
Thames Water AUTOMATICALLY moving customers onto tariffs set in the 90s and charging up to 671% more
THOUSANDS of Thames Water customers are stuck on tariffs which were set in the 90s and bills have jumped by up to 671%.
The water firm, which is in the midst of a multibillion-pound rescue deal, has said bills would rise by 31% from April.
1
Our investigation has discovered that:
Customers without water meters have seen bills soar due to rates set in the 90s
Thousands of homes are unable to get a water meter installed, which could lower their bill, because of where they live
Customers are not being told about a tariff which could save them money
Customers who ask to get a water meter but can't get one could be automatically being moved onto a tariff for a three-bedroom home that is up to £93.72 more expensive annually
We have delivered a dossier of cases to Thames Water asking them to urgently investigate.
We have also shared our concerns with the Consumer Council for Water, regulator Ofwat and the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
Consumer expert Martyn James said: "I'm deeply concerned about affordability and supporting people who can't afford this unavoidable, essential service."
Bills rising by more than expected
The Sun has spoken to scores of people who have seen their bills double, with one customer being hit by a 671% increase.
Many do not have a water meter, so their bills are calculated using a metric known as the rateable value (RV).
The RV of a property is set by the government and is based on the location and size of your home.
The rates were set in 1990 and the values from March 31 of that year are still used to calculate customers' bills.
The RV varies from house to house, so your bill could be different to your neighbour's, even if your houses are identical.
Industry regulator Ofwat told The Sun that some customers, particularly those without a water meter whose bills are calculated in this way, may see their payments increase by more than average.
Ofwat added that the RV may not accurately reflect the amount of water they currently use.
In comparison, households with a water meter pay for the exact amount used.
As a result, their bill could be higher or lower than average based on their usage.
Water meter lottery
Installing a water meter is the main way households can reduce their bill.
Customers firstly must ask Thames Water for a water meter appointment and then an engineer will visit to install one - but thousands of homes around the UK are not suitable for them.
Bill rise is ridiculous - we'll have to cut back
MUM-OF-TWO Susan Palmer, 46, said it's "ridiculous
Susan, who lives in a two-bedroom, one-bathroom flat in Lewisham, London, with her husband James, 48, a warehouse operative and 13-year-old sons Callum & Reece.
She said: "It's worrying. I'm a paramedic so I am not at home very often.
"There is no reason why we would be using a lot of water and we don't have a bath. It doesn't make sense."
Susan called Thames Water to ask why her bill had risen but it couldn't explain the increase.
Susan said her family will now need to cut back.
"I normally do overtime to keep our head above water. This bill increase will mean we need to tighten our purse strings," she said.
This is due to a number of reasons, including sharing your water supply with other residents such as in a flat without your own stop cock or living in a home where there isn't a suitable place to fit one.
Insiders at Thames Water have told this newspaper that around 70% of homes in London cannot get a water meter.
If you live in a home where you cannot get a water meter fitted then you can be moved onto new tariff called the Assessed Household Charge - but this only happens after your home has been assessed by an engineer.
The Sun has found that customers are not being told about this process and therefore cannot access the cheaper tariff.
However, households who are put on the Assessed Household Charge tariff will automatically be moved to the three-bedroom rate, unless they update Thames Water to tell them how many bedrooms they have.
This could mean a household with two bedrooms could be paying around £61.14 extra per year.
Thames Water will not backdate payments so customers need to contact them as soon as possible to check their tariff and update their details.
Experts have slammed the water company for making customers opt-in to find cheaper tariffs.
Martyn James said: "Anything that could reduce bills should absolutely not be conditional on getting a water meter."
Discounts if you live alone
If you live alone you could also access a single occupier tariff.
However, the vast majority of homes will be on the rate of a three-bedroom home.
The tariff costs £606.58 a year - £93.72 less than for a standard three bed property.
I complained to my MP after bill hike
Natasha Tressillian complained to Thames Water after her water bill rose from £359 a year to £535.
Although Natasha lives alone in a flat in Lewisham, London, she is now spending £45 a month on her bill after it rose by £15 a month.
Thames Water estimates that if Natasha had a water meter her bill would be just £315 a year - £220 less than what she is currently paying.
Natasha, who is in her 30s, said: 'Unfortunately a water meter cannot be fitted in my flat.
'That means with a single occupier tariff I'm paying around double what I would otherwise have been charged if a water meter could be fitted.
'It just doesn't seem fair or reasonable.'
She has complained to Thames Water and her local MP, Janet Daby, and plans to file a formal complaint to the Consumer Council for Water and Ofwat.
Surge in demand for water meters
Bill rises have caused a surge in demand for water meter installations, according to the Consumer Council for Water.
