logo
T-Mobile Is the New Mobile Network Champ. I Got a Behind-the-Scenes View Into How It Got There

T-Mobile Is the New Mobile Network Champ. I Got a Behind-the-Scenes View Into How It Got There

CNET17 hours ago

Last week T-Mobile announced that it's been named the Best Mobile Network in the US by Ookla, marking the first time the carrier has taken the overall top spot. That's based on half a billion real-world usage tests conducted over a six-month period.
(Disclosure: Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.)
During a live event at its Tech Experience Hub in Bellevue, Washington, T-Mobile also announced a July 23 commercial launch date for T-Satellite, its Starlink-based satellite connectivity service, as well as additional features, such as support for sending images and audio files. And to boost the array of perks that accompany many T-Mobile plans, it's adding free DoorDash DashPass memberships for subscribers with Magenta status.
"We made big bets on 5G, pushing the limits to deliver speed and coverage no one thought possible," said T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert. "Now, as the Best Mobile Network in America, with unmatched satellite-to-mobile capability, it's clear we're shaping the future of wireless with a network built not just for speed, but for possibility."
Watch this: T-Mobile Announces T-Satellite: Rapid Fire Q&A with T-Mobile Exec
01:42
In less than a decade, T-Mobile has gone from a limited-spectrum upstart with a penchant for bright pink branding to the top of the competitive US mobile industry, largely due to the way it's navigated the transition to 5G networking (and maybe some help from the magenta colors). Merging T-Mobile's low-band spectrum with Sprint's midband became one of the main reasons T-Mobile is now crowing about its spot in Ookla's rankings.
As part of these announcements, T-Mobile invited CNET to an exclusive behind-the-scenes conversation about how it arrived at this point, and a tour of some of the technologies at work at its headquarters and labs.
Entry gates at T-Mobile's headquarters.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
An unconventional road to 5G
Every company says it's the best at something, and for a long time, T-Mobile claimed it was the best value among the major wireless carriers. "US consumers have always had to make a choice between going to a much higher priced but higher quality network, or make a trade-off in network and get a better value," said Mike Katz, T-Mobile president of marketing, strategy and products. "Now it's validated by a third party [that] customers don't have to make this choice. They can get both the best value, which T Mobile has always been known and famous for, and get the best network."
But how did T-Mobile get to this point? It's easy to say you have the best value and that customers love you, but those are results. At this scale -- being one of the top three providers in the US competing for an essential market -- it takes a series of technical decisions, a vision of how technology will evolve and the willingness to take big risks.
At T-Mobile headquarters, even the flowers are magenta colored.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
From a consumer point of view, a few years ago, the focus of every carrier seemed to be to expand coverage, especially 5G coverage. Specifics got lost in the 5G marketing shuffle -- every phone-maker touted its 5G compatibility, and the carriers wanted everyone to know that they were expanding their 5G footprint as fast as possible.
But wireless coverage isn't like a blanket that covers everything equally, and 5G in particular is made up of several speeds and flavors. That's why your 5G-enabled phone will sometimes indicate the network as "5G," "5G+," "5G UC" or other variations, depending on your carrier.
When 5G technologies began to appear in 2020, one focus was on the high speeds possible using the millimeter wave spectrum. But, although millimeter wave can deliver swift connections, it can be thwarted by obstacles such as windows or even plants.
"Primarily, [5G] was going to be a millimeter wave play, which is very high bandwidth with very poor reach," said Ulf Ewaldsson, T-Mobile's president of technology. "We went all-in on a very different strategy. We said, 'it's going to be a midband play, and it's going to be TDD [Time Division Duplex, a way to send and receive data in the same frequency] spectrum in the midband that you pair with a very strong low band.' We were able to get our hands on the best possible spectrum, thanks to merging with Sprint."
Ewaldsson emphasized that it's not just a prevalence of low-band that's advantageous. It's that, at 600 megahertz, T-Mobile has the lowest band in the low-band area. Why is that important? It has better reach, about 25% to 30% wider than the competition.
T-Mobile's visualization of its 5G standalone core technology.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
That Sprint merger in 2020 sounded like a quick way to buy into the top of the market, a shortcut to expand one's footprint. (Indeed, T-Mobile is taking a similar tack right now in the broadband market by acquiring fiber provider Lumos in April). But buying Sprint wasn't an immediate ticket to the top.
