'Lone actor' attacks keep happening. Trump is dismantling the office that helps spot them
'Lone actor' attacks keep happening. Trump is dismantling the office that helps spot them The day before a violent political attack in Minnesota, the last top officials at a program that aims to spot so-called 'lone actor' violent domestic extremists were reassigned to other roles.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Suspect charged in 'targeted' shootings of Minnesota lawmakers
Vance Boelter faces six charges, including murder and stalking, after he allegedly "targeted" two Minnesota lawmakers at their homes.
Just as politically motivated attacks by so-called "lone actors" surge across the country, the administration of President Donald Trump is dismantling the very office that oversees efforts to identify and stop such violent extremists before they strike.
In the four months since Trump took office, his administration has shrunk the Department of Homeland Security's Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships, or CP3, from dozens of analysts and supervisors to fewer than 10 people, led by a 22-year-old recent graduate with no law enforcement or homeland security experience.
Indeed, less than 24 hours before a man shot two Minnesota legislators and their spouses, killing one couple and critically injuring the other, the CP3 office reassigned the last of its senior advisors, said Bill Braniff, who used to lead the center but quit in protest in March.
'The office is being incrementally dismantled,' said Braniff, who is now executive director of the Polarization & Extremism Research & Innovation Lab (PERIL) at American University. 'They explicitly say that they're terminating the office – it's not like this is innuendo.'
In a statement, a DHS official pushed back on claims that dismantling the CP3 program is putting American lives at risk, saying it "plays an insignificant and ineffective role in the broader efforts."
"The Department of Homeland Security has a robust counterterrorism program," the official said in a statement. "Unfortunately, under the Biden administration, CP3 was weaponized against political opponents and its main purpose was to funnel money to progressive groups. It should be no surprise to anyone that the Trump Administration is making a diligent effort to end waste, fraud, and abuse – this office is just another example.'
DHS did not respond to detailed questions about the program and its effectiveness. National security experts, including one who ran counter-terrorism efforts under Trump in his first term, told USA TODAY the dismantling of the CP3 office is dangerous and counter-productive, especially given the steady drumbeat of politically motivated killings that has marked the first half of 2025.
'This is the destruction of our prevention infrastructure," said Jacob Ware, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of 'God, Guns and Sedition: Far-Right Extremism in America.'
'Really the best way that we have to to counter lone actor terrorism is through 'See something, say something' programs,' Ware said. 'If you're going to cut funding to all the great organizations in our country who work day-to-day to prevent violence in their communities, and you're going to redirect resources away from law enforcement, then the only way that we have to counter lone actor terrorism is not going to work.'
According to CP3's annual report last year, between 2020 and 2023, 17 different programs opened more than 1,100 inquiries into individuals who were 'exhibiting behavioral indicators associated with the pathway to violence.' Of those, more than 70% of cases were referred to mental health professionals for counselling, but 77 were sent to law enforcement for a potential criminal investigation.
The report lays out several case studies of potential violent extremists who were identified through programs funded by CP3, including a student who brought weapons to school and a parent who reported her child's fascination with violent extremism. The student received counseling while the child was later investigated by the FBI.
'Lone actor' incidents are hard to predict
Among experts in domestic terrorism and homeland security, attacks like the shootings in Minnesota over the weekend are known as 'lone actor' incidents. They're incredibly difficult for law enforcement to predict or disrupt.
Lone actors usually don't advertise their intentions. They don't typically publish 'manifestos' laying out their gripes and conspiracies until during or after their crimes. They tend not to be members of organized groups that are on the radar of law enforcement. Instead, they quietly hoard weapons, scope out sites and research their victims.
Quite often, however, lone actors do send signals of a coming attack – they say suspicious things to family, friends or colleagues. The suspect in last weekend's shootings, for example, sent a friend an eerie text message, saying he may be dead soon.
For more than a decade, programs have existed across the country that help communities – everyone from school teachers to workplace managers to local police officers – spot the warning signs that a terrorist is about to strike. Groups long ago set up 'See something, say something' hotlines for concerned citizens to call and report suspicious activity.
These programs – essentially the only weapon in the government's arsenal to prevent random acts of political violence – have long received funding from CP3, which is now being shuttered.
That's happening amidst a surge in lone actor domestic terrorism. The Minnesota shootings were just the latest in a series of deadly politically motivated attacks – from both extremes of the political spectrum. Since the beginning of the year, lone attackers have set fire to a governor's mansion in Pennsylvania, shot and killed a young Jewish couple in Washington, D.C. and firebombed a pro-Israel march in Boulder, Colorado.
Braniff and others are quick to stress the programs overseen by CP3 aren't a panacea.
There's no guarantee that concerned friends, neighbors or colleagues will call the hotlines funded by the center. But given the immense difficulty in preventing lone actor attacks, those programs are at least one effective tool, and they're being junked by the federal government under Trump.
'A political football'
The office currently known as 'CP3' has had various iterations over the years, and has seldom been short of controversy.
During the first Trump term, in early 2017, the administration decided unilaterally to pull $10 million of Congressionally approved funding from what was then known as the 'Countering Violent Extremism' program. Arguing that organizations like the Heartland Democracy Center, which sets up counseling groups for kids at risk of radicalization, were biased against conservatives, the administration froze grants that had been approved for anti-extremism efforts.
Reborn as CP3 under President Joe Biden, the center grew to a staff of more than 70 people at its height, Braniff said. But when Trump was reelected, the office immediately began to shed staff. A 22-year old recent graduate with no experience of extremism prevention programs was appointed to run the center earlier this year. In March, Braniff quit.
'This office has been a political football,' Braniff said.
For a decade, efforts like those run under CP3 have been an essential tool in the fight against domestic terrorism, said Javed Ali, senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council in 2017 and 2018 under Trump.
