logo
History Today: How George Floyd's killing in US gave rise to ‘Black Lives Matter' movement

History Today: How George Floyd's killing in US gave rise to ‘Black Lives Matter' movement

First Post25-05-2025

On May 25, 2020, the killing of George Floyd led to what is considered the largest protest movement in United States history and a conversation on racism and policing. Floyd, a Black man, died after Derek Chauvin, a white Minneapolis police officer, pressed his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly 10 minutes. Protesters filled the streets, shouting slogans such as 'Black Lives Matter' and soon spread across the US read more
Floyd was handcuffed and repeatedly said he could not breathe. Reuters/File Photo
On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, a Black man, died after a white Minneapolis police officer pressed his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly ten minutes. Floyd was handcuffed and repeatedly said he could not breathe.
Bystanders filmed the incident, and the video quickly spread, leading to what is believed to be the largest protest movement in US history. It opened a public discussion on race and policing.
Also, on this day in 1977, George Lucas's science fiction film 'Star Wars' was released. It would go on to become one of the most popular and influential film series ever made.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today, is your one-stop destination to explore key events.
Let's take a look at the events:
George Floyd was killed, 'Black Lives Matter' begins
On this day in 2020, the killing of George Floyd led to what is believed to be the largest protest movement in United States history and a huge discussion on racism and policing.
George Floyd, a Black man, was killed by Derek Chauvin , a white Minneapolis police officer, who pressed his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly ten minutes.
People take part in a Black Lives Matter protest in Oklahoma City. Reuters/File Photo
Floyd, a father of five, had gone to a local convenience store in Minneapolis to buy cigarettes. A store clerk suspected he had used a fake $20 note and called the police.
When the officers arrived, they drew a gun on Floyd, who at first followed their instructions and allowed himself to be arrested. But when they tried to put him in a police vehicle, he said he was claustrophobic and resisted.
Police then pulled him from the car and pinned him to the ground. Chauvin kept his knee on Floyd's neck for nine minutes and twenty-nine seconds.
By the time an ambulance arrived, Floyd was unresponsive and was declared dead at a nearby hospital.
A video of the incident quickly spread on Facebook, and protests began in Minneapolis within hours. They soon spread across the country.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Protesters took to the streets in all parts of the country, shouting slogans like 'Black Lives Matter' and ' I Can't Breathe .' Police in many cities responded using riot-control tactics.
A demonstrator holds a sign during the Black Lives Matter protest. Reuters/File Photo
The incident also brought fresh attention to the earlier deaths of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor, two other Black Americans who had been killed that year.
In the weeks that followed Floyd's death, protests were held in more than 2,000 cities and towns across all 50 US states, as well as in cities around the world.
Despite the Covid-19 pandemic and restrictions on public gatherings, people kept marching throughout June. Protesters faced heavy resistance from local and federal law enforcement, many of whom were in riot gear.
Chauvin was arrested four days later, on May 29, 2020. He was charged with second-degree and third-degree murder, along with second-degree manslaughter.
He was later sentenced to 22 and a half years in prison.
When the first 'Star Wars' film was released
On this day in 1977, Memorial Day weekend in the United States began with the release of Star Wars , the first film in what would become one of the most successful franchises in cinema history.
Created by George Lucas, the story is set 'a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away' and follows Luke Skywalker, played by then little-known actor Mark Hamill, as he gets caught up in a battle between a powerful empire and rebel fighters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Despite opening in just 42 theatres, the film made nearly $3 million in its first week. By the end of that summer, it had earned over $100 million in the US alone.
It would go on to become one of the most popular and influential film series ever made. Image: X
Star Wars won six Academy Awards and received a special honour for sound design. It transformed the film industry with its groundbreaking visual effects.
The film quickly became a cultural sensation. It led to a wide range of related media, including more films, TV shows, comics, toys, video games and merchandise.
Two sequels, The Empire Strikes Back (1980) and The Return of the Jedi (1983), brought back most of the original cast and were just as successful, both critically and commercially.
The Star Wars universe has continued to grow, with new films and series being released well into the 2020s.
This Day, That Year
1611: Emperor Jahangir married Mehr-un-Nissa, who would later be known as Nur Jahan. She became one of the most powerful and influential women in Mughal history.
1977: China lifted a ten-year ban on the works of William Shakespeare, which was seen as a shift in the country's cultural policies.
1979: An accident took place when an American Airlines DC-10 crashed shortly after takeoff from Chicago's O'Hare Airport, killing 273 people.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
2011: The final episode of The Oprah Winfrey Show aired. The long-running programme made Winfrey one of the wealthiest and most influential women in the US.
2012: SpaceX made history as its Dragon capsule became the first private spacecraft to successfully dock with the International Space Station.
2018: Harvey Weinstein was arrested and charged in New York with rape and another sex offence in what was the first prosecution to follow the wave of accusations against him.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?
Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?