"It took about a year extra to get through all the regulatory approvals to get this thing done," Ewaldsson said, noting that AT&T's and Verizon's lead in the market made it a challenge for T-Mobile or Sprint alone to actually enter the 5G race. But with a plan in place to use Sprint's spectrum and infrastructure, "once we came out [of the approval process], we were right out of the blocks," he said.
Katz explained that many of T-Mobile's early disadvantages have turned into benefits. "We have more towers than anybody else, and our towers are closer together," he said. "We had to build more towers than AT&T and Verizon. We didn't have any low-band spectrum, which propagates better. So we had to build more towers that were closer together."
Ewaldsson was more specific. "We have about [and here he paused briefly] 82,715 towers," he said. "Now, as a turn of events, that happened to be the best possible asset when we merged with Sprint, because we could power up all those towers with that TDD spectrum … and create a formidable downlink speed experience."
The benefits of the standalone core
Merging T-Mobile's low-band spectrum with Sprint's midband became one of the main reasons T-Mobile is now crowing about its spot in Ookla's rankings.
"We have [a] secret that nobody else has, which is a standalone core. A standalone core is a smarter control over all those towers that stand alone," Ewaldsson said. "Core allows us to combine low-band and midband and all our bands to get higher and faster experiences for our customers."
He explained that building out the network more consistently is something other carriers haven't done. Every T-Mobile tower has nearly the same tri-band configuration.
"You have the same speeds, latency and performance on your apps, wherever you are, and that's also a secret sauce, too," he said.
The standalone core enables T-Mobile's next wave of wireless advancements. In April, the company announced that it had rolled out and successfully tested -- with consumer handsets -- 5G-Advanced networking, achieving uplink speeds of 550 Mbps. It did so by combining multiple spectrums in a technique called carrier aggregation, which is enabled by the standalone core hardware.
The T-Mobile Launchpad facility is home to many of the labs the company uses to investigate new wireless technologies.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
This technology also enables network slicing, a technique T-Mobile has been using commercially for the last two years to guarantee network performance for a specific range of devices, even in crowded or noisy wireless environments. First responders, for example, can be assured they can communicate, even in an emergency environment where other people are all accessing the network.
"You can have a number of different frequencies supporting one single device, one mobile phone," said Ewaldsson. "If you combine all those resources [into] one device, you can get an incredible bandwidth for a short time, and you can get done with what needs to be done faster. So it creates a better customer experience, because you have an enormous bandwidth that is allocated toward one device, instead of sharing it in one frequency with a bunch of devices."
T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert announces Ookla's ranking as T-Mobile being the Best Mobile Network in the US at a live event in Bellevue, Washington.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
How Ookla named T-Mobile the Best Mobile Network in the US
"We've known for a long time that the 5G portion of our network is the best," said Katz, "but this [test] concluded that T-Mobile had the best network. And obviously, we're very excited about that."
Both Katz and Ewaldsson emphasized that Ookla's testing was larger and more comprehensive than earlier metrics. It was performed on over 6 million devices and 500 million test points over a six-month period.
Ewaldsson said it's an active test, collecting data when customers run the SpeedTest app on their phones, "but it's also a passive test where, in the background, they're pulling data from millions of different handsets that are in the hands of real consumers, wherever they are."
He contrasted that with drive testing, an accepted methodology in which a tester drives routes with a collection of representative phones to prove that a network is good. "We don't believe in that," said Ewaldsson. "We believe that if you really want to test this, you're going to crowdsource it, and that's exactly what this test has done… and it's a third-party test."
Ulf Ewaldsson, T-Mobile president of technology, holds an award from Ookla for Best Mobile Network in the US. Beside him is Srini Gopalan, T-Mobile chief operating officer.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
The benefit to this approach is that it more closely captures real mobile usage, according to Ewaldsson, such as people texting and sending email, viewing social apps, watching video clips, playing games and more. Millions of people are also operating under real-world conditions, which can include factors such as pockets of interference or scarcity. Verizon disputes Ookla's methodology, saying that drive testing is a more accurate way to measure network performance.
Getting to this point hasn't been a glide path for T-Mobile, and it still faces turbulence. Just in the past few months, T-Mobile has raised prices on many of its legacy plans (and then turned around and gave out free lines to some). It has also switched all of its current plans to a model that does not include taxes and fees, some of which incrementally increased this spring. Until this year, the main unlimited data plans incorporated taxes and fees into the monthly cost.
