logo
Lowered expectations? Young Albertans most financially stressed but no more worried about being 'left behind'

Lowered expectations? Young Albertans most financially stressed but no more worried about being 'left behind'

CBC3 hours ago

Social Sharing
EDITOR'S NOTE: CBC News commissioned this public opinion research to be conducted immediately following the federal election and leading into the second anniversary of the United Conservative Party's provincial election win in May 2023. As with all polls, this one provides a snapshot in time. This analysis is one in a series of articles from this research.
Mark Patzer is among a minority of Albertans his age; he's very confident he'll have enough money saved for retirement.
"I just started planning at a young age," said Patzer, 27, who works as an environmental scientist in Calgary. "I have an RRSP. I prioritized putting money toward that over other things for the hope of one day retiring."
He credits his financial situation to decisions he made in his early 20s: "Living at home for a while, living with roommates for a while, just doing the uncomfortable situations for as long as possible to get ahead financially, because it's harder to do nowadays."
He also counts himself lucky to have found a good job shortly after graduating.
"I started making a livable salary right out of school, which sometimes takes people a while," he said.
In the past, a livable salary for a post-secondary graduate may have been an expectation. But these days, it's less of a given for young folks like Patzer. His perspective might help explain a puzzling result from a recent poll conducted for CBC Calgary.
On the one hand, young people are more likely than older people to say they're having trouble meeting their monthly expenses. That's not too surprising. Young people also tend to be less confident when it comes to having enough money saved for retirement. Again, not surprising.
On the other hand, young people are just as likely as older Albertans to agree that, "If things keep going the way they are, people like me will get left behind."
That's the surprising bit.
"When we asked people about feeling left behind, we thought we'd see a generational difference in there — and we didn't see that," said pollster Janet Brown, who conducted the public-opinion research for CBC News.
"One of the first things we do is we look for those subgroup differences. But sometimes when you don't see subgroup differences, that can be interesting too."
So what is going on here?
A statistical analysis of the poll results suggests young people's thoughts on being "left behind" are tied less to their personal financial situation, compared to older folks. It's hard to say definitively why that is, but some of it may have to do with different expectations than previous generations when it comes to work and life, a sense of camaraderie with others going through the same struggles, and good old youthful optimism that there's plenty of time to turn things around.
The data differences
Brown said the survey questions were designed to track a wide range of Albertans' sentiments and examine the relationships between those sentiments.
The "left behind" question, in particular, was deliberately worded in a way that could leave respondents with some room for interpretation.
"It's about getting at that fundamental value of whether they feel there's something that's inherently unfair for people like them," said Brown.
That broader question was accompanied by much more specific questions about individual financial situations.
You can see the results from those questions in the charts below.
Quite clearly, the below results show younger people are more worried than older folks about both their short-term and long-term finances.
John Santos, a data scientist with the Janet Brown Opinion Research polling firm, says you can see a relationship in the poll results between Albertans' sense of financial security and their sentiments about being "left behind" — except among the youngest Albertans.
Among the oldest folks, those who worried more about their personal finances were also much more likely to worry about being "left behind."
However, Santos says that statistical relationship diminishes as respondents get younger, to the point of disappearing altogether.
When it comes to 18-to-24-year-olds, in particular, there was no statistically significant difference in their responses to the "left behind" question, whether they were comfortable about their retirement savings or not.
It's possible, Santos said, that retirement just seems so far off for many young people that other considerations may be top of mind when answering the "left behind" question.
Young folks may also feel "they have time to make up any kind of lost financial ground," he said, while the reality of what retirement looks like may be more apparent for older folks.
Brown also believes it has a lot to do with where people are compared to where they figured they would be at this point in their lives.
"We think it has to do with expectation," she said. "When people got their education or training, what kind of an income were they expecting and are they getting that?"
And this brings us back to Patzer and his "livable salary" at age 27.
Grading on a curve?
Young people these days have adjusted their expectations to fit with the reality they face, Patzer believes.
So while many might be struggling to find good jobs, buy houses and save for retirement, there's a sense of camaraderie in the struggle.
Patzer offered an analogy that would be familiar to university and college students: "If you fail a test, but your friend also fails, then you don't feel as bad, because you're both in the same position."
Especially for people in that 18-to-24 age range who are looking around at each other, he said, everyone might seem to be going through the same kinds of challenges, so no one seems "left behind."
"I think that was the case when we were all 23, 24, and no one really had that clear path yet," he said. "People were starting jobs, but the financial differences weren't that apparent."
But a few years later, he's already starting to see that change.
"Now that I'm 27, turning 28, I think that separation of what people's salaries are, is becoming a lot more evident," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Don't want to antagonize:' G7 protesters vow restraint, question if police will follow suit
'Don't want to antagonize:' G7 protesters vow restraint, question if police will follow suit