A spokesperson said: 'We know water companies have seen a surge in applications for water meters since the bill rises were announced and, in some cases, demand has doubled or even trebled.
'This means in some instances it is taking longer than expected to install water meters at properties where they can be fitted.'
Thames Water aims to install meters within 50 days.
This means that if you apply for an appointment now you could be forced to wait until the end of July for a visit from an engineer.
It also means if you are unable to get a water meter that you could be waiting weeks paying a higher rate before you can access the discounted tariff.
If it takes longer than 12 weeks for a water meter to be installed then you are entitled to compensation.
Act now to get help
Anyone who is worried about their bill should speak to Thames Water, the Consumer Council for Water recommends.
It should be able to explain why your bill has increased and double check if it is accurate.
You can contact Thames Water online or by calling 0800 980 8800.
The phone lines are open from Monday to Friday between 8am and 8pm or on Saturdays between 8am and 6pm.
If you are still concerned then you can complain to the Consumer Council for Water, who can investigate on your behalf.
If your bill has increased and you do not have a water meter then you should book an appointment now.
An engineer may be able to install a water meter at your home, so you will only be billed for what you use.
If they cannot install a meter then you will be moved onto the Assessed Household Charge, which should save you money.
Ofwat suggests that customers whose bills are calculated using the RV may benefit financially by switching to the Assessed Household Charge.
We'll tighten our belts due to bill increase
ANN Molloy, 52, was shocked to receive a letter from Thames Water to say that her water bill will increase by more than £180 a year from April.
The mother of one, who lives in Ealing, London, received a letter from Thames Water in February to say that her bill will rise from £440 a year to £620.
She said: 'We can't be using that much water. I live with my husband and teenage son in a two bed house with only one bathroom.
'We don't take baths and only water the garden when it really needs it.'
The family are unable to get a water meter as the pipe that provides their water also supplies the house next door.
To replace the pipe Thames Water would have to rip up the entire ground floor of the family's home.
Ann asked Thames Water how it calculated her new bill but it was unable to explain the increase.
She also contacted Ealing Council for help but they were unable to explain the bill rise.
The family will now need to cut back in order to afford the bill increase.
Ann said: 'It just gets me down. We're going to have to tighten our belts a bit.
"We will really need to take a look at our finances and our expenses going out.'
If your bill will be lower on the new tariff then Thames Water will switch you straight away.
But if your bill will be higher then it will not move you onto the tariff for a year to give you time to understand how you will be affected.
Thames Water will send you a letter to let you know how much you will pay.
If you live alone then contact Thames Water as soon as you can and ask to be moved onto a Single Occupier Tariff.
If you are unable to pay your bill then you may be able to get financial support from Thames Water.
You can complete an assessment online or call 0800 980 8800 to discuss our options.
To apply you will need the details of any income you receive, your debts, regular bills and outgoings and your Thames Water account number.
A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'We offer comprehensive support for customers struggling to pay their bill, rated among the best in the sector.
'We're already helping around 450,000 customers pay their bills, and by 2030, one in ten households will be in receipt of support, including a discount of 50% on their bill.'
What water bill support is available?
IT'S always worth checking if you qualify for a discount or extra support to help pay your water bill.
Over two million households who qualify to be on discounted social water tariffs aren't claiming the savings provided, according to the Consumer Council for Water (CCW).
Only 1.3million households are currently issued with a social water tariff - up 19% from the previous year.
And the average household qualifying for the discounted water rates can slash their bills by £160 a year.
Every water company has a social tariff scheme which can help reduce your bills if you're on a low income and the CCW is calling on customers to take advantage before bills rise in April.
Who's eligible for help and the level of support offered varies depending on your water company.
Most suppliers also have a pot of money to dish out to thousands of customers who are under pressure from rising costs - and you don't have to pay it back.
These grants can be worth hundreds of pounds offering a vital lifeline when faced with daunting water bills.
The exact amount you can get depends on where you live and your supplier, as well as your individual circumstances.
Many billpayers across the country could also get help paying off water debts through a little-known scheme and even get the balance written off.
Companies match the payments eligible customers make against the debt on their account to help clear it sooner.
If you're on a water meter but find it hard to save water as you have a large family or water-dependent medical condition, you may be able to cap your bills through the WaterSure scheme.
Bills are capped at the average amount for your supplier, so the amount you could save will vary.
