logo
Idaho legislators shave heads to support colleague, raise awareness for breast cancer screening

Idaho legislators shave heads to support colleague, raise awareness for breast cancer screening

Yahoo26-03-2025

Reps. Jaron Crane and Brooke Green share a hug on March 25, 2025, after Crane shaved his head to support Green's battle against breast cancer. (Clark Corbin/Idaho Capital Sun)
Several Idaho legislators shaved their heads on Tuesday in Boise to support a colleague battling breast cancer and to raise awareness for breast cancer screening.
Rep. Brooke Green, a Boise Democrat, has been battling breast cancer and is preparing to begin chemotherapy.
When Rep. Mike Pohanka, R-Jerome, learned Green would be losing her hair and beginning treatment, Pohanka offered to shave his head too to symbolically go through the battle with her. Pohanka then recruited other legislators to join him.
'It's absolutely incredible,' Pohanka said. 'We're supporting one of our fellow colleagues, who's fighting cancer, and we're all in the corner fighting it with her. We love her.'
'We just want to make sure, as far as raising breast cancer awareness, to get checked out,' Pohanka added. 'Whatever we can do to help support those that are fighting and show them we're in the fight with them.
This year, Green teamed up with several legislators to sponsor a new law, House Bill 134.
The new law requires health insurance companies to cover supplemental breast cancer screening when abnormalities aren't found or suspected in the breast of people who are at high risk for breast cancer due to personal or family history, genetic predisposition or other factors. Supplemental breast cancer screening required to be covered by the bill includes magnetic resonance imaging, or an MRI.
The law takes effect Jan. 1.
Tuesday's event to support Green and breast cancer screening provided several genuinely touching moments that stood in contrast to the divisive nature of modern politics and the contentious Idaho legislative session.
Green visited the Two Zero Eight Salon and Spa in downtown Boise on Tuesday to watch her fellow legislators get their heads shaved. While she was there, Green posed for photos and hugged each of her legislative colleagues who shaved their heads, telling them the support overwhelmed her.
'I love this, you guys are amazing,' Green said.
Some legislators brought their family members to the salon, and Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen, R-Idaho Falls, snapped photos and offered positive encouragement to each of the men waiting in line to shave off their hair.
Rep. John Shirts, R-Weiser, volunteered to have his head shaved first Tuesday. Just hours before taking his seat in the barber's chair, the student pages who assist legislators presented Shirts with a humorous award for 'best hair' in appreciation of his perfectly groomed salt-and-pepper hair.
Shirts said he hasn't shaved his head since joining the military in 2014, but he didn't hesitate Tuesday to buzz it all off.
'When someone's going through a trying time you can get caught up in the session, all the politics of it, but there's a human side as well and you want to be able to support your colleagues and help them through it,' Shirts said.
Legislators who shaved their heads include Pohanka, Shirts and Reps. Jaron Crane, R-Nampa; Josh Wheeler, R-Ammon; Dan Garner, R-Clifton; Mark Sauter, R- Sandpoint; Jeff Cornilles, R-Nampa; and Jack Nelson, R-Jerome.
Green and the legislators who shaved their heads said they want to highlight the importance of breast cancer screening and early detection. House Bill 134 is one way to do that, she said.
'I've been here for seven years and I've carried several bills, but this one is by far the most meaningful one … Because it's going to help so many Idaho and women,' Green told the Idaho Capital Sun in an interview Tuesday.
The bill was cosponsored by a mix of over two dozen Republican and Democratic state lawmakers. Green said it's one of the most politically diverse cosponsor lists she has seen.
Days after her first breast cancer diagnosis, Green said her radiologist brought the issue to her attention.
She recalled seeing women on Facebook groups saying they needed an MRI, but couldn't afford it.
'And I look to her, and I go, 'Oh my goodness. If we could just get you that MRI early, you're gonna have a better prognosis than say for me, who's at stage two, or somebody who's got stage three or four because they waited too long,'' Green told the Sun. 'And so passing this legislation or being a part of it while I'm going through treatment really makes it that much more meaningful.'
While working on the bill, Green said she's built stronger bonds with colleagues in the Legislature.
Green told the Sun, she was surprised to see her legislative colleagues shave their heads, but she said the support from her Republican colleagues shows how the issue reaches across the political aisle.
'Breast cancer isn't a partisan thing. … It brings people together in the worst kind of ways, and gets everybody in support of a cause,' Green said.
Little signed the bill Monday, a spokesperson for the governor's office told the Idaho Capital Sun.
'I want to highlight Representative Brooke Green as she has courageously battled breast cancer, all while serving in the legislature this session and bringing meaningful legislation forward,' Little told the Sun in a written statement on Tuesday. 'HB 134 ensures access to life-saving breast cancer screening for at-risk individuals, reducing long-term treatment costs for Idahoans, hospitals, and insurers.'
The Idaho Legislature widely passed the bill this year, on a 62-6 vote in the House and a 25-10 vote in the Senate.
The bill doesn't take effect until next year, Green said, mainly to give health insurers time to plan for the requirements. In the meantime, she said she's working on a fact-sheet and educational resources for doctors.
The bill doesn't apply to self-insured health insurance plans, like at major companies like Micron and St. Luke's, Green told the Sun. But, she added, 'we really want to empower women to be able to continue to push for it. Because (in) Idaho, we cannot mandate self-insured plans.'
Next year, said she expects to bring more breast cancer-related bills forward, but she isn't sure yet what they'll look like.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth Stumped by Law 101 Question About Marines in L.A.
Hegseth Stumped by Law 101 Question About Marines in L.A.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth Stumped by Law 101 Question About Marines in L.A.