First Post

time8 minutes ago

  • First Post

Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk have called time on their friendship in the most shocking of ways — social media posts were fired off, threats were made, and big bombshells were dropped. In the aftermath of it, Tesla stocks tanked, and the world's richest man's personal net worth declined. Yes, this breakup could be costly for both. Here's how read more The aftermath of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup raises the question: Who has the most to lose? File image/Reuters No one believed that the Donald Trump-Elon Musk friendship would be one that would last forever. But the fact that it ended in the most spectacular of ways and that too so quickly was not anticipated. On Thursday (June 5), America's two most powerful men — one is the US president and the other is the world's richest man — spent time on social media trying to destroy each other's reputations with threats and secrets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Their spectacular breakup also means the end to perhaps the most powerful of alliances in the US with many pondering who emerges as the bigger loser in this spat. Does Trump have more to lose or will Musk be the one to suffer? A bromance turns nasty It was last July when Elon Musk endorsed Trump for president and became an integral part of his campaign machinery — who can forget Musk manically jumping around at Trump rallies, funding a massive super-PAC on his behalf. Later, when Trump became US president, he returned the favour by appointing Musk to take charge at Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). When Elon Musk attached himself to Trump many began speculating when these two massive egos would, eventually, clash and that their strategic partnership would flame out spectacularly. And crash and burn the relationship did. Since late May, Musk has been vocally critical of Trump's so-called big, beautiful spending bill. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning. But Trump kept his cool and bid adieu to Musk as he called time on his service to the White House. Once out of government, though, the Tesla chief took his criticism against the bill even further. He called the bill a 'd isgusting abomination ,' threatened to politically retaliate against its supporters, and argued it would increase the debt. Social media posts by US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are displayed on smartphones. Trump has threatened to revoke government contracts from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as a public feud escalates over Musk's criticism of the Trump administration's policies. AFP The US president then shot back on Thursday, while he had a sit down in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ' I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said. 'He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He further stated, ' I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Trump then took the fight online, writing in one social media post, 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' And this led Musk to hit back. Musk argued, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election' and accused Trump of 'such ingratitude.' And that wasn't the end, the feud kept going with Musk levelling a serious allegation, '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consequences of the big, nasty breakup But who shall suffer from this breakup? After all, it was a mutual relationship benefiting both individuals. Many analysts and Trump watchers believe Musk shall be the big loser from this breakup. In fact, as the two bickered on social media, Tesla shares slumped — dropping 14 per cent, wiping out roughly $150 billion in market value in one of the worst days in months. Analysts and pundits believed that the losses were an indication of what might be at stake for Musk. Musk's personal net worth also took a tumble on Thursday — it fell by nearly $34 billion, making him the biggest daily loser on Bloomberg's list of the world's 500 richest people. Trump could even take the fight further with cancelling government contracts with Musk's various companies, including SpaceX and Tesla. In fact, the US president even suggested this while feuding with Musk online. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California. If the Trump administration pauses government contracts, SpaceX will lose billions of dollars. Reuters According to data available, last year, Musk's companies were promised $3 billion in nearly 100 contracts with 17 government agencies. Additionally, Reuters reported that if Trump did go ahead with this move, about $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts would be at risk. In addition to hitting his businesses, this feud could also threaten Musk's stay in the US. Musk is not a natural-born American — he was born in Pretoria, South Africa and thanks to his mother, Maye Musk, obtained Canadian citizenship in 1989 when he was 17 years old. This helped him move to North America for his studies and eventually to the United States. It was only in 2002 that he became a naturalised US citizen. Moreover, Musk has already lost his fan base on the liberal side and now with the fight with Trump, he will also lose his Conservative supporters. This will be bad for Musk — personally and from a business standpoint. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 5, Elon Musk and Donald Trump ended their friendship in the most spectacular way. File image/Reuters But many also note that the Trump-Musk feud also has the potential to hurt the US president. How? When Trump was campaigning, Musk emerged as one of his major donors. The SpaceX chief spent more than $250 million to get Trump elected. Now imagine if he used that same financial clout against the US president. Musk could fund campaigns against Republicans, hurting Trump in the long run. Moreover, he could also align with fiscally conservative lawmakers to block Trump's signature tax bill in the Senate. Besides this, Musk could also use the time he has spent with Trump against him. After spending a lot of time closely with the US president, he could use information that the two shared to hurt Trump. He could make big revelations, which have the ability to hurt the US president. For instance, on Thursday, amid the online battle Musk claimed that the US president was part of the Epstein Files STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk could also use X against Trump — the X owner has more than 220 million followers compared to the US president's 105.6 million followers. As some note, Musk could use the platform to keep airing his grievances against Trump. In fact, on Thursday, he called for the impeachment of the US president and even asked his followers 'is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle?' It's left to be seen if Trump or Musk will win this battle, but for now, we can buckle up and wait for their next steps. With inputs from agencies

