Row over 'appalling' California Cross Post Office comparison
A councillor's comments comparing a controversial junction redesign to the Post Office Horizon scandal have been branded "appalling".The California Cross junction in Wokingham, Berkshire, has been the subject of debate since it reopened in autumn 2024, with concerns mainly centred around its safety.Councillor Peter Harper accused the Liberal Democrat administration of "waving the flag about how wonderful the scheme is" despite the concerns being raised.But the leader of Wokingham Borough Council, Stephen Conway, called the comparison "unwarranted".
On Tuesday, Mr Harper presented a petition calling for changes to be made, signed by 1,600 residents, to an overview and scrutiny management committee meeting.He said: "I get a feeling of this as a sort of discussion the Post Office were having when the Horizon scheme was being discussed – everyone was raising concerns, we have the executive members waving the flag about how wonderful the scheme is, with their heads in the sand."I think we should be listening to the people who are using that scheme, we should be listening to the safety experts."Post Office Horizon scandal: Why hundreds were wrongly prosecutedMr Conway said his "appalling and unwarranted" comments went "well beyond the line of what can be considered acceptable".He also accused the Conservatives of "undermining public confidence" in the junction."Our officers have safety as their primary concern throughout the design and implementation of all highways projects, including this one," he said.
Mr Harper said he had received "many emails" from residents concerned about the safety of the junction, adding: "They believe a serious accident is only a matter of time."He accused the council of having a "wait and see" approach to road safety."At the meeting on Tuesday, I likened the council's approach to that of the Post Office and the Horizon scandal where despite many claims that the IT system was faulty, the Post Office were more interested in protecting their reputation than delivering justice," he said."Of course, the problems of a village roundabout do not compare to the devastation caused by the Post Office scandal, but it is illustrative of mindset that is prevalent in many institutions in the UK."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
17 minutes ago
- ITV News
Water sector needs ‘root-and-branch' reform, MPs say
The water sector is in need of 'root-and-branch reform', a committee of MPs has said as it called for 'much more regulated management' of bonuses for senior bosses. The cross-party Environment, Food and Rural Affairs committee has said that the industry is 'failing', but that water companies are 'deaf to the crisis' that it is facing. In their report, Priorities For Water Sector Reform, released on Monday, the MPs argue that the UK Government 'should feel able to use its temporary nationalisation powers' when needed. They also said the system should 'ensure that more money gained from investors and through customer bills is directed towards investment in water infrastructure and service delivery' and less towards debt repayment or financial rewards for executives. United Utilities was also one of six water companies banned earlier this month from paying bonuses to senior bosses. A new law has been introduced which will prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The system of fines and rewards should also focus on a reduction in pollution incidents, responsible ownership and the need for the sector to have long-term resilience, the MPs said. 'Despite some initial success after privatisation in 1989, root-and-branch reform of the water sector is now needed to improve the sector's culture,' the committee said. As part of their investigation, the MPs found that 'public disquiet has increasingly turned to outrage' at the way water companies and their bosses are benefiting from the sector. 'Over hearings with 10 of the largest water companies and Ofwat, we regularly encountered a culture that is deaf to the crisis the sector is facing,' they said. Committee chairman Alistair Carmichael, a Liberal Democrat MP, said the sector 'must not shy away from bold proposals' and that it has a 'serious culture problem'. He said: 'Water companies' complex and sometimes impenetrable financial structures, with their myriad subsidiaries, holding companies and parent organisations, seem to suggest that their purpose is less to provide a good service to their customers and more to allow them to juggle their finances and their increasingly unsustainable levels of debt. 'Meanwhile, an ineffective regulatory system has failed to protect customers, the environment and the financial stability of the sector. 'It has failed to ensure that companies invest in essential infrastructure and it has not encouraged long-term thinking. 'This has got to stop now. Trust and accountability in the water sector are very low. 'It is not acceptable that it has fallen to commendable citizen scientists to expose issues with local water resources. 'Environmental protection and the delivery of reliable and safe water must be the first priorities of water companies and regulators.' A Defra spokesperson said: 'Our rivers, lakes and seas are polluted, and our water system is broken. 'As part of the plan for change, new legislation has banned unfair multimillion-pound bonuses for bosses at six water companies and launched a record 81 criminal investigations. 'This Government has also secured the largest investment into the water sector in history, with £104bn in private sector investment to clean up rivers, lakes and seas and cut sewage by nearly half by 2030.' A Water UK spokesperson said: 'Everyone agrees that the water system is not working, and we have been calling for fundamental reforms which allow investment to get quickly to where it needs to go. 'In the meantime, companies are focused on investing a record £104 billion over the next five years to secure our water supplies, end sewage entering our rivers and seas and support economic growth.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Campaign for free bus passes for over 60s in England passes key threshold