T-Satellite goes online in July with more features
T-Mobile's wireless performance is not the only thing looking skyward. The T-Satellite service, which enables texting from most smartphones via the network of over 620 Starlink satellites when out of range of cellular or Wi-Fi networks, will leave beta status on July 23 and be open to anyone. Pricing for the service will be $10 a month, except for customers on the Experience Beyond and Go5G Next plan, which includes T-Satellite as part of the package.
A T-Mobile Space X display at T-Mobile's headquarters.
Jeff Carlson/CNET
That price will apply even if you're a customer of a competing service like AT&T or Verizon; T-Satellite can be activated as a second eSIM on supported devices. Katz said there are currently over 1.8 million customers in the beta program, including tens of thousands of competitors' customers.
He also pointed out that during the beta, three times more messages were received than sent. "If you can't receive an incoming message because you haven't manually connected your phone, you're not really reachable and, in my opinion, you're not really connected," he said, referring to the way competitors' phones initiate a satellite link.
The T-Satellite service will include 911 emergency texting later this year, which will be available to any mobile subscriber, even if they haven't signed up for T-Satellite service (provided their devices can make the connection).
"We just think that with a technology like this, no customer should ever be in a situation where they are unconnected in an emergency," said Katz.
That's not the last of the satellite news, though. T-Satellite will enable MMS messaging to send pictures and short audio clips via satellite on Android phones, with iOS support coming later. In a demonstration I witnessed at T-Mobile's 5G Hub, sending an image, text and requisite burst of emojis wasn't exactly speedy, but they arrived within 30 to 90 seconds.
Building on that, T-Mobile will bring data service to T-Satellite starting Oct. 1. Considering how satellite bandwidth is constrained, T-Mobile is working with operating system providers to implement an API that developers can use to allow reasonable data access in their apps over the satellite connection. Don't expect to stream Netflix while you're camping in the wilderness, but apps such as All Trails will be able to fetch updated information.
"This will be the first time you've seen a direct-to-cell satellite network support data services," said Katz. "We've worked with many different app developers to help them build their apps to recognize that they're connected to satellite and optimize for satellite data."
DoorDash deliveries without all the fees
When it comes to mobile plan perks, T-Mobile has found success with its Magenta Status goodies, which range from everyday discounts on stays at Hilton hotels to T-Mobile Tuesdays, which offer deals such as a recent Wingstop promotion (during which many of the restaurant's locations ran out of chicken nationwide). Katz said the company has seen 1.2 billion redemptions of T-Mobile Tuesdays offers.
On July 8, Magenta Status is gaining a new perk: T-Mobile is partnering with DoorDash to give customers on the most popular plans DashPass service free for a year. Eligible customers can claim the offer through Aug. 4 via T-Mobile Tuesdays in the T-Life app.
"I think DoorDash did something like 2 billion deliveries last year, and the average price of a delivery is $3 to $4," said Katz. "If you have DashPass, you don't pay delivery fees at all. This can save our customers hundreds and hundreds of dollars."
Incentives to switch and T-Mobile's future
Eager to entice customers of the major competing services, T-Mobile is launching the Easy Upgrade program that makes it "screamingly simple," in Katz's words, to switch to T-Mobile. He specifically mentioned Verizon customers "who signed up with Verizon because they believed, and for years it was true, that Verizon had the best network," he said. "And now that we're in a place where it's definitively clear that T-Mobile has the best network, we want to make it really easy for Verizon customers to come and join the Un-carrier."
Katz said T-Mobile will pay off every cost to switch, including the remaining cost of devices up to $800, and give customers a new Apple or Android device without requiring a trade-in (be sure to read the details of these deals).
T-Mobile's ascent to the top of Ookla's list shows that, even though the mobile market in the US is dominated by just a few large players, the field is in flux. AT&T and Verizon continue to build out their own networks and strategies -- Verizon has teased a "Project 624" that is rumored to be revealed on June 24, for instance. Now that T-Mobile has established this lead, I'm eager to see how it plans to hold onto it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2,000-GPU data center launches powered exclusively by reusable batteries — 12-megawatt storage system built on hundreds of repurposed EV batteries
2,000-GPU data center launches powered exclusively by reusable batteries — 12-megawatt storage system built on hundreds of repurposed EV batteries