Pete Hegseth was at a loss when a senator asked him to cite the part of the Constitution that authorized the deployment of 700 active-duty marines against anti-ICE protestors in Los Angeles. 'I'd have to pull up the specific provision,' Donald Trump's defense secretary, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Wednesday, told Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat. 'But our Office of General Counsel, alongside our leadership, has reviewed and ensured, in the order that we set out, that it's completely constitutional for the president to use federal troops to defend federal law enforcement.' Baldwin wasn't appeased. 'Look, I'd like to know the specific constitutional, statutory authority,' she said. The senator observed that Trump had pointed to the law he invoked to send the National Guard into L.A. 'There's plenty of precedent of active-duty troops being used to support law enforcement—historical precedent,' Hegseth fired back. Baldwin said she was not trying to dispute this point and pressed Hegseth once more for a straight answer. 'It's in the order ma'am, but we'll make sure we get it to you as well,' Hegseth said. Trump sent in the marines on Monday, after previously deploying 2,000 national guardsmen over the weekend. While a state's governor typically signs off in the rare instance when troops are used against American citizens, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, did not approve the decision. The governor has accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis' by sending in troops and said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' As Trump again went over his head to deploy marines, Newsom pleaded with a court to intervene. 'They must be stopped immediately,' read a court filing. Trump's deployment of the National Guard, which cited the Title 10 authority, was already a legal gray area. It says the president can only mobilize the guard against his own citizens in times of invasion or rebellion.

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race
Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Democrats look for reinvention and a new playbook against Trump in key committee race

