Owners Thought Cat Was 'Bored' but They Were Wrong
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
In many ways, pets are like children—they need play, attention, and stimulation to thrive. So when Ollie the British shorthair began acting strangely, his owners assumed he was simply bored. But as his behavior grew more concerning, it became clear something deeper was going on.
Newsweek spoke to owner Karina about the emotional transformation was documented on TikTok (@ollie.and.otis) where Ollie's owners shared their struggle to bring joy back into his life. The video, which quickly went viral and has racked up over 966,000 views, shows the heartache of a cat who seemed to be silently yearning for more.
"We thought he was just bored... then we saw the signs," one of the owners explained.
Ollie began acting differently—he would stare out the window at the neighbor's cat, as if wishing he could join the fun. His behavior took a worrying turn when he began running to the door every time his owner left for work.
Two screenshots from the video showing Ollie was a sad facial expression.
Two screenshots from the video showing Ollie was a sad facial expression.
TikTok/@ollie.and.otis
"My boy was sad," states the text in the clip.
Desperate to lift his spirits, his owners tried everything. From harness training to allow him safe outdoor adventures, to new toys and increased playtime—they left no stone unturned.
"We gave it our all," said Karina and her partner Richard.
But the spark never truly returned. Ollie began napping longer and more heavily, as if simply passing the time rather than truly resting.
The text said: "One day, he let out a cry I'd never heard before. It broke my heart."
Then came Otis. Another feline companion, was introduced into the household—and instantly bonded with Ollie.
"He didn't just need stimulation. He needed a companion."
(L-R) Ollie has grey fur and Otis has light orange. They can be seen staring outside the window and watching an iPad.
(L-R) Ollie has grey fur and Otis has light orange. They can be seen staring outside the window and watching an iPad.
TikTok/@ollie.and.otis
The transformation was instant. Today, Ollie, two, and Otis, one, are described as inseparable. From cuddles to playtime, their bond is undeniable.
"We expected it might take weeks for them to form a bond, but to our surprise, they became friends within just a couple of hours.
"Ollie was immediately curious and gentle. He jumped around trying to get a better look, and when we carefully let them meet, he began licking Otis, who responded calmly. From that moment, their friendship started," Karina told Newsweek.
The clip, captioned "The best decision we have ever made. We gave our cat a friend he needed," has received 85,000 likes, sparking a wave of emotional responses from fellow pet lovers.
She added: "Their bond is very special. Otis is a little more playful and active since he's younger, and Ollie is always gentle with him.
"They enjoy their own space during the day, each retreating to their favorite nap spots, but they always come back together to cuddle or play. They're very different in personality, but it's clear they love having each other."
While cats are often seen as solitary creatures, the reality can be more nuanced. Many cats thrive with companionship—especially if they have been socialized with other cats early in life. However, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) notes that not all cats are open to sharing their space.
Under-socialization, personality clashes, or territorial tendencies can make introducing a new feline tricky.
TikTok Reacts
"I wonder if my cat would be okay with another buddy... He gets jealous so easily, my dad can't even touch my mom without him being all worked up," shared one user.
"My senior girl is in her twilight years, so I adopted a kitten for her. It's like she's had a second wind," said another.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Thunderbolts' Filmmaker Confirmed as 'X-Men' director
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors Variety has seemingly confirmed that "Thunderbolts*" director Jake Schreier will be helming Marvel's next stab at an "X-Men" film. In a story about Marvel's 2028 release dates, it was speculated that the "X-Men" reboot could be one of the features scheduled for the year. It was mentioned that Jake Schreier had been chosen as the director for the film, though this is the first time that's been confirmed. Read More: New Spider-Man Series Resolves Decades-Old Cliffhanger There were reports in May that Schreier was in early talks to possibly direct "X-Men", including speculation that the reason the director had been turning down work from other studios was to make room for the Marvel feature. But it had yet to be reported that the director/film match was a lock. Promotional material for "X2: X-Men United". Promotional material for "X2: X-Men United". 