Support has soared as a parliamentary debate is a step closer as campaigners say it's unfair English travellers don't get the same as those in Wales, Scotland and NI A public outcry is mounting as campaigners push for the government to introduce free bus passes for over 60s in England, mirroring benefits already available in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. A parliamentary petition has surged past the 75,000 mark, edging closer to triggering a debate on what many see as an unfair policy that leaves English seniors out of pocket. While residents in Merseyside and London enjoy free travel from 60, elsewhere in England, the age threshold is set at 66, with cash-strapped local authorities left to foot the bill. The campaign, created by Karen Hickman, is gaining momentum, with MPs raising questions and ministers indicating that funds exist for councils willing to tap into them. Hickman's petition demands: "We call on the Government to extend free bus travel to all people over 60 years old in England outside London. We believe the current situation is unjust and we want equality for everyone over 60. "Currently, people in England who do not live in London are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach the state pension age, which we believe has changed dramatically. As people get older some over 60s drive less and less, therefore we believe we need equality on public transport. It would mean England had the same provision as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland." Just last week, an MP raised a question on this matter, receiving a response that explained how one source of funding was already available. Liberal Democrat MP Pippa Heylings posed a new question to the Secretary of State for Transport Heidi Alexander: "if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the eligibility criteria for an older person's bus pass to include people over the age of 60 in England.", reports Lancs Live. Simon Lightwood, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, responded yesterday (June 10): "The English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age, currently sixty-six. The ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability. "However, local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, such as lowering the age of eligibility. Additional local concessions are provided and funded by local authorities from local resources. "The government has confirmed £955 million for the 2025 to 2026 financial year to support and improve bus services in England outside London. This includes £243 million for bus operators and £712 million allocated to local authorities across the country. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority have been allocated £10.5 million of this funding. Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish. This could include extending the discretionary concessions available." In England the over 66s can get concessionary travel which allows them to travel: To view the petition, sign up, and read the full DfT response click here.
South Wales Guardian
11 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Baroness Casey's findings on grooming gangs set to be announced
The Home Secretary is set to address Parliament over the review, which prompted the Prime Minister to implement a full probe after months of resistance. Meanwhile, the Home Office has said that the National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation targeting people who have sexually exploited children. Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said on Sunday that the delivery of the Casey review should not mean agencies and ministers delay on bringing forward changes that have been recommended before. She told the BBC's Westminster Hour that 'we have had the Jay Inquiry before, there are lots of recommendations already on the table so whilst I welcome this announcement, at the same time it shouldn't be an excuse for the Government or other agencies to delay action in terms of implementing the recommendations of previous inquiries'. According to the Home Office, the NCA will work in partnership with police forces to investigate cases that 'were not progressed through the criminal justice system' in the past. Ms Cooper said that it was 'unforgivable' that 'not enough people' listened to victims in the past, but ministers 'are changing that now'. She said: 'The vulnerable young girls who suffered unimaginable abuse at the hands of groups of adult men have now grown into brave women who are rightly demanding justice for what they went through when they were just children. 'Not enough people listened to them then. That was wrong and unforgivable. We are changing that now.' According to the Times, the review by Baroness Casey is expected to explicitly link the grooming gang issue to men of Pakistani origin and say that people were ignored for the fear of racism. The review comes after a row on the issue was ignited earlier this year, when Sir Keir became embroiled in a row with tech billionaire Elon Musk over calls for a national investigation. In January, the Prime Minister hit out at politicians 'calling for inquiries because they want to jump on the bandwagon of the far right', but on Sunday, the Chancellor said that Sir Keir had been focused on 'victims' rather than 'grandstanding'. Asked whether the Prime Minister had changed his mind about the idea of a national inquiry, the Chancellor told the Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I think Keir Starmer, our Prime Minister, has always been really focused, as he was when he was director of public prosecutions, on the victims and not grandstanding. 'But actually doing the practical things to ensure that something like this never happens again, but also to ensure that the victims of this horrific abuse over many, many years is got to grips with and that people have answers to their questions.' A children's charity has said that the Government must not wait until the end of the inquiry to implement the recommendations from existing reports sich as the Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). Lynn Perry, chief executive of Barnardo's, said: 'Children and survivors of abuse have already been waiting many years for action, so it's vital the Government doesn't wait for the outcome of this new inquiry to implement recommendations from previous ones. 'That includes upskilling social workers and other professionals to spot the signs of abuse, as well as investing in vital support services to help children experiencing life-changing consequences of abuse and to keep them safe from further harm.'
