logo
30 years later, letters to the US&J offer insight into Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing

30 years later, letters to the US&J offer insight into Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing

Yahoo20-04-2025

Thirty years ago today, what was then the worst act of domestic terrorism in American history shook the nation to its core.
It was an act that appeared to have been foretold, a little more than three years earlier, in a letter to the editor of the Lockport Union-Sun & Journal.
The letter arrived in early February 1992, written by a young man named Timothy McVeigh. McVeigh was from Pendleton, a town of about 6,000 people on the southern edge of Niagara County.
Pendleton was, and is still, a quiet, mostly rural community, not a hotbed of hate. But McVeigh's letter screeched with anger and rage towards the U.S. government.
The managing editor of the US&J decided to print the McVeigh letter because, in the words of an unidentified former employee of the paper, 'We have a longstanding policy; we print every letter.' The letter appeared in the paper's print edition on Feb. 11, 1992.
None of the editors at that time found the anti-government screed to be a cause for alarm. No one saw it as a canary in a terrorist coal mine.
Only three years later would then-managing editor Dan Kane re-read McVeigh's letter, and a second one sent in March 1992, and call them 'chilling.'
'There was one paragraph in particular that made my heart stop a little bit,' Kane told a reporter from the Los Angeles Times. 'It was the one that said: 'shed blood.' After Oklahoma City, I certainly look at it as a sort of eerie and prophetic statement.'
It was three years later, at 9:02 a.m. on April 19, 1995, that McVeigh would trigger the detonator on a massive truck bomb parked in front of the nine-story Alfred P. Murrah Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City. The force of the explosion obliterated the building, killing 168 people, many of them children, and wounding 680 others, many of them severely.
Inside the building were the offices of 14 federal agencies, including the Social Security Administration, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, recruiting stations for the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, and a child daycare center.
The explosion devastated a 16-block area of downtown Oklahoma City, destroying or damaging 324 other buildings and causing an estimated $652 million worth of damage.
HINDSIGHT
Thomas Beilein served as the Niagara County Sheriff for almost 15 years, from 1994 to 2008.
He says with 20-20 hindsight, McVeigh's writings should have been a warning.
'I think if that letter came today, the newspaper would want to contact authorities and let them know this looks dangerous,' Beilein said. 'Especially with what happened 30 years ago.'
McVeigh was a decorated Army vet who had served in the Gulf War. In his first letter, published Feb. 11, 1992, he wrote in revolutionary terms.
'What is it going to take to open up the eyes of our elected officials? AMERICA IS IN SERIOUS DECLINE,' McVeigh wrote. 'We have no proverbial tea to dump; should we instead sink a ship full of Japanese imports?'
The unidentified US&J employee who spoke with the LA Times reporter said letters like McVeigh's were not uncommon in the early 1990s.
'We have a fair amount of that kind of mail, and it's probably encouraged because we allow it (to be published),' the employee told the Times reporter, David Willman.
McVeigh's two rambling letters were discovered after the Oklahoma City bombing when a reader called the paper to say he remembered having read letters to the editor signed by Tim McVeigh.
'Is a civil war imminent? Do we have to shed blood to reform the current system?', McVeigh asked in his first letter. 'I hope it doesn't come to that! But it might.'
Beilein said he finds McVeigh's views from more than 30 years ago eerily similar to political rhetoric being used in the United States today.
'It's a reflection on the state of our nation,' the former sheriff said. 'Look at the reactions to the school shootings that have taken place (since the Oklahoma City bombing). Are they really any different? Are the school shooters any different than Tim McVeigh?'
PROPHECY
McVeigh's letters revealed a young man who deeply distrusted the federal government and who, after his discharge from the Army, had drifted into the growing militia movement of the early 1990s. He would regularly attend gun shows where he would pass out leaflets that repeated right-wing militia talking points, and he hawked copies of his favorite book, The Turner Diaries.
The Turner Diaries was a 1978 novel that depicted a violent revolution in the U.S. that leads to the overthrow of the federal government, a nuclear war and, ultimately, a race war. In his first letter, McVeigh referenced a race war.
'Racism on the rise? You had better believe it!,' he wrote. 'At a point when the world has seen communism falter as an imperfect system to manage people; democracy seems to be heading down the same road. Maybe we have to combine ideologies to achieve the perfect utopian government.'
McVeigh's letters also contained a list of government grievances as common in conservative media today as they were then.
'Crime is out of control. Criminals have no fear of punishment. Prisons are overcrowded so they know they will not be imprisoned long,' McVeigh predicted. 'Taxes are a joke. Regardless of what a political candidate 'promises,' they will increase. More taxes are always the answer to government mismanagement. They mess up, we suffer. Taxes are reaching cataclysmic levels, with no slowdown in sight.'
Finally, McVeigh made it clear in his writing that if something didn't change, the American middle class, which he believed represented him and his family, would disappear.