Whoever wins will immediately be squaring off against Republicans as they prepare for splashy hearings this summer on immigration enforcement, LGBTQ rights and former President Joe Biden's age and mental condition while in office. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As they hear from the candidates, Democrats are weighing many of the factors that were in play late last year, when Connolly, a veteran member of the committee, fended off a challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. Advertisement A look at how the race is shaping up: The age factor The debate over Biden's age coincides with a reckoning over seniority and generational change happening across the Democratic Party. Four House Democrats are running for the position: Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, the acting ranking member; Jasmine Crockett of Texas, a viral sensation; Robert Garcia, a former Los Angeles County mayor who has pitched colleagues on a government reform agenda; and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, former president of the NAACP and civil rights advocate. Advertisement While Lynch is the most senior of the four, Democrats broadly said they are more open to breaking from seniority than they were in December, when Connolly, then 74, beat out Ocasio-Cortez, 35, for the job. Democrats are interested in how the candidates would communicate with the public, how they would help support lawmakers in battleground districts — and of course, how they would challenge President Donald Trump and his administration. How the four Democrats are making their case Crockett, 44, has pitched herself as the candidate best able to compete with Trump's pugnacious and attention-grabbing style. Democrats, Crockett has argued, often fail to connect with voters and explain why the president's actions may be harmful. She believes she can. 'It's a matter of bringing that in, having a hearing and making sure that we are translating it and amplifying it,' Crockett told MSNBC in an interview. 'Communications has to be a full-on strategy.' Garcia, 47, has focused on government reform and effectiveness, a key issue for Democrats after the Trump administration's blitz across federal agencies and mass firings of federal workers by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Mfume, 76, has attracted support from members impressed by his longtime stewardship of the nation's oldest civil rights group. He returned to Congress after decades leading the NAACP following the death of a previous Democratic Oversight chair, the late Congressman Elijah Cummings, a fellow Baltimore Democrat. Lynch, 70, has styled himself as the acting chair and the lawmaker best positioned to take on the committee's chairman, Republican James Comer of Kentucky. 'There are some members who speak to a very narrow audience, and that's great,' Lynch said. Advertisement 'We want them to be energized and animated. But that same person is not going to go to the Rust Belt with people that are farmers, moderates, conservatives,' Lynch told The Associated Press. 'You need different voices to appeal to different constituencies.' 'I think I have a better chance of bringing back the blue-collar working people, and I have less of a chance of appealing to very younger people who are intensely invested in social media,' Lynch said. What's ahead as Democrats make their choice The vote for Oversight ranking member is scheduled for June 24 and will be conducted by secret ballot. All four candidates are speaking before multiple caucuses this week, including the New Democrats and the progressive caucus, the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. While many Democrats are undecided, others have made up their mind. Some who are privately stumping for their candidate believe it will be a tight race. That makes the public forums and private pitches even more crucial in the run-up to the vote. House progressives are divided over their preferred choice. Three members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus — Crockett, Garcia and Mfume — are vying for the ranking member seat, which makes it unlikely the caucus will back a single candidate. 'We're looking for folks that could expose this kind of corruption and hold Trump and his billionaire donors accountable,' said Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, the Progressive Caucus chair. Rep. Brad Schneider, chair of the centrist New Democrat Coalition, said he's weighing two factors: which candidate could best help Democrats win the 2026 midterm elections and whether they can successfully lead investigations into the Trump administration and 'try to repair some of the damage that's been done.' Advertisement 'The committee can be a flash point, or it can be a very effective place for us to make our point, and we want to know who's going to do best in that role to make sure the committee works to help us secure 218 (members) next November,' Schneider said. The role of seniority and the Congressional Black Caucus Some Democratic caucuses have traditionally prized seniority as a clear and reliable way for lawmakers of color to rise through the ranks. There has never been a Hispanic Oversight chairman and only one Black chairman, Elijah Cummings. 'The CBC has always stood for seniority,' said Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia. But Johnson noted that the Black Caucus has at times 'deviated' from that norm. He said many in the caucus are open to a conversation about age. 'So, Steve Lynch, I think, is the next senior member. And but as I said, other factors have to be considered and I'm sure that, along with myself, other CBC members are going through that process,' Johnson said. 'Since I've been here, seniority has had weight,' said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, who said he was undecided on which candidate to back. 'But seniority is not the only thing. And there are times and circumstances where the person with the most seniority has not won. Whether that's one of these times or not is what we're going to see.' Associated Press writer Leah Askarinam contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store