Calgary Herald

time29 minutes ago

  • Calgary Herald

'Don't want to antagonize:' G7 protesters vow restraint, question if police will follow suit

Article content Activists protesting the G7 gathering say they'll assemble peacefully, but some doubt police will refrain from violently suppressing their right to demonstrate. Article content An organizer with an alliance of 25 activist groups across the country that's bringing some of its members to Calgary said they avoid provoking police backlash, but might not confine their activities to three designated protest zones being set up for them in Calgary — near the airport, at Municipal Plaza and in Victoria Park. Article content Article content Article content 'Depending on the security situation, we might do a march and we'll see what the implications of leaving the designated zones are, but we don't want to put public safety at risk,' said Yasmeen Khan, North American vice-chair of the International League of Peoples' Struggle in Canada (ILPS). Article content Article content 'We should be able to bring a voice to the wider public but, at the same time, we don't want to antagonize.' Article content Police have said they have no legal mandate to confine protesters to the assigned zones, but add they won't tolerate law-breaking outside them. Article content Khan said she expects modest numbers from her alliance's groups to come to Calgary — maybe as few as 100, mostly activists from around Western Canada — though demonstrators from other groups as well as Calgary-based will add to those numbers. Article content They'll highlight a host of issues, including Indigenous struggles, housing, migrant and national liberation struggles, wages, climate change and international support for Israel's onslaught on Gaza. Article content Article content 'I don't think we're expecting thousands of people but we're hoping to bring together a political consciousness in Calgary,' she said, adding there's a simmering desire to join that movement in conservative Calgary. Article content 'There are people in the community who are waiting to come together, to be galvanized.' Article content Activists target the G7, said Khan, because they don't believe its leaders seek to address the problems facing regular people. Article content 'It's a sham sense of democracy and decision-making,' said Khan. Article content Activists will hold demonstrations and a 'people's forum' at Municipal Plaza from June 14 to 15, she said, and there could be other protests in the following days during the G7, which runs from June 15 to 17. Leaders from Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Italy and France, Japan and the European Union will gather at Kananaskis Village to seek consensus on peace and security, economic stability and the war in Ukraine.

What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill
What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill