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2,000-GPU data center launches powered exclusively by reusable batteries — 12-megawatt storage system built on hundreds of repurposed EV batteries

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A data center housing 2,000 GPUs is now successfully run with off-the-grid power using solar panels and repurposed batteries. According to Bloomberg, the site is powered by solar panels that generate at least 12 megawatts of power and backed up by reused EV batteries with up to 63 megawatt-hours of capacity. This should be sufficient power for approximately 10,000 average U.S. homes, with the batteries providing power for over five hours. 2,000 GPUs have an estimated power draw of about four megawatts, so the on-site battery capacity should be enough for around 15 hours. The company behind this project is Redwood Materials, which was founded by JB Straubel, one of the people behind Tesla. Redwood's main business is battery recycling, and it has been focusing on getting battery materials from old EV modules that are no longer useful for transportation and have since been disposed of. But even though these batteries have already reached their end-of-life, Redwood discovered that they still retain about 50% of their capacity. This meant that they can be reused for other purposes that do not require high performance, such as driving an electric car. 'Think of this almost like a retirement home for these batteries,' said Redwood Materials Chief Commercial Officer Cal Lankton. These reused batteries are much cheaper than buying new ones while simultaneously delivering the same performance. So, aside from reducing the burden of disposing of old batteries, it also allows businesses to save on capital expenditure when setting up a backup power supply. Crusoe Energy operates the data center that Redwood is powering with its reused EV batteries. The former is part of the $500-billion OpenAI Stargate project, although it's unclear if the Nevada site is part of that initiative. Lankton says that they expect to deploy more similar systems for the remainder of 2025, with 5 GWh capacity slated to go live next year. Redwood also claims that it's working on 100 MW projects — a crucial development for power-hungry data centers that require stable and consistent power. The exponential growth of data centers is putting a strain on our current electricity supply. Many tech companies are investing in small modular reactors to control their own power, but it will still take years before this technology starts to go online. While already available renewable energy like wind and solar is ideal, they're oftentimes unreliable due to changing conditions, forcing data centers to rely on fossil fuel sources. So, solutions like this help ensure that these tech companies will get the kind of clean power they need without putting a strain on the local electric grid. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

CoreWeave Could Buy Core Scientific. How Should You Play CORZ Stock Here?
CoreWeave Could Buy Core Scientific. How Should You Play CORZ Stock Here?

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CoreWeave Could Buy Core Scientific. How Should You Play CORZ Stock Here?

Core Scientific (CORZ) shares soared late on Thursday following a Wall Street Journal report that CoreWeave (CRWV) is once again interested in acquiring the AI infrastructure company. While top executives from both firms are already in advanced talks, financial terms of the potential agreement remain unknown, the report added. 3 Under-The-Radar Dividend Aristocrats Set to Breakout in Q3 Analysts: AMD Stock Will 'Close the Gap' With Nvidia by 2026. Should You Buy AMD Stock Here? The Saturday Spread: Data-Driven Trades That Cut Through the Noise (GILD, MCD, DJT) Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Including the recent rally, Core Scientific stock is up more than 160% versus its April low. CoreWeave's renewed interest in buying CORZ could prove a meaningful tailwind for the latter's investors since it validates its strategic pivot from crypto mining to AI infrastructure. A potential buyout could help Core Scientific could rposition it as a critical enabler in the generative artificial intelligence arms race. Moreover, takeover agreements often involve a significant premium. So, it's reasonable to believe that an agreement with CRWV will likely deliver immediate value to Core Scientific shareholders. That's what made CORZ shares soar more than 40% on Thursday. On the flip side, investors should note that neither company has so far confirmed reports of buyout discussions. For those sticking with Core Scientific stock at current levels, that's a huge risk given CORZ could give up its recent gains entirely if the WSJ report proved more rumor than reality in the days ahead. Additionally, since the AI stock has rallied some 40%, a strong enough case can be made that much of the anticipated benefit from a potential CoreWeave deal is baked into it already. Caution is warranted in buying CORZ shares also because the company's revenue crashed about 56% year-on-year to a weaker-than-expected $79.5 million in its latest reported quarter. Despite the aforementioned concerns, Wall Street remains bullish on Core Scientific stock, forecasting further upside in the second half of 2025. According to Barchart, the consensus rating on CORZ shares currently sits at 'Strong Buy' with the mean target of about $18 indicating potential for another 7% gain from current levels. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What Executives Need To Know About The State Of Sustainability Reporting In July 2025
What Executives Need To Know About The State Of Sustainability Reporting In July 2025