The Consumer Council for Water estimates that bills are reduced by £307 on average through the scheme.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd hears incoming NRW chair embroiled in rail funding row
Nilesh Sachdev, the Welsh Government's preferred candidate to take the helm at Natural Resources Wales (NRW), appeared before the Senedd's climate committee on June 11. On his CV, Mr Sachdev boasts of securing £6bn of UK Government investment as chair of East West Rail (ERW) which is leading on a new railway between Oxford and Cambridge. The railway was controversially reclassified as a Wales-and-England project by the UK Treasury, denying Wales any consequential funding through the Barnett formula. Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the committee, asked: 'I was just wondering whether you have any qualms about… how does it look that potentially the chair of one of the biggest public bodies in Wales is actually spending Welsh money on England-only projects?' During the pre-appointment hearing, Mr Sachdev replied: 'A very fair and reasonable ask, I guess, I think I'll turn it around the other way: what a great opportunity. 'I managed to persuade, through my board and chief executive, to get the government in England to give all that money to East West Rail, I wonder what we could do here. 'So, I think there's an opportunity of saying: how can we, in Wales, put a case forward that makes sure the money that Welsh taxpayers are paying stays here?' Mr Gruffydd pressed concerns about his involvement with ERW, saying: 'I know you don't decide where the money comes from – but you're the guy signing the cheques.' Asked about his motivation for wanting to be chair of NRW, Mr Sachdev pointed to his passion on climate change and a recent move to Bristol. 'In fact, it's quicker to get here than it would be from Abergavenny in the traffic,' he said. He told the committee: 'I want to play a part in a community I dearly respect and have an affection for in an area I deeply care about.' Pressed about his local links, the father of three confirmed he has never lived in Wales but said his wife's grandparents were born in Gower and his son attended Cardiff University."

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Senedd hears incoming NRW chair embroiled in rail funding row
Nilesh Sachdev, the Welsh Government's preferred candidate to take the helm at Natural Resources Wales (NRW), appeared before the Senedd's climate committee on June 11. On his CV, Mr Sachdev boasts of securing £6bn of UK Government investment as chair of East West Rail (ERW) which is leading on a new railway between Oxford and Cambridge. The railway was controversially reclassified as a Wales-and-England project by the UK Treasury, denying Wales any consequential funding through the Barnett formula. Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the committee, asked: 'I was just wondering whether you have any qualms about… how does it look that potentially the chair of one of the biggest public bodies in Wales is actually spending Welsh money on England-only projects?' During the pre-appointment hearing, Mr Sachdev replied: 'A very fair and reasonable ask, I guess, I think I'll turn it around the other way: what a great opportunity. 'I managed to persuade, through my board and chief executive, to get the government in England to give all that money to East West Rail, I wonder what we could do here. 'So, I think there's an opportunity of saying: how can we, in Wales, put a case forward that makes sure the money that Welsh taxpayers are paying stays here?' Mr Gruffydd pressed concerns about his involvement with ERW, saying: 'I know you don't decide where the money comes from – but you're the guy signing the cheques.' Asked about his motivation for wanting to be chair of NRW, Mr Sachdev pointed to his passion on climate change and a recent move to Bristol. 'In fact, it's quicker to get here than it would be from Abergavenny in the traffic,' he said. He told the committee: 'I want to play a part in a community I dearly respect and have an affection for in an area I deeply care about.' Pressed about his local links, the father of three confirmed he has never lived in Wales but said his wife's grandparents were born in Gower and his son attended Cardiff University."


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW PIERCE: Is Angela Rayner's hard-Left boyfriend plotting to put her in No 10 as revenge for his sacking by Starmer's ruthless right-hand man?
On the eve of the Government's difficult Spending Review, Angela Rayner was in surprisingly high spirits. Drinks were flowing as the Deputy Prime Minister held court, acting as the DJ playing loud 'house music' while her guests danced the night away. Rayner's office has refused to confirm whether a party took place in her resplendent grace-and-favour apartment in Admiralty House, once the home of Sir Winston Churchill, the night before the Housing Secretary received one of the biggest financial packages of the Spending Review. Rayner had to battle to the bitter end against Chancellor Rachel Reeves, but the outcome fell in her favour and is a sign of her growing influence. In recent weeks, there have been reports of Rayner limbering up to replace Keir Starmer as Labour leader, and she has solid backing from members of the soft-Left, as well as the unions. Her victory in the Reeves negotiations is a clear sign that Downing Street is trying to keep her on side. Little wonder, then, that she indulged in raucous celebrations hours before the Chancellor addressed the Commons, reviving memories of when she was photographed belting out songs behind the DJ's desk in an Ibiza nightclub last summer. When Rayner, 45, took her place on the benches for the Spending Review, many thought she looked somewhat jaded. The same was said of Blackpool South MP Chris Webb, who was at the party and is one of her closest friends. A source told me: 'They were celebrating the fact that Ange had won her deal on the Spending Review. She is feeling on top of the world. The settlement showed that Ange is a serious