'Politicians are further eroding the 'American Dream' by passing laws which are supposed to be a 'quick fix,' when all they are really designed for is to get the official reelected,' he wrote. 'These laws tend to 'dilute' a problem for a while, until the problem comes roaring back in a worsened form. (Much like a strain of bacteria will alter itself to defeat a known medication.)'
A SECOND LETTER
McVeigh wrote to the US&J again in March 1992. This time he seemed focused less on politics and more on issues of life and death.
The letter, published on March 10, 1992, attacked veganism, while speculating on how killing prey in the wild is preferable to meat processing. McVeigh wrote of the 'clean, merciful shot' taken by a hunter so that the prey 'dies in his own environment, quick and unexpected.'
He compared that to the slaughter of cattle. Which, he wrote, had 'less dignity.'
'Would you rather die while living happily or die while leading a miserable life, you tell me which is more 'humane'? ' McVeigh wrote.
Not long after McVeigh's arrest for the Oklahoma City bombing, the FBI came calling for the original copies of his two letters to the US&J. The federal agents also sought a third letter, written by his sister Jennifer in early 1995.
Published by the US&J on March 10, 1995, Jennifer McVeigh's letter railed against 'communism, gun control, permissive sex and the L.A. riots.'
She also referenced the August 1992 confrontation in Idaho between federal agents and a survivalist named Randall Weaver, and the 1993 siege by federal agents of the weapons-filled compound of the Branch Davidians sect near Waco, Texas. That siege ended in the deaths of 86 people.
In a perhaps eerie echo of her brother, Jennifer McVeigh also predicted the coming of an America ruled by 'a single authoritarian dictatorship.'
After taking the letters, federal prosecutors subpoenaed Kane to testify before the federal grand jury in Oklahoma City that would indict McVeigh and his co-conspirator Terry Nichols.
TRIAL AND CONVICTION
Beilein said he vividly remembers the phone call he received from federal agents, telling him they identified McVeigh as the Oklahoma City bomber.
'It was shocking,' he said. 'You knew (the bombing) was horrific and what made it worse was this was someone who grew up in our backyard.'
The FBI asked Beilein what his investigators might know about McVeigh and suggested that he send deputies to McVeigh's family home in Pendleton, 'to see what was there and protect the occupants from possible retaliation.' What Beilein's deputies found was a gaggle of reporters.
'It was something we weren't used to,' Beilein said. 'There were satellite trucks up and down the road. The whole country was focused on Tim McVeigh.'
Just over two years after the bombing, on April 24, 1997, McVeigh's trial, on 11 counts of murder and related charges, began in U.S. District Court in Denver.
The case had been moved there from Oklahoma City over fair trial concerns. Nichols would be tried later both in federal court and Oklahoma state courts.
McVeigh's trial featured 137 witnesses, including McVeigh's sister, and lasted roughly five weeks. A jury found him guilty on all counts.
Following a hearing, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Matsch found factors sufficient to sentence McVeigh to death. The execution was set to take place at the United States Penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana.
THE EXECUTION
Former Niagara Gazette reporter Valerie Pillo was sent to Terre Haute to cover the execution. She had been involved in the paper's coverage of McVeigh in the aftermath of the bombing and during the trial.
Pillo was also one of a small group of journalists who regularly attempted to speak to McVeigh's father. William 'Bill' McVeigh spoke, on the record, to only one reporter, who became a family spokesman while still covering the story and later wrote a book about McVeigh.
For Pillo, her contact with Bill McVeigh consisted of what she called 'talks in the garden.'
Bill McVeigh was known to be an avid gardener. Pillo said he would sometimes welcome a few reporters he had grown to know to chat while he gardened.
'I think what happened was a complete shock to Bill,' Pillo said. 'He didn't want the spotlight. He didn't know how to handle it and didn't want to handle it.'
McVeigh even questioned Pillo's motivations in visiting him.
'He said, 'Are you only coming over here 'cause you want to interview me?'' Pillo recalled.
As his son's execution day drew nearer, Pillo had more 'talks in the garden' with Bill McVeigh.
'There were some victim families who had reached out to (Bill) and they were very gracious,' Pillo said he had told her. 'Several became friends with him in their shared grief.'
Bill McVeigh told Pillo he would not attend his son's execution. He said those were 'Tim's wishes' and he would instead visit relatives in North Carolina.
'Why would I go to that?' she said McVeigh asked her.
And the bomber's father didn't like it when Pillo told him she would be covering the execution.
'He wasn't happy I was going,' she remembered. 'He said, 'Why are you going? Why do you have to be there?''
The execution took place on June 11, 2001, just three months before America would be shaken to its core again by the foreign terrorist attacks of 9/11.
LESSONS
Three decades later, Beilein still struggles to find lessons learned from the Oklahoma City bombing and the life of Tim McVeigh.
'I don't think America took too many lessons away from this,' he said. 'To some people and groups, McVeigh is considered a martyr and that just encourages others.'
And the long-time lawman said if McVeigh were still alive, he thinks the son of Pendleton would be thriving in the America of 2025.
'It wouldn't have surprised me at all if Tim McVeigh would have been at (the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on) Jan. 6 or be a member of the Proud Boys. He was just a cold-blooded killer with no motive.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump
Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