Globe and Mail

time32 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill

If the first six months are any indication, the reign of U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be a rough one for Canadian investors. First, the stock market plunged earlier this spring as Mr. Trump's tariffs started a global trade war. Stocks have mostly recovered, but a new threat has emerged in the form of legislation that would allow Washington to ramp up the taxation of Canadians holding U.S. stocks. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not yet law – it passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a single vote but must still pass in the Senate – and may change in scope. For now, it has the potential to more than double the tax applied to dividends from U.S. companies received by Canadian investors and corporations. The ultimate effect of the tax changes could be costly in total but perhaps not so bad on an individual basis. Regardless, it's too early to make changes in your investment portfolio. 'Currently, we're not making any moves, and I'm recommending everyone do the same thing and just wait to see what the information actually is,' said Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital. 'Then we can assess and see if there's any changes necessary.' Wealth managers brace for proposed U.S. tax bill's impacts on Canadian clients What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Ultimately, Section 899 of the legislation could introduce a withholding tax of 20 to 50 per cent of dividends received by Canadians. There are estimates that this extra tax could cost individual investors, pension funds and others billions of dollars. The point of Section 899 is to give the U.S. a weapon to punish what it considers to be unfair taxes in other countries. Thought to be a target is our digital services tax, which mainly applies to U.S. tech giants generating revenue in Canada. Estimates from Mr. Bender show a worst-case additional drag on returns of 0.46 percentage points from U.S. stocks and U.S. equity exchange-traded funds when the higher withholding tax is fully phased in over four years. Think of this cost as being in addition to the management expense ratio of an ETF or mutual fund. If your return from a U.S. equity fund was a net 10 per cent with the management expense ratio (MER) included, then a higher withholding tax could ultimately leave you with as little as 9.54 per cent. Note that fund returns are always published on a net basis, with the MER included and, where applicable, foreign withholding taxes already deducted. Under existing U.S. tax law, there is a base withholding tax rate of 30 per cent for foreign investors holding U.S. stocks. A Canada-U.S. tax treaty generally reduces this rate to 15 per cent. No withholding tax applies to U.S. dividends paid into registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds by U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. There's no clear sense of whether this exemption would continue to apply under Section 899. In a non-registered account, you can offset the 15-per-cent withholding tax by claiming an offsetting foreign tax credit. In a TFSA, registered education savings plan, first home savings account or registered disability savings plan, the withholding tax cannot be recovered; it is also non-recoverable in RRSPs and RRIFs if you hold a Canadian-listed U.S. equity ETF. Canadian investors have a massive level of exposure to U.S. stocks directly and through funds. About $60-billion is invested in just four TSX-listed ETFs that track the S&P 500 index. But investing in the S&P 500, and the even more tech-focused Nasdaq, is much more about growth than dividend income. The dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is about 1.3 per cent, half the level of the yield on Canada's S&P/TSX composite index. 'It's very low, which is why this tax maybe isn't as much of an issue as people are making it out to be,' Mr. Bender said. 'Some extra withholding taxes are probably not going to blow up your financial plan.' Mr. Bender added that the impact is further diminished by the fact that most investors have diversified their U.S. exposure with bonds and Canadian stocks, plus international markets in many cases. Investors who use ETFs for exposure to U.S. stocks can buy funds listed on U.S. exchanges as well as those located in Canada. Among Canadian-listed funds, there are those that hold U.S. stocks directly and those that are effectively a wrapper for a U.S.-listed fund in the same corporate family. Mr. Bender said each of these three ETF types would be affected similarly by higher U.S. withholding taxes. Are you a young Canadian with money on your mind? To set yourself up for success and steer clear of costly mistakes, listen to our award-winning Stress Test podcast.

Danielle Smith reignites feud with Guilbeault over his plans for Canada's national parks
Danielle Smith reignites feud with Guilbeault over his plans for Canada's national parks

National Post

time33 minutes ago

  • National Post

Danielle Smith reignites feud with Guilbeault over his plans for Canada's national parks

OTTAWA — Steven Guilbeault may no longer be federal environment minister, but Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she still sees him as a threat to the province's oil and gas industry. Article content Smith said on her weekly radio show this weekend that Guilbeault, now heritage minister, has an 'overt motive' to establish new federally-protected parks in the path of pipelines and other energy infrastructure. Article content Article content Article content She added that she wouldn't consent to the creation of any new federal parks in Alberta. Article content 'I do not want to see one additional acre of territory that's within Alberta turned into a federal park … we certainly don't need Steven Guilbeault telling us what is important to protect in Alberta,' said Smith. Article content 'If there is critical habitat that Albertans want to protect … we'll put in provincial parks.' Article content Guilbeault, a former Greenpeace activist, was shuffled out of the environment portfolio in March by Prime Minister Mark Carney but kept his role as minister responsible for Parks Canada. Article content This puts him in charge of implementing the Liberals' campaign promise to create at least 10 new national parks and protect 30 per cent of public lands by 2030. Article content According to Parks Canada's website, the agency is currently vetting four proposed national parks and protected areas, including a northern Manitoba watershed on the Hudson Bay, one possible destination for future oil shipments. Article content Neither Guilbeault's office nor Parks Canada gave an immediate response to Smith's comments about future federal parks blocking energy infrastructure. Article content This isn't the first time that mistrust has flared between Smith's United Conservative Party government and Parks Canada. Article content Greater Edmonton UCP MLA Brandon Lunty put forward a private member's bill in late 2023 barring municipalities and Parks Canada from expanding urban parks without the province's consent. The bill was signed into law in 2024. Article content Lunty told the National Post that he decided to champion the bill when he caught wind of bilateral discussions Edmonton's city council was having with federal officials about an urban park in the capital region. Article content 'It seemed like they were down the road a bit on those conversations and I kept coming back to the question of, well, what about the provincial perspective on this?' said Lunty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store