Forbes

time44 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What Executives Need To Know About The State Of Sustainability Reporting In July 2025

ESG environment social governance investment business concept. Sustainability has dominated the conversation in the corporate world over the past few years. Sustainability reporting; environmental, social, and governance reporting; and climate related-risk reporting were poised to be new standards alongside other financial reporting requirements. However, elections around the world shifted political leadership to the right, resulting in a"green backlash." The future of sustainability reporting is being reevaluated and debated. With so many moving pieces in jurisdictions around the world, it is difficult to know what to watch. Below are key developments that occurred leading up to June and to watch for in July. U.S. Department of Labor Under powers delegated to them under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Department of Labor regulates what factors fund managers can consider when investing retirement funds. In 2020, under Trump, the DOL issued a rule that said investments should be made based on 'pecuniary factors' only. In 2022, under Biden, the DOL issued a new rule saying that investments can consider ESG as a tiebreaker. The 2022 rule allows for the consideration of ESG factors, if, and only if, they are going to make the investment more profitable. The Trump Administration is seeking to reverse the 2022 rule. However, any action created through rulemaking can only be reversed through the same rulemaking April 25, an attorney for the DOL gave notice to the Court of the department's intent to reverse the rule. On May 28, the DOL filed an update, stating the "Department has determined that it will engage in a new rulemaking on the subject of the challenged rule. This rulemaking will appear on the Department's Spring Regulatory Agenda, and the Department intends to move through the rulemaking process as expeditiously as possible.' The posting of regulatory agenda is the first step to the rulemaking process, providing official notice to the public that an agency intends on creating, editing, or rescinding a rule. The DOL will release the 2026 Spring Regulatory Agenda in July. Prepare for the new rule to be released in early 2026, with a comment period in the summer. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission In March 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted the Climate-Related Disclosure Rule to require large publicly traded companies to disclose climate action, greenhouse gas emissions, and the financial impacts of severe weather events. The rule was immediately met with legal challenges and was delayed while the court heard the cases. The lawsuits came from both sides. In February, acting SEC Chair Mark Uyeda began the process to permanently end the rule. At the time, he asked the court for a delay in the proceedings while the SEC takes action to rollback the Climate-Related Disclosure Rule. In March, the SEC officially voted to end their legal defense of the rule. As with the DOL, the reversal of the Biden era rule must go through the rulemaking process. The SEC will also release their 2026 Spring Regulatory Agenda in July, expect the Climate-Related Disclosure Rule to be on the list. Prepare for the new rule to be released in early 2026, with a comment period in the summer. On June 12, the SEC gave notice the are withdrawing a number of proposed rules that were still in the process of being drafted. Most notably, the 2022 'Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies About Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment Practices.' As those rules were never enacted, the withdrawal is effective immediately. State Level Sustainability Reporting With the collapse of sustainability reporting at the national level, focus shifted to state level requirements. Sustainability activists held hope that what could not be obtained at the national level, could be accomplished in Democrat led states. Unlike Congress that meets year round, state legislatures typically meet for 60 days at the beginning of the year. Those legislative sessions mostly concluded in June, with no new notable climate reporting or sustainability reporting requirements adopted. For now, California stands alone as the only state with a climate reporting requirement. In September 2023, California approved the Climate Accountability Package, a pair of bills aimed at creating sustainability reporting requirements. Senate Bill 253 required companies that do business in California and have an excess of $1 billion in revenue, defined as 'reporting entities', to submit an annual report for Scope 1 and Scope 2 starting in 2026, for FY 2025. Scope 3 reporting will begin in 2027, for FY 2026. The responsibility of drafting specific regulations and implementing the reporting standards was delegated to the California Air Resources Board. CARB was initially given until January 1, 2025 to draft the rules and processes. That was delayed until July 1. CARB will not meet that deadline. CARB is still in the informal pre-rulemaking stage and debating what standards will be used to determine what companies fall under the reporting requirements. They are working on the definitions of 'doing business in California', revenue, and corporate relationships between parent and subsidiary companies. For now, if your