Time​ Magazine

time8 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump

The breakdown in relations between President Donald Trump and his one-time ally Elon Musk has played out over social media in spectacular fashion, with the two engaging in a tit-for-tat spat. The row initially started over politics. Musk expressed his vehement disapproval of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and encouraging people to 'kill the bill.' Meanwhile, Trump maintained that the fall-out was prompted by Musk being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies —a provision that made Tesla vehicles more affordable. But the fight has since taken a far more personal turn, bolstered by Musk's allegation that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk said in a post shared via his social media platform, X. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this. The accusation has spurred Democrats to chase the full unsealing of the Epstein files. California Rep. Robert Garcia and Massachusetts Rep. Stephen F. Lynch—Democratic members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—sent a letter on June 5 to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Kash Patel. 'We write with profound alarm at allegations that files relating to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been declassified and released to the American public because they personally implicate President Trump,' read the letter titled 'Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?' The White House responded, saying that the move by the Oversight Committee members was 'another baseless stunt that bears no weight in fact or reality.' Here's what to know about the Epstein files and the renewed push to declassify them following Musk's allegation. What do we know about the Epstein files so far? On Feb. 27, Bondi released more than 100 pages of declassified documents related to Epstein—as part of the Trump Administration's vow to be more transparent regarding the high-profile case. During the presidential election, Trump promised to appease the clamoring for the alleged 'client list' of Epstein's since his arrest and subsequent death by suicide in 2019. Though Bondi called this the 'first phase' of declassified files, people were underwhelmed by the published pages, as much of the text had been redacted. Bondi's release included Epstein's 'black book,' which had previously been published. It featured names like Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but as the New York Times reported, there were people in the book with whom Epstein had never even met, and thus listed names are not necessarily connected to Epstein's activities. One of the only never-before-seen documents included in the release was an 'Evidence List' of catalogued evidence obtained by investigators. Bondi blamed the FBI for the fact that the report was incomplete, suggesting in a published letter to Patel that the FBI had more information related to Epstein. Bondi ordered Patel to deliver the rest of the investigation documents and 'conduct an immediate investigation' to understand why she had only received parts of the files. There is much discussion as to whether a fully-fledged 'Epstein client list' even exists. Jacob Shamsian, Business Insider's legal correspondent who has covered the Epstein case for years, said via social media on Feb. 27: 'I should also point out that the 'Jeffrey Epstein client list' does not exist and makes no sense on multiple levels (you think he made a list???). But if Pam Bondi wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.' Will the Musk allegations prompt the release of further Epstein files? Musks' allegations have brought the Epstein files back into the spotlight, but there were already calls for them to be published in full. In April, Trump was asked by a reporter about when the next phase of the files are due to be released, to which he responded: 'I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that. I really don't know.' Since then, Democrats have continued to push for more documents to be released. Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York released a statement in May, 'demanding that [Bondi] promptly release the Jeffrey Epstein Files in full.' Spurred by Musk's allegation, Democrats including Garcia, Goldman, and Lynch are now renewing these calls for more transparency. But it remains to be seen whether or not the pressure will be enough for Bondi, Patel, or Trump to provide more answers. What do we know about Trump's relationship with Epstein? Trump's connection to Epstein dates back decades. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, he famously said that Epstein was 'a lot of fun to be with.' 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told the reporter. In July 2019, NBC News' TODAY released unearthed video footage believed to be from 1992, which showed Trump greeting Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The two men could be seen laughing as they engaged in conversation. After Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump made strides to distance himself. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office in 2019, Trump said: 'I had a falling out with him [Epstein]. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.'