How Thane Techie Spied For Pakistan's ISI, Shared Info On Indian Warships
How Thane Techie Spied For Pakistan's ISI, Shared Info On Indian Warships

NDTV

time14 minutes ago

  • NDTV

How Thane Techie Spied For Pakistan's ISI, Shared Info On Indian Warships

Mumbai: A week after a 27-year-old man from Maharashtra was arrested in an alleged espionage case, it has now emerged how he spied for his Pakistani agents and the information that he shared with them. Ravi, a mechanical engineer based in Thane, had shared intelligence about Indian warships and submarines with his Pakistani handler. He had provided inputs about 14 Navy ships, out of which the inputs about five ships were accurate. For this, he received money from Pakistan's spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the police said. Ravi was "honey-trapped" by a Pakistani agent who had befriended him on Facebook, posing as a woman, officials had earlier said. He was found sharing sensitive information with the Pakistani operative through WhatsApp, officials said. Based on a tip-off, he was arrested on May 29 by the Thane unit of the Anti-Terrorism Squad. He has been charged with criminal conspiracy and relevant sections of the Official Secrets Act. Two others who were taken into custody along with him were left off after an inquiry. Indian agencies had heightened surveillance in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent India-Pakistan tensions. Over a dozen men and women have been arrested on charges of sharing sensitive information with Pakistani intelligence operatives. This includes two influencers, travel vlogger Jyoti Malhotra and YouTuber Jasbir Singh. Both had over a million subscribers on YouTube and had travelled to Pakistan multiple times. They are currently being probed. A student from Punjab and a security guard from Haryana are among others who face charges of leaking classified information across the border.