Crucially, these attackers come from all sides of the political spectrum, Ali said.
'There is a large pool of people in this country who are highly radicalized for whatever reasons, but they are not all swimming in the same ideological sea,' Ali said. 'These are all people who are flying under the radar, but are very angry, and on their own timeline they decide now is the moment to conduct an attack.'
Time to regroup
The programs supported by CP3 don't just aim to identify possible lone actors. They also help to wean people away from extremist groups through counseling, according to the agency's annual report, which highlighted several counseling programs.
And at the same time the Trump administration is dismantling the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships, researchers who monitor such groups worry that far-right groups in particular are taking the opportunity to rebuild.
The leaders of the two most well-known far-right extremist groups, the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, were both convicted of seditious conspiracy for their roles in the Jan. 6 insurrection. Both men were pardoned by President Trump and have vowed to rebuild and revamp their organizations.
Ware said the Jan. 6 pardons sent a clear message to Americans who are willing to engage in political violence: As long as it is directed towards the political left, or opponents of President Trump, it will be tolerated, if not encouraged, he said.
'I would not just say Trump is ignoring the far right, I would say he's actively sending messages that the violence is tolerable – violence is accepted – violence is legal and legitimate, as long as it's perpetrated on our behalf,' Ware said. 'And that is catastrophic from a messaging standpoint.'
Colin P. Clarke, director of research at the Soufan Group, a global intelligence consultancy, agreed.
'In the longer term, groups like the Oath Keepers, these guys can now spend the next four years stockpiling – training, commiserating – without any concern,' Clarke said. 'And so what you get at the end of this is you have far more robust militia groups and other violent extremists that have just had free rein to rebuild their organizations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Futures fall, Fed meeting begins, X CEO Linda Yaccarino: 3 Things
Here are some of the stories Wall Street is watching on June 17. Stock futures (ES=F, NQ=F, YM=F) are slipping after President Trump left the G7 summit early while downplaying a truce between Iran and Israel. The Federal Reserve is beginning the first day of its two-day meeting. The FOMC will announce its decision on interest rates on Wednesday, June 18. Wall Street widely expects the central bank to leave rates unchanged. X CEO Linda Yaccarino speaks with Yahoo Finance from the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Welcome to Yahoo Finance's flagship show, the Morning Brief. I'm Brad Smith. Let's get to the three things that you need to know today. First up, US stock futures falling this morning over increased concerns on the conflict between Israel and Iran as President Trump has called for the evacuation of Tehran. The president's comments come after he left the G7 meeting in Canada early, but said his departure had nothing to do with working on a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, adding that his reason is much bigger than that. Investors were also looking for progress on trade deals at the event in Canada, but none have materialized so far. Plus, the Federal Reserve kicking off its two-day meeting in Washington with investors looking for any clues on the central bank's path forward for interest rates. Economists and investors widely expect the central bank to keep rates on hold as the Fed grapples with economic uncertainty from White House policy. And the CEO of Elon Musk's X social platform weighing on the state of the advertising industry after the Wall Street Journal alleged the social media company had threatened to sue advertisers that didn't buy ads on the platform. Yaccarino says the company is seeing an influx of ad spenders. 96% of our advertisers coming back and a tidal wave of new advertisers coming back. Think about partners that want to be in the gaming conversation, that want to be in the AI conversation. It happens on X. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Former Michigan House speaker joins increasingly crowded GOP primary for Michigan governor
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A former GOP state lawmaker who served as speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives is joining a crowded bench seeking the Republican nomination for the 2026 gubernatorial race in the battleground state. Tom Leonard, who served in the state Legislature from 2013 to 2018, announced his bid for governor Tuesday. He joins three other Republicans in the state who are seeking the office and likely also the endorsement of President Donald Trump. Leonard ran for attorney general in Michigan twice, losing to Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel in the 2018 general election by 3 percentage points and to conservative attorney Matthew DePerno in the 2022 GOP primary. He served as the Michigan House chamber's top lawmaker from 2017 to 2018. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is now term-limited and cannot run again. Candidates from both parties — and one in between — have lined up to replace her. On the Republican side, Leonard joins the field that includes U.S. Rep. John James, former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox and state Senate Leader Aaric Nesbitt. The three have closely aligned their campaigns to Trump's 'Make America Great Again' vision. In a video advertisement announcing his campaign, Leonard focused on affordability and education. While the video showed a headline of Trump tapping Leonard as U.S. attorney in 2019, Leonard said, 'As President Trump protects his border, I'll have his back." However, Leonard was never confirmed for the position due to objections from Michigan's two Democratic senators. On the Democratic side, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson are competing for the nomination. And finally, the longtime Democratic mayor of Detroit Mike Duggan is running for governor, but as an independent. Nationwide, midterm elections tend to favor the party not in power, which could boost the Democratic nominee in 2026. But in recent memory in Michigan, the governor's office has flipped to the opposite party every time there has been an open race.


San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment
WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program. But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was 'very close' to having a nuclear bomb. Trump's statement aligned him with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, rather than with his own top intelligence adviser. The Republican president was expected to meet with national security officials in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps. Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.' The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations. Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump, is expected to testify Tuesday in a closed session on Capitol Hill, along with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, during a previously scheduled budget hearing. Both officials would likely face questions about their views on Iran and Trump's latest statements. Representatives for Gabbard and the CIA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Gabbard, in her March testimony to lawmakers, said the intelligence community was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that its "enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs should it choose to do so. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful. An earlier intelligence report, released in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran 'is not building a nuclear weapon.' However, it said the country has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses,' such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built. Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that. In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president. 'President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists,' the statement said. 'Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies.'