20th Century Studios The script for the film has been written by Michael Lesslie, with Kevin Feige producing. From one point of view, it's a surprising confirmation considering the "Thunderbolts*" theatrical run didn't end on a high note. In spite of high critical praise and a promising opening weekend, the Marvel film only amassed $380 million against a production budget of $180 million, officially flopping. Of course, the X-Men are a much different animal than the Thunderbolts. On the comic book stands and to movie audiences, the X-Men are a much better-known and proven property. Marvel fans have been waiting for years to see what Marvel Studios would do with beloved characters like Wolverine, Professor X, and Magneto. Few fans, on the other hand, were on the edge of their seat to see the next movie with Red Guardian. Now that we know who will be helming the first MCU "X-Men" film, we still need to wait to learn exactly who will be in the film. We know many of the stars from the Fox X-Men films will be appearing in "Avengers: Doomsday", including Kelsey Grammer, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Alan Cumming, Rebecca Romijn and James Marsden. Add to that Channing Tatum, whose version of Gambit finally got its chance to shine in last year's "Deadpool & Wolverine," but has never been shown as part of an X-Men team on the big screen. There is also continuing speculation that Hugh Jackman will appear in either "Doomsday" and/or the follow-up "Avengers: Secret Wars". But will Schreier use X-Men we already know and love, or will he introduce us to a brand new batch of mutant heroes? More Comics: Captain Kirk Back From the Dead in New 'Star Trek' Series Robert Downey Jr. Surprises 'Ironheart' Stars with Interview Appearance
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
‘28 Days Later' franchise: Box-office success on modest budgets for the zombie apocalypse film series
More than two decades after the release of 28 Days Later, the third installment in the zombie-apocalypse film franchise has been released. 28 Years Later picks up almost three decades after the release of a dangerous virus that turned humans into zombie-like creatures that plagued the streets of London. 28 Years Later tells the post-apocalyptic story of a group of survivors on a small island from which a father and his son leave and discover what has happened to the outside world. Here's how much the first two films in the iconic British zombie franchise have made at the box office. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Eamonn M. McCormack/Getty Images Each movie in the 28 Days Later franchise has its own storyline, and the main characters are different in each film. Here's a synopsis of each film in the trilogy, which spans more than two decades. 28 Days Later The series' first film, released in 2002, centers around a few survivors. Jim is a bicycle courier played by Cillian Murphy (who won the Best Actor award at the Oscars for the titular role in Oppenheimer in 2023). Naomie Harris (who played Eve Moneypenny in the James Bond films opposite Daniel Craig's 007) portrays Selena, who saves Jim from the infected before the two travel together. The film focuses on the aftermath of the Rage virus that was accidentally released by a group of animal-rights activists from a medical research laboratory testing monkeys. After nearly a month of the initial infection, this group encounters other survivors whose outlook on survival differs from theirs. 28 Weeks Later The second film, released in 2007, takes place more than half a year after the initial release of the virus and is a follow-up to the events of 28 Days Later, but with different characters and a different story. In the U.K., survivors are rounded up to live in an area in central London controlled by the U.S. military. One infected person infiltrates the compound, and a group of survivors attempts to flee the city on foot. 28 Years Later The third film focuses on survivors who live on a small island in the 28 years after the virus infected the general population of the U.K. Related: 'How to Train Your Dragon': Which film made the most money? 28 Days Later can be viewed without a paid subscription on Pluto TV and on paid streaming services, including Amazon Prime. 28 Weeks Later is available on Hulu, which requires a subscription plan, but it can also be streamed for free on Tubi. The budget for 28 Years Later is modest compared to other much-anticipated movies of 2025, such as Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning. The reported budget for 28 Years Later is $75 million, the highest among the movies in the trilogy. More on Hollywood and money: Gerard Butler's net worth: The A-list actor's wealth & incomeRalph Macchio's net worth: A revived career for the Karate Kid starTom Cruise's net worth: The 'Mission: Impossible' star's wealth in 2025 Each of the 28 Days Later movies in the trilogy has made more than $100 million, in inflation-adjusted 2025 dollars. The first two films have made a combined total of $234 million on modest budgets. Here's how each 28 Days Later film has performed at the box office based on data compiled by Box Office Mojo, which tracks movie revenue at theaters. Box office revenues in parentheses are adjusted for inflation. Yui Mok -28 Days Later Global box office gross receipts: $74 million ($134 million in 2025)Budget: $8 millionRelease Date: February 29, 2002Director: Danny Boyle28 Weeks Later Global box office gross receipts: $65 million ($100 million in 2025)Budget: $15 millionRelease Date: May 9, 2007Director: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo Europa28 Years Later Global box office gross receipts: ?Budget: $75 millionRelease Date: June 20, 2025Director: Danny Boyle The first two films featured actors who weren't widely known at the time - including Murphy, Harris, Rose Byrne, and Jeremy Renner - and who later went on to take leading roles in popular films. In 28 Years Later, the film features established stars, including Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and Ralph Fiennes. Related: Which "Mission: Impossible" film made the most money? A retrospective of the Tom Cruise action franchise Danny Boyle returns to direct the third installment of the 28 Days Later franchise, after helming the first film. After 28 Days Later, Boyle became an in-demand director, heading up notable films including Slumdog Millionaire (2008), a film about an economically struggling teenager trying to answer trivia questions on the Indian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. He also directed 127 Hours (2010), a true story about a stranded hiker's fight for survival, and Yesterday (2019), a movie about a musician's shift to an alternative life in a world without the Beatles. 