The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats
The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats

In a hulking grey building just east of Tiananmen square in Beijing, a small team in China's Ministry of Commerce is deciding the fate of the global auto industry , one rare earth magnet export permit at a time. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets - a crucial component in electric vehicle motors - and it added them to an export control list in April as part of its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licenses. It falls to the Bureau of Industrial Security and Import and Export Control - which is part of China's Ministry of Commerce - to review export permits for the rare earth magnets, which are vital for car motors, wind turbines and even U.S. F-35 fighter jets. While dozens of licences have been issued since late April, executives, lobbyists and diplomats say they are only a small fraction of the applications that have flooded in from automakers, semiconductor companies and aerospace firms around the world since the tougher export controls were introduced. Washington says delays in issuing export licences show China is reneging on commitments made during trade talks in Geneva last month and it has retaliated with export curbs on plane engine parts and other equipment. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks by phone on Thursday as the escalating dispute over China's rare earth stranglehold threatened to derail the fragile trade truce agreed between the two superpowers. When the new rare earth magnet measures came in, the export control bureau had a total of just 30 staff, though this has since been doubled to around 60, according to two sources who were briefed on a meeting between the ministry and Chinese and European semiconductor firms last week. "We appreciate that MOFCOM has increased its resources to address demand and they're working hard and long hours on these issues," said Adam Dunnett, Secretary General of the European Chamber of Commerce in China, referring to the ministry. "But the reality is this is having a huge impact on a wide variety of sectors. It's something that could have been better planned and rolled out," he said. According to personnel records posted to the Ministry of Commerce's website in June 2024, there are only three senior officials within the bureau who can approve the export permits. The ministry's website lists the export licence bureau's office hours as: Weekdays, 8:30-11:30 a.m., 14:00-17:00 p.m. Reuters was unable to determine current staffing levels or whether more officials are now able to approve applications. The Ministry of Commerce did not respond to questions from Reuters on this subject. Chokepoint The global alarm over shortages underscores the enormous leverage China has acquired through its near-monopoly on rare earth production. It also reveals a complex bureaucratic process that has gone from checkpoint to chokepoint. "The process for our suppliers to apply for export licences for various rare earths ... since April, is complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information," a spokesperson for Bosch, the German engineering and technology multinational, said last month. A Chinese-language guide to the process published by the Ministry in late March runs to almost 14,000 Mandarin characters. European auto suppliers alone have filed hundreds of requests since early April, with only about a quarter granted. These applications can range from dozens to hundreds of pages, according to sources who have either filed requests or been briefed about them. Public Ministry of Commerce guidelines require information including technical product descriptions, signed contracts. Descriptions of production facilities and photos of products are also encouraged. China's stated aim is to ensure dual-use items don't end up in military equipment, but officials are often overly cautious even though many applications clearly state commercial use, Dunnett said. "Another concern we have heard from some companies is that they are being asked for sensitive and excessive information that is part of their intellectual property which has led to delays in their applications," Dunnett added. While applications are meant to be processed in 45 working days, the ministry says applications related to national security will take longer, without defining how long. Strategic excuse Cory Combs, head of critical mineral and supply chain research at Trivium China, a policy research group, said it was not clear whether the delays were due to bureaucratic inertia or intentional weaponisation. "We do expect these applications to U.S. end-users to be reviewed on par with other countries and approved whenever they're not for military use," he said. "The issue here is that, is it quick enough for the Trump administration to believe that Beijing has not reneged on the Geneva agreement?" Some U.S. industry figures believe that the bureaucratic backlog is a "strategic excuse". "China can staff up as fast as they want, if they wanted to," said a source from the U.S. rare earths industry who declined to be named for sensitivity reasons. In public, Chinese officials have said the export controls apply to all countries, the implication being that they do not count as a U.S.-specific countermeasure under the Geneva agreement. Foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on May 30 that the rare earth export controls are "non-discriminatory and not targeted at any specific country". During the Geneva talks, however, China privately admitted that the rare earth export controls qualified as non-tariff countermeasures, according to a source briefed on the talks. Rare earths remain a core part of ongoing U.S.-China discussions, the person said. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for clarification. Chinese scholars openly admit that the rare earth export controls are retaliation for U.S. chip curbs. "It's a short-term form of leverage which doesn't hurt China, as the rare earths in question have relatively low monetary value," said Zhu Junwei, an international relations scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Chinese think-tank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store