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans
3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

In the last days of the Biden administration, the Energy Department dolled out billions of dollars for politically favored green energy projects. The Trump administration is looking to claw this funding back. The Energy Department is getting ready to "cancel seven major loans and loan guarantees that had been conditionally approved under the Biden administration," reports Semafor. This action will cancel approximately $5 billion worth of funding for a transmission project by a New Jersey utility company, a loan program for low-income homeowners to install rooftop solar panels by Sunnova, and a Monolith Nebraska factory to produce low-carbon ammonia. The remaining four projects, which collectively received over $3 billion, include three battery factories and a plastics and recycling facility, which "were already previously cancelled by their companies because of other various headwinds," according to Semafor. The three active projects that will have their federal loans axed have faced their own share of problems. In September 2023, Sunnova received a $3 billion partial loan guarantee from the Energy Department's Loan Programs Office (LPO) for Project Hestia—a program that would make residential rooftop solar, battery storage, and virtual power plants "available to more American homeowners." Hestia was expected to provide loans to as many as 115,000 homeowners in the United States and Puerto Rico for these technologies, while creating "3,400 good-paying, high-quality American jobs." After receiving the federal loan, Sunnova came under fire for its alleged history of predatory practices and scamming elderly clients, which led to subsequent congressional scrutiny. In April, Sunnova began filing for bankruptcy. The company recently said it was no longer planning to use the programming funding and was working with the Energy Department to return the remaining guarantees. Monolith received a $953 million conditional loan guarantee from the LPO to accelerate its clean hydrogen and carbon utilization project in Nebraska. The company, which has received backing from BlackRock and NextEra Energy and was valued at over $1 billion in 2022, creates hydrogen fuel with renewable energy (which can be used to make ammonia in fertilizers) and carbon black. Despite the federal funding and private sector support, The Wall Street Journal reported in September 2024 that the company was "running short on cash and facing project delays." The third project facing the ax is New Jersey's Clean Energy Corridor, "a project to upgrade and expand transmission infrastructure to accommodate planned generation in New Jersey to meet growing electricity demand." Run by Jersey Central Power & Light Company, the project received a conditional loan guarantee of up to $716 million in January to support the state's goal of "introducing 11,000 MW of offshore wind-generated electricity by 2035." When First Energy, which owns Jersey Central, first announced the project in 2022, Danish energy company Orsted was planning two large wind projects off New Jersey's coast. The projects were canceled in 2023. Another New Jersey offshore wind project was recently halted after the Environmental Protection Agency rescinded the project's environmental permits. Despite these project cancellations and the LPO's history of questionable and risky investments, it does not appear that the office is going away soon; Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently told lawmakers that his agency would use the LPO to advance nuclear energy projects. Assuming Wright fully cuts billions of dollars worth of wasteful projects and narrows the agency's scope to only fund nuclear power projects, it's possible that the LPO's budget—which ballooned to over $400 billion under the Biden administration—could meaningfully shrink. Still, a meaningfully reduced budget is not enough. With the national deficit climbing to over $28 trillion in debt held by the public, taxpayers can no longer afford to support the federal government's fantasy that it should be a green bank. The post 3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans appeared first on Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump Team Scrambles After Report He's Killing Manufacturing Jobs
Trump Team Scrambles After Report He's Killing Manufacturing Jobs

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Team Scrambles After Report He's Killing Manufacturing Jobs

The labor market is slowing, but it's all good news in the White House. The U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May, a slight decline from April, according to a jobs report released Friday. The unemployment rate remained at 4.2 percent, still within the ballpark of historic lows reached in 2023, when the unemployment rate reached 3.4 percent—the lowest it had been in more than five decades. But within the folds of the report hid a major red flag for Donald Trump's agenda: The U.S. is still bleeding manufacturing jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' Trump celebrated on Truth Social. But even the president's favorite conservative network couldn't hide its dismay at the slight manufacturing downturn. 'Now, 8,000 manufacturing jobs were lost in May. That's not what you wanted to see,' said Fox Business host Stuart Varney. 'Well, we're certainly holding steady,' said Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer. 'And under the Trump administration, manufacturing jobs are still up over what the last administration, under [Joe] Biden, had. 'The focus of my 'America at Work' tour is to increase those manufacturing jobs, and we'll continue to stay laser focused on that as the president continues to double down on how important this is to the American economy,' she added. 'But how come we're losing 8,000 manufacturing jobs in May, when there's a big push to bring manufacturing jobs back to America? How come we're losing those jobs?' Varney pressed. Chavez-DeRemer was stuck in her script. 'We're certainly holding steady,' she insisted. Since the beginning of April, Trump has pitched his global tariff agenda as a means to return manufacturing jobs to U.S. shores. But two months later, the president's on-again, off-again tariffs have done little more than add tumult to American markets and trade. Investors have learned to play the market by an unflattering acronym—TACO, or 'Trump always chickens out'—while administration officials such as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have blundered by publicly admitting they have no intention of bringing tariffs between the U.S. and other nations down to zero.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store