player. Tarry, 42, has never got over being sacked as a shadow minister in July 2022 for giving a TV interview while on a picket line during a rail strike 'It may look insensitive but it was a private party for a small group of friends and supporters. These party guests will run an Angela Rayner leadership campaign if and when the time comes.' Rayner's ebullience was in stark contrast to the downbeat demeanour of the dwindling band of Reeves supporters. Her stock has fallen to rock bottom among Labour MPs and members. And Rayner's soiree will only heighten suspicions in the Downing Street bunker ahead of a potential crunch Commons vote on reforms to disability benefits. As many as 200 Labour MPs are said to be deeply unhappy about Reeves's plans to make £5 billion of cuts. In public, Rayner says she has no interest in becoming Labour leader. In private, however, I can disclose that many of the party-goers on Tuesday night are working hard to bolster her support among MPs and party members. Some MPs have dubbed the less-than-covert Rayner campaign Operation Revenge because it is being masterminded by her boyfriend Sam Tarry, 42, who has never got over being sacked as a shadow minister in July 2022 for giving a TV interview while on a picket line during a rail strike. Later that year, he was deselected as the MP for Ilford South. Tarry, who was part of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership team, blames his downfall on Starmer's all-powerful chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who wants to purge the party of Left-wingers. Revenge is a dish best served cold, they say, and Tarry is pushing for Rayner to be the first elected woman leader of the Labour Party. In the run-up to the election, Rayner ruled out a tilt at the top job because she knew Labour was destined to win big and assumed that Starmer would be a fixture in No 10 for years. Since he became PM, however, support for Labour has collapsed faster than that of any newly elected governing party in the past 40 years. Starmer's personal rating is a woeful minus 46 per cent. And Rayner is popular where it counts – with party members. In a poll by independent party news website LabourList, she came second to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, who is not a leadership contender after his disastrous election defeat in 2015. What's more, many Labour MPs believe they must elect a woman for the first time in the party's 125-year history. Even Rayner's many detractors, who scorn her intellectual ability, concede there is no serious alternative contender. Rachel Reeves and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson have crashed and burned in the eyes of voters. Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, another favourite of party members, does not have a Commons seat. And Health Secretary Wes Streeting's majority was cut to 550 by an independent Muslim candidate standing on a pro-Gaza platform. Many suspect he will lose next time. The man who helped Rayner avoid a similar fate is her close friend Wajid Khan, a former mayor of Burnley. He was instrumental in ensuring no independent Muslim candidate stood against her in her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency in Greater Manchester, which she won with a 6,700 majority over Reform. To the surprise of many, Khan – who was elevated to the Lords by Starmer in 2020 – became Rayner's deputy minister in the housing department. 'Khan was repaid with a ministerial job and he is now repaying her in turn by working discreetly on her behalf,' says a supporter. 'He will be a hugely important link to the Muslim vote which Labour is losing under Starmer.' All of which helps explains why Rayner has come round to the idea that, if Starmer goes, she should run. It explains, too, last month's leak of a memo from Rayner to the Chancellor outlining her alternative money-raising measures, arguing for higher taxes on wealthier people and cutting benefits for migrants. Whoever leaked it – and Rayner's team say it wasn't them – had one purpose: to cast her in a positive light with the MPs and party members who will choose the next leader. Some MPs say the leak fired the starting gun on a long race to succeed Starmer, which is why it caused such anger in Downing Street. Days later, Rayner had to fight her corner behind the scenes after reports that Starmer would strip her of the housing element of her brief. Flame-haired Rayner is unashamedly combative and, according to a source, 'there was a lot of shouting'. A darling of the trade unionists, she has the personality to build bridges across the party. Rayner was the special guest at Tony Blair's Christmas drinks last year. She is also close to Gordon Brown and her boisterous birthday karaoke parties are well attended by the Right and Left in the party. A Rayner associate says: 'If you're a working-class woman like Ange, who is always being written off by the men in the Downing Street bunker, what better way to prove them wrong than by seizing the top job?' Rayner famously left school aged 16, pregnant and without any qualifications. Her political hero was former Labour deputy prime minister John Prescott. 'Some say she's Prescott in a skirt,' says a supporter. 'Like Prescott, she speaks the language of ordinary voters. She understands them the way the metropolitan elite around Starmer don't. If there's a leadership election tomorrow, she wins hands down.' Downing Street is aware of the manoeuvring. It may be why, in the past few weeks, Rayner has lost her personal photographer, Simon Walker. 'No 10 thought she was getting too big for her boots, so they grounded her photographer and have now taken the post away altogether,' a source told me. A source close to Starmer says: 'You can't blame them for reining her in. Keir leads a stable government, a disciplined party, and knows what he wants. Ange would be woefully out of her depth as PM. She's not up to it and MPs know it.' But Rayner is indifferent to the barbs. She thinks she's on a roll and, judging by the mood of her party guests, they think the same.