28 Years Later also marks the return of Alex Garland, who was the writer of the first film. Columbia Pictures is one of the big companies that produced 28 Years Later. Sony Pictures Releasing is distributing the film. 28 Days Later helped to revive interest in a genre that first started decades earlier. George A. Romeo was among the first filmmakers about zombies, putting out Night of the Living Dead in 1968 and follow-up films over the next 40 years. Boyle helped to bring back interest in the genre with 28 Days Later, which featured fast-moving zombies, in an engaging, dramatic storyline. The film has been highly influential on subsequent zombie media, and its themes have permeated countless other movies and TV shows. In one of the opening scenes of the first movie, Cillian Murphy's character wakes up to a deserted London at the dawn of the zombie apocalypse. It's a scene that's been replicated by other characters on other movies and television shows, including Rick Grimes, played by Andrew Lincoln, in the popular The Walking Dead series, which first aired in 2010. Other zombie-related films, ranging from horror and drama to comedy, included World War Z (2013), Zombieland (2009), and Train to Busan (2016). Popular TV shows included Black Summer (2019), Z Nation (2014), and Ash vs Evil Dead (2015). Related: Jackie Chan's net worth: The 'Karate Kid: Legends' star's wealth & income The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
'I Was Broke': Gary Oldman Gets Honest About Starring In 1 Of The Most Hated Films Ever
Sir Gary Oldman has opened up about how he came to star in a film that's widely considered one of the worst in history. Back in 2003, the newly-knighted British actor starred alongside Matthew McConaughey, Patricia Arquette and Kate Beckinsale in Tiptoes (two of whom have gone on to win Academy Awards, as has Sir Gary). The film centred around a young man, played by Matthew, who gets his girlfriend pregnant, having concealed from her that every member of his family, including his twin brother, has a form of dwarfism. Sir Gary played Matthew's brother in the movie, for which he donned prosthetics and spent much of the shoot on his knees. During a new interview with the Happy Sad Confused podcast, Sir Gary admitted that he's never actually seen Tiptoes, and revealed that it came along at a difficult time in both his personal and professional life. 'I'll be very honest with you,' Sir Gary began. 'I had gone through a divorce and a nasty thing with a contractor.' He continued 'I ended up in California, in LA, at 42 years old, a single dad, and I was broke. And, ironically, I was living under the Hollywood sign, living in this rental. We had no furniture – thank God for Ikea.' Sir Gary said that when the offer for Tiptoes came along, he'd not worked for just shy of two years, and had been affected by an actors' strike. 'It was a bit of a rough time, and I needed to pay some bills, and I needed some money, and it was an actors' strike ontop of it all, which was a double whammy,' he admitted, noting the situation was a 'terrible time' for everyone in Hollywood. 'And then this film came along, this crazy idea, from this director, that I would play a little person. And I would play Matthew McConaughey's brother. 'There were several [issues]. First of all, I got locked in to doing a voice like that, because I had to sound like Matthew. We were brothers, so somehow, I had to sound like Matthew. So that was that. And then, I'm on my knees… desperate measures, desperate times.' 'I needed to work,' he insisted. 'And it was a crazy idea. But, would I do it now? No.' He said that if one good thing came out of the film, it's that several actors with dwarfism – including a pre- Game Of Thrones Peter Dinklage – were able to get work at a time when many performers were struggling. 'It was a good thing in that regard, because they were all going through the same thing I was going through, with no work,' Sir Gary said, insisting: 'But it's a misfire, to be sure. Not one I talk about, I'm so glad you brought it up.' Elsewhere in the interview, Sir Gary was also asked about another of the films he hasn't held in an especially high regard, The Fifth Element. He explained that his wife of eight years, Gisele Schmidt, has helped to 'convince me that it's a better film than I think it is'. Sir Gary explained: 'I'm contaminated, because I was the one who had that haircut. And I was the one who was wearing rubber. So, others can experience it in a different way. I get a little triggered when I see it, and I go back to that place of Jean-Paul Gaultier and rubber.' He added: 'Bruce [Willis] didn't like [that] either – you know that orange vest that he wears? He hated it.' A year after Tiptoes hit cinemas, Sir Gary made his debut as Sirius Black in the third Harry Potter film – a role with which he's still synonymous to many today. Since then, he also won an Oscar for his portrayal of Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour. Over the weekend, it was announced that Sir Gary had been bestowed with a knighthood by King Charles for his services to drama.
