Cup final is already different. Plus: The PWHL gets expansion right
Red Light newsletter 🏒 | This is The Athletic's hockey newsletter. Sign up here to receive Red Light directly in your inbox. Good morning to everyone except whoever keeps putting those multi-day gaps in the Stanley Cup Final schedule. The rematch between the Panthers and Oilers is finally underway — let's dig into it. Last night's Game 1 offered a few things we didn't get at all in last year's seven-game prequel. A Leon Draisaitl goal. Any Oilers goal at all in the opener. And most importantly: sudden-death overtime. Yes, we all got to ride our motorcycles out of the helicopter last night, something that hadn't happened in either of the conference finals. I won't keep you in suspense, here's how it ended: That's Draisaitl burying the winner on the power play off a pass from, who else, Connor McDavid. Yes, an overtime power play, which can only mean one thing: The dreaded puck-over-glass rule showed up, with Florida's Tomas Nosek making the mistake that ended up deciding the game. Draisaitl's goal was his second of the game, one year after he was held to just three assists in the final. Advertisement The loss hardly feels like a disaster for the Panthers; after all, we knew they weren't going to jump out to a 3-0 lead this time around (or did we?). They'll want to to respond tomorrow to avoid a 2-0 deficit, although even that wouldn't mean game over. For now, they can focus on the positive: They led for most of the game, they nearly stole a road win and they kept Connor McDavid from any highlight-reel miracles. For now, at least. (Speaking of highlights, did you know you can now get NHL highlights directly in The Athletic app? I would never lie to you about something this important.) Game 2 is tomorrow at 8 p.m. ET on TNT, truTV, MAX and Sportsnet. If it's as good as Game 1, we might be headed toward a classic. Are you tired of the Canada vs. USA discourse yet? I'm getting there. And I get it — we do this every time a Canadian team makes the final against an American opponent, and it's especially relevant given everything that's gone on this year, including the 4 Nations chaos. We got into the topic on yesterday's podcast. It's a thing. Your two favorite hockey newsletter writers even debated the whole 'Canada's Team' thing a few years ago, when the political climate was admittedly different. I won't relitigate it all here. But I do want to know what you think. So please take a minute to fill out my one-question survey, and I'll share the results in Monday's newsletter. Survey: Canada vs. USA — Who are you cheering for in the Stanley Cup Final, and why? (And if you're still trying to decide who to root for, I've got you covered with my annual rooting guide.) 🏒 We've got new coaches. Just this morning, the Bruins hired Marco Sturm as their new head coach. He's best known in Boston as Patrice Bergeron's former left wing, so he's instantly got more name recognition than the new head coach of the Penguins, Dan Muse. It's OK to admit you have no idea who that is. Josh Yohe brings you up to speed on a coach hired off the Rangers staff. Advertisement 🚨 Nikita Kucherov is your Ted Lindsay Award winner as most outstanding player, as voted on by his fellow players. Will he pair it with the Hart Trophy as MVP? We won't find out until a week from now, with a condensed one-hour version of the annual awards show hosted by that guy from that commercial from a decade ago. 📺 I don't want to burden you … But if you missed it, I teamed up with Other Sean for our annual exchange of the most annoying playoff ads of the year. 💲 The Avalanche have locked up deadline rental Brock Nelson, and he didn't come cheap. Dom Luszczyszyn's model sees trouble down the road. 🔥The start of the Stanley Cup Final means we get our annual 'State of the NHL' update from Gary Bettman and friends. This year's edition featured some news. This is how you do expansion 🔥 Pop quiz, hotshot: When was the last NHL expansion draft? There's a good chance you said 2021, or maybe 2017 if you're one of the increasing number of fans who occasionally forget the Kraken exist. And sure, according to the NHL, you'd be right. But were either of those events really drafts? I'd argue no, because a 'draft' implies more than one team taking turns with selections. The Kraken and Golden Knights both entered the league solo, meaning their expansion was less of a draft and more just a case of submitting a list. Which brings us to the PWHL, and what's happening over the next few days. Now this is an expansion draft. The league is adding two teams this summer, with Seattle and Vancouver joining the six existing clubs. The expansion rules were announced last month, and they'll be stunning to fans who are used to hearing NHL GMs cry about losing their ninth-best forward. PWHL teams can only protect three players on their initial lists, which has led to huge names like Hilary Knight and Sarah Nurse being made available. Vancouver and Seattle wasted little time utilizing their exclusive window to sign free agents — Knight signed in Seattle and Nurse in Vancouver — leading into Monday night's draft. Keep this link handy: We're tracking all the signings as they happen. Advertisement As always, Hailey Salvian has you covered, including with yesterday's mock draft with Shayna Goldman. We'll have more on how things have shaken out on Monday morning. 📺 I don't know … maybe basketball? I've heard some people like it. The NBA Finals start tonight (8:30 p.m. ET, ESPN), and yes, they do call it the 'finals,' plural. In hockey, it's the 'final,' which you know if you follow even one sportswriter on social media because we all become weird pedants about this stuff at this time of year. Can we not get the leadership from the two leagues together and reach a consensus on this? Final or finals — it doesn't matter, guys, just pick one and ride with it. Where was I? Oh right, basketball. We worked out a little exchange program between Red Light and our friends over at The Bounce, our NBA newsletter. As part of that, we asked Zach Harper what he found interesting about the Stanley Cup. His answer: They move around on knives! How does this not freak people out?! I also find it fascinating that we haven't had a Canadian team win a Stanley Cup title in over 30 years, and a team from Florida could block the Oilers two years in a row. Sorry Zach, the only correct answer for any basketball fan watching the NHL playoffs is: 'Wow, they shake hands after each series, what a magnanimous display of integrity that makes hockey players better than any other athletes. We bow before your sportsmanship and respect for tradition.' Although to be honest, the knives thing is a close second. You can read the full exchange over at The Pulse, because I am the *furiously googles 'good basketball player'* Nikola Jokić of newsletter cross-promotion. We believe that in hockey, as in life, there are no dumb questions. So if you have something you've always wondered about the sport, ask away by emailing us at redlight@ Why don't linesmen just drop the puck? Why do players get tossed out of faceoffs? I've been watching hockey for over 50 years and I've never heard anyone explain this. – Chris F. Advertisement The short answer: Because many linesmen didn't get enough attention as kids and are trying to make up for it now. The longer, and more accurate answer: There are a whole bunch of rules around how a faceoff is supposed to be done, taking up the better part of four full pages of the rulebook. Most of those are focused on the centers taking the draw, who have to have their shoulders square, their sticks down properly and their skates in the right place, and can't move until the puck does. Meanwhile, their teammates are supposed to stay out of the circle, and avoid contact. If the linesman feels like any of those rules are violated in a way that prevents a clean draw, he can kick the offending team's center out, to be replaced by a teammate. If the same team commits a second violation on the same draw, it's a minor penalty for delay of game. As most fans have noticed, some of these rules are enforced inconsistently. For example, the wingers infringe on the circle on just about every draw, and it's almost never called. Sometimes the linesman will issue a warning instead, at least for a first offense. You'll also get those frustrating plays where the linesman only decides the faceoff wasn't done properly after he drops the puck, and we have to start all over again. But in general, there's a ton of gamesmanship involved in every faceoff, and if a center gets tossed, it's because the linesman feels that he went too far. Believe it or not, the longest current drought for a regular-season division title is owned by none other than the Edmonton Oilers, who haven't finished first since 1987 despite appearing in five finals (and winning two) in that span. 📫 Love Red Light? Check out The Athletic's other newsletters.