company meets the revenue requirements in SB 253 or SB 261 and has over $735,000 in annual sales in California or $73,500 in property in California, keep a close eye on this process. CARB wants to release the rule by the end of the year. A fast-track approach still takes about three months, so I expect CARB will shift to the formal stage by September. Now is the time for interested parties to weigh in. Once the formal process begins, the template will be set and changes are hard to argue. I question if the California standard will survive the 2026 legislative session. Governor Newsome questioned the viability of the initial proposal, but still signed it. With the SEC withdrawing reporting requirements, no other states following California's lead, and the European Union rolling back international standards, it is difficult to believe California will stand alone in imposing such a burdensome requirement. EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting The most vigorous debate on the future of sustainability reporting is unfolding in the European Union. The EU was the world leader in the establishment of sustainability reporting requirements. They are now rolling back those requirements. As part of the European Green Deal, a trilogy of directives were passed to force businesses to address climate change and report GHG missions. However, the cost of these proposals on businesses and the broader impact on the EU economy became a theme during the 2024 elections. The shift to the right in EU politics embolden opponents to the European Green Deal directives. As a result, the Commission proposed a package of new directives to 'reduce the burden' on businesses. The Omnibus Simplification Package was officially adopted by the Commission in February. The Commission proposal raised the thresholds for businesses to have to report under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Council adopted their proposal on June 23. Now it is being debated in the Parliament. The current CSRD uses a two out of three criteria test to determine if a company must report: 250 employees, €50 million in net turnover, and €25 million in assets. The Commission proposes raising the employee threshold. Stating 'to be subject to the reporting requirements an undertakings must have an average of more than 1000 employees during the financial year and either a net turnover above €50 million or a balance sheet total above €25 million.' The Council's proposal uses the 1000 employee threshold, but raises the annual turnover to €450 million. The Parliament is debating a proposal to raise the employee threshold to 3000. The current CSDDD requires companies to execute due diligence in ensuring that companies along the value chain are in compliance with environmental and human rights requirements. The Commission did not propose changes to the scope, but the Council wants to raise the employee threshold to 5000 employees and an annual net turnover of €1.5 billion. The Parliament is debating a proposal to raise the employee threshold to 3000. Sustainability advocates are fighting to save the directives, but it is a losing battle. Changes are coming to both the CSRD and the CSDDD, the debate is over the scope of those changes. The Commission proposal effectively removes 80% of businesses in the EU from having to report. It also eliminates nearly all non-EU based businesses. Watch the Parliament. Members and the parties were required to submit amendments by June 27. Those will most likely be published the first week of July. The party leaders will meet on July 15 to discuss the proposals and begin official negotiations for the final bill. The Parliament is expected to adopt its final position on October 13. That will be debated in a trilogue negations between the Council, Commission, and Parliament in November and December. Final changes should be adopted in December or January. In February 2024, the EU adopted the Directive on Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition, legislation that specifically targeted green and climate related claims. The Directive banned generic environmental claims 'without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim.' In June 2024, the Council of the European Union announced its position on the Green Claims Directive. The Commission, Council, and Parliament were in the 'trilogue' negotiations on the final language. The directive appeared poised for passage, but momentum to rollback green initiatives caught the green directive. In mid-June, members of Parliament from the EPP sent a letter to the environment Commissioner Jessika Roswall threatening to pull all support of the directive. On June 20, the Commission announced they were planning to withdraw the proposal, a procedural step that would terminate negotiations. The political blowback was swift from moderate political parties, threatening the support of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. For a presidency in a multi-party system, where leadership is based on coalitions rather than majority, the loss of support could be devastating. However, by June 24, the Commission was reversing course. Keep an eye on this issue in July. Watch for the Commission to propose a reduced Green Claims Directive, most likely removing some SMEs from falling under the requirements. For now, negotiations on the anti-greenwashing legislation are stalled.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store